Verbal Art 1st Semester BA BSW BVA

Notes by Dr. Priyanka M.G.
|Verbal Art| 1st Semester BA/BSW/BVA | SEP -2024
Prose
1. The Story of an Hour
Kate Chopin
About the Author:
Kate Chopin (1850-1904) was an American author known for her bold exploration of women's
independence and identity. Her famous works include The Awakening and The Story of an
Hour. Although her writing was not widely celebrated during her lifetime, she is now recognized
as a key figure in early feminist literature. Chopin didn’t receive major awards in her life but
gained posthumous acclaim as a pioneering writer.
Theme of the Story
The primary theme of "The Story of an Hour" is the exploration of personal freedom and self-
identity, especially for women. In Louise's society, marriage often meant a loss of personal
freedom and independence. Her brief experience of liberation reveals the hidden struggles
women faced within traditional marital roles. The story also explores the complexity of human
emotions—Louise feels sorrow over her husband's death but also a profound sense of relief,
highlighting how conflicting emotions can coexist.
Summary
The story begins with the news that Mrs. Louise Mallard's husband, Brently Mallard, has died in
a tragic train accident. Knowing that Louise has a heart condition, her sister, Josephine, gently
breaks the news to her. Louise is initially devastated, crying openly in her sister's arms. She then
retreats to her room to grieve in solitude.
As she sits by the window, something unexpected happens. Louise begins to feel a strange sense
of relief and freedom. While she loved her husband, she realizes that his death has liberated her
from the constraints of marriage. She feels the joy of independence and imagines a future where
she can live for herself. Louise whispers, “Free, free, free!” realizing that she is no longer bound
by anyone else’s will.
Just as Louise is embracing this new feeling of freedom, her husband, Brently, walks through the
front door, alive and unharmed. It turns out he was nowhere near the accident and is completely
unaware of the tragedy his family thought had occurred. Seeing him alive shocks Louise so much
that she dies from a heart attack. The doctors conclude that she died of “the joy that kills,”
unaware of the true complexity of her emotions.
1|Page
Notes by Dr. Priyanka M.G. |Verbal Art| 1st Semester BA/BSW/BVA | SEP -2024
Conclusion
The story concludes with a powerful irony. Louise dies just as she feels she has gained her
freedom, underlining how fragile her moment of happiness was. Her death also suggests that
society’s expectations can be so overwhelming that a taste of freedom, followed by its sudden
removal, can have fatal consequences.
Question:
1. Answer each of the following questions in about 40-50 words.
(a) How does Mrs. Mallard initially react to the news of her husband’s death?
Mrs. Mallard initially reacts with immediate grief upon hearing the news of her husband’s death.
She cries uncontrollably, which is expected in such a situation. Her reaction reflects the shock
and sadness she feels as she processes the loss of her husband.
(b) What is the significance of the open window in the story?
The open window symbolizes freedom and new possibilities in Mrs. Mallard’s life. Through it,
she sees the vibrant, lively world outside, which contrasts with her previous confined life. The
fresh spring scene inspires her to think about a future of independence and autonomy.
(c) How does Mrs. Mallard’s view of freedom evolve during the story?
At first, Mrs. Mallard is shocked by the news, but soon, she begins to feel an unexpected sense of
liberation. She realizes that her husband’s death frees her from the constraints of marriage,
allowing her to live for herself. Her view of freedom grows from initial fear to enthusiastic
anticipation.
(a) How does Chopin challenge traditional gender roles and marriage dynamics in the
story?
In The Story of an Hour, Kate Chopin challenges traditional gender roles and marriage dynamics
by presenting Mrs. Mallard’s complex reaction to her husband’s death. In the 19 th century,
women were expected to be dependent on their husbands, and marriage was often seen as their
ultimate fulfillment. However, Chopin portrays marriage as limiting for Mrs. Mallard, who sees
her husband’s death as an opportunity for personal freedom rather than merely a tragedy.
Instead of the conventional, devoted wife, Mrs. Mallard experiences joy at the prospect of living
independently, challenging the typical depiction of women as solely caretakers and devoted
partners. Her feeling of liberation suggests that, for some women, marriage may feel restrictive
and suffocating. Chopin’s portrayal invites readers to question the assumption that all women are
2|Page
content in traditional marital roles and to consider the possibility that, for some, these roles may
suppress their individuality and desires.
Through Mrs. Mallard, Chopin brings forward the theme of self-discovery and the pursuit of
one’s own identity, which were often denied to women in her time. The story subtly critiques the
unequal dynamics in marriage and challenges the social norms that limit women’s roles to mere
extensions of their husbands’ lives.
(b) What is the role of irony in The Story of an Hour, particularly in relation to Mrs.
Mallard’s death at the end?
Irony plays a crucial role in The Story of an Hour, particularly through the unexpected twist at
the end. Mrs. Mallard, who initially mourns her husband’s death, quickly begins to embrace the
idea of a new life of freedom. She envisions a future where she can live for herself without the
influence of her husband, feeling an overwhelming joy in the realization of her independence.
The ultimate irony occurs when her husband, who was thought to be dead, unexpectedly returns
home. This shocking sight leads to Mrs. Mallard’s sudden death. The doctors claim she dies from
"the joy that kills," implying that her weak heart could not handle the happiness of seeing her
husband alive. However, the real irony lies in the fact that her death is more likely caused by the
devastating loss of her newfound freedom rather than joy.
Through this ironic twist, Chopin highlights the conflict between Mrs. Mallard's inner desires
and the oppressive nature of her marriage. The story’s ending underscores the limitations
imposed on women’s lives, illustrating how the possibility of freedom is thrilling but fleeting in a
society that restricts female autonomy.
(c) How does Chopin explore the theme of repression and freedom within the institution of
marriage?
Kate Chopin explores the theme of repression and freedom within marriage by showing the
conflicting emotions Mrs. Mallard experiences after hearing about her husband's death. Initially,
she grieves, as expected, but her feelings soon shift toward relief and hope for a life of
independence. This unexpected reaction reflects her sense of being repressed within her
marriage, even though her husband was not unkind or oppressive in an obvious way.
The narrative reveals that Mrs. Mallard had felt constrained by the roles and expectations placed
upon her as a wife. Her joy at the thought of freedom indicates that, for her, marriage limited her
autonomy and forced her to live according to her husband's wishes. When she whispers "free,
free, free," she envisions a future where she can make her own choices and experience life on her
terms.
Chopin uses Mrs. Mallard’s reaction to challenge the idealized view of marriage as a purely
joyful institution. She suggests that, for some, marriage can be a form of repression, suppressing
3|Page
individual freedom and self-expression. By allowing readers to see Mrs. Mallard’s inner world,
Chopin critiques the societal expectations that confine women to predefined roles, illustrating
how true freedom and personal fulfillment often exist outside these conventional constraints.
2. Back from the west and unable to find lodging in Baroda
- Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's

