19910023385
19910023385
19910023385
ABSTRACT
This paper presents the main principles of a method dealing with the
resolution of electromagnetic internal problems: Electromagnetic Topology. A
very interesting way is to generalize the multiconductor transmission line
network theory to the basic equation of the Electromagnetic Topology: the
B.L.T. equation.
This generalization is illustrated by the treatment of an aperture as a four
port junction. Analytical and experimental derivations of the scattering
parameters are presented. These concepts are used to study the
electromagnetic coupling in a scale model of an aircraft, and can be seen as
a convenient means to test internal electromagnetic interference.
1. INTRODUCTION
The study of the internal electromagnetic problem should, in the future, lead
to the development of an electromagnetic design tool. An electromagnetic
design can be carried out in four phases. The first one is to design a first
prototype. The second phase is to calculate the interference in the system
previously defined. In a third phase the system has to be optimized, to be in
agreement with specific goals such as price, but also weight. The last phase
is to establish maintenance specifications once the system is entirely
defined.
F ~ D A ~ E N T AAPPROACH
L
The propagation equation relates the outgoing wave supervectors W(0) and the
incoming wave supervectors W(L) by means of a scattering supermatrix S:
Combining (1) and ( 2 1 , a single equation can then be derived, taking into
account all the electromagnetic interactions on the network: it is called the
B.L.T. equation (Baum - Liu - Tesche):
(1 - sr) w(o) = sws (3)
One can already measure how this equation can be useful to perform the
optimization phase of an electromagnetic design. However, the main problem is
to express the waves and S and P supermatrices in any coupling configuration.
72-2
sour ce wave-
vector
junction /
Figure 2: Topological network.
J
,
/
wave vector
A QUALITATIVE APPROACH
In this approach, the concepts of topological diagram and graph remain valid.
The difference is that all the evaluations of the interference are made by
means of transfer functions. For this, judicious observables must be definied
at each node of the graph, such as electromagnetic fields or currents and
voltages and related by means of matricial expressions involving transfer
operators T, k, as defined in figure 3 . As an example, the current and
voltage at node 3.1 is given with respect to external electromagnetic
T L ) g}o
n
Y
= T3 . 1 ; 2 , 2 T 2 , 2 ; 1 , 1 (Lo+
“3.1
72-3 I
A NEW APPROACH COMBINING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE ASPECTS
The two previous fundamental approaches must progress each in its own way,
but it must always be kept in mind, that they must meet and merge in a single
approach in the future.
Today, an approach conciliating the two is developed, based on the fact that
a very important way to propagate the interference is constituted by cables.
As a matter of fact, the multiconductor transmission line network theory is
well suited to the B.L.T. equation formalism because all the quantities
defined in (3) can be easily expressed with respect to current I(z) and
voltage V(z) observables all along the lines [2],[5]. Figure 4 shows the
electrical modeling of a multiconductor line cell where Z and Y are the
distributed shunt impedance and parallel conductance matrices respectively.
Vsand Is are the shunt voltage and parallel current generators dealing with
the coupling of external sources'on the wires.
A Zcmatrix can be defined on each transmission line by:
zc= (Z.Y)% (3)
Z' z+dzl
Figure 4: Electrical modeling of a multiconductor cell.
This can be done in two ways. The first one deals with distributing Vsand Is
generators all along the lines, using direct measurements or 3-dimensional
codes. The second one consistsin characterizing the coupling in terms of a
network junction. This is what will be discussed now.
I
72-4
3. ELECTROMAGNETIC COUPLING THROUGH AN APERTURE DESCRIBED AS A JUNCTION
3.1. COUPLING OF TWO WIRES LOCATED ON BOTH SIDES OF AN APERTURE
Geometrical configuration
This model is valid insofar as the resonances of the aperture are not
involved. The electrical scheme associated with this configuration is shown
in figure 6 (the reaction of the inner wire is not taken into account). It
can be shown that current I and voltage V in the upper volume, create in the
lower wire shunt current Ieqand serial voltage Veqgenerators [3], defined as:
V e q = jwaI (5)
Ie = jwPV (6)
One can consider this configuration as a four port junction. The scattering
parameters determination implies that each port is loaded on the
characteristic impedance of the lines connected to ZcIand ZcIIrespectively
(see figure 6).
