P1-3 Criteria Evaluation Form

P1-P3 CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM
1. Individual speaking
Prathom 1-3 Individual speaking
No. Content Pronunciation Fluency Stage Tota
Presence l
4 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 10
1
2
3
4
5
P1-3 Individual Speaking Criteria

Content (4 scores):
- Have complete information with correct structure. (4)
- Have complete information and comprehensible (3)
- Have sufficient information and comprehensible (2)
- Have some information but comprehensible (1)
Pronunciation (2 scores):
- Near native-speaker stress/timing, rhythm and placing of stress, intonation pattern and
pitch range within sentence; natural linking of phrases. (2)
- Stress/timing, rhythm and placing of stress, intonation, sufficiently native-like as to make
comprehension easy and listening pleasurable. (1)
Fluency (2 scores):
- Near native-speaker speed and rhythm. (2)
- Good fluency with minimal hesitation. (1)
Stage Presence (2 scores):

- Have very good self-confidence that could make gestures and facial expressions in front
of the audience. (2)
- Look a bit nervous and doesn’t connect well to the audience. (1)
****
2. Pair speaking
Prathum 1-3 Pair Speaking
No. Comprehensibilit Pronunciation Fluency Interaction Total
y
4 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 10
1
2
3
4
5
P1-3 Pair Speaking Criteria

Comprehensibility (4 scores):
- Have complete information with the correct structure. (4)
range of pitch within a sentence; natural linking of phrases. (2)
- Stress/timing, rhythm and placing of stress, intonation, sufficiently native-like to make
Fluency (2 scores):
Interaction (2 scores):
- Very good interaction and flow of dialogue with each other. (2)
- Poor interaction with each other and the flow of dialogue could be clearer. (1)
******
3. Writing
Prathom 1-3 Writing
No. Penmanship Writing Conventions Total

5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 10
1
2
3
4
5
P1-3 Writing Criteria

Penmanship (5 scores):
- Easy to read and understand. Letters and words are properly and consistently spaced.
Letters are formed properly. (5)
- Readable. Letters and words are well spaced. Letters are formed properly. (4)
- Understandable with a little bit of effort from the reader. Letters and words are
sometimes spaced. Letters are well formed with some errors. (3)
- Difficult to read. Spacing errors. Letters are full of errors. (2)
- Impossible to understand. No correct spacing. No correct letter formation. (1)
Writing Conventions (5 scores):

- Few, if any errors are present in usage and sentence formation. Effective and consistent
use of punctuation, capitalization, and spelling. (5)
- Some errors in usage and sentence formation may be present, but no systematic pattern of
errors is displayed. Some errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization and grammar.(4)
- Frequent errors in grammar that may obscure the meaning. Frequent errors in spelling,
punctuation, capitalization and grammar. (3)
- Severe errors in grammar that obscure the meaning. Severe errors in spelling,
punctuation, capitalization and grammar. (2)
- No evidence of correct grammar. No correct spelling. punctuation, capitalization and
grammar. (1)
***
4. Reading out loud
Prathom 1-3 Reading Out Loud
No. Pronunciation Fluency Voice Poise Total
3 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 10
1
2
3
4
5
P1-3 Reading Out Loud Criteria

range of pitch within sentence; natural linking of phrases. (3)
- Stress/timing, rhythm and placing of stress, intonation, sufficiently native-like as to make
- Stress/timing, rhythm and placing of stress, intonation, need improvement as to make
Fluency (3 scores):
- Insufficient fluency.(1)
Voice (2 scores):
- Have a modulated voice that is clear for the audience to listen to. (2)
- The sound isn’t clear to some of the audience. (1)
Poise (2 scores):
- Have proper posture and maintain grace on stage. (2)
- Inconsistent good posture and grace on stage. (1)
***
5. Group presentation
Prathum 1-3 Group Presentation
No. Content Delivery Teamwork Total
4 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 10
1
2
3
4
P1-3 Group Presentation Criteria

Content (4 scores):
- Have complete information with correct structure. (4)
Delivery (3 scores):
- Familiar with the content and confidently perform on stage. (3)
- Familiar with the content with few mistakes. (2)
- Lack of familiarity with the content with many mistakes.(1)
Teamwork (3 scores):
- All members contribute equally to accomplish the activity while managing time wisely.
(3)
- Not all members contribute equally to accomplish the activity but still manage the time
wisely. (2)
- Some members don’t contribute equally to accomplish the activity and can’t manage time
wisely. (1)

P1-3 Criteria Evaluation Form

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

P1-3 Criteria Evaluation Form

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

P1-3 Criteria Evaluation Form

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

P1-P3 CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM

P1-3 Individual Speaking Criteria

Stage Presence (2 scores):

P1-3 Pair Speaking Criteria

No. Penmanship Writing Conventions Total

P1-3 Writing Criteria

Writing Conventions (5 scores):

P1-3 Reading Out Loud Criteria

P1-3 Group Presentation Criteria

- Lack of familiarity with the content with many mistakes.(1)

You might also like