About the Author:
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar (1891-1956) was a key leader in the fight for social justice in India. He
wrote influential books like Annihilation of Caste and The Buddha and His Dhamma,
advocating for equality and the upliftment of marginalized communities. As the main architect of
the Indian Constitution, he worked to secure rights and freedoms for all citizens. For his
contributions, he received India's highest civilian award, the Bharat Ratna, in 1990,
posthumously.
Theme
The theme of this incident is the painful reality of caste discrimination and the need for social
justice and equality.
Summary
After Dr. B.R. Ambedkar returned from his studies in the West, he was eager to start his new
position in Baroda, where he had been offered a job by the Maharaja of Baroda. Despite his
education and qualifications, he faced a shocking reality upon arrival. Being from a Dalit
background, he encountered discrimination from society, which had deep-rooted prejudices
against people of his caste.
As he arrived in Baroda, he found it impossible to rent a room in the city. Landlords refused to
offer him accommodation because of his caste, despite his prestigious education and
employment. He went from place to place, hoping to find a place to stay, but each time, he was
rejected after the landlords learned of his background. He even tried to conceal his identity, but
when his origins were discovered, he was again turned away. This repeated rejection hurt him
deeply, as he realized that his education and achievements were not enough to protect him from
discrimination.
Ultimately, he found temporary lodging at a Parsi inn. However, even this was short-lived
because he was forced to leave when the other residents found out about his caste. Dr. Ambedkar
4|Page
felt helpless and humiliated. Despite all his achievements and abilities, he was treated as an
outcast in his own country, which he found both frustrating and painful.
This experience left a lasting impact on Dr. Ambedkar. It showed him firsthand the harsh
realities of caste discrimination in India, and it strengthened his determination to fight for the
rights and dignity of the marginalized communities. This incident in Baroda was a turning point
in his life and influenced his lifelong dedication to social justice and equality.
Conclusion
Dr. Ambedkar’s experience in Baroda made him acutely aware of the challenges that Dalits face,
regardless of their qualifications or status. It inspired him to work tirelessly to eliminate caste-
based discrimination. This painful experience reinforced his commitment to creating an India
where everyone would be treated with dignity and respect.
Here are answers to the questions based on Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s essay Back from the West and
Unable to Find Lodging in Baroda.
Questions:
(a) Why did Dr. Ambedkar return to Baroda after his studies in the West, and what were
his expectations upon his return?
Dr. Ambedkar returned to Baroda after studying in the West, where he had earned advanced
degrees and gained respect as a scholar. He expected to begin a respectable career, as he had
been offered a government position by the Maharaja of Baroda. Ambedkar hoped that his
qualifications and position would bring him acceptance and respect in Indian society.
(b) What challenges did Dr. Ambedkar face when trying to find lodging in Baroda?
In Baroda, Dr. Ambedkar faced significant challenges finding a place to stay because of his Dalit
background. Despite his education and government job, landlords rejected him due to his caste,
refusing him accommodation. This discrimination left him without a stable place to live and
deeply hurt his dignity.
(c) How did Dr. Ambedkar's experience of discrimination upon his return contrast with his
time in the West?
While studying in the West, Dr. Ambedkar was treated with respect and did not face
discrimination based on caste. In contrast, upon his return to India, he faced severe prejudice
solely due to his caste, despite his education and status. This difference highlighted the deep-
rooted social issues in India.
5|Page
(a) What role did caste identity play in Ambedkar's inability to secure a place to stay?
Dr. Ambedkar’s caste identity was the primary reason he could not secure a place to stay in
Baroda. Although he was highly educated and held a respectable government position, landlords
and others in society still judged him based on his caste. In India at that time, the caste system
was rigidly enforced, especially for Dalits, who were considered “untouchables.” This meant that
no matter how educated or accomplished a Dalit was, they were still socially ostracized. For
Ambedkar, this deeply embedded caste prejudice led to repeated rejection when seeking
accommodation. The landlords’ refusal to accept him, even after knowing his position, showed
that social status or education could not overcome the stigma of caste in India. His experience
reflects how deeply rooted the caste system was and how it affected every aspect of a Dalit’s life,
even something as basic as finding a place to stay. This incident emphasized to Ambedkar the
urgent need to fight against such discrimination and shaped his resolve to dedicate his life to
achieving social equality.
(b) How does Ambedkar describe his feelings of humiliation and frustration in the essay?
In the essay, Dr. Ambedkar expresses a profound sense of humiliation and frustration due to the
constant rejection he faced in Baroda. He describes how, despite his achievements and
government position, he was still denied basic respect and dignity because of his caste. The
rejection from landlords and residents made him feel helpless, as he was seen as “untouchable”
in his own country. He felt betrayed and humiliated, especially because he had returned from the
West, where he had experienced respect and equality. This contrast made the discrimination even
more painful, as he realized that his identity as a Dalit would always overshadow his
accomplishments in India. Ambedkar’s feelings of frustration grew with each rejection, and he
began to question the value of his education if he was still seen as inferior due to his caste. This
experience added to his resolve to challenge the caste system and fight for equal rights.
(c) What does the essay reveal about the persistence of caste-based discrimination in India,
even for an educated and accomplished individual like Ambedkar?
The essay reveals that caste-based discrimination in India was so ingrained that it affected even
those who were educated and held prestigious positions, like Dr. Ambedkar. Despite his
impressive academic achievements and government job, Ambedkar was still viewed primarily as
a Dalit, and his accomplishments did not protect him from caste prejudice. His experiences
highlight the limitations placed on Dalits, regardless of their qualifications or status. The incident
in Baroda shows that in India, the caste system was deeply embedded in society, affecting not
only personal but also professional aspects of life. For someone like Ambedkar, who hoped his
education would earn him respect, this experience was a harsh reminder that social status based
on caste often outweighed individual achievements. This persistent discrimination against
6|Page
Ambedkar, even after his time in the West, showed the powerful grip of caste-based prejudice in
Indian society, reinforcing his determination to bring about social change.
3. The Last Leaf
- O. Henry
About the Author:
O. Henry (Pen Name), whose real name was William Sydney Porter (1862–1910), was an
American writer known for his short stories with surprising, twist endings. His most famous
works include The Gift of the Magi, The Last Leaf, and The Ransom of Red Chief. His
stories often focus on ordinary people and highlight themes of love, sacrifice, and irony.
Although he didn’t receive formal awards in his lifetime, his influence on American short story
writing remains strong, and he is remembered as a master of the genre.
Theme
The Last Leaf is a story about hope, sacrifice, and the power of friendship.
Summary
In the story, two young women, Sue and Johnsy, live together in an apartment in Greenwich
Village, New York City. Both are artists who dream of making a name for themselves. One cold
autumn, Johnsy falls seriously ill with pneumonia, and her condition quickly worsens. The
doctor is not optimistic and warns Sue that Johnsy’s will to live is as important as the medicine.
Johnsy becomes obsessed with a vine outside her window, which is steadily losing its leaves as
winter approaches. She convinces herself that when the last leaf falls, she too will die. Sue,
deeply worried, tries to lift Johnsy’s spirits but struggles to change her friend’s mindset.
In the same building lives an old artist named Behrman, who has yet to achieve his dream of
painting a masterpiece. Behrman cares for the two young women and feels a paternal affection
toward them. When Sue tells him about Johnsy’s fixation on the last leaf, Behrman scoffs but is
deeply affected by the news.
One night, during a heavy storm, Behrman quietly goes out and paints a leaf on the wall outside
Johnsy’s window to look like the last leaf clinging to the vine. In the morning, Johnsy sees that
the last leaf has miraculously survived the storm and finds hope and strength within herself,
realizing that she wants to live.
Tragically, Sue later learns that Behrman has died of pneumonia after spending that cold, wet
night painting the leaf. In his selfless act, Behrman has created his masterpiece—a symbol of
7|Page
resilience and the power of hope. Johnsy recovers, inspired by what she believes to be the leaf’s
strength, unaware of the sacrifice behind it.
Conclusion
O. Henry’s story beautifully shows how even small acts of kindness can change a person’s life.
Behrman’s sacrifice gives Johnsy hope, allowing her to see life differently. In the end, the leaf
becomes a symbol of courage and the deep bond of friendship.
Questions:
(a) What illness does Johnsy suffer from, and how does it affect her mentally and
physically?
Johnsy suffers from pneumonia, a serious lung infection, which leaves her very weak and
bedridden. Mentally, she loses hope and becomes depressed, convinced that she will die soon.
This negative mindset affects her physical recovery, making her too weak to fight the illness.
(b) Why does Johnsy become obsessed with the ivy leaves outside her window?
Johnsy becomes obsessed with the ivy leaves on the vine outside her window because she starts
believing her life is tied to them. She tells herself that when the last leaf falls, she will die, as if
the leaves represent her own strength and will to live.
(c) What is Sue's role in taking care of Johnsy, and how does she try to keep her hopeful?
Sue is Johnsy's caring friend and roommate. She takes on the responsibility of nursing Johnsy,
doing everything she can to lift her spirits. Sue tries to keep Johnsy hopeful by talking positively,
distracting her with art, and reassuring her that she will recover soon.
(a) What do you think the story is trying to convey about the connection between hope and
survival?
The story The Last Leaf highlights how crucial hope is for survival. Johnsy’s physical illness
worsens because she loses the will to live; she believes her fate is tied to the ivy leaves and
decides to give up on life. Without hope, her body and spirit grow weaker, showing that mental
resilience plays a vital role in physical recovery. In contrast, when Johnsy sees the "last leaf" still
clinging to the vine, she finds a spark of hope and begins to think about surviving, which aids her
recovery. O. Henry uses Johnsy’s journey to demonstrate that a positive outlook and inner
strength can empower a person to fight through difficulties. The story suggests that survival
depends not only on physical strength but also on mental endurance. This theme is reinforced by
8|Page
Behrman’s selfless act of painting the leaf; his act of kindness and sacrifice helps restore
Johnsy’s will to live. In essence, the story beautifully illustrates that hope is essential to
overcome life's darkest moments, and sometimes, a small gesture of love can inspire someone to
keep going.
(b) Why do you think Behrman chose to paint the leaf? Do you see this as an ultimate act of
artistic creation or sacrifice?
Behrman paints the leaf as an ultimate act of sacrifice and love. Although he is an old artist with
unfulfilled dreams of creating a masterpiece, he willingly risks his life to give Johnsy hope.
Behrman understands how deeply Johnsy believes her life depends on that last leaf, and he feels
a sense of duty to protect her. By going out in the cold to paint a realistic leaf on the wall, he puts
himself in harm's way, knowing it might help her regain her will to live. This act can be seen as
Behrman’s masterpiece, not because it’s a great work of art in the traditional sense, but because
it embodies a pure, selfless sacrifice. The painted leaf becomes his greatest creation, as it not
only saves a life but also conveys a powerful message about hope and resilience. Through this
act, Behrman leaves behind a legacy of compassion and bravery, making his final work an
unforgettable blend of art and love.
(c) How does O. Henry use irony to create a surprise ending, and what effect does it have
on the reader?
O. Henry uses irony masterfully to create a surprise ending that leaves a strong impact on the
reader. Throughout the story, Johnsy is convinced that her fate is tied to the ivy leaves, and she
believes she will die when the last leaf falls. However, the twist reveals that the last "leaf" never
actually fell; it was a painting created by Behrman. This unexpected revelation turns the reader’s
expectations upside down, showing that the leaf that sustained Johnsy’s hope was not real but
rather a loving illusion. The irony deepens when we learn that Behrman caught pneumonia and
died as a result of painting the leaf. The "leaf" saved Johnsy’s life, yet it cost Behrman his own,
creating a bittersweet ending. This ironic twist emphasizes the story’s themes of sacrifice and
friendship, leaving readers to reflect on the power of selfless acts. It also reinforces the idea that
hope, even if built on something artificial, can be life-saving. The effect is both heartwarming
and heartbreaking, showing the profound impact of small acts of kindness.
9|Page
4. Freedom from Fear - 1990
- Aung San Suu Kyi
About the Author:

Aung San Suu Kyi, born on June 19, 1945, is a prominent Burmese politician and human rights
activist. She is best known for her work in promoting democracy in Myanmar and was the leader
of the National League for Democracy. Suu Kyi has written several books, including Freedom
from Fear, where she discusses the importance of courage and non-violence. She received the
Nobel Peace Prize in 1991 for her efforts to fight for democracy and human rights in her country.
Despite facing political challenges and controversies, her contributions to peace and freedom are
widely recognized.
Theme:
True freedom comes from the courage to overcome fear and stand for justice.
Summary
In her essay Freedom from Fear, Aung San Suu Kyi reflects on the political struggles and the
courage needed to overcome oppression, particularly in her native Myanmar (formerly Burma).
She explains that fear is a major factor used by oppressive regimes to maintain control over
people, making them submissive and scared to stand up for their rights. Fear can paralyze both
the powerful and the oppressed. Those in power fear losing their authority, and the people fear
the consequences of opposing the government. Suu Kyi encourages her fellow citizens to resist
this cycle of fear, stating that only when they overcome this fear can they be truly free.
She draws inspiration from her father, Aung San, who was a revolutionary leader in Myanmar's
independence movement. Aung San believed in justice, bravery, and self-sacrifice for the sake of
the nation, even if it meant risking his own life. Suu Kyi calls on her people to embrace these
values, reminding them that courage is not the absence of fear but the decision to act in spite of
it. She believes that fearlessness is a foundation for building a democratic society where people
have the right to think, speak, and act freely.
Suu Kyi also emphasizes the role of non-violence in the fight for freedom. She argues that peace
and democratic reforms cannot be achieved through violence, which only breeds more fear and
resentment. Her approach to resistance is influenced by the principles of non-violence advocated
by leaders like Mahatma Gandhi. She insists that by remaining peaceful, people can maintain
their moral integrity and inspire more support for their cause. Suu Kyi’s vision is one of unity,
where people come together with courage to demand freedom and justice for all.
Throughout the essay, Suu Kyi shows that freedom is not just about the absence of physical
chains or oppressive laws; it is also about freeing one’s mind from fear. She encourages people
10 | P a g e
to cultivate a mental and emotional resilience that will allow them to act with dignity and self-
respect, no matter the external situation. Her message is clear: overcoming fear will enable true
freedom and allow individuals to achieve their full potential.
Conclusion:
In Freedom from Fear - 1990, Aung San Suu Kyi conveys that true freedom requires moral
courage, unity, and a commitment to non-violence. By shedding fear, people can gain both
individual dignity and collective strength, enabling them to build a society based on fairness and
freedom.
Questions:
(a) What is the primary message Aung San Suu Kyi conveys in Freedom from Fear?
Aung San Suu Kyi's primary message is that true freedom comes from overcoming fear. She
emphasizes that fear can paralyze individuals and communities, preventing them from standing
up for their rights. Courage and non-violence are essential for achieving democracy and personal
dignity.
(b) How does Suu Kyi define "fear," and why does she consider it a central problem in
both personal and political life?
Suu Kyi defines fear as a deep emotional response that can hinder people from acting justly. She
considers it central to both personal and political life because it keeps individuals from speaking
out against injustice. Fear limits personal growth and stifles democratic movements.
(c) What role does Suu Kyi attribute to fear in sustaining oppressive regimes?
Suu Kyi believes that fear is a crucial tool for oppressive regimes, as it keeps people submissive
and unwilling to challenge authority. By instilling fear, these regimes can control the population,
making it difficult for individuals to unite and demand their rights, thus sustaining their power.
(a) How does Aung San Suu Kyi contrast fear with the notion of freedom?
Aung San Suu Kyi contrasts fear with freedom by illustrating how fear restricts individual
actions and thoughts. She explains that fear is a mental prison, preventing people from
expressing themselves and standing up for their rights. In her view, true freedom involves the
ability to think, speak, and act without fear of oppression. She argues that a society cannot be
free if its citizens live in fear of their government or the consequences of their actions. Freedom,
for Suu Kyi, is not merely the absence of physical constraints; it is also about emotional and
11 | P a g e
psychological liberation. She encourages people to confront and overcome their fears, stating
that it is this courage that leads to genuine freedom and the establishment of a democratic
society. By advocating for non-violence and moral courage, she emphasizes that freedom
requires both inner strength and collective action against oppression.
(b) In what ways does the essay link fear with moral responsibility and courage?
In her essay, Suu Kyi links fear with moral responsibility by suggesting that individuals have a
duty to confront their fears in order to act justly. She believes that overcoming fear is not just a
personal struggle; it is also a moral imperative. When people allow fear to dominate their
actions, they often compromise their integrity and ethics. Courage, in her view, is the choice to
act in accordance with one’s values, even in the face of fear. Suu Kyi argues that moral
responsibility involves standing up for what is right, which requires courage to face the unknown
and challenge the status quo. By highlighting the need for individuals to act with bravery, she
inspires others to reject fear and embrace their role in creating a more just and equitable society.
Thus, her essay serves as a powerful reminder that true moral courage is essential for personal
growth and social change.
(c) How does Suu Kyi address the importance of collective action in overcoming fear and
achieving democracy?
Suu Kyi emphasizes that collective action is vital in overcoming fear and achieving democracy.
She asserts that individuals can feel isolated and powerless in the face of oppression, but when
they unite, they can create significant change. By coming together, people can share their
experiences, support each other, and collectively resist fear. Suu Kyi believes that a unified front
can challenge oppressive regimes more effectively than individual efforts. She encourages
citizens to engage in non-violent protests, community organizing, and dialogue to build a strong
movement for democracy. Through collective action, individuals can amplify their voices and
demand their rights, creating a sense of solidarity that helps diminish fear. Suu Kyi illustrates
that when people stand together, they gain strength and resilience, making it harder for
oppressive powers to maintain control. Her message is clear: democracy is not just the
responsibility of a few leaders; it requires the active participation and courage of all citizens
working together for a common cause.
12 | P a g e
5. The Nightingale and the Rose
- Oscar Wilde
About the Author
Oscar Wilde (1854-1900) was an Irish playwright, poet, and author known for his sharp wit and
flamboyant style. His notable works include The Picture of Dorian Gray, The Importance of
Being Earnest, and The Canterville Ghost. Wilde was a prominent figure in the Aesthetic
Movement, emphasizing "art for art's sake." Although he did not receive formal awards during
his lifetime, his legacy has earned him significant recognition posthumously, making him one of
the most celebrated writers in English literature.
Theme
True love often requires sacrifice, but society can fail to appreciate such sacrifices.
Summary
In Oscar Wilde's story The Nightingale and the Rose, a young student is deeply in love with a
girl who says she will only dance with him if he brings her a red rose. The student is heartbroken
because his garden has no red roses. Desperate to win the girl’s heart, he wanders through the
garden, hoping to find a solution.
The Nightingale, who overhears the student’s plight, feels sympathetic towards him. She knows
that to create a red rose, she must sacrifice something precious. She searches the garden for a red
rose but finds none. Instead, she decides to sing a beautiful song to the rose bush, and in the
process, she realizes that only by sacrificing her life can she produce a single red rose.
As night falls, the Nightingale finds a thorn and presses it against her heart, letting her blood
seep into the rose. This sacrifice gives life to a stunning red rose, which blooms just in time for
the student to discover it. Ecstatic, the student takes the rose to the girl he loves, but when he
presents it to her, she dismisses him. She tells him she will only love someone wealthy and
chooses to dance with another boy who has jewels instead.
Heartbroken and disillusioned, the student tosses the rose away, believing love is pointless.
Meanwhile, the Nightingale, who sacrificed everything for love, dies, her beautiful song fading
into silence. The story ends with the stark contrast between the Nightingale's selfless love and
the shallow values of human society.
Conclusion
The Nightingale and the Rose teaches us about the depth of true love and the pain of unrequited
feelings. The Nightingale’s willingness to give everything for love highlights the beauty of
