RSC - Li/pccp: As Featured in
RSC - Li/pccp: As Featured in
RSC - Li/pccp: As Featured in
effects. The present work can provide useful guidelines on the computational approach
rsc.li/pccp
Registered charity number: 207890
PCCP
View Article Online
PAPER View Journal | View Issue
ammonia synthesis in the universe. To study the dynamics of this reaction, a global accurate potential
energy surface (PES) of the ground state NH+
2 was constructed by combining numerous high-level ab initio
energy points with the permutation invariant polynomial neural network method. Utilizing this newly
constructed PES, time-dependent wave packet calculations were performed on the state-to-state reactions
of N+(3P0) + H2 (v = 0, j = 0) and N+(3P0) + D2 (v = 0, j = 0) in order to study the microscopic reaction
Received 17th May 2019, mechanisms and dynamical isotope effects. Isotope effects have a significant influence on the rovibrational
Accepted 6th August 2019 state distributions and state resolved angle distributions of the product. The total differential cross sections
DOI: 10.1039/c9cp02798j (DCSs) present in the aforementioned reactions are dominated by both forward and backward scattering, as
expected from the observable deep well along the reaction path. Meanwhile, the rovibrational state-resolved
rsc.li/pccp DCSs show that both reactions are not entirely statistical at the state-to-state level.
1 Introduction energies, and only a limited number of states are included due to
its slight endothermicity. Thus, various statistical methods11,12,16,17
The nitrogen atom and nitrogenous molecules are important have been employed to treat the reactions of N+(3P) with H2 and
tracers when studying interstellar objects; nitrogen hydrides or its isotopic variants. Gerlich16 applied dynamically biased
their ions are also of significance in astrophysics due to their statistical theory to obtain the state-specific ICSs for the title
abundance in the universe. One of the simplest nitrogen reaction. The calculated results were very comparable with
chemical reactions of N+(3P) + H2(X1S+g) - NH+(X2P) + H(2S) known experiments; however, large discrepancies occurred
has been suggested as the first step in the synthesis of ammonia upon replacing H2 molecule with D2 molecule. Recently,
within dense interstellar clouds.1,2 In addition, as a prototype for Grozdanov et al.11 formulated a new statistical model to calculate
understanding ion–molecule reaction dynamics, it has highly the ICSs of reactions involving N+ with H2, D2 and HD molecules.
interesting characteristics for study because of its near thermo- The fine structure states of N+ ion were treated equally to other
neutrality. Especially, the dynamical behaviors are substantially internal motions, and the calculated results for the three reac-
different when the hydrogen undergoes isotopic substitution; tions could reproduce the experimental ICSs. In later work,12 the
numerous studies3–12 have focused on these isotope effects, authors concluded that the dynamics results were strongly
which have been consecutively explored over the past 30 years. dependent on the fine structure state of N+ ion and the initial
A variety of experimental results for the title reaction and its rotation state of the reactant H2 or HD.
isotopic counterparts, such as velocity-angle distributions13,14 However, theoretical treatment of statistical models is
and integral cross sections (ICSs),4,9 have been reported limited due to the addition of certain assumptions. A better
and provide abundant reference data for theoretical studies. method for accurately describing the characteristics of the title
Additionally, according to reported ab initio calculations,15 the reaction is based on the precise potential energy surface (PES)
title reaction processes a deep potential well (B6.5 eV) path, that covers the entire reactant and product regions. The first
resulting in the formation of long-lived complex NH+2 at low ground state PES of NH+2 was constructed by Gittins and Hirst.18
The energy points were calculated via the configuration inter-
action (CI) method, and a deep 3B1 well at C2v symmetry was
a
Key Laboratory of Materials Modification by Laser, Electron, and Ion Beams
represented in the PES. However, a crucial issue was that their
(Ministry of Education), School of Physics, Dalian University of Technology,
Dalian 116024, P. R. China. E-mail: mdchen@dlut.edu.cn
calculations of the product generated the wrong electronic state
b
State Key Laboratory of Molecular Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of of NH+(a4S), which is actually the first excited state of NH+
Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Dalian 116023, P. R. China molecule.19 Gonzalez et al.20 presented an ion-induced single
This journal is © the Owner Societies 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 22203--22214 | 22203
View Article Online
Paper PCCP
surface model for the title reaction and discovered that the 3A2 results. Furthermore, quantum dynamics simulations of the
well plays a predominant role in the energy range of 1 to 4 eV. The N+(3P) + D2 reaction have not been presented to date, and it is
most recent PES for the NH+2 system was reported by Wilhelmsson desirable to perform these simulations to study the influence of
et al.21 in 1992. In their work, a total of 752 configurations isotope effects on the title reaction. Herein, a new accurate
calculated by the complete active space self-consistent (CASSCF) ground state PES of the NH+2 system is constructed using a large
and multi-reference configuration interaction (MRCI) methods number of high level ab initio energy points and a neural
were used to fit the analytical form, and the average least-squares network (NN) model. Based on our new PES, rigorous quantum
deviation was 0.026 eV. Based on these PESs, dynamics simula- TDWP calculations for the N+(3P0) + H2 (v = 0, j = 0) - NH+ + H
tions of the N+ and H2 reaction and its isotopic variants using and N+(3P0) + D2 (v = 0, j = 0) - ND+ + D reactions are
Published on 07 August 2019. Downloaded by Universidad de Salamanca on 2/12/2020 6:48:29 PM.
