Magic in the Biblical World From the Rod of Aaron to the Ring of Solomon 1st Edition Todd Klutz All Chapters Instant Download
Magic in the Biblical World From the Rod of Aaron to the Ring of Solomon 1st Edition Todd Klutz All Chapters Instant Download
Magic in the Biblical World From the Rod of Aaron to the Ring of Solomon 1st Edition Todd Klutz All Chapters Instant Download
https://ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/magic-in-the-
biblical-world-from-the-rod-of-aaron-to-the-ring-
of-solomon-1st-edition-todd-klutz/
https://ebookultra.com/download/the-routledge-companion-to-philosophy-
of-medicine-1st-edition-miriam-solomon/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/ecological-rationality-intelligence-
in-the-world-1st-edition-peter-m-todd/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/the-sentimental-touch-the-language-of-
feeling-in-the-age-of-managerialism-1st-edition-aaron-ritzenberg/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/the-secret-history-of-the-soul-
physiology-magic-and-spirit-forces-from-homer-to-st-paul-1st-edition-
richard-sugg/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/ghost-magic-witches-wizards-and-the-
dead-in-the-ancient-world-1st-edition-daniel-ogden/
ebookultra.com
Executive Editor
Stanley E. Porter
Editorial Board
Craig Blomberg, Elizabeth A. Castelli, David Catchpole,
Kathleen E. Corley, R. Alan Culpepper, James D.G. Dunn,
Craig A. Evans, Stephen Fowl, Robert Fowler, George H.
Guthrie, Robert Jewett, Robert W. Wall
This page intentionally left blank
Magic in the Biblical World
edited by
Todd E. Klutz
Copyright © 2003 T&T Clark International
A Continuum imprint
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any
form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or
any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the
publishers.
Preface vii
Abbreviations ix
List of Contributors xv
TODD E. KLUTZ
Reinterpreting 'Magic' in the World of Jewish
and Christian Scripture: An Introduction 1
Part I
'MAGIC' IN JEWISH SCRIPTURE AND AT QUMRAN
THOMAS C. RÖMER
Competing Magicians in Exodus 7-9:
Interpreting Magic in the Priestly Theology 12
CHRISTOPHE L. NIHAN
1 Samuel 28 and the Condemnation
of Necromancy in Persian Yehud 23
ALAIN BÜHLMANN
Qoheleth 11.1-6 and Divination 55
GEORGE J. BROOKE
Deuteronomy 18.9-14 in the Qumran Scrolls 66
Part II
'MAGIC' IN THE NEW TESTAMENT AND ITS GRAECO-ROMAN MILIEU
F. GERALD DOWNING
Magic and Scepticism in and around
the First Christian Century 86
vi Magic in the Biblical World
DANIEL MARGUERAT
Magic and Miracle in the Acts of the Apostles 100
ANDY M. REIMER
Virtual Prison Breaks: Non-Escape Narratives
and the Definition of 'Magic' 125
THIERRY LAUS
Paul and 'Magic' 140
LLOYD K. PIETERSEN
Magic/Thaumaturgy and the Pastorals 15 7
Part III
'MAGIC' IN DISREPUTABLE BOOKS FROM LATE ANTIQUITY
PHILIP S. ALEXANDER
Sefer ha-Razim and the Problem of Black Magic
in Early Judaism 170
DAVID BAIN
MEAANITIITH in the Cyranides and Related Texts:
New Evidence for the Origins and Etymology of Alchemy? 191
TODD E. KLUTZ
The Archer and the Cross: Chorographic Astrology
and Literary Design in the Testament of Solomon 219
All the contributors to this volume participated in the Magic in the World
of the Bible colloquium held at the Universities of Manchester and Shef-
field, 6-8 May 1999, when scholars and students from the two host insti-
tutions and from the University of Lausanne gathered to read papers and
exchange ideas on the colloquium's chosen topic. Eleven of the essays pub-
lished here were presented and discussed in that context; another (my own
introductory essay) was planned there; and the remaining piece, namely
Professor David Bain's essay on the 'black land', which at the time of the
colloquium was already in press with another publisher (see below), was
summarized by Professor Bain during our discussion of his work-in-pro-
gress on the Cyranides, a magico-medical work which, though it should
perhaps not be dated to earlier than the fourth century CE, transmits infor-
mation and earlier traditions that merit the attention of anyone seeking to
understand ancient Christian literature's earliest cultural context in its full
polyphonic complexity.