selflessness, while the student's experience shows how society can overlook genuine emotions in
13 | P a g e
favor of material wealth. In the end, the story reminds us that real love is rare and often
unrecognized in a world focused on superficiality.
Questions:
1. (a) How does the Nightingale learn of the student's sorrow, and what decision does she
make to help him?
The Nightingale learns of the student’s sorrow when she overhears him talking about his love for
a girl who wants a red rose. She feels compassion for him and decides to help by finding or
creating a red rose for him, believing that love is worth any sacrifice.
(b) What is the process the Nightingale undergoes to create the red rose, and what sacrifice
does she make?
To create the red rose, the Nightingale sings all night long to the rose bush, seeking to inspire it
to bloom. She realizes that to make the rose red, she must sacrifice her life. The Nightingale
presses a thorn into her heart, letting her blood nourish the rose.
(c) How does the student react when he finally finds the red rose?
When the student finally finds the red rose, he is overjoyed and believes it will win the girl’s
love. However, when he presents it to her, she rejects him because she prefers gifts from
wealthier suitors. His joy turns to disappointment and anger, leading him to toss the rose aside.
1. (a) What is the significance of the Nightingale's sacrifice, and how does it contrast with
the student's understanding of love?
The Nightingale's sacrifice is significant because it demonstrates the depth and purity of true
love. She gives her life to create the red rose, showing that real love requires selflessness and
devotion. In contrast, the student views love as a means to gain approval from the girl, equating
it with material gifts. This difference highlights how the Nightingale understands love as a
profound emotional connection, while the student sees it through a superficial lens. Ultimately,
the Nightingale’s sacrifice shows the beauty of love, whereas the student’s approach reveals the
emptiness of his understanding.
(b) How does Wilde portray the difference between the Nightingale's idealistic view of love
and the human characters' more materialistic view of relationships?
Wilde contrasts the Nightingale's idealistic view of love with the materialistic views of the
human characters. The Nightingale believes that love is worth any sacrifice, valuing emotions
14 | P a g e
over possessions. In contrast, the student and the girl prioritize wealth and status, indicating that
their relationships are transactional rather than genuine. The girl’s rejection of the student despite
his heartfelt offering reveals how society often values material wealth over the true essence of
love. Wilde uses this contrast to critique a society that overlooks the beauty of selfless love in
favor of superficial gains.
(c) What role does nature play in the story, and how does Wilde use the natural world to
comment on human emotions?
Nature plays a crucial role in The Nightingale and the Rose, serving as a backdrop that reflects
the emotional states of the characters. The Nightingale, with her beautiful song, embodies the
spirit of love and sacrifice, while the rose bush represents the beauty that can emerge from pain.
Wilde uses the natural world to highlight the differences between the purity of the Nightingale's
love and the shallow desires of humans. The vibrant imagery of the garden contrasts with the
harsh realities of human relationships, suggesting that while nature can inspire deep emotions,
human society often fails to appreciate or reciprocate those feelings.
15 | P a g e
Poetry
1. The Burning of the Books
- Bertolt Brecht
About the Author
Bertolt Brecht (1898-1956) was a German playwright, poet, and theater director known for his
influential works in the development of modern theater. He is best recognized for his plays such
as The Threepenny Opera, Mother Courage and Her Children, and The Caucasian Chalk
Circle, which often explored themes of social justice and the human condition. Brecht pioneered
the concept of "epic theater," encouraging audiences to think critically rather than passively
engage with the performance. His contributions to literature and theater earned him numerous
accolades, including the prestigious Georg Büchner Prize in 1951. Brecht's legacy continues to
impact playwrights and theater artists around the world.
Theme
The poem illustrates the destructive consequences of censorship and the importance of
safeguarding knowledge and intellectual freedom.
Summary
"The Burning of the Books" is a powerful poem by Bertolt Brecht that reflects on the act of
censoring knowledge and the consequences of silencing voices. The poem begins with the
imagery of books being burned in a public square, symbolizing a desperate attempt to control the
flow of ideas and suppress dissent. As the flames rise, they consume not just the pages but the
thoughts and truths contained within them.
Brecht describes the scene vividly, highlighting the chaos and emotion surrounding the event.
People watch in horror and disbelief as the flames crackle and the books turn to ash. The poem
contrasts the value of knowledge with the destructive nature of censorship. It evokes a sense of
loss, as the burning books represent the destruction of culture, history, and the freedom to think
critically.
Throughout the poem, Brecht emphasizes that the act of burning books is not just a physical act
but a symbolic one. It represents the broader societal issues of authoritarianism and the fear of
enlightenment. The poem encourages readers to reflect on the importance of literature and ideas
in shaping society and warns against the dangers of ignorance and oppression.
In the concluding lines, Brecht calls attention to the responsibility of individuals to stand against
such acts of violence towards knowledge. He urges the audience to recognize that the burning of
16 | P a g e
books is a warning sign for society, reminding them that the fight for intellectual freedom is
essential in the face of tyranny.
Conclusion
Bertolt Brecht's "The Burning of the Books" serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of
suppressing ideas and controlling knowledge. It highlights the deep loss experienced by society
when literature is destroyed and calls on individuals to resist censorship. By valuing and
protecting freedom of thought, we ensure that history and culture can thrive, allowing future
generations to learn and grow from the past.
Questions:
(a) What is the central event in The Burning of the Books and what historical context is
Brecht referring to?
The central event in Brecht's poem is the burning of books, which symbolizes the destruction of
ideas. This refers to historical events like the Nazi book burnings in Germany, where oppressive
governments aimed to silence voices that challenged their authority.
(b) What reasons are given for the burning of the books in the poem?
The poem states that books are burned to control knowledge and eliminate ideas that threaten
power. Those in authority fear that literature can inspire people to think critically and challenge
the government, so they destroy books to maintain their control and prevent rebellion.
(c) How do the books themselves "respond" to being burned, according to Brecht?
According to Brecht, the books "respond" to being burned by asserting their lasting importance.
Even when they are physically destroyed, the ideas within them cannot be erased. The
knowledge and thoughts they represent continue to live on in people's minds, showing that true
ideas endure.
(a) What does Brecht suggest about the relationship between literature and political power
in the poem?
In The Burning of the Books, Brecht explores how literature and political power interact. He
suggests that literature is a significant force that can challenge authority and inspire people to
think critically. When oppressive regimes burn books, it shows their fear of literature and its
ability to spark dissent. Brecht illustrates that books contain ideas and knowledge that can
empower individuals and encourage them to question their leaders. This fear leads those in
17 | P a g e
power to censor and destroy literature to control the narrative and maintain their authority. By
burning books, they attempt to erase the truths that threaten their rule. Thus, Brecht emphasizes
that literature is not just for entertainment; it is vital for freedom and social change. The poem
serves as a reminder of the importance of protecting literary expression to ensure a just and
democratic society.
(b) How does The Burning of the Books reflect Brecht's broader concerns about
totalitarianism and oppression?
Brecht's The Burning of the Books reflects his deep worries about totalitarianism and oppression
by showcasing the extreme measures authoritarian regimes take to silence dissent. The act of
burning books represents a violent attempt to control thought and eliminate diverse perspectives.
Brecht highlights that such actions symbolize a fear of free expression and independent ideas. By
destroying literature, oppressive governments seek to erase the potential for rebellion and
maintain their power over society. This poem serves as a warning against allowing censorship
and totalitarianism to go unchecked, stressing the importance of defending the freedom to
express ideas and thoughts. Brecht's message emphasizes that literature and knowledge are
essential to safeguarding individual rights and liberties, and any attack on them threatens the
very foundations of a free society.
(c) What might Brecht be saying about the futility of trying to erase ideas through violence
or censorship?
Brecht suggests that trying to erase ideas through violence or censorship is ultimately pointless.