classical trajectory calculations22 or the quasiclassical trajectory implemented to study the reaction mechanism and the influ-
(QCT) method6,7,20,23 have been extensively implemented. ence of isotope effects on the dynamics results.
Although the QCT method or statistical models can describe
the mechanism of the reactions of N+(3P) with H2 and its
isotopic variants to some extent, the significant quantum 2 Potential energy surface
effects are not included. The structure of the deep well and 2.1 Ab initio calculations
its nearly thermoneutral character imply that the quantum The electronic energies of the ground state (13A00 ) NH+2 within Cs
scattering resonances and the zero point energy (ZPE) effect symmetry were calculated by the internally contracted MRCI
are highly crucial to the reaction dynamics. Performing quantum method31,32 with the Davidson correction (icMRCI + Q), as
wave packet calculations on the title reaction is extremely implemented in the MOLPRO package.33 First, the Hartree–
expensive due to the numerous quasi-bound states supposed Fock wave functions were calculated as an initial guess,
by the deep well, which require a large number of grids and a followed by CASSCF34,35 calculations for the seven equally
long propagation time in order to achieve evolution of the wave weighted states (13A00 , 23A00 , 33A00 , 13A 0 , 11A 0 , 21A 0 , 11A00 ). The
packet. It is well known that the only quantum dynamics results icMRCI + Q calculations were carried out based on the opti-
for the N+(3P) + H2 reaction were calculated using the time- mized wave functions of the CASSCF process. In the CASSCF
dependent wave packet (TDWP) method proposed by Russell and icMRCI + Q calculations, six valence electrons are included
and Manolopoulos.24 They performed TDWP calculations for in seven active orbitals (6a 0 + 1a00 ). The augmented correlation-
the reactions of N+(3P) + H2 (v = 0 and 1, j = 0 and 1) on the consistent polarization valence quadruple-zeta (AVQZ) basis
Wilhelmsson PES. The ICS results of the ground vibrational set36 and the Dunning-weighted correlation consistent polarized
reactions showed different behaviors compared with QCT calcu- core-valence triple-zeta (WCVTZ)37 basis set were used for H and
lations due to the inability of the traditional QCT method to treat N atoms, respectively, which ensured accuracy of the calcula-
the vibrational ZPE effect of the product molecule. In the QCT tions and convergence of key energy points by testing numerous
calculations, only the ZPE of the reactant H2 molecule was geometries. A large number of ab initio energies over a great
corrected; thus, the title reaction became exothermic. range of configuration spaces were chosen in the Jacobi coordi-
According to previous studies, traditional QCT calculations nates, where the N+–H2 region was defined by 0.9 r rHH/a0 r 25,
are unable to correctly describe the dynamical behaviors of the 0.8 r RN+–HH/a0 r 25, and 0 r y/degree r 90 and the H–NH+
title reaction. The ZPE problem can be solved to some extent region was defined by 0.8 r r+NH/a0 r 28, 0 r RH–NH+/a0 r 25,
using various corrective methods; however, the Gaussian– and 0 r y/degree r 180.
