Cede202-Cied202 Design Project Learner Guide 2024-Sem02 (Rev-00)
Cede202-Cied202 Design Project Learner Guide 2024-Sem02 (Rev-00)
Cede202-Cied202 Design Project Learner Guide 2024-Sem02 (Rev-00)
Thank you to the following colleagues for compiling the briefs and rubrics for the individual
graduate attributes.
GA4: Mr RF P.Kamdem
Prof Trevor Haas (PR Eng) from Stellenbosch University thank you for providing the
insightful information and guidance that was very essential in compiling this Learner Guide.
INTRODUCTION
This learner guide serves as an instrument for the student to provide information regarding the tasks
that are to be completed in the module. This module is sub-divided into civil engineering sub-
disciplines which are utilised in assessing the first 11 of 12 ECSA graduate attributes. Tasks have
been provided in this learner guide related to the each of the 11-graduate attribute, so that the
student can plan their time and prepare adequately and complete each task, final report, individual
and team interview.
For more information regarding the module students are required to refer to the Module guide.
SUB DISCIPLINE: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
RANGE STATEMENT
The balance of investigation and experiment should be appropriate to the sub-discipline. Research
methodology is to be applied in research or an investigation where the student engages with
selected knowledge in the research literature of the sub-discipline.
EXPECTED OUTCOMES:
• Analyze and define the problem and identify criteria for an acceptable solution.
• Use relevant information, engineering knowledge, and skills to solve the problem.
• Consider and formulate various approaches that lead to workable solutions.
• Model and analyze solutions.
• Evaluate solutions and select the best solution; and
• Formulate and present the solution in an appropriate form.
DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT FOR A RESIDENTIAL
ROAD
1. Introduction
Flexible pavement design is a critical aspect of civil engineering, especially for urban roads that
experience varying traffic loads and environmental conditions. This project aims to design a flexible
pavement for a residential area of your choice on a gravel road, incorporating local data and
conditions to ensure durability and efficiency.
2. Objectives
• To collect and analyze data relevant to the pavement design, including traffic loads,
soil conditions, and environmental factors.
• To design a flexible pavement structure using the TRH4 design method, that meets
the standards and specifications of South African road authorities.
• To ensure the design is cost-effective and sustainable.
3. Data Collection
• Traffic Volume: Conduct traffic counts over a period of one week to determine
the average daily traffic (ADT).
• Vehicle Classification: Classify vehicles into categories (e.g., light vehicles,
heavy trucks) to estimate the equivalent single axle loads (ESALs).
• Growth Rate: Estimate the annual traffic growth rate for the next 20 years.
• Soil Sampling: Collect soil samples at regular intervals along the proposed
road alignment.
• Laboratory Tests: Present typical tests results to determine the soil's physical
and mechanical properties of the road, including:
o Particle size distribution
o Atterberg limits
o California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
o Moisture content
3.3 Environmental Data
• Climate Data: Obtain historical climate data for the area, including temperature
ranges, rainfall patterns, and humidity.
• Drainage Conditions: Assess the existing drainage conditions and design
appropriate drainage systems to prevent water accumulation.
4. Design Methodology
• Traffic Analysis: Use the traffic data to calculate the cumulative ESALs over the
design life of the pavement.
• Subgrade Evaluation: Based on the CBR values, determine the subgrade strength
and classify it accordingly.
• Layer Design: Design the thickness of each pavement layer (surface, base, and sub-
base) using the TRH4 design method.
• Surface Course: Select appropriate materials for the asphalt concrete mix,
ensuring adequate performance under local traffic and environmental conditions.
• Base and Sub-base Courses: Choose granular materials that meet the
specified gradation and strength requirements.
5. Cost Analysis
6. Sustainability Considerations
7. Conclusion
Summarize the key findings from the data collection and analysis. Highlight the designed pavement
structure and its expected performance over the design life.
