Learning by Examples
Learning by Examples
Learning by Examples
Learning by Examples
A Learning Theory is rooted in the work of Ivan Pavlov, the famous scientist who
discovered and documented the principles governing how animals (humans included) learn
in the 1900s. Two basic kinds of learning or conditioning occur, one of which is famously
known as the classical conditioning. Classical conditioning happens when an animal learns
to associate a neutral stimulus (signal) with a stimulus that has intrinsic meaning based on
how closely in time the two stimuli are presented. The classic example of classical
conditioning is a dog's ability to associate the sound of a bell (something that originally has
no meaning to the dog) with the presentation of food (something that has a lot of meaning
to the dog) a few moments later. Dogs are able to learn the association between bell and
food, and will salivate immediately after hearing the bell once this connection has been
made. Years of learning research have led to the creation of a highly precise learning
theory that can be used to understand and predict how and under what circumstances
most any animal will learn, including human beings, and eventually help people figure out
how to change their behaviours.
B Role models are a popular notion for guiding child development, but in recent years very
interesting research has been done on learning by examples in other animals. If the subject
of animal learning is taught very much in terms of classical or operant conditioning, it
places too much emphasis on how we allow animals to learn and not enough on how they
are equipped to learn. To teach a course of mine, I have been dipping profitably into a very
interesting and accessible compilation of papers on social learning in mammals, including
chimps and human children, edited by Heyes and Galef (1996).
C The research reported in one paper started with a school field trip to Israel to a pine
forest where many pine cones were discovered, stripped to the central core. So the
investigation started with no weighty theoretical intent, but was directed at finding out what
was eating the nutritious pine seeds and how they managed to get them out of the cones.
The culprit proved to be the versatile and athletic black rat,(Rattus rattus), and the
technique was to bite each cone scale off at its base, in sequence from base to tip following
the spiral growth pattern of the cone.
D Urban black rats were found to lack the skill and were unable to learn it even if housed
with experienced cone strippers. However, infants of urban mothers cross-fostered by
stripper mothers acquired the skill, whereas infants of stripper mothers fostered by an
urban mother could not. Clearly the skill had to be learned from the mother. Further elegant
experiments showed that naive adults could develop the skill if they were provided with
cones from which the first complete spiral of scales had been removed; rather like our new
photocopier which you can work out how to use once someone has shown you how to
switch it on. In the case of rats, the youngsters take cones away from the mother when she
is still feeding on them, allowing them to acquire the complete stripping skill.
E A good example of adaptive bearing we might conclude, but let’s see the economies.
This was determined by measuring oxygen uptake of a rat stripping a cone in a metabolic
chamber to calculate energetic cost and comparing it with the benefit of the pine seeds
measured by calorimeter. The cost proved to be less than 10% of the energetic value of the
cone. An acceptable profit margin.
F A paper in 1996, Animal Behaviour by Bednekoff and Baida, provides a different view of
G The experiment is to discover not just whether a bird can remember where it hid a seed
but also if it can remember where it saw another bird hide a seed. The design is slightly
comical with a cacher bird wandering about a room with lots of holes in the floor hiding food
in some of the holes, while watched by an observer bird perched in a cage. Two days later,
cachers and observers are tested for their discovery rate against an estimated random
performance. In the role of cacher, not only the Nutcracker but also the less specialised Jay
performed above chance; more surprisingly, however, jay observers were as successful as
jay cachers whereas nutcracker observers did no better than chance. It seems that,
whereas the Nutcracker is highly adapted at remembering where it hid its own seeds, the
social living Mexican Jay is more adept at remembering, and so exploiting, the caches of
others.
Write the correct letter A-G in boxes 1-4 on your answer sheet.
Questions 5-8
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage?
5..................... The field trip to Israel was to investigate how black rats learn to strip pine
cones.
6..................... The pine cones were stripped from bottom to top by black rats.
Questions 9-13
Complete the summary below using words from the box.
While the Nutcracker is more able to cache seeds, the Jay relies 9..................... on
caching food and is thus less specialised in this ability, but more 10...................... To
study their behaviour of caching and finding their caches, an experiment was designed
and carried out to test these two birds for their ability to remember where they hid the
seeds.
In the experiment, the cacher bird hid seeds in the ground while the
other 11...................... As a result, the Nutcracker and the Mexican Jay showed different
performance in the role of 12..................... at finding the seeds - the observing
13..................... didn’t do as well as its counterpart.