Unit 2 GB
Unit 2 GB
Unit 2 GB
1. Exporting
1.1 Definition and Overview
Exporting is the simplest and most common mode of entering global business, where a company sells its products or
services to customers in foreign countries. This can be done directly, through a distributor, or via online platforms.
Direct Exporting: The company sells directly to the foreign market without intermediaries.
Indirect Exporting: The company sells through intermediaries such as agents, distributors, or export management
companies.
Intracorporate Transfers: Intracorporate transfers involve the export of goods and services between subsidiaries
or divisions of the same company located in different countries. This method is common among multinational
corporations (MNCs) with global operations, allowing for the efficient allocation of resources and coordination of
activities across borders.
Example: Toyota Motor Corporation transfers automotive parts from its manufacturing plants in Japan to its assembly
plants in the United States and Europe, facilitating global production and distribution.
Example: Apple’s Direct Exporting Strategy
Apple Inc. initially entered international markets through direct exporting. The company sold its iPhones, iPads, and
other products directly to foreign customers via its online store and physical Apple stores in select countries.
Risk Mitigation: Less exposure to political and economic risks of the foreign market.
Market Testing: Allows companies to test foreign markets without significant commitment.
Limited Control: Less control over marketing, distribution, and customer service in the foreign market.
Tariff and Non-Tariff Barriers: Exporting is subject to tariffs, quotas, and other trade barriers.
Transportation Costs: High shipping and logistics costs can reduce profit margins.
2. Licensing
2.1 Definition and Overview
Licensing is a contractual arrangement where a company (licensor) grants a foreign firm (licensee) the rights to
produce and sell its products, use its brand name, or exploit its intellectual property in exchange for a fee or royalty.
Product Licensing: Allowing a foreign company to produce and sell a product using the licensor's brand and
technology.
Trademark Licensing: Granting rights to use the licensor’s trademark in the foreign market.
Low Risk: Licensing involves low financial risk and no need for significant capital investment.
Market Access: Provides access to foreign markets that may have trade barriers or strict regulations.
Loss of Control: The licensor has limited control over the quality, marketing, and distribution of the licensed
products.
Intellectual Property Risks: There is a risk of intellectual property theft or misuse by the licensee.
Limited Profit Potential: Licensing fees and royalties may be lower than the profits generated from direct sales.
Greenfield Investment: The parent company builds a new facility or operation from scratch in the foreign market.
Acquisition: The parent company acquires an existing company in the foreign market to gain immediate market
presence.
Full Control: The parent company has complete control over the subsidiary’s operations, strategy, and decision-
making.
Profit Retention: All profits generated by the subsidiary are retained by the parent company.
Brand Consistency: Ensures consistent branding, quality, and customer experience across all markets.
High Investment Cost: Establishing or acquiring a subsidiary requires significant capital investment.
High Risk: The parent company assumes all the financial and operational risks associated with the subsidiary.
Complex Management: Managing a wholly owned subsidiary in a foreign market can be complex and resource-
intensive.
Product/Trade Name Franchising: The franchisee is allowed to sell specific products under the franchisor’s brand
name.
Business Format Franchising: The franchisee operates the entire business following the franchisor’s model,
including branding, operations, and marketing.
Rapid Market Expansion: Franchising allows for rapid expansion into multiple markets with relatively low capital
investment.
Local Adaptation: Franchisees can adapt the business model to local tastes and preferences while maintaining
brand consistency.
Shared Risk: The franchisee assumes the financial risk of establishing and operating the business, reducing the
risk for the franchisor.
Limited Control: The franchisor has limited control over the daily operations of the franchisee, which can affect
brand consistency.
Profit Sharing: Profits are shared between the franchisor and franchisee, reducing the overall financial gain for the
franchisor.
Quality Assurance: Ensuring consistent quality and customer experience across all franchises can be challenging.
5. Strategic Alliances
5.1 Definition and Overview
Strategic alliances involve collaboration between two or more companies to achieve mutually beneficial goals while
remaining independent. Unlike joint ventures, strategic alliances do not require the formation of a new legal entity.
5.2 Types of Strategic Alliances
Equity Alliances: Partners invest in each other’s companies, often leading to partial ownership.
Non-Equity Alliances: Partners collaborate without any equity investment, typically through contracts and
agreements.
Global Strategic Alliances: Partners from different countries collaborate to achieve global objectives.
Resource Sharing: Partners can share resources, technology, and expertise, leading to cost savings and
innovation.
Risk Mitigation: Sharing risks among partners reduces the financial and operational burden on each company.
Conflicts of Interest: Differences in objectives, management styles, and corporate cultures can lead to conflicts.
Limited Control: Each partner retains control over its own operations, which can lead to coordination challenges.
Dependence on Partner: The success of the alliance depends on the partner’s performance, which can be
unpredictable.
5.5 Case Study: Starbucks and Tata Global Beverages Strategic Alliance
Starbucks and Tata Global Beverages formed a strategic alliance to source and roast coffee beans in India. This
partnership allowed Starbucks to ensure a steady supply of high-quality coffee while supporting Tata’s goal of
promoting Indian coffee globally. The alliance also facilitated Starbucks’ entry into the Indian market, where it
successfully established a strong presence.
Horizontal Merger: Involves the merger of two companies operating in the same industry and at the same stage of
production.
Vertical Merger: Involves the merger of companies operating at different stages of production within the same
industry.
Acquisition: One company purchases another company and fully integrates it into its operations.
Rapid Market Entry: M&A allows companies to quickly enter new markets and gain market share.
Synergies: Combining the strengths and resources of both companies can lead to cost savings, innovation, and
competitive advantage.
Increased Market Power: M&A can increase the company’s market power and influence in the industry.
Integration Challenges: Integrating two companies with different cultures, systems, and processes can be complex
and challenging.
High Costs: M&A involves significant financial costs, including the purchase price, legal fees, and integration
expenses.
Regulatory Scrutiny: M&A deals are subject to regulatory approval, and antitrust concerns can delay or block the
transaction.
Industrial Turnkey Projects: Involves the construction and setup of industrial plants, such as refineries or factories.
Infrastructure Turnkey Projects: Includes the construction of infrastructure, such as highways, airports, or power
plants.
Risk Transfer: The contractor assumes the risks associated with the design and construction of the facility.
Cost Certainty: The client has a clear understanding of the total cost upfront, reducing the risk of cost overruns.
High-Quality Delivery: The contractor is responsible for delivering a fully operational facility that meets the client’s
specifications.
Limited Flexibility: The client has limited input during the design and construction phases, which can lead to
dissatisfaction.
High Initial Costs: Turnkey projects require significant upfront investment, which can be challenging for smaller
companies.
Dependency on Contractor: The success of the project depends on the contractor’s ability to deliver on time and
within budget.
Equity Joint Ventures: Partners invest capital and share ownership in the newly formed entity.
Contractual Joint Ventures: Partners collaborate without forming a new legal entity, often through contracts.
Shared Risk and Cost: Partners share the financial and operational risks and costs of entering a new market.
Local Expertise: Access to the local partner’s market knowledge, distribution channels, and regulatory expertise.
Resource Synergy: Combines the strengths and resources of both partners, leading to innovation and competitive
advantage.
Complex Management: Joint ventures require complex coordination and management, which can lead to conflicts.
Cultural Differences: Differences in corporate culture, management style, and objectives can create challenges.
Profit Sharing: Profits must be shared with the partner, reducing the potential financial gain for each company.
Conclusion
The modes of entering global business are diverse, each with its own set of advantages, disadvantages, and strategic
implications. Companies must carefully evaluate their resources, objectives, and market conditions before selecting the
most appropriate mode of entry. From exporting and licensing to joint ventures, wholly owned subsidiaries, and
mergers and acquisitions, each mode offers unique opportunities and challenges in the global marketplace.
Understanding the intricacies of these entry modes, along with real-life case studies, provides valuable insights for
businesses looking to expand their global presence. By learning from the successes and challenges of other
companies, businesses can make informed decisions that maximize their potential for success in the international
arena.
Strategic Mergers
Criterion Exporting Franchising Licensing Joint Ventures Subsidiaries
Alliances Acquisit
Permitting a
A partnership
Allowing a foreign A business
between two or The
foreign entity to company to arrangement A company
more consolid
Selling goods operate a manufacture where two or owned and
companies to of compa
produced in business using and sell your more parties operated in a
Definition achieve through v
one country to your brand, products using agree to pool foreign country
strategic types of
another. processes, and your resources for a by the parent
objectives financial
business technology, specific company.
without forming transacti
model. brand, or project.
a new entity.
process.
Licensor has
The exporting Control is
Franchisor has limited control
company has shared Control is
significant over how the The acqu
limited control between the shared, but
control over licensee Full control by company
over the partners, typically more
Control operations, operates but the parent full contr
distribution and requiring autonomy than
brand, and can enforce company. post-me
marketing in coordination in joint
quality quality and acquisitio
the foreign and ventures.
standards. usage
market. compromise.
standards.
Moderate risk;
Moderate risk; High risk due to Moderate to
dependent on
Relatively low; dependent on shared high risk, High risk due to
the licensee’s High risk
main risks are the decision- depending on large
ability to failure ca
Risk related to franchisee's making and the degree of investment and
adhere to to signifi
exchange rates performance potential integration and market
agreements financial
and tariffs. and adherence conflicts of coordination exposure.
and market
to guidelines. interest. required.
conditions.
