2022LHC8234
2022LHC8234
2022LHC8234
Judgment Sheet
IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT,
MULTAN BENCH,
MULTAN.
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
….
Versus
J U D G M E N T.
deed Exh.C-1 the appeal was partially accepted vide judgment and
decree dated 24.12.1998. Legal heirs of respondent No.3 filed an
execution petition on 23.04.2014 against the legal heirs of Mst.
Iqbal Bibi/present petitioners for the satisfaction of judgment and
decree dated 24.12.1998. The petitioners filed an objection petition
on 19.09.2014 with the contention that the execution petition is
badly time barred and the same is liable to be dismissed. The
learned execution Court after obtaining its reply allowed the
objection petition and dismissed the execution petition vide order
dated 21.05.2015 being barred by time. Feeling aggrieved,
respondent/legal heirs of respondent No.3 preferred an appeal
which was allowed and the order passed by the learned executing
Court was set-aside and the case was remanded to the learned
executing Court with the direction to decide the execution petition
in accordance with law vide judgment dated 21.10.2016, hence, this
Civil Revision.
with the fact that she had taken the possession of the suit property,
hence, these facts make this case of its own nature and unique. In
somewhat similar circumstances, august Supreme Court of Pakistan
has laid down following principles in case titled “Moulvi Abdul
Qayyum vs. Syed Ali Asghar Shah and 5 others” (1992 SCMR 241)
JUDGE.
A.Razzaq.