IAN DAVE P.

CORTEZA
ENS 211 – TXI (PSAE)

A) Histogram

8
7
7
6
5
4
4
3
2
1
1
0
[765, 802] (802, 839] (839, 876]

B) Dot plot

2.5

2 2 2 2

1.5

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0.5

0
760 780 800 820 840 860 880
C) Stem-and-Leaf Plot D) Boxplot

Stem Leaf 880

76 5
860 860
78 5 5
79 0 0 5 840

80 0 820
825
813.75
81 0 0 5
800 802.5
82 5 797.5
786.25
86 0 780
765
760

740

720

700
1

Data 880
860 860
Mean 802.5 840
Standard Error 7.003786854 820 825
813.75
Median 797.5 800 802.5 797.5
786.25
Mode 785 780
765
Standard 760
Deviation 24.26182935 740
Sample 720
Variance 588.6363636 700
Kurtosis 2.076762918 1
Skewness 1.04267889
Range 95
Minimum 765
Maximum 860
Sum 9630
Count 12
 N Frac Pos 1000
-
900
1 0.083333333 1.382994127
- 800
2 0.166666667 0.967421566 700
3 0.25 -0.67448975 600
- 500
4 0.333333333 0.430727299
400
-
5 0.416666667 0.210428394 300

6 0.5 0 200
7 0.583333333 0.210428394 100
8 0.666666667 0.430727299 0
9 0.75 0.67448975 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
-100
10 0.833333333 0.967421566 Series1 Series2
11 0.916666667 1.382994127

Interpretation:

The data is not normally distributed. The normality of data can be improved by
identifying and removing outliers.

Range Count Groups

[12,13) 2 12.6 12.8
[13, 14) 8 13.1 13.3 13.3 13.6 13.7 13.7 13.8 13.9
[14, 15) 27 14 14 14.1 14.1 14.2 14.2 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.4 14.4 14.4 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.6 14.6 14.6 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9
[15, 16) 23 15.1 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.4 15.4 15.5 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.7 15.8 15.9
[16, 17] 12 16 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.4 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.8 16.9 16.9 17
 Data

Mean 14.95
Standard Error 0.116884438
Median 14.9
Mode 15.2
Standard
Deviation 0.991797344
Sample Variance 0.983661972
-
Kurtosis 0.224568117
Skewness 0.004232063
Range 4.4
Minimum 12.6
Maximum 17
Sum 1076.4
Count 72

A) Mean is 14.95,
B) Median is 14.9,
C) Coefficient of Skewness is 0.004232063, and
D) Coefficient of Peakedness (kurtosis) is -0.224568117

Interpretation:

Skewness value of 0.004232063 suggests that the data is nearly symmetrical since
it is very close to zero. On the other hand, the kurtosis value of -0.224568117
suggests a flatter rather than normal distribution with fewer extreme values since
the value is negative.
 Catalyst Catalyst t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming
1 2 Equal Variances
91.5 89.19
94.18 90.95 Variable 1 Variable 2
92.18 90.46 Mean 92.255 92.7325
95.39 93.21 Variance 5.68831429 8.90099286
91.79 97.19 Observations 8 8
89.07 97.04 Pooled Variance 7.29465357
94.72 91.07 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
89.21 92.75 df 14
t Stat -0.3535909
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.36445681
t Critical one-tail 1.76131014
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.72891362
t Critical two-tail 2.14478669

Interpretation:

Since the p-value of 0.728913619 is greater than the significance level at 0.05, the
null hypothesis is not rejected. Assuming equal variances and a significance level
of 0.05, the mean yields of the two catalysts have no significant difference.
 LWL Speed
Speed vs LWL
22 6.1
30 6.6 45
40
34 6.3
35
48 8.1 30
65 8.9 25
105 13.4 20
130 15.4 15
240 20 10
410 28 5
0
980 42
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

Interpretation:

It is confirmed that the relationship is not linear.

LWL Speed Sq.rt of LWL
22 6.1 4.69041576 Speed vs Sq.rt of LWL
30 6.6 5.477225575 35
34 6.3 5.830951895 30
48 8.1 6.92820323 25
65 8.9 8.062257748 20
105 13.4 10.24695077
15
130 15.4 11.40175425
10
240 20 15.49193338
410 28 20.24845673 5

980 42 31.30495168 0
0 10 20 30 40 50

Interpretation:

It is confirmed that the relationship appears linear and suggests that the speed is
proportional to the square root of the waterline length.

Using the regression model, the maximum predicted speed of a 36 ft. boat is 7.15, with
a 95% confidence interval approximately [6.18, 8.12].