Moderate; Slow; du
Moderate; Moderate to Slow; involves
setting up Moderate to diligence
Fast, especially dependent on slow; setting up full
franchises can slow; aligning negotiati
Speed of for well- finding suitable establishing operations,
take time due strategies and and integ
Market Entry established licensees and agreements which can be
to training and operations take
exporters. setting up and operations time-
local requires time. consider
agreements. takes time. consuming.
adaptation. time.
Market Limited; often Requires Requires High; success High; requires Very high; Very high
Knowledge relies on local understanding understanding depends on knowledge of requires in- requires
Requirement partners for of the franchise of the licensing mutual both markets depth market extensive
market market and market and understanding and strategic knowledge and market a
knowledge. local alignment. company
High;
Moderate; Low;
agreements Low; me
High; can Moderate; flexibility is High; alliances subsidiaries are
can be flexible, and
easily scale up flexibility is limited by the can be a long-term
but are acquisitio
Flexibility or down based limited by need for adjusted or commitment
dependent on often diff
on market franchise consensus terminated as with high
licensor- and cost
conditions. agreements. between needed. operational
licensee reverse.
partners. costs.
relationship.
High; requires
Moderate; Moderate; Very high
detailed legal Moderate;
involves involves High; involves involves
Low; primarily agreements, requires legal
franchise licensing navigating complex
concerned with clear agreements to
Legal agreements, agreements, foreign laws, negotiati
export governance define the
Complexity local laws, and intellectual taxation, and regulator
regulations and structures, and terms and
adherence to property laws, regulatory approval
tariffs. conflict scope of the
brand and compliance. integratio
resolution alliance.
standards. compliance. challeng
mechanisms.
Moderate;
High; Very high;
licensing High; cultural Very high
franchising High; requires subsidiaries
Moderate; agreements differences can mergers
requires understanding must navigate
cultural need to create involve
Cultural adaptation to of both local cultural
differences can consider challenges in significa
Sensitivity local cultural partners' norms, labor
impact export cultural decision- cultural
norms and cultures and practices, and
success. differences in making and integratio
consumer markets. consumer
production and operations. challeng
preferences. behavior.
marketing.
Tata Motors’ acquisition of Jaguar Land Rover is a notable example. Tata Motors purchased these luxury car brands
to expand its global presence and leverage the established market position and expertise of the acquired brands.
Disney's acquisition of Pixar exemplifies how acquiring a well-established company can enhance content creation
capabilities and innovation in the entertainment industry.
This text format provides a comprehensive overview of mergers and acquisitions, covering various aspects relevant to
the topic.
Case Study: Venezuela - The political instability in Venezuela has led to significant challenges for international
businesses, including the risk of nationalization and currency controls, which have affected companies like General
Motors, which had its assets seized by the Venezuelan government.
Case Study: US-China Trade War - The imposition of tariffs by the U.S. on Chinese goods and the subsequent
retaliation by China has affected various industries, including technology and agriculture, leading to increased costs
and supply chain disruptions.
Case Study: Apple Inc. in the European Union - Apple's legal challenges in the EU, particularly regarding antitrust
laws and tax regulations, highlight the importance of understanding and adapting to different legal environments in
international markets.
Case Study: Nestlé in Nigeria - Nestlé has faced political risks in Nigeria, including threats from militant groups and
changing government policies, which have affected its operations and market strategies.
Case Study: Coca-Cola in Russia - Coca-Cola's operations in Russia have been influenced by the U.S.-Russia
relations, particularly during periods of sanctions and political tensions, affecting its market presence and
profitability.
Case Study: Siemens Bribery Scandal - Siemens faced a major scandal involving bribery in multiple countries,
leading to significant fines and legal challenges, underscoring the importance of adhering to anti-corruption laws in
international business.
Case Study: Argentina’s Economic Crisis - The economic instability in Argentina, characterized by hyperinflation
and currency devaluation, has posed significant challenges for companies like Procter & Gamble, which had to
adjust pricing strategies and operations to cope with the economic turmoil.
Case Study: Amazon in India - Amazon's entry into the Indian market was driven by the country's large population
and growing middle class, which offered significant growth potential. However, the company had to adapt its
business model to suit local preferences and regulations.
Case Study: Toyota’s Operations in the US - Toyota’s profitability in the U.S. has been affected by fluctuations in
the yen-dollar exchange rate, leading the company to adopt currency hedging strategies to mitigate the impact on
its earnings.
Case Study: Starbucks in Brazil - Brazil's high inflation rates have impacted Starbucks’ pricing strategies, leading
to increased prices for consumers and affecting sales volumes.
Case Study: Unilever in Indonesia - Unilever’s success in Indonesia is attributed to its understanding of the local
consumer behavior, particularly the preference for affordable products due to income distribution patterns.