Binning method displays excellent corrective abilities toward
this shortcoming of the QCT method. The Gaussian–Binning 2.2 Fitting the potential energy surface
procedure25,26 has been successfully incorporated into several
Representing global PESs from ab initio energies is challenging
barrierless reactions, such as H+ + H227,28 and C(1D) + H229
but can be achieved by combining electronic structure calcula-
reaction systems, and the calculated results were in good agree-
tions with advanced machine learning technologies. Artificial
ment with the quantum dynamics calculations. Another basic
NNs and Gaussian process regression are the most popular
problem of the QCT method is its poor capability to describe
machine learning methods to fit PESs by a large number of
quantum resonances, which are vital for deep well reactions.
ab initio data; these methods have been widely applied to
Therefore, using only quantum methods can give perfect
numerous molecular systems.38–46 In this work, the NN method
dynamics information for the title reaction. Although quantum
was used to obtain the analytical PES of the NH+2 system. The
dynamics calculations for the title reaction have been reported,
expression of the global surface consists of two-body and three-
the inaccuracy of the results is attributed to the lack of reliable
body terms and is written as follows:
PES. The error of the Wilhelmsson PES is relatively large due to
the limitations of early computational conditions. In addition, Vtotal ðR1 ; R2 ; R3 Þ ¼ VNHþ ðR1 Þ þ VH2 ðR2 Þ þ VNHþ ðR3 Þ
ab initio calculations30 and a recent experimental study10 have (1)
ð3Þ
proved that the endothermicity of the reaction (33 meV) on the þ VNHþ f ðR1 ; R2 ; R3 Þ
2
Wilhelmsson PES is too large. Hence, performing quantum
dynamics calculations for the title reaction on a high-precision where R1, R2 and R3 are the internuclear distances of NH+a, HH
global PES is necessary to improve the accuracy of the dynamics and NH+b, respectively. For the ion–molecule reaction, the
22204 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 22203--22214 This journal is © the Owner Societies 2019
View Article Online
PCCP Paper
PNHþ ¼ exp 0:2RNHþ (4)
b b
G3 = PHH (8)
where Rn represents the bond length of two atoms and Rd and where o and b represent the corresponding weights and bias,
Rw are the central position of f (R1, R2, R3) and the switch which were optimized by training the NN. The linear and
strength constant, respectively. In the process of two-body hyperbolic tangent functions were used as the transfer func-
term fitting, the NN structure included two hidden layers, tions f in the output layer and hidden layers, respectively. To
and 6 neurons were included in each hidden layer. 97 and 92 avoid overfitting, 30 519 energy points were divided randomly
ab initio points were generated to obtain the potential energy into three sets, namely the training set (90 percent), testing set
curves of HH and NH+, and the root mean square errors (5 percent), and validation set (5 percent). The overall RMSE of
(RMSE) are 0.10 and 0.12 meV, respectively. Fig. 1 shows the the PIP-NN PES is only 2.7 meV.
potential energy curves (PECs) of the H2(X1S+g) and NH+(X2P)
2.3 Features of the potential energy surface
molecules, where the fitting of the PECs is in good agreement
with the original ab initio data. The equilibrium bond length Fig. 2 shows the potential energies at four different insertion
and dissociation energy of H2(X1S+g) on the fitted PECs are angles in the reactant Jacobi coordinates, where rHH and RN+–HH
1.402 Bohr and 4.71 eV, respectively, which compare well with are the HH bond length and the distance between N+ and the
the corresponding experimental data47 of Re = 1.401 Bohr center of mass of the H2 molecule, respectively, and y is the
and De = 4.74 eV. In the case of NH+(X2P) molecule, the angle between rHH and RN+–HH. The energies are relative to
equilibrium bond length and dissociation energy are 2.047 Bohr the N+ + H2 dissociation limit, and the maximum energy was set
and 4.64 eV, respectively, showing good agreement with the as 5 eV in order to clearly display the structures of the wells.
