Background Born on February 27, 1863 in South Hadley, Massachusetts His father was a minister in the Congressional Church and taught the art of preaching at Oberlin Theological Seminary His mother also taught at Oberlin but later became the president of Mount Holyoke College Mead attended Oberlin at the age of sixteen, graduated in 1883 In 1887 Mead attended graduate school at Harvard University, studied physiological psychology More Background Mead quit graduate school and accepted a teaching position at University of Michigan in 1891 In 1893 Mead was invited to teach at the University of Chicago, this is where he spent the rest of his life Died in 1931 at the age of 68 Intellectual Influences William James: James Principal of Psychology re- examination of the relations between individuals and society. Mead perspective of “habit” was also influenced by James, “Individual acquires a new nature through habit.” Another critical aspect of James’s psychology was his rethinking of the role of consciousness, had an effect of Mead’s Mind, Self, and Society. Charles Darwin and Evolutionism: Darwin’s presentation of evolution helped free him from his religious beliefs. He also influenced Mead in his philosophical and psychological beliefs. More Intellectual Influences German Idealism: “Romantic idealists utilized the self-not-self process in experience, and identified this process with the subject-object process” Mead learned that there is no consciousness that is not conscious of something. American Pragmatism: “Rejected the ideas as absolute truths and regard all ideas as provisional and subject to change in light of future research.” Truth and reality do not simply exist. Pragmatists believe that humans reflect on the meaning of a stimulus before reacting. Concepts and Contributions Pragmatism: The extension of the scientific method to all areas of intellectual inquiry, including psychology, sociology, and philosophy. Provides intellectual justification for social action.
Symbolic Interactionism: Suggests that people cope
with the reality of their circumstances according to their comprehension of the situation. More Concepts and Contributions Mind, self and Society: Mead’s attempt to understand individual social experiences in relation to society. Argued that there can be no self, no consciousness of self, and no communication apart from society. 1) Mind- process, not a thing. Reflects the human capacity to conceive what the organism perceives, define situations, evaluate phenomena, convert gestures into symbols, and exhibit pragmatic and goal-directed behavior. 2) Self-Actors reflect on themselves as objects (able to be object and subjects) It has a development and is not initially there at birth. 3) Society-Cannot exist without minds and selves. The organization of human experience and behavior. Mead suggests that the self is composed of two parts: The “I” and the “Me”: According to Mead, the self is composed of two parts, the “I” and the “Me”, both are a part of an individual’s self concept and the self is the dialogue between the two. “I” is spontaneous, unsocialized, unpredictable, and impulsive aspect of the self. The subject of one’s actions. “Me” develops gradually through interaction and internalization of the community, it monitors the “I”. When an individual fails to conform to the expectations of society, they are under the influence of the “I”. Identifies three stages of development: Development of Self: The development of the self takes place through several stages 1) Imitation stage: As skills are developing, babies learn to play based on observing and imitating (Copying or trying to copy the actions of someone elsetheir parents.) Imitation implies learning (positive and negative rewards) 2) Play stage: at this stage the child has learned to use language and meanings of certain symbols. In this stage they are not only acting out but allowing their imagination to let them BE that person. 3) Game stage: child must now be capable of putting herself in the role of several others at the same time and be able to understand the relationship between those roles. 4) Generalized other: Conception of multiple statuses and roles In short…. Mead believes people take the role of the other by progressing through three stages. In stage I the infant is all "I". The "me" begins to develop through play in stage II and fully develops as the child learns to respond to the generalized other in stage III, taking into account the broader social community. Significant others or persons with whom an individual has intimate and long term contact facilitate this process. This self-awareness makes it possible for people to position themselves within larger social units. More Concepts and Contributions The Act: the response to a stimulus is not automatic because the individual has choices of behaviors in which to react. 1) Impulse: gut reactions or immediate responses to certain stimuli. The “need” to do something. 2) Perception: People use their senses as well as mental images in attempt to satisfy impulses and must choose the one most beneficial to them. 3) Manipulation: Once an impulse has been manifested and the object has been perceived, the individual must take some action with regard to it. 4) Consummation: The individual has followed through on a course of action and can consummate the act by satisfying the impulse. More Concepts and Contributions The Social Act: “A social act may be defined as one in which the stimulus sets free an impulse that then triggers possible reactions from those found in the environment.” Emphasized the importance of the vocal gesture. The individual that sends the vocal gesture can perceive it in a different way then the person receiving the gesture. Mutually understood gestures become significant symbols Common gestures lead to the development of language. More Concepts and Contributions Mental Processes of Intelligence and Consciousness: Intelligence is defined as the mutual adjustment of the acts of an organism. Human intelligence is more advanced then other animals, therefore humans can carry on conversations. Communication allows for reflective intelligence, allows a human to inhibit action temporarily. Language: Language has its origin in gestures. Gestures are important because of their social properties. This affects and coordinates behavior between two or more individuals. People that share the same language possess the ability to take the role of the other and understand the other’s behavior. More Concepts and Contributions Science and Social Progress: Science provides a clear and effective way to test ideas on how to improve future society. For Mead, scientific analysis eliminates bias and dogmatic thinking, making it separate from Christian thought. Mead attached Darwin’s evolutionary principles to social organization and societies. Ethics: “Solving moral problems requires creative intellectual effort and consideration of all values relevant to the given situation.” “The value relation is an objectively existing relationship between subject and object: but it is not equated with cognitive relation. Value-relations and cognitive relations are distinctly different. Social Theory: The approach on macro theory is based on evolutionary models and the relationship between people and their environment. Relevancy Mead’s form of pragmatic social sciences has an enormous potential for development and elaboration. Biggest contribution from a sociological perspective: symbolic interaction theory. Considered one of the “big three” sociological theories. It has been and will continue to be a dominant theory in the field. Theories continue to be influential in contemporary symbolic interactionism, social psychology, and sociology Limitations Development of the self is dependent on interactions with others, implies the less interaction with others then the less the self is developed making it controversial. His intense focus on the social act (individual focus) can limit the view of how society works and a whole. There is noticeably less detail and precision in macro facets of Mead’s theoretical system than in the micro. Theories of Development: Charles Horton Cooley Cooley’s concept of self development has been termed “Loking glass self” concept. According to him, man develops the concepts of self with the help of others. Man does not come to form opinions about himself unless and until he comes into contact with other people and knows their opinions about himself. He forms the concepts of himself on the basis opinions held by others about him. Thus when our associates call us intelligent or average, tall or short, fat or thin we react to their opinion and form the same opinion about ourselves as they have formed. In other words,just as the picture in the mirror gives an image of the physical self. So the perception of others gives an image of the social self. The knowledge about ourselves comes to us from the reaction of other persons. These other comprise our social Loooking –glass through which we form the image of ourselves. Cooley maintains that the self develops in a three stage process he calls the looking glass self • We imagine how our actions appear to others • We imagine how other people judge these actions • We evaluate ourselves based on presumed judgments of others Example : Suppose that whenever you enter a room and approach a small group of people conversing together, the member promptly leave the room with lame excuses. This has taken place several times. Would it not effect your feelings about yourself? Or, if whenever you appear, a group quickly forms around you, how would this attention affect your feelings about your self-feelings? Thus we discover over selves through the reactions of others about us. This self knowledge is first gained from parents and is modified later by the reactions of other individuals. It may also be referred that the reactions of the people about us are not similar or may misjudge their reactions. An ego-boosting remark may be a mere flattery. Thus, the looking- glass self which the individual perceives may differ from the image others have actually formed. There is often a significant variation between the individual perception of how others picture him and the views they actually hold. Theories of Development: Freud The theories of Cooley and Mead presume a basic harmony between the self and society according to Cooley , society and individuals are not separate phenomena but are simply collective and distributive aspects of the same thing. Sigmund freud the father of psychco –analysis does not agree with this concept of self and society are not identical. He has explained the process of socialization in term of his concept of ID. EGO & SUPER EGO which constitute the three system of mind. Theories of Development: Freud Freud suggested that the personality is made up of three parts which are inherently conflicting: id– drives and instincts superego—represents society’s norms and expectations ego—mediates conflict between id and superego The id is the organ of untamed passions and represents instinctive desires. The ego acts with reasons while the super ego acts with ideals and norms. Sigmund Freud believed that the personality develops in infancy as the child is forced to control his or her bodily urges. Freud’s model of the personality is divided into three parts: The original, unsocial zed urges arise out of the id. The norms, values, and feelings taught through socialization belong to the superego, and the ego is one's conception of oneself in relation to others. Freud believed that the ego is formed as a result of conflict between the infant's basic biological urges and society's need for a socialized person. Freud has compared the id with the horse and the ego with the rider. He says “ the function of the ego is that of the rider guiding the horse, Which is the id. But like the rider, the ego sometimes is unable to guide the horse as it wishes and perforce must guide the id in the direction it is determined to go, or in a slightly different direction.”