As the colloquium was self-consciously selective in its coverage of the
chosen topic (e.g. none of the participants concentrated on the question of
Jesus as 'magician'), our collection makes no claim to have covered the
field in a comprehensive fashion. However, for reasons given in the 'Intro-
duction', the collection can claim to possess a good measure of topical
coherence, which, along with the fresh insights afforded by the individual
essays, should be appreciated by readers who share the contributors' fas-
cination with this field of research.
As volume editor, I myself wish to thank several individuals and insti-
tutions who have made my work on the volume a rewarding experience:
my colleague Professor George Brooke, for suggesting that the privilege
of editing the collection be given to me in the first place; to Professor Philip
R. Davies of Sheffield Academic Press, for his good-humoured advice on
a variety of editorial and technical matters; to J. Edward Crowley, who,
with assistance from Dr Pamela Milne and Professor Walter Skakoon of
the University of Windsor, skilfully translated the French originals by
Alain Btihlmann and Thierry Laus; to the Norwegian Institute of Athens,
viii Magic in the Biblical World
AB Anchor Bible
ABD David Noel Freedman (ed.), The Anchor Bible Dictionary
(New York: Doubleday, 1992)
ACF Annuaire du College de France
AE L 'annee epigraphique
AfO Archivfur Orientforschung
AGP Archivfur Geschichte der Philosophic
AJBI Annual of the Japanese Biblical Institute
AnBib Analecta biblica
ANRW Hildegard Temporini and Wolfgang Haase (eds.), Aufstieg und
Niedergang der romischen Welt: Geschichte und Kultur Roms
im Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin: W. de Gruyter,
1972-)
Anth. Pal The Palatine Anthology of Greek poetic epigrams
AOAT Alter Orient und Altes Testament
APF Archivfur Papyrusforschung und verwandte Gebiete
ATANT Abhandlungen zur Theologie des Alten und Neuen
Testaments
ATh Acts of Thomas
AV Authorized Version
BBB Bonner biblische Beitrage
BDF Friedrich Blass, A. Debrunner and Robert W. Funk, A Greek
Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian
Literature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961)
BETL Bibliotheca ephemeridum theologicarum lovaniensium
BEvT Beitrage zur evangelischen Theologie
BFLL Bibliotheque de la Faculte de philosophic et letters de
1'Universite de Liege
BibOr Biblica et orientalia
Bis ace. Bis accusatus sive tribunalia, Lucian of Samosata
BJRL Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester
BJS Brown Judaic Studies
BKAT Biblisches Kommentar: Altes Testament
BLR The Bodleian Library Record
BM Tablets in the collections of the British Museum
BN Biblische Notizen
x Magic in the Biblical World
TC Tablettes Cappadociennes
.
Todd E. Klutz
In the last quarter of a century, historical scholarship has made a quiet but
impressive advance in the study of magico-religious phenomena in ancient
Jewish and Christian culture. This progress is most evident in two general
areas of scholarly activity: on the one hand, there has been a sharp increase
in translation and publication of magico-religious texts that for various
reasons had been difficult to access for many students;1 but, just as impor-
tantly, during the same period a shift in theory and method has taken place
which, by critically scrutinizing some of the key categories normally used
to organize and evaluate the evidence, has facilitated a growth in awareness
of how ideological interests have influenced not merely the magico-reli-
gious activities of ancient worshippers but also the interpretative manoeu-
vres of modern analysts.2
1. See, e.g., H.D. Betz (ed.), The Greek Magical Papyri in Translation, including
the Demotic Spells (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986); J.G. Gager (ed.),
Curse Tablets and Binding Spells from the Ancient World (Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 1992); M. Meyer and R. Smith (eds.), Ancient Christian Magic: Coptic Texts of
Ritual Power (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1994); M.A. Morgan, Sepher ha-
Razim: The Book of the Mysteries (SBLTT, 25; Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1983); D.L.