In The Burning of the Books, he shows that although books can be physically destroyed, the
ideas within them cannot be completely eliminated. Even when literature is burned, the
knowledge and thoughts it carries continue to exist in people's minds and hearts. Brecht
highlights that attempts to suppress ideas often lead to a stronger desire for knowledge, making
people value those ideas even more. This resilience indicates that intellectual and cultural
resistance persists despite efforts to control or silence it. Brecht's message reinforces the belief
that knowledge is powerful and cannot be fully contained or erased. Thus, the poem serves as a
reminder of the enduring strength of human thought and the importance of defending literature
and ideas in the face of oppression.
18 | P a g e
2. Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening
- Robert Frost
About the Author
Robert Frost (1874–1963) was an American poet known for his depictions of rural life and
exploration of complex social and philosophical themes. His major works include The Road Not
Taken, Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening, Mending Wall, and Birches. Frost won four
Pulitzer Prizes for Poetry, a rare achievement, and was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal
in 1960 for his contributions to American literature. His work is celebrated for its clear language
and deep insight into human nature and relationships with nature.
Theme
The poem’s theme is the tension between the allure of peace and beauty in nature and the call of
duty and responsibility.
Summary
In Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening, Robert Frost describes a quiet moment when the
speaker pauses during a journey to admire the beauty of a snowy forest. The poem begins with
the speaker noticing a stretch of woods filled with snow. These woods belong to someone known
by the speaker, but this person lives elsewhere, away from this secluded spot, so the speaker
feels they are alone in this peaceful, quiet scene.
The speaker pauses, gazing into the woods, captivated by the falling snow and the stillness
around him. His horse, however, is puzzled by this unexpected stop in the middle of nowhere on
a dark evening. The horse shakes his harness bells, as if to question why they have stopped in
such a strange place—a place with no farmhouse nearby, just the woods filling with snow. This
gentle sound of the bells adds a contrast to the silent, snow-covered woods.
In the final stanza, the speaker reflects on the allure of the beautiful, quiet woods, which feel
almost inviting, as if calling him to stay longer. But the speaker reminds himself of his
obligations and commitments, which he refers to as "promises to keep." He realizes he has a long
way to go before he can rest, both literally and symbolically. He repeats the line "And miles to
go before I sleep," emphasizing his need to continue his journey and fulfill his responsibilities
before finding peace or rest.
Conclusion
Through simple words and imagery, Frost captures the quiet beauty of a snowy evening and the
pull between the desire to pause and enjoy life’s peaceful moments and the obligations that keep
19 | P a g e
us moving forward. This poem reminds us of the responsibilities we must face, even when we
long for a break or a moment of rest in nature's calm.
Questions:
(a) What is the speaker doing in the woods, and why does he stop there?
The speaker pauses in the woods during a snowy evening to take in the quiet beauty of nature.
He stops because he is captivated by the peacefulness of the falling snow, which makes the
woods feel serene and inviting, offering a temporary escape from his responsibilities.
(b) Whose woods does the speaker stop by, and why does he mention that the owner "will
not see" him?
The speaker stops by woods owned by someone who lives in the village, away from the scene.
He mentions that the owner "will not see" him, emphasizing his solitude and sense of privacy, as
if he can enjoy the beauty of the woods without interruption or judgment.
(c) What is the significance of the snow falling "on the darkest evening of the year"?
The phrase “the darkest evening of the year” likely refers to the winter solstice, when daylight is
shortest. It emphasizes the sense of isolation and mystery in the scene, as well as the contrast
between the darkness of the evening and the brightness of the falling snow.
(a) Why do you think the speaker is drawn to the woods despite knowing he has "promises
to keep"?
The speaker is drawn to the woods because they offer a peaceful escape from his usual
responsibilities and commitments. The beauty of the snow-covered trees, the quiet surroundings,
and the serene moment captivate him, pulling him into a space where he can experience
calmness and freedom from everyday demands. The woods seem to invite him to linger, to
appreciate the beauty of nature, and to enjoy a rare moment of tranquility.
However, the speaker’s awareness of his “promises to keep” reminds him that he cannot stay.
This line reveals an inner conflict: on one hand, he is deeply attracted to the stillness and beauty
of the woods; on the other, he feels the weight of his responsibilities, which compel him to
continue on his journey. This tension between the allure of peace and the pull of duty is at the
heart of the poem, highlighting a universal human experience. We all have moments when we
are tempted to pause and take a break from our obligations, but ultimately, we must return to the
“promises” that give our lives purpose and direction.
20 | P a g e
(b) What might the "miles to go before I sleep" symbolize, beyond just a literal journey?
Could it represent something deeper, like life's commitments or mortality?
The line “miles to go before I sleep” can symbolize the many commitments, duties, and goals the
speaker must fulfill before he can truly rest. Beyond a literal journey, it suggests the ongoing
demands of life—the responsibilities, challenges, and personal goals we all carry. These “miles”
could represent unfinished tasks, important relationships, or even personal growth that must
happen before one reaches the end of life.
In another sense, “sleep” may symbolize death, making the phrase a reminder of mortality. The
speaker acknowledges that he has much to accomplish before his life is over, as if he is aware of
time passing and the need to make the most of his journey. Frost’s line thus resonates with
readers on multiple levels: it speaks to the demands of everyday life as well as the broader
journey of life itself, with all its complexities and obligations. This awareness of life’s fleeting
nature makes the speaker’s moment of peace in the woods even more precious, as he knows it is
only temporary.
(c) How does Frost create a sense of calmness and stillness in the poem, and what effect
does this mood have on the reader?
Frost creates a sense of calmness and stillness through gentle, flowing language and vivid
descriptions of a snowy scene. Phrases like “easy wind and downy flake” capture the softness of
the snow falling, while the repeated sounds and rhyming structure give the poem a soothing
rhythm. The speaker’s slow-paced observations, combined with the solitary setting, draw readers
into a quiet, reflective moment, free from distractions.
The gentle shaking of the horse’s harness bells is the only sound in the stillness, emphasizing the
deep quiet and the speaker’s immersion in the peaceful surroundings. Frost’s use of imagery,
especially the contrast between the dark woods and white snow, helps readers visualize the scene
and feel its calm, creating a meditative mood.
This calmness invites readers to slow down and appreciate life’s beauty, even if only for a
moment. By experiencing the speaker’s brief escape into nature, readers may reflect on their own
moments of peace, as well as the responsibilities that eventually pull them back into daily life.
Frost’s serene mood encourages an appreciation of life’s quiet moments, reminding readers of
the importance of balance between pause and purpose.
21 | P a g e
3. Five Ways to Kill a Man
- Edwin Brock
About the Author
Edwin Brock (1927–1997) was a British poet known for his dark humor and sharp observations
on modern life. His most famous works include the poems Five Ways to Kill a Man and Song
of the Battery Hen. Brock wrote several poetry collections, such as An Attempt at Exorcism
and With Love from Judas. Though he didn’t receive major literary awards, his work is
respected for its wit and critical look at society. He also worked as a police officer and an
advertising copywriter, which influenced his unique poetic style.
Theme
The poem explores how humanity has become increasingly efficient and detached in its capacity
for violence, highlighting a tragic loss of empathy over time.
Summary
Edwin Brock’s poem Five Ways to Kill a Man is a satirical take on human history, emphasizing
the brutality and efficiency with which humans have devised ways to kill one another. The poem
is structured in five stanzas, each describing a method of killing in a historical context. Brock
presents these methods in a detached, almost instructional tone, highlighting the cruelty of each
era without glorifying violence.
1. Medieval Crucifixion: The first stanza references the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, a brutal
method used in ancient times. Brock describes the requirements for this act—wood for a cross,
nails, a crowd for spectators, and a “fairly large hill,” suggesting the calculated cruelty involved.
This stanza reflects how society normalized such barbaric acts for punishment and control.
2. Knights and Chivalry: In the second stanza, Brock shifts to the medieval era of knights and
battles. He describes the process of arming soldiers with heavy armor and sharp weapons,
