Digital Financial Inclusion: Peterson Kitakogelu Ozili
Digital Financial Inclusion: Peterson Kitakogelu Ozili
Digital Financial Inclusion: Peterson Kitakogelu Ozili
Abstract
Purpose: This chapter revisits digital financial inclusion as an internation-
al development agenda and discusses everything you need to know about
digital financial inclusion.
Methodology: This chapter uses conceptual discourse methodology to
explain digital financial inclusion.
Findings: This chapter identifies the definitions of digital financial inclusion, the
goal of digital financial inclusion, the components of digital financial inclusion,
the types of providers of digital financial services, the instruments for digital
financial inclusion, the benefits of digital financial inclusion, the risks of digital
financial inclusion, and the regulatory issues associated with digital financial in-
clusion. It also proposes suggestions on how to make digital financial inclusion
work for the good of all. This chapter concludes by offering some implications
for policymaking and practice in the digital finance ecosystem.
1. Introduction
The purpose of this chapter is to discuss digital financial inclusion. This chapter
presents everything that needs to be known about digital financial inclusion.
Over the years, the number of digital applications that offer financial services
have increased and continue to grow. Many of the digital applications used to offer
financial services are developed by technology companies or financial technology
companies, for themselves or for banks who need digital finance applications to
serve their customers better and for digital financial inclusion purposes. Another
recent development is the increase in the number of research studies into digital
financial inclusion. In the year 2021 alone, a lot of studies have examined digi-
tal financial inclusion in relation to economic growth (Ahmad, Majeed, Khan,
Sohaib, & Shehzad, 2021), entrepreneurship (Baker, 2021), urban–rural income
gap (Ji, Wang, Xu, & Li, 2021), poverty reduction (Wang & Fu, 2021), investment
diversification (Lu, Guo, & Zhou, 2021), complex systems (Dai, 2021), research
and development (Sun, Xu, Tang, & Zu, 2021), etc.
Despite the increasing number of studies on digital financial inclusion, digital
financial inclusion – in terms of its meaning, goal, components, instruments, and
regulatory issues – is not generally understood. There is a diversity of views on what
digital financial inclusion is among scholars and researchers in policy and academic
circles. Also, those who do not know the meaning of digital financial inclusion form
their own abstract meanings of digital financial inclusion. Others regard digital
financial inclusion as nothing but a means of digital surveillance by the State. Still,
many others continue to enrol into the digital financial system because their peers
are also in the digital financial system – they have no clue about what they will find
in the digital financial system when they join whether good or bad.
What does this apparent lack of understanding mean for digital financial inclu-
sion and for its future? Is there anything new or special about digital financial
inclusion? Can digital financial inclusion improve the well-being of the poor? And
where is digital financial inclusion going in the future? Is digital financial inclusion
merely a fad that will disappear as other schemes have done in the past? Or, does
digital financial inclusion have a bright future? Is digital financial inclusion a topic
worth investing one’s research career into? Many questions like these have been
raised. This chapter provides answers to some of these questions by highlighting
the meaning of digital financial inclusion, the goal of digital financial inclusion,
the components of digital financial inclusion, the instruments for digital financial
inclusion, and the regulatory issues associated with digital financial inclusion.
The remainder of this chapter is structured as follows: Section 1 presents the
definition of digital financial inclusion. Section 2 presents the definition and goal
of digital financial inclusion. Section 3 presents the components of digital finan-
cial inclusion. Section 4 presents the providers of, and instruments for, digital
financial inclusion. Section 5 presents the important digital financial inclusion
research. Section 6 presents the benefits of digital financial inclusion. Section
7 presents the risks and regulatory issues of digital financial inclusion. Section
8 presents a discussion on how to achieve digital financial inclusion. Section 9
presents the limitations of digital technology in promoting financial inclusion.
Section 10 presents the conclusion.
place. It is responsible for storing and organising data and ensuring everything
on the front-end interface works well for users. The back-end server commu-
nicates with the front-end. It sends and receives information to be displayed
on the front-end user interface. When customers fill in their login details or
want to make a digital transfer, the front-end application sends a request to the
back-end server, which returns information in the form of front-end code that
the front-end application can interpret and display.
⦁⦁ The customers. The customers in a digital financial inclusion programmes are
mainly individuals, corporations, and governments. The individuals include
young adults, older adults, households, poor individuals, low-income individu-
als, middle-income individuals, and high-income individuals. The corporations
include small business, small- and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs), and large
corporations. Governments include municipal agencies, boroughs, and other
government agencies.
i. e-money accounts
ii. debit cards
iii. credit cards
iv. mobile money
v. internet banking
vi. retail POS terminals
vii. agent networks
Digital Financial Inclusion 233
iv. Lower cost of digital transactions for customers and providers of digital
financial services;
v. Permitting financial services that are tailored to meet poor customers’ needs
and their financial circumstances (Ozili, 2020). For instance, permitting
digital transfer of tiny amounts of money (e.g. $1.86 cents) and saving tiny
amounts of money ($3.28 cent), which would not be possible using cash;
vi. Reduced risks of loss, theft, and other financial crimes posed by cash-based
transactions;
vii. Reduced cost associated with transacting in cash and using informal
providers;
viii. A reduction in counterfeit money being circulated to poor individuals and
households;
ix. It promotes economic empowerment by enabling asset ownership and
accumulation;
x. It increases economic participation for women;
xi. It promotes growth and stability for the economy through increase in aggre-
gate spending and increase in tax revenue collections.
