Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views

Chapter 4 Constrained Convex Optimization

Uploaded by

hai.nguyen29
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views

Chapter 4 Constrained Convex Optimization

Uploaded by

hai.nguyen29
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

FUNDAMENTALS OF

OPTIMIZATION
Constrained convex optimization
CONTENT

• Lagrange dual function


• Lagrange dual problem
• KKT condition
Lagrange dual function

• Optimization problem in the standard form

(P) minimize f(x)


s.t. gi(x) ≤ 0, i = 1, 2,…, m
hi(x) = 0, i = 1, 2, …, p
x  X  Rn
with x  Rn, and assume D = (𝑖=1
𝑚 𝑚
dom gi)(𝑖=1 dom hi) is not empty.
• Denote f* the optimal value of f(x)
• If f, gi (i = 1,2,…,m) are convex functions, hi (i = 1,…,p) are linear → convex program
Lagrange dual function

• Define Lagrangian function L: Rn x Rm x Rp → R


𝑝
L(x, , ) = f(x) + σ𝑚
𝑖=1 𝑖𝑔𝑖(𝑥) + σ𝑖=1 𝑖ℎ𝑖 (𝑥)

• Lagrange dual function (or dual function)


q(, ) = 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑥𝐷 L(x, , )
• Lagrange dual problem
(D) maximize q(, )
,   0
Lagrange dual function

• Weak duality theorem if x* is an optimal solution to the primal problem and (*,*) is an
optimal solution to the dual problem, then f(x*)  q(*,*)
• Corollary If there exist x* and (*,*) such that f(x*) = q(*,*), then x* and (*,*) are
respectively optimal solutions to the primal and dual problems
KKT Conditions

• Theorem (Fritz John necessary conditions) Let x* be a feasible solution of (P). If x* is a


local minimum of (P), then there exists (u,,) such that:
𝑝
• uf(x*) + σ𝑚 𝑖=1 𝑖𝑔𝑖 (x*) + σ𝑖=1 𝑖ℎ𝑖 (x*) = 0
• u,  0, (u,,)  0
• i gi(x*) = 0, i = 1,…, m
KKT Conditions

• Theorem (Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) necessary conditions) Let x* be a feasible solution


of (P) and  = {i: gi(x*) = 0}. Further, suppose that hi(x*) for i = 1,…, p and gi(x*) for i  
are linearly independent. If x* is a local minimum of (P), then there exists (,) such that:
𝑝
• f(x*) + σ𝑚 𝑖=1 𝑖𝑔𝑖 (x*) + σ𝑖=1 𝑖ℎ𝑖 (x*) = 0
•   0,
• i gi(x*) = 0, i = 1,…, m
KKT Conditions

• Theorem (KKT sufficient conditions) Let x* be a feasible solution of (P) which is convex
program (f, gi are convex functions, hi are linear functions). If there exists (,) such that:
𝑝
• f(x*) + σ𝑚 𝑖=1 𝑖𝑔𝑖 (x*) + σ𝑖=1 𝑖ℎ𝑖 (x*) = 0
•   0,
• i gi(x*) = 0, i = 1,…, m
then x* is a global optimal solution of (P)
Example

minimize f(x,y) = 2x – y
s.t. g1(x,y) = x2 + y2 – 2 ≤ 0
g2(x,y) = x – y – 1 ≤ 0

• f(x,y) = [2 -1]T, g1(x,y) = [2x 2y]T, g2(x,y) = [1 -1]T


• f and g2 are linear, so they are convex
• 2g1(x,y) = 2 0 which is positive definite, so g1 is convex
0 2

• Exercise Apply KKT condition, solve the problem ?


Lagrange relaxation for Integer Programming

ZIP = minimize f(x) = cTx


s.t. Ax  b
Dx  d
x integer

• Let X = {x integer | Dx  d}
• Assume optimizing over X can be solved easily, but adding constraint Ax  b makes the
problem too difficult
Lagrange relaxation for Integer Programming

Z() = minx cTx + T(b - Ax)


s.t. Dx  d
x integer c

• For a fixed , Z() is assumed to be computed easily


• Important: compute the best lower bound
ZD = max 𝑍()
0
Lagrange relaxation for Integer Programming

• Exercise Given a constant value  = (k), suppose x(k) is an optimal solution to the problem

Z() = minx cTx + T(b - Ax)


s.t. Dx  d
x integer c

Explain why s(k) = b - Ax(k) is a subgradient of function Z at (k) ?


Lagrange relaxation for Integer Programming

• Subgradient method for computing ZD

Choose starting point (0) (e.g., (0) = 0); k = 0


while (STOP condition not reach) {
x(k) is the solution of Z((0))
Compute subgradient s(k) = b - Ax(k) of function Z at (k)
if s(k) = 0 then BREAK
(k+1) = max{0, (k) + (k)s(k)} /* (k) denote the step size */
k=k+1
}
Thank you
for your
attentions!

You might also like