experimental results48 of Re = 2.043 Bohr and De = 4.65 0.5 eV. There are two wells at every angle, which correspond to the 3B1
Thus, the fitting results for the two-body potential are sufficiently and 3A2 wells at the C2v structure, respectively. As the insertion
accurate. angle decreases, the deeper well corresponding to the 3B1 state
For the three-body term, permutation invariant polynomials at the C2v structure becomes less accessible and the depth of
(PIP)49,50 were employed to solve the problem of the adaptation the outer 3A2 well slowly decreases. The 3B1 well is located
of permutation symmetry caused by the two identical H atoms. at rHH = 3.76 Bohr at the T-shaped symmetry, indicating the
The geometries after PIP preprocessing were used in the input involvement of a bond stretching process prior to complex NH+2
layer of the NN. First, the bond length between two atoms was formation. Moreover, there is a saddle point between the two
transformed as wells, which can be attributed to prevention of the crossing of
the two lowest electronic states.20 In the case of C2v symmetry,
the complex NH+2 processes form at the deep 3B1 state well
PNHþa ¼ exp 0:2RNHþa (3)
via the 3A2 - 3B1 intersection, and the two lowest states 3A2 and
This journal is © the Owner Societies 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 22203--22214 | 22205
View Article Online
Paper PCCP
Published on 07 August 2019. Downloaded by Universidad de Salamanca on 2/12/2020 6:48:29 PM.
3
B1 return to the adiabatic ground state 3A00 in the Cs geometry. and previous ab initio calculations,15 and the Wilhelmsson PES
In the present work, the ground state PES is constructed in underestimates the depth of the well. However, there is a large
the adiabatic representation, and the conical intersection is deviation between our data and previous ab initio calculations52 for
hampered by the limitation of the Born–Oppenheimer approxi- the minimal energy of the collinear structure. This may be because
mation. Thus, the origin of the repulsive regions is the inter- the electron correlation energy cannot be treated well using the self-
action of the first excited state. consistent field method with rough CI corrections. The new PES can
The geometries and energies of the stationary points obtained on better reproduce the high-level ab initio calculations at the stationary
the new PES and original ab initio calculations are listed in Table 1 points, suggesting enhanced reliability in reaction dynamics studies.
and compared with reported results. The energy values are relative to The contour maps of the new PES at four different N+–H–H
the N+(3P) + H2 dissociation limit. For the C2v geometry, the angles (451, 901, 1351 and 1801) are presented in Fig. 3. RHH
equilibrium structure corresponds with the 3B1 well, which is a represents the bond length of the two H atoms, R+NH is the
highly crucial structure to the title reaction. As shown, the results distance between the N+ and one of the H atoms, and the
calculated on the new PES are in good agreement with the original N+–H–H angle is the included angle between RHH and R+NH.
The energy is set as zero at the N+ + H2 dissociation limit.
Two valleys exist at the bottom and left, corresponding to the
Table 1 Stationary points of the ground state NH+
2 N+(3P) + H2(X1S+g) channel and NH+(X2P) + H(2S) channel,
C2v rHH (Bohr) RN+–HH (Bohr) Energy (eV) respectively. The depth of the two valleys is comparable,
indicating that the title reaction is approximately thermoneutral.
NN PES 3.76 0.48 6.49
Wilhelmsson PES21 3.66 0.64 6.15 The deep well structure connects the two valleys at all four
icMRCI + Q 3.76 0.48 6.50 approaching angles, highlighting the important role of quantum
MRD-CI15 3.67 0.49 6.45 resonances in the reaction dynamics. At the beginning of the
title reaction, the N+ ion and H2 molecule convene in the bottom
CNv RHH (Bohr) R+NH (Bohr) Energy (eV)
valley, generating the long-lived NH+2 complex in the deep well
NN PES 1.68 2.24 2.20 and eventually dissociating to the NH+ molecule and H atom in
Wilhelmsson PES21 1.70 2.27 2.05
icMRCI + Q 1.67 2.24 2.22 the left valley. To more clearly describe the characteristics of
SCF-CI52 1.60 2.50 1.76 the title reaction on the new PES, the minimum energy paths
22206 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 22203--22214 This journal is © the Owner Societies 2019
View Article Online
PCCP Paper
Published on 07 August 2019. Downloaded by Universidad de Salamanca on 2/12/2020 6:48:29 PM.
(MEPs) of the N+(3P) + H2(X1S+g) - NH+(X2P) + H(2S) reaction at has a shorter lifetime when the reaction proceeds at a large
four N+–H–H angles (451, 901, 1351, 1801) are shown in Fig. 4. approaching angle. It can be seen from the minimum energy
The MEPs were determined by scanning the PES, as shown in paths that the title reaction is weekly endothermic, with an
Fig. 3, at different coordinates (RHH–R+NH) to obtain the minimum endothermicity of approximately 83 meV; this is consistent with
values of the potential energy. The depth of the well decreases the ab initio calculations. Table 2 lists the molecular constants
with increasing S–H–H angle, suggesting that the NH+2 complex of the reactants and products, which were obtained from the
analytical PES. When the ZPEs of the reactants and products
are considered, the endothermicities of the N+ + H2 and N+ + D2
reactions are approximately 8 and 23 meV, respectively, which
is in good agreement with the experimental measurements8
of 11 3 and 29 3 meV.
Fig. 5(a) displays the potential energy of N+ ion moving
around the H2 molecule with a fixed bond length of H2
(1.401 Bohr); the energy is set as zero when the N+ ion is far
from the H2 molecule. A 2.67 eV deep well is present at x = 0.0
Bohr and y = 2.3 Bohr. The depth of the well increases as the
HH bond stretches, which can promote insertion collisions at
a
H(2S) reaction at four N+–H–H angles (451, 901, 1351 and 1801). ZPE determined by oe/2 oexe/4.
This journal is © the Owner Societies 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 22203--22214 | 22207
View Article Online
Paper PCCP
Fig. 5 (a) Contour plot of the PES for the N+ ion moving around the H2 (13)
molecule fixed at the equilibrium distance (1.401 Bohr). (b) Contour plot of
the PES for a H atom moving around the NH+ molecule fixed at the where kv0 j0 is the momenta in the entrance channel. The state-
equilibrium distance (2.043 Bohr). resolved differential cross sections (DCSs) can be calculated by
dsvj v0 j0 ðy; EÞ
set as zero when the H atom is far from the NH+ molecule. (14)
It can be seen that a deeper well exists around the N+ ion, J
in which y is the scattering angle and dKK ðyÞ represents the
implying that the H atom can more readily escape from the side 0
of the H in the NH+ molecule in the title reaction. element of the reduced Wigner rotation matrix.
The initial rovibrational states of the reactant H2 molecule
were set as v0 = 0 and j0 = 0, and the TDWP calculations
included all Coriolis couplings. All partial waves were calcu-
3 Dynamics calculations
lated up to J = 75 for the N + H2 reaction and J = 81 for the N + D2
The TDWP method is a powerful tool for calculating atom– reaction, yielding converged ICSs and DCSs for collision
diatom reactive scattering and can give accurate information energies beyond 0.7 eV, which was set as the upper limit of
about the state-to-state reaction dynamics. Only an abbreviated the collision energy in the reaction dynamics. Large grids and
outline is introduced here; more detailed descriptions of the sufficient propagation times were used to ensure that the
method can be found in previous literature reports.53,54 In wave packet could reach the low energy region. The optimal
the body fixed representation, the Hamiltonian is expressed numerical parameters used in the calculations are listed in
as follows: Table 3 by numerous convergence tests.
The collision energy dependence of the total reaction prob-
2 2 2 2 ^ ^2 ^2 abilities for the N+ + H2 and N+ + D2 reactions with four
^ ¼ h @ h @ þ ðJ j Þ þ j þ V^
H (11)
2mR @R 2 2mr @r 2 2mR R2 2mr r2 different partial waves are presented in Fig. 6. An extremely
N+(3P) + H2 N+(3P) + D2
Grid ranges and sizes R (Bohr) A [0.1, 22.0], Ntot
R = 389 R (Bohr) A [0.1, 22.0], Ntot
R = 389
r (Bohr) A [0.4, 16.0], Ntot
r = 299 r (Bohr) A [0.4, 16.0], Ntot
r = 299
Nj = 100 Nj = 100
Initial wave packet Rc = 16.0 Bohr Rc = 16.0 Bohr
DR = 0.20 Bohr DR = 0.18 Bohr
k0 = (2E0mR)1/2 with E0 = 0.50 eV E0 = 0.50 eV
Propagation time 100 000 a.u. 100 000 a.u.
Highest J value 74 81
22208 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 22203--22214 This journal is © the Owner Societies 2019
View Article Online
PCCP Paper
Published on 07 August 2019. Downloaded by Universidad de Salamanca on 2/12/2020 6:48:29 PM.
Fig. 6 Total reaction probabilities for the N+(3P) + H2 and N+(3P) + D2 reactions as a function of collision energy with four different total angular
momentums (J = 0, 20, 40, 60).
dense oscillation feature was found in the reaction probability complexes in the deep well. The domination of long-lived
curves, which can be attributed to the formation of long-lived resonance is similar to the typical insertion reactions of
S(1D) + H257 and C(1D) + H2,58 and the title reaction has a
sharper oscillation peak because of the deeper well. For J = 0,
the threshold of the two reactions is consistent with the
corresponding endothermicity, implying a barrierless path at
low collision energies. With increasing J, the oscillation amplitude
becomes less pronounced due to the increased centrifugal barrier.
In the case of high J values, the threshold of the N+ + H2 reaction is
larger than that of the N+ + D2 reaction due to the heavier reduced
mass of ND+2. Because the increased collision energy diminishes
the constraint of the deep well, the resonance peak becomes
broader at high energy.
The total ICSs for the N+(3P) + H2 and N+(3P) + D2 reactions
obtained from the TDWP calculations on the NN PES together
with the experimental measurements9 using a guided ion bean
mass spectrometer and calculated by statistical theory11 are shown
in Fig. 7. Previous TDWP calculations24 for the N+(3P) + H2 reaction
on the Wilhelmsson PES are also presented. The ICS values for the
N+(3P) + H2 reaction calculated by the TDWP method on the NN
Fig. 7 Total ICSs for the N+(3P) + H2 and N+(3P) + D2 reactions as a
function of collision energy compared with previous TDWP calculations on
PES are larger than those on the Wilhelmsson PES due to the
the Wilhelmsson PES, the results calculated by statistical theory and smaller reaction threshold of the NN PES. As shown, the quantum
available experimental values. resonances remain strong on the TDWP ICS curves even though
This journal is © the Owner Societies 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 22203--22214 | 22209
View Article Online
Paper PCCP
various partial waves have been summed, and the oscillatory In general, the ICS values generated by the TDWP calcula-
structures calculated on the NN PES are narrower than the tions are close to the results calculated by the statistical
previous results due to the deeper well of the NN PES. The TDWP method and the experimental data. However, the collision
results show that the total ICS increases slightly as a function of energy dependence of the ICSs obtained by the TDWP calcula-
collision energy and then nearly reaches a plateau, which is tions is in contrast with the statistical and experimental results,
characteristic of an endothermic reaction. which present a monotonic decreasing dependence of collision
Published on 07 August 2019. Downloaded by Universidad de Salamanca on 2/12/2020 6:48:29 PM.
Fig. 8 Rovibrational state-resolved ICSs for the (a–d) N+(3P) + H2 and (e–h) N+(3P) + D2 reactions at four collision energies (0.1, 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 eV).
22210 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 22203--22214 This journal is © the Owner Societies 2019
View Article Online
PCCP Paper
This journal is © the Owner Societies 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 22203--22214 | 22211
View Article Online
Paper PCCP
Published on 07 August 2019. Downloaded by Universidad de Salamanca on 2/12/2020 6:48:29 PM.
Fig. 10 Total and vibrational state-resolved DCSs for the N+(3P) + H2 and N+(3P) + D2 reactions at 0.7 eV collision energy.
N+(3P) + H2 and N+(3P) + D2 reactions at collision energies below energy, and the corresponding vibrational state is v 0 = 0. It is
0.7 eV are given in Fig. 9. The angular distributions of NH+ and clear that the asymmetry of the forward–backward scattering is
ND+ molecules are nearly forward-backward symmetric in the more apparent. For example, at the rotational state j 0 = 10, the
whole selected collision energy range. The peaks appear at forward peak of the N+(3P) + H2 reaction is three times higher
two extreme angles, which is attributed to the long-lived than the backward peak. In the case of the N+(3P) + D2 reaction,
complex-forming mechanism. The collision energy dependence the peak at 01 disappears in the j 0 = 0 state, and the forward bias
of the DCSs shows sharp, dense oscillatory structures at each becomes dominant when the product is excited to high rota-
scattering angle; this stems from the long-lived quasi-bound tional states. This asymmetric behavior is also found in some
states supported by the deep well, which lead to densely long-lived complex-forming reactions, such as the H+ + D2,27
distributed quantum resonances. S(1D) + H259 and H + O260 reactions. The basic reason for the
Fig. 10 displays the total and vibrational state-resolved DCSs asymmetric angle distributions may be the strong scattering
of the two reactions at 0.7 eV collision energy. The total DCSs resonances even after summation over all the partial waves.