i. The rising cost of digital devices (e.g. mobile phone, laptops, etc.) and the ris-
ing cost of internet connectivity in developing and poor countries can make
it difficult for people to remain in the digital financial system for a long time;
ii. Permitting non-financial firms to offer financial services may give rise to new
problems;
iii. New digital financial services will require different regulatory treatment and
could make the regulatory ecosystem become too complex;
iv. Increase in digital transaction costs will affect poor customers who have very
low income;
v. Data privacy and data security issues will arise due to the use of new kinds
of data;
vi. Customers who are not familiar with digital financial services are susceptible
to exploitation and abuse;
vii. There may be agent-related risks arising from rogue agents that offer digital
financial services that are not subject to existing consumer protection laws
that apply to banks and other traditional financial institutions;
viii. There are digital technology-related risks arising from unexplained loss of
internet connectivity, breakdown of telecommunications infrastructure, pri-
vacy, or security breach which can be a major disruption in the use of digital
technology;
ix. Risks associated with the digital transactional platform being used.
Digital Financial Inclusion 235
i. Ensuring that digital agent networks do not exploit customers seeking retail
digital financial services in remote locations;
ii. Challenges in developing strong anti-money laundering (AML) laws;
iii. Challenges in developing countering financing of terrorism (CFT) rules;
iv. Regulatory loopholes in the regulation of e-money;
v. Consumer protection issues;
vi. Weak payment system regulation;
vii. Dealing with unfair competitive practices between banks and non-bank
players in the digital finance ecosystem.
viii. The presence of rogue and unregulated digital players in the market for digi-
tal financial services.
ix. Agents of digital financial inclusion must provide digital financial services
that are easy to access and easy to use;
x. Providers of digital financial services should have internal security measures
that mitigate against data theft, identity theft, or loss of money perpetrated
by bad actors and cybercriminals;
xi. Providers of digital financial services should offer data-driven insights to
customers. Providers of digital financial services should use the large volume
of digital data at their disposal, and with permission, to educate and advise
customers on the need to improve their saving habits, and the affordability
of purchases before they are made;
xii. Regulators should embrace open banking and new payment models as it can
expand the breadth and depth of digital financial services in ways that sup-
port digital financial inclusion.
10. Conclusion
This chapter revisited the digital financial inclusion agenda with a view to provide
extensive insights into what digital financial inclusion is all about. This chapter
defined digital financial inclusion and then highlighted the goal of digital finan-
cial inclusion, the components of digital financial inclusion, the types of provid-
ers of digital financial services, the instruments for digital financial inclusion, the
benefits of digital financial inclusion, the risks of digital financial inclusion, and
the regulatory issues associated with digital financial inclusion, among others.
The implication of the discussion in this chapter is that digital financial inclu-
sion is more of a journey than a destination. A great deal of progress needs to
be made, and it will require the use of existing and new innovation and digital
technologies to adapt financial services to meet the needs of everyone towards
financial inclusion. Policymakers should be careful to choose an effective strategy
for digital financial inclusion and evaluate the effectiveness of the strategy on a
continuous basis. Also, seeing that digital financial inclusion is not without prob-
lems, policymakers must understand the challenges of digital financial inclusion
and the limits of digital technologies in promoting financial inclusion.
Reference
Ahmad, M., Majeed, A., Khan, M. A., Sohaib, M., & Shehzad, K. (2021). Digital financial
inclusion and economic growth: Provincial data analysis of China. China Economic
Journal, 14(3), 291–310.
Bachas, P., Gertler, P., Higgins, S., & Seira, E. (2018, May). Digital financial services go a
long way: Transaction costs and financial inclusion. AEA Papers and Proceedings,
108, 444–448.
Baker, L. (2021). Everyday experiences of digital financial inclusion in India’s ‘micro-
entrepreneur paratransit services. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space,
53(7), 1810–1827.
Dai, W. (2021). Development and supervision of robo-advisors under digital financial
inclusion in complex systems. Complexity, 2021, 1–12.
Ji, X., Wang, K., Xu, H., & Li, M. (2021). Has digital financial inclusion narrowed the
urban-rural income gap: The role of entrepreneurship in china. Sustainability,
13(15), 1–18.
Lu, X., Guo, J., & Zhou, H. (2021). Digital financial inclusion development, investment
diversification, and household extreme portfolio risk. Accounting & Finance, 61(5),
6225–6261. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12863
Ozili, P. K. (2018). Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability. Borsa
Istanbul Review, 18(4), 329–340.
Ozili, P. K. (2020). Contesting digital finance for the poor. Digital Policy, Regulation and
Governance, 22(2), 135–151.
Ozili, P. K. (2021a). Has financial inclusion made the financial sector riskier? Journal of
Financial Regulation and Compliance, 29(3), 237–255.
Ozili, P. K. (2021b). Digital finance, green finance and social finance: Is there a link?
Financial Internet Quarterly, 17(1), 1–7.
238 Peterson Kitakogelu Ozili
Senou, M. M., Ouattara, W., & Acclassato Houensou, D. (2019). Financial inclusion
dynamics in WAEMU: Was digital technology the missing piece? Cogent Economics
& Finance, 7(1), 1–16.
Shen, Y., Hueng, C. J., & Hu, W. (2020). Using digital technology to improve financial
inclusion in China. Applied Economics Letters, 27(1), 30–34.
Sun, M., Xu, J., Tang, H., & Zu, Z. (2021). Research on the Impact of Digital Financial
Inclusion on R&D Innovation. In E3S web of conferences (Vol. 275, p. 01017). EDP
Sciences.
Wang, X., & Fu, Y. (2021). Digital financial inclusion and vulnerability to poverty: Evidence
from Chinese rural households. China Agricultural Economic Review, 14(1), 64–83.
https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-08-2020-0189