Bacterial Ecology and Bacterial Resistance Profile To Antibiotics in The Department of Medicine and Urology of The Bss University
Bacterial Ecology and Bacterial Resistance Profile To Antibiotics in The Department of Medicine and Urology of The Bss University
Bacterial Ecology and Bacterial Resistance Profile To Antibiotics in The Department of Medicine and Urology of The Bss University
2
Traumatology Department CHU "Professor Bocar Sidy Sall"
of Kati.
3
Department of Urology, CHU "CHU Professor Bocar Sidy
Sall" of Kati. *
Correspondence:
Professor. Daouda Kassoum MINTA, Department of Infectious
4
Primum NOCERE Clinic. Diseases, Point G University Hospital, Bamako, Mali, Tel: +223
66844762 /+223 75090209, E-mail: minta_daouda@yahoo.fr.
Department of infectious diseases, CHU du Point G, Bamako,
5
Mali. Received: 07 Jan 2024; Accepted: 15 Feb 2024; Published: 22 Feb 2024
Mali.
7
National Institute of Public Health, Bamako, Mali.
8
National Institute of Public Health, Bacteriology Laboratory.
Citation: Hamsatou C, Youba S, Abdramane T, et al. Bacterial Ecology and Bacterial Resistance Profile to Antibiotics in the Department
of Medicine and Urology of the BSS University Hospital of Kati. Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024; 8(1): 1-7.
ABSTRACT
Background: The emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance is a major public health threat. Worldwide, one of the main causes
remains the unreasonable use of antibiotics.
Objective: To map bacterial infections and the resistances profile of antibacterials at Kati University Hospital.
Methodology: Transversal analytical study with prospective collection over a period of 20 months in the department of general
medicine and urology of the BSS University Hospital of Kati.
Results: 102 patients participated in this study with an average age of 55.5 years. Almost a quarter (72.5%) of participants were men.
Less than half were patients aged 60 years. The biologics examined involved urine (78.4 %), pus (16%), blood (12.7%), stool (2%)
samples. The main germs isolated were: Escherichia coli (52.9%); Klebsiella pneumonia (14.5%); Staphylococcus aureus (9.9%);
Acinetobacter baumannii and Enteroccocus faecium (4.9%). The level of resistance of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae
was high to ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; cotrimoxazole; moderately elevated to C3G, and fluoroquinolones with relative
sensitivity to aminoglycosides. Imifpenem, Amikacin, Ertapenème were the most active antibiotics. Staphylococci were resistant
to penicillin, with ciprofloxacin and oxacillin. Thus, Acinetobacter baumannii had a high level of resistance to C3G, Ticarcillin,
Cotrimoxazole and Piperacillin-tazobactam. Enteroccocus faecium had strong resistance to Cotrimoxazole and Ciprofloxacin.
Conclusion: The level of resistance recorded should serve as an alert for the implementation and application of prevention strategies
for BMR. The resistance profile determined will be used to better guide the rational prescription of antibiotic therapy in our hospital.
Keywords profile and write the determinants associated with the emergence
Bacterial ecology, Antibacterial resistance profile, CHU BSS Kati. of antibacterial resistance.
Introduction Methodology
The discovery of antibiotics was considered the most important It is analytical cross-sectional study using a prospective collection
and astonishing of the twentieth century. Their introduction into method over a period of 20 months (January 2019 to August2020)
clinical care practice is one of the interventions that has addressed in the Department of General Medicine and urologsurgery within
not only infectious disease control challenges with millions of lives the University Hospital Center “Professor Bocar Sidy Sall" (CHU-
saved but also a revolutionized practice [1]. However, according BSS) by Kati. Our study site is located about fifteen km from the
to the WHO, a serious and growing threat to global health is capital of the country and approved for the care of patients referred
deteriorating the effectiveness of these therapeutic molecules, due from different levels of the country's health pyramid or from those
to the increase in antibiotic resistance in community care settings who have come for routine consultations by personal decision.
and the environment concomitant with their use [2]. This Bacterial
Resistance to Antibiotics, defined here as the ability of bacteria Study Population Characteristics
to survive in concentrations of antibiotics that usually inhibit/ Adult patients admitted to hospitalization following referral from a
kill others of the same species "Antimicrobial resistance may not health facility of lower technical platform level or equivalent level,
seem as urgent as a pandemic, but it is just as dangerous" [3]. The having been exposed to antibiotic therapy or not; or patients who
European Antibiotic Resistance Surveillance Network (EARSS) have made an individual decision of outpatient consultation prior
reports about 50% of Escherichia coli strains were resistant to hospitalization.
to ampicillin in France, as globally in all AERSS participating
countries [4]. Eligibility
Eligibility for the study concerned exhaustively all patients
It affects 500,000 people with suspected bacterial infections in 22 admitted to hospitalization with clinical signs in favor of an
countries and according to the same source, more than 700,000 infectious syndrome who had benefited from a collection of
deaths worldwide result each year from antimicrobial-resistant pathological products for etiological research purposes and whose
infections based on OMS, more than the number of deaths caused bacterial etiology documented is combined with an antibiogram
by cancer by 2050 [5]. over the entire study period.
In the United States, resistance to ATBs is responsible for more Data collection and analysis
than 23,000 deaths and a direct societal cost of $20 billion, and an Data collection is carried out by pre-trained and field-tested survey
indirect cost of $35 billion. It is noted during 400,000 infections personnel. The data is collected on pre-established individual
responsible per year with at least 25,000 deaths [5,6]. records and entered on Access version 2016. The variables studied
include sociodemographic, clinical, biological bacteriological
In Africa, this phenomenon of resistance is poorly evaluated; data variables. The premium IMB SPSS Statistics 21 software was
show a strong spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria in the various used for the analysis. The proportions were compared by the chi-
countries of West Africa [6]. The lack of national epidemiological square test and Fisher's exact test. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered
data on Bactriean resistance and of national reference on BMR are a statistically significant difference.
a handicap to the implementation of BMR prevention strategies
[1]. Plot work in the context of the LCRMs reports a high Ethical aspects
frequency of multidrug-resistant enterobacteriaceae among others, The protocol of this study was submitted to the administrative
64.3% of E coli and 34.5% of Klebsiella pneumonia [1,5]. Within managers of the CHU " Professor Bocar Sidy Sall" of Kati. After
other hospitals in the country, ours would not be immune to the approval, patients' voluntary, voluntary and informed consent
emergence of antibacterial resistance. It is necessary to take stock was sought prior to inclusion. All patients have an identification
of the issue of the profile of antibacterial resistance, with regard number that will allow them to remain anonymous. The files are
to abusive and unregulated prescription; The absence of a local closed in a safe and kept for a period of 5 years.
repository; the frequency of invasive procedures and the long stay
of patients in a care setting. Results
Socio-demographic characteristics of participants
Our objective was to do bacterial infectious etiological research of During the study period, we collected 840 hospitalizations, 102
cases; determine the frequency of the current bacterial resistance patients meeting our inclusion criteria or 12.14% of patients. Most
Table 2: Profile resistance Escherichia coli to antibacterial. Table 3: Resistance profile of Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Sensitive Resistant Total Sensitive Resistant Total
Antibiotic Antibiotic
n% n% n% n% n% n%
Ampicillin 2 (3,7) 48 (88,9) 50 (92,6) Ampicillin 0 11 (78,6) 11 (78,6)
Amoxi-Ac clavulanic 7 (13) 44 (81,5) 51 (94,5) Amoxi-Ac clavulanic 7 (21,4) 10 (71,4) 13 (92,8)
Ticarcillin 3 (5,6) 39 (72,2) 42 (77,8) Ticarcillin 0 11 (78,6) 11 (78,6)
Piperacillin-Tazobactam 7 (13) 32 (59,3) 39 (72,3) Piperacillin -Tazobactam 3 (21,4) 7 (50) 10 (100)
Cefotaxime 10 (18,5) 39 (72,2) 49 (90,7) Cefotaxime 4 (28,6) 7 (50) 11 (78,6)
Ceftazidime 8 (14,8) 38 (70,4) 46 (85,2) Ceftazidime 3 (21,4) 8 (57,1) 11 (78,6)
Ertapenem 40 (74,1) 5 (9,4) 45 (83,3) Ertapenem 9 (64,3) 1 (7,1) 10 (74,4)
Imipenem 45 (83,3) 2 (3,7) 47 (87) Imipenem 11 (78,4) 2 (14,3) 13 (92,8)
Amikacin 41 (75,9) 9 (16,7) 50 (92,6) Amikacin 12 (85,7) 0 12 (85,7)
Gentamicin 27 (50) 20 (37) 47 (87) Gentamicin 3 (21,4) 8 (57,1) 11 (78,6)
Ciprofloxacin 8 (14,8) 42 (64,6) 50 (92,6) Tobramycin 4 (28,6) 8 (57,1) 12 (85,7)
Ofloxacin 4 (7,4) 40 (74,1) 44 (81,5) Ciprofloxacin 4 (28,6) 10 (74,4) 14 (100)
Ofloxacin 3 (21,4) 9 (64,3) 12 (85,7)
© 2024 Hamsatou CISSE, et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License