A 4x4 matrix [SI is then derived and can be divided into four blocks as
follows 141:
72-5
port, ------------------- I Port2
zc,
1 1 1 and S I I , I I
are 2x2 matrices dealing with the scattering parameters of a
transmission line and are only slightly affected by the presence of the
aperture. More important are the 2x2 blocks SIJIIandSI, dealing with the 1 1
signal transfer from one side of the structure to the other. The expression
of S - - _components is given by:
1 1 1 1
It must be noted that the relation ( 8 ) still remains valid for low
frequencies (before the resonances of the wires) and can inspire an efficient
way to go back to 01 and P values.
However, when the frequency increases, the best way to characterize the
aperture coupling is the measurement. The scattering parameter determination
is not made directly. The first step of the work generally consists in
measuring the microwave parameters So of the 4-port junction with a network
analyser [ S I . These parameters have the same definition as the "topological"
S parameters except the load impedance is fixed at Zcogenerally equal to
50 42.
The second step is to go back to the Y parameters of the junction with such a
rnatricial relation:
1
CY1 = -
Z
(C11 + (C11 - Pol) (9)
co
with [l]: the unit matrix.
One can then derive the [ S I topological matrix, considering the local
characteristic impedance matrix [Zc] of the connected lines:
[ S I = (111 - CZCl CY])= (C11 + CzclCyl)-l (10)
72-6
Figures 7a,7b,7c illustrate as an example the variation of So,Y and S
parameters between port 1 and port 3.
It must be specified that when the length of the lines becomes greater than
the aperture size, the B.L.T. equation formalism gives the opportunity to
find the parameters in the actual reference plane of the junction.
W
III
So in d6 i
-30
.Figure 7: Evolution of electrical
-40 parameters between port 1 and port 3.
-50 a) Microwave parameter.
-60v
-60
-70
7
b) Admittance parameter.
c) Scattering parameter.
For this case, one must consider the geometrical configuration represented in
figure 8. The upper wire in volume I has disappeared and has been replaced by
an external electromagnetic plane wave. If the aperture is short circuited,
this wave creates, short circuit electric Escand magnetic Hscfields on it,
The aperture must be supposed small enough to consider that the distribution
of the fields is homogeneous.
Then the question can be asked what should the characteristic of the fictive
wire in volume 1 - b e to create such an electromagnetic field distributions.
For this, the E.M. fields created by a wire on a conductive plane can be
calculated. According to the notations of figure 8, we have:
--+ v
Zo d - +
E = - - - (11)
sc ex
zc d2 t y2
and
+ I d +
Hs c = - - e (12)
R d2 t y2 Y
where Zcis the characteristic impedance of the wire, Zo the impedance of the
medium.
72-7
Volume I
1
I "
At each extremity (see figure 91, two orthogonal references can be created:
Frcrq at port 1, GrCtq at port 2. The short circuit fields
_$ +
Es C
and Hsc can be expressed according to these new directions and become
__++
respectively E s C l lHsC2 .
If I is introduced, an index dealing with volume I including indices 1 and 2,
the topological wave for the fictive wire is defined by:
w;+ = VI? ZCIII
72-8
+
(y = y 0 at the center of the aperture), and a topological field wave WscIby:
+
W-S C I = ES C I + ZoHscI (15)
If [SI is the scattering matrix dealing with the coupling of the fictive wire
and the wire in volume 11, defined in 4 blocks as in (8) , it can be seen that
[S'] in relation (16) is equal to:
*1
I'- , I 1 /le q
L I I 1 (17)
As the scattering parameter definition needs to have a ratio V/I equal to Zc,
it is seen that the ratio E(y)/H(y) remains equal to Zo. So, by adjusting the
value of the medium impedance, it is possible to simulate any direction of
the incident plane wave.
In fact, a single wire can be shown as an approximate tool to simulate a
plane wave but as a convenient system for testing a structure. One could also
think of measuring the scattering parameters when the wire in volume I is
replaced by a conductive plane, thereby defining a stripline.
Wire 1
Wire 2
72-1
5. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES