Capital Budgeting
Capital Budgeting
Capital Budgeting
Capital Budgeting is defined as the process by which a business determines which fixed asset
purchases or project investments are acceptable and which are not. Using this approach, each
proposed investment is given a quantitative analysis, allowing rational judgment to be made by
the business owners.
Capital asset management requires a lot of money; therefore, before making such investments,
they must do capital budgeting to ensure that the investment will procure profits for the
company. The companies must undertake initiatives that will lead to a growth in their
profitability and also boost their shareholder’s or investor’s wealth.
There is a long duration between the initial investments and the expected returns.
The organizations usually estimate large profits.
The process involves high risks.
It is a fixed investment over the long run.
Investments made in a project determine the future financial condition of an organization.
All projects require significant amounts of funding.
The amount of investment made in the project determines the profitability of a company.
How Capital Budgeting Works
It is of prime importance for a company when dealing with capital budgeting
decisions that it determines whether or not the project will be profitable.
Although we shall learn all the capital budgeting methods, the most common
methods of selecting projects are:
It might seem like an ideal capital budgeting approach would be one that
would result in positive answers for all three metrics, but often these
approaches will produce contradictory results. Some approaches will be
preferred over others based on the requirement of the business and the
selection criteria of the management. Despite this, these widely used
valuation methods have both benefits and drawbacks.
Investing in capital assets is determined by how they will affect cash flow in
the future, which is what capital budgeting is supposed to do. The capital
investment consumes less cash in the future while increasing the amount of
cash that enters the business later is preferable.
In smaller businesses, a project that has the potential to deliver rapid and
sizable cash flow may have to be rejected because the investment required
would exceed the company's capabilities.
The amount of work and time invested in capital budgeting will vary based
on the risk associated with a bad decision along with its potential benefits.
Therefore, a modest investment could be a wiser option if the company fears
the risk of bankruptcy in case the decisions go wrong.
Sunk costs are not considered in capital budgeting. The process focuses on
future cash flows rather than past expenses.
Formula:
Evaluating capital investment projects is what the NPV method helps the
companies with. There may be inconsistencies in the cash flows created over
time. The cost of capital is used to discount it. An evaluation is done based
on the investment made. Whether a project is accepted or rejected depends
on the value of inflows over current outflows.
This method considers the time value of money and attributes it to the
company's objective, which is to maximize profits for its owners. The capital
cost factors in the cash flow during the entire lifespan of the product and the
risks associated with such a cash flow. Then, the capital cost is calculated
with the help of an estimate.
Formula:
It follows the rule that if the IRR is more than the average cost of the capital,
then the company accepts the project, or else it rejects the project. If the
company faces a situation with multiple projects, then the project offering
the highest IRR is selected by them.
Examples:
Example of Payback Period Method:
An enterprise plans to invest $100,000 to enhance its manufacturing
process. It has two mutually independent options in front: Product A and
Product B. Product A exhibits a contribution of $25 and Product B of $15. The
expansion plan is projected to increase the output by 500 units for Product A
and 1,000 units for Product B.
This brings the enterprise to conclude that Product B has a shorter payback
period and therefore, it will invest in Product B.
Despite being an easy and time-efficient method, the Payback Period cannot
be called optimum as it does not consider the time value of money. The cash
flows at the earlier stages are better than the ones coming in at later stages.
The company may encounter two projections with the same payback period,
where one depicts higher cash flows in the earlier stages/years. In such as
case, the Payback Period may not be appropriate.
Expected Inflow in Second Year = $2,500; Expected Inflow in Third Year = $3,500
Expected Inflow in Fourth Year = $2,650; Expected Inflow in Fifth Year = $4,150
Discount Rate = 9%
Solution:
Net Present Value achieved at the end of the calculation is= (With 9%
Discount Rate ) $18,629
This indicates that if the NPV comes out to be positive and indicates profit.
Therefore, the company shall move ahead with the project.