Bric Country's
Bric Country's
Bric Country's
Student’s Name
Course
Instructor
Date
2
The BRIC is an acronym that describes Brazil, Russia, India and China. According to the
predictions from Goldman Sachs economist Jim O'Neill, the four countries were likely to control
the global economy by 2050. In 2001, the four countries were ranked as the globe's fastest
emerging economy. According to economists, the states were likely to form a powerful
economic bloc, even acknowledging and forecasting that the government was optimistic
(Siddiqui, 2016). The high wave of economic reforms characterized the last quarter of the 20th
Century. The policy changes in the economy were proposed regarding the technology up-
gradation, industrial licensing, removal of restrictions in the private sector, and foreign direct
investments.
The BRIC countries are important because they account for 20% of the global GDP and
40% of the World's population. The significant determinants of the economic growth among the
BRIC countries include the increase in exports of manufactured goods, the development of GDP
and the changes in trade policies. China is projected to be an economic powerhouse by 2050 in
terms of economic output. India is likely to be third, while Russia and Brazil follow on fourth
and fifth position (Siddiqui, 2016).). The Economist (2015) notes that developing world
accounts or global economic growth by purchasing power parity. The lower chance of the
emerging markets impacts the multinational corporates by hitting their profits and the cash flow
of exporters. Development banks from put in place in 2015 offered to give loans to members of
the BRIC for infrastructure projects. The developmental policy will increase the way of the
south, and this makes it necessary for the member countries to avoid being dependent on IMF
While the BRIC countries have presented higher economic growth, there is a difference
in the member states. China and Russia have shown a higher growth while India only gave a
significant positive economic growth in the past five years. The GDP growth rate for China for
2016, 2017 and 2018 is 6.755, 6.95%, and 6.85%. The Russian GDP growth is 0.29%, 1.79%
and 2.54. On the other hand, India's GDP growth rate is 8.26%, 7.04% and 6.12%. The Brazillian
GDP growth marked the highest by 3.80 but has always been negative (Trading Economies,
2019). The BRIC countries economic growth is challenging the global giants. The Strong GDP
growth is making the countries to the more robust engines of the World's economy.
The Financial crisis in October 2008 sent a shock in the stock market of the BRIC
economies, making them to the tumbling of the markets. As the global economic hits recession,
the economies from the developing BRIC countries felt the pinch of the recession as the demand
for exports from the BRIC economy fell in the United States and Europe. The foreign
investments could fail due to the departure of the foreign funds from the BRIC stock markets.
Also, the Indian's service industry suffered due to its dependency on the developed countries for
the market. The direct foreign investments had played a significant role in the growth of the
BRIC economies. For instance, Foreign Direct investments accounted for 4% of the Russian
GDP in 2007(Kaplinsky & Farooki, 2010). On the other hand, the energy prices throughout the
World had gone down due to the falling o the oil prices and other sources. On the other hand,
The fall of the consumer demand was worrying for China as the exports accounted for
35.8% of GDP in 2007(Li et al., 2013). The main exports for Brazil constituted Iron ore and
agricultural products such as the Soya and Coffee. Coffee prices fell by February and October
4
2008. Similarly, 56.3% of the exports in Brazil were destined for developed countries and thus
a prevalent fall. Therefore, the fall in demand was likely to have a significant impact on the
Brazilian economy. The combined effects of the slow growth could account for the job losses
and the slow economic growth due to the slower growth of BRIC. At the same time, domestic
consumer spending power would decrease as it supposed to fuel the economy during the
recession period.
However, the survival of the BRIC countries was fueled by the economic strength of
large trade surpluses and the foreign exchange reserves. The BRIC governments incorporate the
extras to increase spending and boost consumer demands. While other developing countries were
cutting down the consumption power, BRIC's consumers represented a substantial growing
market with 2.8 billion consumers or 41.8% of the global population in 2008 (Eghbal, 2008).
Also, the BRIC consumers were not hit by the credit crunch as they did not depend on the
mortgages. Also, many Chinese did not have a bank account. The limited level of debt
dependency assisted the consumers from China and other BRIC countries from vulnerability to
the banking institutions. In particular, the low dependence on the credit made the BRIC
References
Banerjee, R., & Vashisth, P. (2010). The financial crisis: impact on BRIC and policy response.
https://tradingeconomics.com/brazil/gdp-growth
Eghbal, M. (2008). BRIC economies withstand the global financial crisis. Euro-monitor
International, https://blog.euromonitor.com/bric-economies-withstand-global-financial-
crisis/
Kaplinsky, R., & Farooki, M. (2010). Global value chains, the crisis, and the shift of markets
Perspective, 125-154.
Lin, C. Y. Y., Edvinsson, L., Chen, J., & Beding, T. (2013). Impact of the 2008 global financial
crisis. In National intellectual capital and the financial crisis in Brazil, Russia, India,
China, Korea, and South Africa (pp. 7-20). Springer, New York, NY.
Siddiqui, K. (2016). Will the Growth of the BRICs Cause a Shift in the Global Balance of
Economic Power in the 21st Century?. International Journal of Political Economy, 45(4),
315-338.
The Economist. 2015. "The Never Ending Story", November 14, pp.15, London