APPENDIXES
(Appendixes to be inserted here)
CREDIT ALLOCATION
See the table below on credit breakdown and allocation:
Task Estimated Estimated
duration to credit for
complete the task
task
Use the correct codes of practice to obtain loading on pavement 0.50 0.05
and correct standards to determine the number of design vehicles
Determine the layer thickness using the appropriate design method 4.50 0.45
Determine initial cost analysis to select the most economically 10.00 0.10
feasible alternative and provide neat, labelled free-hand sketches
for all alternatives
Total 15 1.5
Very
Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent Exceptional
Stud no. poor
Outcome 0 – 29 30 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 70 - 79 80 - above
The problem is analysed and defined
and criteria are identified for an
acceptable solution.
Relevant information and engineering
knowledge and skills are identified
and used for solving the problem.
Various approaches are considered
and formulated that would lead to
workable solutions.
Solutions are modelled and analysed.
Solutions are evaluated and the best
solution is selected.
The solution is formulated and
presented in an appropriate form.
• Students who scores between 0% to 29% falls in the category of “Very Poor”
performance. Very poor signifies that the student has failed to achieve the minimum
criteria for the GA. One opportunity will be granted to the affected student to redo the
GA, to possibly achieve GA. Should the student underperform after being granted a
second opportunity, he/ she automatically fail the module and will have to repeat the
module.
• Students who score between 30% to 49% falls in the category “Poor” performance. One
opportunity will be granted to the affected student to redo the GA, to possibly achieve
GA. Should the student underperform after being granted a second opportunity, he/ she
automatically fail the module and will have to repeat the module.
• Student who scores between 50% to 59% falls in the category “Good” performance.
Such student automatically achieves GA without pre-condition.
• Student who scores between 60% to 74% falls in the category “Excellent” performance.
Such student automatically achieves GA without pre-condition.
• Student who scores between 74% to 100% falls in the category “Exceptional”
performance. Such student automatically achieves GA without pre-condition.
• Should a student find themselves having failed to achieve satisfactory in 4 GA’s or more,
he/ she will automatically fail the module and will have to repeat the module. This is to
say the student will have to achieve satisfactory and above in 8 GA’s in order to be given
an opportunity to “redo”/ “resubmit” the 3 GA’s which he/ she has obtained less than
satisfactory.
SUB DISCIPLINE: WATER & ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING
Graduate Attribute 2: Application of scientific and engineering knowledge
Project Credits
RANGE STATEMENT
The balance of investigation and experiment should be appropriate to the sub-discipline. Research
methodology is to be applied in research or an investigation where the student engages with
selected knowledge in the research literature of the sub-discipline.
EXPECTED OUTCOMES:
The student must be able to:
PROJECT BRIEF:
Background:
Urban runoff is a critical environmental issue that arises from impervious surfaces such as roads,
rooftops, and parking lots. It leads to flooding, water pollution, and ecosystem degradation.
Effective runoff management is essential for sustainable urban development, water quality
improvement, and flood prevention. This research project aims to understand the causes, impacts,
and mitigation strategies for urban runoff.
Write a report to assess the effectiveness of current water runoff management practices in Durban
and propose and evaluate innovative solutions for sustainable urban runoff management in Durban.
APPENDIXES
N/A
CREDIT ALLOCATION
The design must allow for stormwater and design calculation 1.0 0.1
What is the pump rate required? 1.0 0.1
Determine the rate in m3 /hr? 0.1
1.0
What is the required storage volume of the reservoir in m3? 1.0 0.1
RANGE STATEMENT
Design problems used in the assessment must conform to the definition of well-defined
engineering problems:
EXPECTED OUTCOMES:
The student must be able to:
To apply the codes of practice and used the correct safety load factor 1.0 0.1
To be able to conduct careful structural Analysis on the beam (factored 5.0 0.5
load, loads combination, SFD, and BMD) that you are required to analyze,
as stipulated by your senior structural engineering technologist. Hand
calculations are required to be submitted. Wind Loading must be
considered.
To design the required beam as specified by your senior structural 3.0 0.3
engineering technologist. Provide all necessary checks and hand
calculations are required to be submitted
To be able to calculate the ultimate load on the slab, SFD, and BMD as 2.0 0.2
required by your senior structural engineer technologist. Hand
calculations are required to be submitted
To design the slab as specified by your senior structural engineering 2.0 0.2
technologist. Provide all necessary checks and hand calculations are
required to be submitted
To Determine the ultimate load acting on the column as specified by your 6.0 0.6
senior structural engineering technologist. Design and provide all
necessary checks and hand calculations are required to be submitted
To be able to only size the foundation as specified by the senior structural 3.0 0.3
engineering technologist. No design is required in this sub-subsection
Very
Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent Exceptional
poor
Stud no.
Outcome 0 – 29 30 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 70 - 79 80 - above
TOTAL: …………/100
• Students who scores between 0% to 29% falls in the category of “Very Poor”
performance. Very poor signifies that the student has failed to achieve the minimum criteria
for the GA. One opportunity will be granted to the affected student to redo the GA, to
possibly achieve GA. Should the student underperform after being granted a second
opportunity, he/ she automatically fail the module and will have to repeat the module.
• Students who score between 30% to 49% falls in the category “Poor” performance. One
opportunity will be granted to the affected student to redo the GA, to possibly achieve GA.
Should the student underperform after being granted a second opportunity, he/ she
automatically fail the module and will have to repeat the module.
• Student who scores between 50% to 59% falls in the category “Good” performance. Such
student automatically achieves GA without pre-condition.
• Student who scores between 60% to 74% falls in the category “Excellent” performance.
Such student automatically achieves GA without pre-condition.
• Student who scores between 74% to 100% falls in the category “Exceptional”
performance. Such student automatically achieves GA without pre-condition.
• Should a student find themselves having failed to achieve satisfactory in 4 GA’s or more,
he/ she will automatically fail the module and will have to repeat the module. This is to say
the student will have to achieve satisfactory and above in 8 GA’s in order to be given an
opportunity to “redo”/ “resubmit” the 3 GA’s which he/ she has obtained less than
satisfactory.
SUB DISCIPLINE: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
Project Credits
RANGE STATEMENT
The balance of investigation and experiment should be appropriate to the sub-discipline. Research
methodology is to be applied in research or an investigation where the student engages with
selected knowledge in the research literature of the sub-discipline.
EXPECTED OUTCOMES:
In the year 2022 Durban experienced heavy storms which damaged most of the
infrastructure, some buildings and bridges collapsed due to unstable soil conditions.
As S4 student technician you are required to do an investigation of what happened during heavy
storms, why bridges, roads, railways, buildings and houses were washed away. Also you are
required to design a retaining wall which will retain or protect the collapsed sections either a
road section or a bridge or any structure that you might came across that might need to be
retained or protected. On your report you need to show the collapsed structure (attach pictures),
existing soil conditions, type of soil that the structure is built on, location of that structure, annual
precipitation, design calculations, findings, solutions, recommendations and conclusion.
CREDIT ALLOCATION
Locate spots on the image of the site to indicate where the relevant 1.0 0.1
in – situ tests will be performed, and soil samples collected.
Conduct one (01) relevant in-situ test of your own choice. 2.0 0.2
Conduct three (03) laboratory test on four samples collected from 9.0 0.9
the site (you may use soil sample in the Geotech lab). Each lab test
should be conducted on 4 soil samples.
Process and analyze the data collected and make findings. 7.0 0.7
Provide effective recommendation(s) to stabilize the soil and 1.0 0.1
improve its strength.
Total 20 0.2
GRADUATE ATTRIBUTE 4 ASSESSMENT RUBRIC
The assessment of the project will be based on the rubric presented below:
Very
Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent Exceptional
poor
Stud no.
Outcome 0 – 29 30 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 70 - 79 80 - above
• Students who score between 0% to 29% falls in the category of “Very Poor”
performance. Very poor signifies that the student has failed to achieve the minimum
criteria for the GA. One opportunity will be granted to the affected student to redo the
GA, to possibly achieve GA. Should the student underperform after being granted a
second opportunity, he/ she automatically fail the module and will have to repeat the
module.
• Students who score between 30% to 49% falls in the category “Poor” performance. One
opportunity will be granted to the affected student to redo the GA, to possibly achieve
GA. Should the student underperform after being granted a second opportunity, he/ she
automatically fail the module and will have to repeat the module.
• Student who scores between 50% to 59% falls in the category “Good” performance.
Such student automatically achieves GA without pre-condition.
• Student who scores between 60% to 74% falls in the category “Excellent” performance.
Such student automatically achieves GA without pre-condition.
• Student who scores between 74% to 100% falls in the category “Exceptional”
performance. Such student automatically achieves GA without pre-condition.
• Should a student find themselves having failed to achieve satisfactory in 4 GA’s or more,
he/ she will automatically fail the module and will have to repeat the module. This is to
say the student will have to achieve satisfactory and above in 8 GA’s in order to be
given an opportunity to “redo”/ “resubmit” the 3 GA’s which he/ she has obtained less
than satisfactory.
SUB DISCIPLINE: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Project Credits
RANGE STATEMENT
A range of methods, skills, and tools appropriate to the discipline of the program including:
2. Computer packages
3. Computers and networks and information infrastructures for accessing, processing, managing,
and storing information to enhance personal productivity and teamwork.
4. Basic techniques from economics, management, and health, safety, and environmental
protection.
EXPECTED OUTCOMES:
• Use engineering design software packages such as Prokon to conduct a full structural
analysis and design Reinforced concrete members such as beams, slabs, and columns.
• Discuss the pros and cons of the limits of using hand calculation, Excel spreadsheets, and
design software
• Apply the basic techniques of the safety act in order to ensure progress during the
construction stage in the form of a brief technical report.
PROJECT BRIEF:
1. Refer to Figure 01.
2.1. Hand sketch all connection details for the structure on the given calculation document in
Team Classroom named GA05 DESIGN WORK SHEET.
2.2. Draw detailed shop drawings of the above sketch on AutoCAD.
2.3. Draw detailed shop drawings of all members also on AutoCAD.
Please note All CAD Drawing to be on a tile block
3. Refer to Figure 04 to 12 using Prokon assess each member of the structure and produce a
calcsheet showing all the necessary analysis of the member. Design ALL members and
produce bending schedule using prokon
3.1. The Slab is plastered with live loads of slab 3.6 Kpa and tiled with Granite tiles,
3.2. Fcu: 25 Mpa in Foundations, in columns 25 Mpa and 30Mpa in all other concrete members
3.3. Cover: 50mm in foundations, 30mm on slabs and 25mm on columns
3.4. Bearing Preasure 375 Kpa
3.5. Where information if not given make reasonable assumptions. However, assumptions are
to be justified.
Please note All calculation to be done on GA05 DESIGN WORK SHEET
4. Create a MS Excel program that will automatically solve the truss regardless of the loading
(UDL and point loads) deflections, reactions and axail loads. For Figure 02
APPENDIXES
Figure 01
Figure 02
Figure 03
Figure 04
Figure 05
Figure 06
Figure 07
Figure 08
Figure 09
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
CREDIT ALLOCATION
See the table below on credit breakdown and allocation.
Estimated Estimated
Task duration to credit for
complete the task
task
To use engineering design software packages such as Prokon to 5.0 0.5
conduct a full structural analysis and design Reinforced concrete
members such as beams, slabs, and columns.
To discuss the pros and cons of the limits of using hand calculation, 1.0 0.1
Excel spreadsheets, and design software
To compare results from hand calculations and design software in a 2.0 0.2
brief technical report.
To calculate and produce a bending schedule using excel 1.0 0.1
To detail and annotate a construction drawing. 1.0 0.1
Total 16 1.6
GRADUATE ATTRIBUTE 5 ASSESSMENT RUBRIC
The assessment of the project will be based on the rubric presented below:
Very
Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent Exceptional
poor
Stud no.
Outcome 0 – 29 30 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 70 - 79 80 - above
To automatically generate a
bending schedule using Prokon
design software.
Project Credits
RANGE STATEMENT:
Material to be communicated is in an academic or simulated professional context. Audiences range
from engineering peers, academic personnel and related engineering peers, using appropriate
academic or professional discourse. Written reports range from short (300 words) to long (a
minimum of 2000 words excluding tables, diagrams and appendices), covering material at exit-
level. Methods of providing information include the conventional methods of the sub-discipline,
for example engineering drawings, as well as subject- specific methods.
EXPECTED OUTCOMES:
PROJECT BRIEF:
Prepare a report give a templated on the work done for GA1, GA2, GA3, GA4, GA5, GA7, GA8,
GA9, GA10 and GA11. Refer template to be used for submission of the final work.
CREDIT ALLOCATION
Total 15 1.5
Very
Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent Exceptional
poor
Stud no.
Outcome 0 – 29 30 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 70 - 79 80 - above
Project Credits
RANGE STATEMENT
Research methodology is to be applied in research or an investigation where the student engages
with selected knowledge in the research literature of the sub-discipline.
EXPECTED OUTCOMES:
The student must be able to:
• Master the general concepts related to the conventional treatment technology of water and
wastewater.
• Design of wastewater plants and troubleshooting
• Understand the Waste management treatment concepts
• The students should understand the basic sewage treatment technologies, Environmental
Ecology.
• Understand the basic Environmental circle concept and the effect of noise and air pollution
to the Environment.
• To understand the basic principles of Urban planning and basic other treatment
technologies.
PROJECT BRIEF:
Background:
Access to clean and safe water is a fundamental human right, yet many communities worldwide
face challenges in achieving this due to pollution, limited resources, and outdated infrastructure.
Innovative water treatment methods can address these issues by providing sustainable, cost-
effective, and efficient solutions. This project aims to design, develop, and evaluate new water
treatment technologies that can improve water quality and availability.
Project Activities:
Students are to develop, and evaluate new water treatment technologies that can improve water
quality and availability in Durban and also engage with local communities to raise awareness about
water conservation and environmental sustainability in the study area.
APPENDIXES
N/A
CREDIT ALLOCATION
Project Credits
RANGE STATEMENT:
Multidisciplinary tasks require co-operation across at least one disciplinary boundary. Co-
operating disciplines may be engineering disciplines with different fundamental bases other than
that of the programme or may be outside engineering.
EXPECTED OUTCOMES:
PROJECT BRIEF:
Prepare a MS Power Point presentation which will reflect the skills, knowledge and competency
used and developed in the project.
Also, you are required to work in teams made up of 3 members maximum to complete the task in
GA 4.
CREDIT ALLOCATION
Total 10 1.0
Very
Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent Exceptional
poor
Stud no.
Outcome 0 – 29 30 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 70 - 79 80 - above
Demonstrating competency in
working as an individual.
Demonstrating competency in
working in a team.
Project Credits
RANGE STATEMENT:
Operate in well-structured environment with some unfamiliar elements requiring personal
responsibility and initiative, accurately self-evaluate and take responsibility for learning
requirements; be aware of social and ethical implications of applying knowledge in particular
contexts.
EXPECTED OUTCOMES:
• Show the ability of learning independently and improving on their current knowledge, skills
and abilities.
PROJECT BRIEF:
With reference to GA6 project brief regarding the project, show in you conclusion the knowledge
and skills that you have developed individually ask you completed the different tasks in each sub-
disciple. This should translate into showing the ability for the student to demonstrate critical
thinking abilities.
CREDIT ALLOCATION
Total 10 1.0
Very
Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent Exceptional
poor
Stud no.
Outcome 0 – 29 30 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 70 - 79 80 - above
Project Credits
RANGE STATEMENT:
Evidence includes case studies typical of engineering practice situations in which the graduate is
likely to participate. Ethics and the professional responsibility of a technician and the contextual
knowledge specified in the range statement of Graduate Attribute 7 is generally applicable here.
EXPECTED OUTCOMES:
• Understanding and adhering to the ethical principles related to the engineering profession.
PROJECT BRIEF:
As the appointed (RE) resident engineering to oversee the construction of a 5-story building in a
local township. In the course of your duty, you have found that the contractor cast concrete into a
reinforced concrete foundation in your absence and without you approval .
1. What are your stacks in terms engineering ethics and moral standards?
Total 10 1.0
Very
Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent Exceptional
poor
Stud no.
Outcome 0 – 29 30 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 70 - 79 80 - above
Understanding of engineering
ethics and professionalism.
Compiling and repoting.
• The take-off on the SOQ has to follow all rules and guidelines
of take-off as per Documentation for Civil Engineers –
DOCU202 & DOCM202 syllabus.
RANGE STATEMENT
Basic techniques from economics, business management; project management applied to one’s
own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary
environments.
PROJECT BRIEF:
Outcome 0 – 29 30 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 70 - 79 80 - above
Apply knowledge of planning,
scheduling, and costing of project
Use of sufficient mastery in
processing and analysing data
collected using relevant software
packages and specifications.
Use relevant civil engineering
specifications, and other relevant
literatures to make findings.
Make adequate standard
documentation and presentation of
project planning, schedules and
costing.
Submit work that is of good quality
and meets satisfactory standards as
guided in project documentation.
• The rubric structured in the table above, assesses Graduate Attribute 11 (GA 11). GA 11
ensures that the student fully possess the ability to submit work that is of good quality.
The student must also achieve adequate standards of documentation and presentation of
project planning, schedules and costing. Illustrate use of sufficient mastery in processing
and analysing data collected using relevant software packages and specifications.
pg. 71
ASSESSMENT / GRADING OUTCOMES
• Students who scores between 0% to 29% falls in the category of “Very Poor”
performance. Very poor signifies that the student has failed to achieve the minimum
criteria for the GA. One opportunity will be granted to the affected student to redo the
affected GA, to possibly achieve GA. Should the student underperform after being
granted a second opportunity, he/ she automatically fail the module and will have to
repeat the module.
• Students who score between 30% to 49% falls in the category “Poor” performance. One
opportunity will be granted to the affected student to redo the affected GA, to possibly
achieve GA. Should the student underperform after being granted a second opportunity,
he/ she automatically fail the module and will have to repeat the module.
• Student who scores between 50% to 59% falls in the category “Acceptable”
performance. Such student automatically achieves GA without pre-condition.
• Student who scores between 60% to 69% falls in the category “Good” performance.
Such student automatically achieves GA without pre-condition.
• Student who scores between 70% to 74% falls in the category “Excellent” performance.
Such student automatically achieves GA without pre-condition.
• Student who scores between 75% to 100% falls in the category “Exceptional”
performance. Such student automatically achieves GA without pre-condition.
• 10% deduction per day for the first 3 days of late submission. Thereafter,
no submissions will be accepted, resulting in failure of the module.
pg. 72
GRADUATE ATTRIBUTE ALLOCATION TABLE
Credit Allocation per Sub-discipline 2023-SEM1
Graduate Attributes
Sub-
Discipline GA1 GA2 GA3 GA4 GA5 GA6 GA7 GA8 GA9 GA10 GA11
Structure 2,5 1,6 4,1
Water 1,0 1,0
Geotech 2,0 2,0
Management 2,2 2,2
Transport 1,5 1,5
Environmental 0,7 1,0 1,7
Overall
Project 1,5 1,0 1,0 3,5
Total
Credits 1,5 1,0 2,5 2,0 1,6 1,5 0,7 1,0 1,0 1,0 2,2 16,0
pg. 73
AFFIDAVIT/ DECLARATION
pg. 74
TEAMS CLASSROOM LINK:
Use the below teams code to access the Design Project Team Classroom:
nhjqhn3
REVISIONS TABLE
pg. 75