…it is out of this conflict between the ego and the id that psychosis develops”. (1) Cooley’s Theory: Cooley’s concept of self development has been termed “looking-glass self’ concept. According to him, man develops the concept of self with the help of others. Man does not come to form opinions about him unless and until he comes into contact with other people and knows their opinions about him. He forms the concept of himself on the basis of opinions held by others about him. Thus when our associates call us intelligent or average, tall or short, fat or thin we react to their opinion and form the same opinion about ourselves as they have formed. In other words, just as the picture in the mirror gives an image of the physical self, so the perception of others gives an image of the social self. The knowledge about ourselves comes to us from the reaction of other persons. These other comprise our social looking-glass through which we form the image of ourselves. There are three principal elements of the looking-glass concept:
(1) Our perception of how we look to others;
(2) Our perception of their judgment of how we look; and (3) Our feelings about these judgments. Take an example. Suppose that whenever you enter a room and approach a small group of people conversing together, the members promptly leave the room with lame excuses. This has taken place several times. Would it not affect your feelings about yourself? Or, if whenever you appear, a group quickly forms around you, how would this attention affect your self- feelings? Thus, we discover ourselves through the reactions of others about us. This self knowledge is first gained from parents arid is modified later by the reactions of other individuals. It may also be referred that the reactions of the people about us are not similar or we may misjudge their reactions. An ego-boosting remark may be a mere flattery. Thus, the looking-glass self which the individual perceives may differ from the image others have actually formed. There is often a significant variation between the individual’s perception of how others picture him and the views they actually hold. (2) Mead’s Theory: G. H. Mead has given a sociological analysis of the process of socialization. According to him the self develops out of the child’s communicative contact with others. The new-born infant has needs like those for food and clothing that press for satisfaction. The mother satisfies these needs and the child comes to depend upon her and ‘identifies himself with her emotionally. But in course of time the child differentiates himself from his mother and then he has to integrate himself and mother into a new social system, a two-person, two-role system, with the child taking a subordinate role to the superior role of the mother. Then the child repeats the process for his father. He differentiates his father from his mother and then integrates him into the social system. In this way the number of ‘significant others’ increases for the child; and the child internalises the role of these others. He puts himself in the role of the others and then responds to his own words and acts in terms of the meaning they would convey to the other person. In this way the self develops and grows. An essential characteristic of the self is its reflexive character. By this Mead, George H. means that the self can be both subject and object to itself. It can reflect upon itself, or in other words, it can be self- conscious. Man can do so only through assuming the role of other persons and looking at himself through their eyes. He learns to imagine how he appears to others and how do they judge this appearance. Then he reacts himself to this judgment as he imagines it. Thus by adopting towards himself the attitude that others take towards him, he comes to treat himself as an object as well as subject. But acquiring the attitudes of others towards himself is not sufficient for the individual. He explores and finds out others’ attitudes toward him. This is very necessary for him; otherwise he could not predict or control what happens to him. The child learns at an early age that one of the most important ways of controlling his destiny is to influence the feelings of others towards himself. The attitudes can be known only through the mechanism of symbolic communication. He must learn to utilize the symbols by which attitudes are communicated, so that he can conjure up the attitudes of others in his own imagination and in turn communicate his own reaction to others in the light of what he imagines to be their attitudes. Questions What do you mean by socialization ? Explain the process of socialization giving some illustrations. What are the various agencies of socialization? Briefly describe the various theories of socialization. What are the various stages of sociali?zation