showing the organized violence of this period. The emphasis on armor and weapons symbolizes
the grandeur and brutality of medieval warfare, where people killed in the name of honor and
land.
3. Chemical Warfare in World War I: The third stanza captures the horrors of World War I
and introduces more sophisticated means of killing. Brock mentions "gas" and "mud,"
referencing the use of chemical warfare and the horrific trench conditions that caused suffering
and death on a massive scale. This stanza reflects the dehumanization of soldiers, treated more as
pawns than individuals, as nations advanced their tools of war.
22 | P a g e
4. World War II and Nuclear Destruction: In the fourth stanza, Brock speaks about World
War II and the use of airplanes to drop bombs, hinting at the atomic bombs dropped on
Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This shift from direct, hands-on killing to mass destruction from afar
illustrates humanity’s increasing detachment from the consequences of violence. The mention of
bombing from a distance captures the chilling effectiveness and indifference with which modern
war can annihilate entire populations.
5. Modern-Day Apathetic Killing: In the final stanza, Brock suggests that the simplest way to
kill a man now is through indifference and apathy. Unlike previous methods, this involves no
weaponry or direct violence—just ignoring others' struggles, leading to a loss of empathy and
care. This reflects a society where individuals are "killed" emotionally and spiritually due to the
lack of human connection.
Conclusion
Five Ways to Kill a Man is a stark reminder of the dark aspects of human history. It shows that
as time progresses, people develop more destructive ways to harm each other, ultimately leading
to a world where indifference can be just as deadly as physical violence. The poem critiques
humanity’s continuous pursuit of violent solutions instead of compassion and understanding.
Questions:
(a) What are the five ways to kill a man mentioned in the poem?
The poem describes five ways to kill a man: crucifixion as used in ancient times, medieval
combat with knights in armor, chemical warfare in World War I, bombings in World War II, and
finally, indifference in the modern era. Each method reflects the violence and efficiency of its
time.
(b) How does Brock contrast ancient and modern methods of killing?
Brock contrasts ancient methods, which involved physical presence and spectacle, with modern
methods, which are detached and efficient, like bombs and chemical weapons. The final method,
indifference, needs no weapon at all, showing that modern society can "kill" without direct
violence, simply by ignoring others.
(c) What does the poem suggest about human nature and violence?
The poem suggests that humans have an ongoing tendency toward violence and cruelty, adapting
over time to create more effective ways to harm others. It implies that humans have not only
continued to kill but have also grown increasingly desensitized, with modern society being
capable of emotional and spiritual "killing" through indifference.
23 | P a g e
(a) How does "Five Ways to Kill a Man" reflect on the dehumanization in modern
warfare?
Five Ways to Kill a Man reflects on dehumanization by showing how warfare has moved from
personal acts of violence to cold, impersonal methods that distance the attacker from the victim.
In ancient times, killing was public and hands-on, as seen with crucifixion. This method was
brutal, yet it involved a human connection, with witnesses and personal involvement. As the
poem progresses, Brock describes increasingly impersonal methods, like knights battling with
armor, chemical warfare in trenches, and bombings from planes in World War II. Each shift
shows less direct engagement between attacker and victim, making it easier to kill without facing
the reality of one’s actions. Finally, the modern form of "killing" requires no weapons—just
indifference. This represents the ultimate dehumanization, as people no longer need to harm
directly; they can cause suffering simply by ignoring others. Brock’s poem criticizes how this
emotional detachment has become common, making it easier for society to ignore the pain or
struggles of others, especially in a world where technology and physical distance can remove us
from the consequences of our actions.
(b) Evaluate the poem's critique of modern society.
The poem criticizes modern society by highlighting its growing indifference and emotional
detachment. Brock shows how humanity has become efficient at causing harm with minimal
effort and maximum distance, especially with the development of modern weapons like chemical
and nuclear bombs. The final stanza, where Brock suggests that one can "kill" by simply
ignoring others, is especially critical. This modern "method" of killing needs no weapons,
reflecting how society now allows people to suffer due to neglect or apathy rather than physical
violence. Brock’s critique implies that society has become so accustomed to violence and
suffering that it can now "kill" indirectly. This indifference means that people can ignore
poverty, injustice, or isolation, effectively "killing" the spirit of others without facing
consequences. The poem is a warning against losing empathy, suggesting that this indifference is
as dangerous as any weapon, making modern society more dehumanizing than ever before.
(c) Consider the theme of inevitability in "Five Ways to Kill a Man."
The theme of inevitability runs throughout Five Ways to Kill a Man, as Brock presents killing
methods as if they are a natural progression through history. Each stanza introduces a new way
to kill, showing how, over time, humans seem bound to invent more efficient ways of harming
each other. Brock’s tone suggests that these methods are almost expected, as if history itself
moves inevitably toward more destructive and detached ways of killing. The poem implies that
as society advances, so does its capacity for violence, reaching a point where people can harm
others simply through indifference. This indifference feels like the final step in a long
progression of desensitization, as if humanity has become "inevitably" numb to the value of life.
24 | P a g e
Brock’s poem warns that unless society changes this course, it may continue to develop more
inhumane forms of violence, both physical and emotional. In this way, the poem portrays human
history as a path of inevitable dehumanization, urging readers to reconsider this seemingly
unstoppable cycle.
Caged Bird
- Maya Angelou
About the Author
Maya Angelou (1928–2014) was an American poet, writer, and civil rights activist. Her most
famous book, I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, is an autobiography about her early life and
struggles. Angelou wrote several poetry collections and memoirs, celebrated for their themes of
resilience and freedom. She received numerous awards, including the Presidential Medal of
Freedom, and was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize for her poetry.
Theme
The theme of Caged Bird is the longing for freedom in the face of oppression and the
unbreakable resilience of the human spirit.
Summary
Maya Angelou’s poem Caged Bird contrasts two birds to explore themes of freedom and
oppression. The poem begins by describing a free bird that enjoys the natural world, soaring
through the skies, feeling the wind, and claiming the sky as its own. This bird represents freedom
and self-expression, as it roams without any limits, free to follow its desires.
In contrast, the caged bird lives a restricted, painful life. Trapped behind bars, its wings are
clipped, and its feet are tied, leaving it helpless and unable to fly. The caged bird, though
confined, does not stay silent. Despite its suffering, it sings of freedom, its voice rising in hope
and desperation. This song is a cry for liberty, full of yearning and deep sorrow. The caged bird’s
song represents a strong desire for freedom and resilience, even in the face of hardship.
The poem repeats this contrast to emphasize the difference between the free bird and the caged
bird, symbolizing those who live with opportunities and those who are oppressed or
marginalized. The repetition of the caged bird’s song highlights its spirit, showing that although
it is physically trapped, its hope and inner will remain strong. This song carries over mountains,
symbolizing how its desire for freedom cannot be silenced.
Through this powerful contrast, Angelou sheds light on the effects of freedom and confinement
on the human spirit, pointing to the resilience of those who are oppressed. The poem ultimately
25 | P a g e
illustrates the desire for equality, as the caged bird’s song calls out for a life without limits and
oppression.
Conclusion
In Caged Bird, Maya Angelou reminds readers of the profound impact of freedom and
oppression on the soul. Even in captivity, the caged bird’s song of hope endures, showing that
the desire for liberty cannot be suppressed. The poem speaks to all who yearn for justice and
equality, inspiring strength and resilience.
Questions:
(a) How do the two birds serve as metaphors for different social groups or experiences?
The two birds symbolize contrasting social experiences. The free bird represents those who enjoy
freedom, opportunities, and a life without barriers, while the caged bird symbolizes oppressed
groups, particularly people facing systemic injustices, restrictions, or discrimination. Their
different lives highlight the inequality in society.
(b) What do the cage, the clipped wings, and the bars symbolize in relation to oppression
and freedom?
The cage, clipped wings, and bars represent the restrictions and suffering of oppression. They
trap the caged bird, symbolizing the forced limitations and control over oppressed individuals.