show that the forward and backward peaks are almost equal, Therefore, the quenching effect of the quantum interferences
and the angle distributions are symmetric with respect to 901. between various partial waves is less efficient than intuitively
However, the symmetries of the DCSs are broken at the vibra- expected at the state-resolved level. A comparison study59 of
tional state-resolved levels of the product molecules for the quantum and statistical methods for several typical complex-
two reactions. The forward scattering becomes more obvious forming reactions has proved that statistical theories are unable
when the product is excited to higher vibrational states, to accurately study product state-resolved reaction dynamics,
which suggests that both reactions demonstrate nonstatistical and the N+(3P) + H2 and N+(3P) + D2 reactions have similar
behavior at the vibrational state-resolved levels of the product nonstatistical behaviors. In addition, the DCSs of the two reac-
molecules despite their complex-forming natures. Fig. 11 shows tions have dramatic differences at specific rotation states; thus,
several rational states ( j 0 = 0, 5, 10, 15) of the resolved DCSs for the isotope effects have a significant impact on the state-resolved
the N+(3P) + H2 and N+(3P) + D2 reactions at 0.7 eV collision angle distributions of the product molecules.
22212 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 22203--22214 This journal is © the Owner Societies 2019
View Article Online
PCCP Paper
Published on 07 August 2019. Downloaded by Universidad de Salamanca on 2/12/2020 6:48:29 PM.
Fig. 11 Several rotational state-resolved ( j 0 = 0, 5, 10 and 15) DCSs for the N+(3P) + H2 and N+(3P) + D2 reactions at v 0 = 0 and a collision energy of 0.7 eV.
This journal is © the Owner Societies 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 22203--22214 | 22213
View Article Online
Paper PCCP
3 N. G. Adams and D. Smith, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1985, 117, 67–70. 32 P. J. Knowles and H. J. Werner, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1988, 145,
4 K. M. Ervin and P. B. Armentrout, J. Chem. Phys., 1987, 86, 514–522.
2659–2673. 33 H. J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, G. Knizia, F. R. Manby and
5 J. B. Marquette, C. Rebrion and B. R. Rowe, J. Chem. Phys., M. Schutz, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci., 2012, 2,
1988, 89, 2041–2047. 242–253.
6 M. Gonzalez, A. Aguilar and R. Sayos, Chem. Phys., 1989, 34 H. J. Werner and P. J. Knowles, J. Chem. Phys., 1985, 82,
132, 137–151. 5053–5063.
7 G. Nyman and U. Wilhelmsson, J. Chem. Phys., 1992, 96, 35 P. J. Knowles and H. J. Werner, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1985, 115,
5198–5212. 259–267.
Published on 07 August 2019. Downloaded by Universidad de Salamanca on 2/12/2020 6:48:29 PM.
8 P. Tosi, O. Dmitriev, D. Bassi, O. Wick and D. Gerlich, 36 R. A. Kendall, T. H. Dunning and R. J. Harrison, J. Chem.
J. Chem. Phys., 1994, 100, 4300–4307. Phys., 1992, 96, 6796–6806.
9 L. S. Sunderlin and P. B. Armentrout, J. Chem. Phys., 1994, 37 D. E. Woon and T. H. Dunning, J. Chem. Phys., 1995, 103,
100, 5639–5645. 4572–4585.
10 I. Zymak, M. Hejduk, D. Mulin, R. Plasil, J. Glosik and 38 J. C. Yuan, D. He and M. D. Chen, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
D. Gerlich, Astrophys. J., 2013, 768, 86. 2015, 17, 11732–11739.
11 T. P. Grozdanov and R. McCarroll, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2015, 39 J. C. Yuan, D. He, S. F. Wang, M. D. Chen and K. L. Han,
119, 5988–5994. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20, 6638–6647.
12 T. P. Grozdanov, R. McCarroll and E. Roueff, Astron. Astro- 40 Z. J. Yang, J. C. Yuan, S. F. Wang and M. D. Chen, RSC Adv.,
phys., 2016, 589, 735–745. 2018, 8, 22823–22834.
13 S. G. Hansen, J. M. Farrar and B. H. Mahan, J. Chem. Phys., 41 J. Cui and R. V. Krems, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2015, 115, 073202.
1980, 73, 3750–3762. 42 J. Cui and R. V. Krems, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys., 2016,
14 B. H. Mahan and W. E. W. Ruska, J. Chem. Phys., 1976, 65, 49, 224001.
5044–5051. 43 B. Kolb, P. Marshall, B. Zhao, B. Jiang and H. Guo, J. Phys.