Case Study: Nike’s Manufacturing in Vietnam - Nike's choice of Vietnam as a manufacturing hub was influenced
by the availability of cheap labor and favorable labor market conditions, allowing the company to maintain
competitive pricing.
Case Study: KFC in China - KFC’s success in China is partly due to its efforts to localize marketing and
communication, including translating its brand name and adapting its advertising to resonate with Chinese
consumers.
Case Study: L'Oréal in Brazil - L'Oréal’s success in Brazil is attributed to its understanding of the country's social
structure, particularly targeting the growing middle class with affordable luxury products.
Case Study: Nestlé in the Middle East - Nestlé’s operations in the Middle East involve strict adherence to halal
standards, ensuring that its products meet the religious requirements of Muslim consumers.
Case Study: PepsiCo in Africa - PepsiCo’s expansion in Africa is driven by the continent's young and growing
population, offering significant opportunities for long-term growth.
Case Study: Apple in Japan - Apple’s success in Japan is partly due to its understanding of local consumer
preferences, including the emphasis on quality and design, which align with Japanese values.
Case Study: Amazon in India - Amazon’s expansion in India was supported by the country's growing internet
penetration and mobile usage, enabling the company to reach a large and diverse customer base through its e-
commerce platform.
Case Study: Samsung in South Korea - Samsung’s investment in R&D and innovation has enabled it to dominate
the global electronics market, with South Korea serving as a hub for cutting-edge technology development.
Overview: Intellectual property (IP) protection is vital for safeguarding innovations and competitive advantages.
Companies must assess the strength of IP laws and enforcement in foreign markets to protect their assets.
Case Study: Microsoft in China - Microsoft’s struggles with software piracy in China highlight the challenges of
protecting intellectual property in markets with weak IP enforcement, leading the company to adopt new strategies,
including cloud-based services.
Case Study: Tesla in the United States - Tesla’s success in the U.S. is driven by its early adoption of electric
vehicle technology and its focus on innovation, positioning the company as a leader in the growing electric vehicle
market.
Case Study: Alibaba in Global Markets - Alibaba’s success as a global e-commerce giant is attributed to its
innovative use of digital platforms and technology, enabling it to connect buyers and sellers across borders.
Case Study: Facebook’s Data Privacy Issues - Facebook’s data privacy challenges, particularly in the wake of the
Cambridge Analytica scandal, underscore the importance of cybersecurity and data protection in maintaining
consumer trust and complying with international regulations.
Case Study: IKEA’s Sustainability Initiatives - IKEA’s commitment to sustainability, including using renewable
energy and sourcing sustainable materials, has helped the company maintain a positive brand image and comply
with environmental regulations in various markets.
Case Study: TOMS Shoes - TOMS Shoes’ one-for-one giving model, where the company donates a pair of shoes
for every pair sold, has resonated with consumers globally and strengthened the brand's reputation for social
responsibility.
Case Study: Google's GDPR Compliance in the European Union - Google faced significant challenges in
complying with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union, which imposes strict rules on
data privacy and security. The company had to overhaul its data management practices and policies to avoid heavy
fines and legal action.
Case Study: Apple vs. Samsung Patent Dispute - The legal battle between Apple and Samsung over smartphone
patents is a prominent example of the importance of IPR in international business. The dispute, which spanned
several countries, involved claims of patent infringement and led to significant financial and strategic implications
for both companies.
Case Study: BP and TNK-BP Joint Venture in Russia - The joint venture between BP and the Russian consortium
TNK highlighted the complexities of contract law in international business. Disputes over management control and
profit distribution led to legal battles and ultimately the dissolution of the joint venture.
Case Study: Walmart in Germany - Walmart faced significant challenges in Germany due to differences in
employment law, particularly regarding labor unions and employee rights. The company’s failure to adapt to the
local labor environment contributed to its eventual exit from the German market.
Case Study: Siemens Bribery Scandal - Siemens was involved in one of the largest bribery scandals in corporate
history, with allegations of bribing officials in multiple countries to win contracts. The company faced significant
legal and financial penalties, highlighting the importance of adhering to anti-corruption laws in international
business.
Case Study: ExxonMobil vs. Venezuela Arbitration Case - ExxonMobil sought arbitration against Venezuela after
the government expropriated its assets during the nationalization of the oil industry. The arbitration process,
conducted under the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), resulted in a significant
compensation award for ExxonMobil, demonstrating the importance of dispute resolution mechanisms in protecting
international investments.
Conclusion
International business analysis is a multifaceted process that requires a thorough understanding of various political,
economic, social-cultural, technological, environmental, and ethical factors. Companies must carefully evaluate these
criteria to identify opportunities, mitigate risks, and develop strategies for successful international expansion. By
considering real-life case studies, businesses can learn valuable lessons and apply best practices to navigate the
complexities of global markets effectively.