These symbols show how oppression denies freedom, limits growth, and prevents the oppressed
from reaching their potential.
(c) How does the free bird symbolize freedom and opportunity?
The free bird symbolizes the joy, freedom, and limitless potential of those with access to
opportunities. It can explore and claim the sky, representing people who can pursue their dreams,
make choices, and live without restrictions, showing the positive impact of freedom.
(a) How does Angelou balance the themes of despair and hope within the poem?
In Caged Bird, Angelou presents a balance between despair and hope by showing both the
suffering and the resilience of the caged bird. The despair is visible in the caged bird’s
confinement—its wings are clipped, its feet are tied, and it is locked in a cage. These physical
limitations reflect the oppressive conditions and sadness faced by those without freedom. The
image of the caged bird captures this trapped feeling, portraying the weight of suffering and lack
of control. However, despite the pain, the caged bird sings. Its song symbolizes hope and an
26 | P a g e
undying spirit. Even though the bird is physically confined, its voice rises in defiance, expressing
the strong desire for freedom. Through the caged bird’s song, Angelou shows that hope and
strength can exist even in hardship. By balancing these themes, she emphasizes the resilience of
those facing oppression. The poem suggests that even in despair, hope remains alive, and the
longing for freedom cannot be silenced.
(b) How does the metaphor of the caged bird resonate with the African American
experience and broader themes of systemic injustice?
The caged bird metaphor resonates strongly with the African American experience, representing
centuries of struggle against systemic injustice and oppression. African Americans, historically
confined by slavery, segregation, and discrimination, are symbolized by the caged bird—
restricted, denied freedom, and often suffering in silence. The clipped wings and tied feet signify
the barriers that prevent growth and progress, just as laws and prejudiced practices have held
back marginalized communities. The caged bird’s yearning for freedom mirrors the African
American community's fight for equality, civil rights, and dignity. Moreover, this metaphor
expands to reflect broader injustices faced by oppressed groups globally. It captures the universal
experience of people denied basic freedoms, facing social and institutional restrictions. The
bird’s song becomes a symbol of resilience and resistance, expressing both sorrow and hope. In
this way, Angelou’s metaphor not only reflects the African American experience but also
connects with anyone enduring systemic injustice, making the poem powerful and universal.
(c) How does the act of singing become a symbol of both suffering and survival for the
caged bird?
In Caged Bird, singing symbolizes both the suffering and survival of the caged bird. The bird’s
song is born from its pain and confinement, an expression of its deep sadness and yearning for
freedom. This act of singing in captivity represents the sorrow of being trapped and the
frustration of having no escape. However, the song is also a symbol of survival and hope.
Though the bird’s physical freedom is denied, its spirit remains alive, expressed through the song
that reaches far beyond its cage. This act of singing is the caged bird’s way of resisting its
situation; it refuses to stay silent, asserting its will to be heard. The song becomes a voice for the
voiceless, showing that even in the worst conditions, the spirit endures. Angelou uses the bird’s
song to highlight resilience, showing that, despite suffering, hope and survival persist in the face
of oppression. The caged bird’s singing embodies both its pain and its strength, capturing the
dual nature of suffering and the unbreakable will to survive.
27 | P a g e
Take Not Away My Wits, O God!
- Alexander Pushkin
About the Author
Alexander Pushkin (1799-1837) was a famous Russian poet, playwright, and novelist, often
considered the father of modern Russian literature. His most well-known works include the novel
Eugene Onegin, the play Boris Godunov, and many beautiful poems. Pushkin's writing is
celebrated for its lyrical quality and deep exploration of themes like love, freedom, and identity.
Although he did not receive formal literary awards during his lifetime, his influence on Russian
literature is immense, and he is still widely studied and admired today.
Theme
The poem explores the vital connection between mental clarity and the essence of human
existence, emphasizing the importance of retaining one's reason.
Summary
Stanza 1:
The speaker begins by addressing God, pleading not to take away his wits. He expresses his deep
fear of losing his reason, suggesting that his ability to think clearly is essential for his survival.
The speaker recognizes that his mental state is fragile and relies on divine protection.
Stanza 2:
The speaker reflects on the importance of his wits in navigating the complexities of life. He
mentions how his reason has guided him through hardships and has helped him maintain his
identity. Without his mental faculties, he fears he would become lost and unable to cope with the
challenges he faces.
Stanza 3:
He describes the consequences of losing his reason, suggesting that it would lead to despair and
confusion. The speaker feels that if his mind were taken away, he would be reduced to a mere
shadow of himself, unable to feel joy or pain, love or hatred. His existence would lose meaning
without the clarity of thought.
Stanza 4:
In a moment of vulnerability, the speaker admits that he often grapples with doubt and
uncertainty. He acknowledges that his wits sometimes falter, but he pleads for God’s mercy to
keep them intact. He sees reason as a gift that helps him understand the world and maintain hope.
28 | P a g e
Stanza 5:
Finally, the speaker concludes with a heartfelt plea, reaffirming his desire to retain his wits. He
emphasizes the strength that comes from clear thinking and the importance of reason in his life.
The poem ends with a strong appeal to God, showcasing his deep reliance on divine grace for
mental clarity.
Conclusion
In "Take Not Away My Wits, O God!", Pushkin powerfully conveys the fear of losing one’s
mind and the despair it brings. The speaker’s plea highlights the fragile nature of human reason
and the deep need for clarity in life. Ultimately, it is a reflection on the significance of mental
stability and the hope for divine protection against the chaos of the world.
Questions:
(a) What is the speaker's primary plea in the poem, and why is it significant?
The speaker's primary plea in the poem is for God not to take away his wits or mental clarity.
This is significant because the speaker believes that his reason is essential for understanding life
and coping with challenges. Without it, he fears losing his identity and purpose.
(b) How does Pushkin convey the importance of intellect in the poem?
Pushkin conveys the importance of intellect by showing how the speaker relies on his wits to
navigate life's difficulties. The poem emphasizes that clear thinking allows the speaker to
experience emotions, make choices, and find meaning in his existence. Intellect is portrayed as a
vital part of being human.
(c) How does Pushkin explore the theme of mortality in the poem?
Pushkin explores the theme of mortality by highlighting the fragility of life and the mind. The
speaker fears that losing his wits would lead to a life devoid of meaning, joy, or pain. This fear
reflects a deeper concern about the inevitable end of life and the significance of mental clarity in
facing mortality.
(a) Analyze the role of faith in the poem.
In "Take Not Away My Wits, O God!", faith plays a crucial role as the speaker turns to God for
help in preserving his mental clarity. The speaker's plea reveals a deep reliance on divine
protection, indicating that he believes in a higher power that can influence his fate. Faith is
depicted as a source of comfort and strength, suggesting that without it, the speaker would feel
29 | P a g e
lost and vulnerable. The act of praying highlights the importance of a spiritual connection in
facing life’s uncertainties. The speaker's faith gives him hope that God will keep him from losing
his wits, reinforcing the idea that belief in something greater can provide stability amid life's
challenges.
(b) Examine the speaker's tone toward God in the poem.
The speaker's tone toward God in the poem is one of desperation and reverence. He approaches
God with a heartfelt plea, showing both humility and fear. His words reflect a deep emotional
bond, as he acknowledges God’s power over his mental state. There is a sense of urgency in his
request, indicating that the loss of his wits would lead to despair. Despite the fear, the speaker's
tone is not accusatory; instead, it reveals trust and dependence on God’s mercy. This tone
illustrates the speaker’s vulnerability, highlighting the fragile nature of human existence and the
need for divine support.
(c) What do you think the speaker fears more: physical death or the loss of mental clarity?
The speaker fears the loss of mental clarity more than physical death. While physical death is a
natural part of life, losing his wits would mean losing his identity, emotions, and ability to
understand the world. The poem emphasizes that mental clarity is essential for a meaningful
existence. The speaker associates his wits with his humanity, suggesting that without them, life
would become a shadowy, meaningless experience. Therefore, the fear of losing his mental
faculties overshadow the fear of dying, as a life without reason feels more like a death in itself.
 Happy Reading 
30 | P a g e