15 S. D. Peyerimhoff and R. J. Buenker, Chem. Phys., 1979, 42, Chem. A, 2017, 121, 2552–2557.
167–176. 44 Y. F. Guan, S. Yang and D. H. Zhang, Mol. Phys., 2018, 116,
16 D. Gerlich, J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 90, 3574–3581. 823–834.
17 G. Nyman, J. Chem. Phys., 1992, 96, 3603–3612. 45 B. Jiang, J. Li and H. Guo, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem., 2016, 35,
18 M. A. Gittins and D. M. Hirst, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1975, 35, 479–506.
534–536. 46 S. F. Wang, J. C. Yuan, H. X. Li and M. D. Chen, Phys. Chem.
19 H. P. D. Liu and G. Verhaegen, J. Chem. Phys., 1970, 53, Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 19873–19880.
735–745. 47 K. P. Huber and G. Herzberf, Constants of Diatomic Molecules,
20 M. Gonzalez, A. Aguilar and Y. Fernandez, Chem. Phys., Springer, 1979.
1986, 104, 57–66. 48 R. Colin and A. E. Douglas, Can. J. Phys., 1968, 46, 61.
21 U. Wilhelmsson, P. E. M. Siegbahn and R. Schinke, J. Chem. 49 B. J. Braams and J. M. Bowman, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem., 2009,
Phys., 1992, 96, 8202–8211. 28, 577–606.
22 M. A. Gittins and D. M. Hirst, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1979, 65, 50 B. Jiang and H. Guo, J. Chem. Phys., 2013, 139, 054112.
507–510. 51 M. T. Hagan and M. B. Menhaj, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw.
23 U. Wilhelmsson and G. Nyman, J. Chem. Phys., 1992, 96, Learn. Syst., 1994, 5, 989–993.
1886–1895. 52 D. M. Hirst, Mol. Phys., 1978, 35, 1559–1568.
24 C. L. Russell and D. E. Manolopoulos, J. Chem. Phys., 1999, 53 Z. G. Sun, S. Y. Lee, H. Guo and D. H. Zhang, J. Chem. Phys.,
110, 177–187. 2009, 130, 174102.
25 L. Bonnet and J. C. Rayez, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1997, 277, 54 Z. G. Sun, H. Guo and D. H. Zhang, J. Chem. Phys., 2010,
183–190. 132, 084112.
26 L. Bonnet and J. C. Rayez, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2004, 397, 106–109. 55 Z. G. Sun, X. Lin, S. Y. Lee and D. H. Zhang, J. Phys.
27 P. G. Jambrina, F. J. Aoiz, N. Bulut, S. C. Smith, G. G. Chem. A, 2009, 113, 4145–4154.
Balint-Kurti and M. Hankel, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 56 S. Gomez-Carrasco and O. Roncero, J. Chem. Phys., 2006,
2010, 12, 1102–1115. 125, 054102.
28 P. G. Jambrina, J. M. Alvarino, F. J. Aoiz, V. J. Herrero and V. Saez- 57 J. C. Yuan, D. He and M. D. Chen, Sci. Rep., 2015, 5, 14594.
Rabanos, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 12591–12603. 58 Z. P. Sun, C. F. Zhang, S. Y. Lin, Y. J. Zheng, Q. T. Meng and
29 L. Banares, F. J. Aoiz, P. Honvault, B. Bussery-Honvault and W. S. Bian, J. Chem. Phys., 2013, 139, 014306.
J. M. Launay, J. Chem. Phys., 2003, 118, 565–568. 59 P. Larregaray and L. Bonnet, J. Chem. Phys., 2015,
30 R. Tarroni, P. Palmieri, A. Mitrushenkov, P. Tosi and 143, 144113.
D. Bassi, J. Chem. Phys., 1997, 106, 10265–10272. 60 Z. G. Sun, D. H. Zhang, C. X. Xu, S. L. Zhou, D. Q. Xie,
31 H. J. Werner and P. J. Knowles, J. Chem. Phys., 1988, 89, G. Lendvay, S. Y. Lee, Y. Lin and H. Guo, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
5803–5814. 2008, 130, 14962.
22214 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 22203--22214 This journal is © the Owner Societies 2019