Verbal Art 1st Semester BA BSW BVA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Verbal Art 1st Semester BA BSW BVA

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Verbal Art 1st Semester BA BSW BVA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Notes by Dr. Priyanka M.G.

|Verbal Art| 1st Semester BA/BSW/BVA | SEP -2024

1. The Story of an Hour

Theme of the Story

1. Answer each of the following questions in about 40-50 words.

(b) What is the significance of the open window in the story?

2. Answer each of the following questions in about 200-250 words.

2. Back from the west and unable to find lodging in Baroda

- Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's

1. Answer each of the following questions in about 40-50 words.

2. Answer each of the following questions in about 200-250 words.

3. The Last Leaf

About the Author:

1. Answer each of the following questions in about 40-50 words.

2. Answer each of the following questions in about 200-250 words.

4. Freedom from Fear - 1990

- Aung San Suu Kyi

About the Author:

1. Answer each of the following questions in about 40-50 words.

2. Answer each of the following questions in about 200-250 words.

5. The Nightingale and the Rose

About the Author

1. Answer each of the following questions in about 40-50 words.

2. Answer each of the following questions in about 200-250 words.

1. The Burning of the Books

1. Answer each of the following questions in about 40-50 words.

2. Answer each of the following questions in about 200-250 words.

2. Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening

1. Answer each of the following questions in about 40-50 words.

2. Answer each of the following questions in about 200-250 words.

3. Five Ways to Kill a Man

1. Answer each of the following questions in about 40-50 words.

2. Answer each of the following questions in about 200-250 words.

(b) Evaluate the poem's critique of modern society.

(c) Consider the theme of inevitability in "Five Ways to Kill a Man."

1. Answer each of the following questions in about 40-50 words.

2. Answer each of the following questions in about 200-250 words.

Take Not Away My Wits, O God!

1. Answer each of the following questions in about 40-50 words.

2. Answer each of the following questions in about 200-250 words.

(a) Analyze the role of faith in the poem.

(b) Examine the speaker's tone toward God in the poem.

You might also like