Penney and M.O. Wise, 'By the Power of Beelzebub: An Aramaic Incantation Formula
from Qumran', JBL 113 (1994), pp. 627-50; J. Naveh and S. Shaked, Amulets and Magic
Bowls: Aramaic Incantations of Late Antiquity (Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 2nd edn,
1987); D.C. Duling, 'Testament of Solomon', in OTP, I, pp. 935-87; and G. Luck,
Arcana Mundi: Magic and the Occult in the Greek and Roman Worlds (Baltimore: The
Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985). Some of these sources, it is worth noting, had
never been published in a modern language edition prior to their publication in the
collections just cited.
2. Especially influential has been A.F. Segal, 'Hellenistic Magic: Some Questions
of Definition', in R. van den Broek and MJ. Vermaseren (eds.), Studies in Gnosticism
and Hellenistic Religions (EPRO, 91; Leiden: EJ. Brill, 1981), pp. 349-75; but see also
2 Magic in the Biblical World
J.Z. Smith, 'Trading Places', in M. Meyer and P. Mirecki (eds.), Ancient Magic and
Ritual Power (Religions in the Graeco-Roman World, 129; Leiden: EJ. Brill, 1995),
pp. 13-27; G. Poupon, 'L'accusation de magie dans les Actes apocryphes', in F. Bovon
(ed.), Les actes apocryphes des apotres (Geneva: Labor et Fides, 1981), pp. 71-85;
D.E. Aune, 'Magic in Early Christianity', ANRWII.23.2, pp. 1507-57; S.R. Garrett,
The Demise of the Devil: Magic and the Demonic in Luke 's Writings (Minneapolis:
Fortress Press, 1989), pp. 2-5, 11-36; F. Graf, Magic in the Ancient World (trans.
F. Philip; Revealing Antiquity, 10; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,
1997), pp. 8-19; H.-J. Klauck, Magie und Heidentum in der Apostelgeschichte des
Lukas (SBS, 167; Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1995), p. 12; H.C. Kee, Medicine,
Miracle and Magic in New Testament Times (SNTSMS, 55; Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1986), pp. 2-8; M. Meyer and R. Smith (eds.), Ancient Christian
Magic, pp. 2-6; and J.G. Gager, 'Introduction', in idem (ed.), Curse Tablets andBind-
ing Spells, p?. 22-25.
3. See, e.g., E.R. Goodenough (ed.), Jewish Symbols in the Greco-Roman World.
II. The Archaeological Evidence from the Diaspora (13 vols.; New York: Pantheon,
1953), p. 156.
4. G. Fohrer, e.g., in his Introduction to the Old Testament (trans. D. Green; Nash-
ville: Abingdon Press, 1968), pp. 209,356, repeatedly assumes not only that 'magic'
exists as a definable reality in the extralinguistic world of Jewish Scripture, but also
that wherever a 'magical' point of view can be detected in the biblical text, it indicates
that the material in question is early in origin, a key assumption thus being that 'magic'
originated earlier than genuine 'religion' in the history of Israelite culture. Also
R. MacMullen (Paganism in the Roman Empire [New Haven: Yale University Press,
1981 ], pp. 50-51), after characterizing 'religion' as public and 'magic' as private, classi-
fies exorcism in general as a form of 'magic' yet offers no comment either about who
in the Roman world can be shown to have held such a rigid view, or about the signifi-
cant differences between various exorcistic practitioners, or about how exorcism's
tendency to occur in agonistic settings could sometimes result in observers and partici-
pants arriving at conflicting evaluations of a single therapeutic act (e.g. Mt. 12.22-30;
par. Lk. 11.14-23; Mk 3.22-27).
5. In addition to the work of Segal noted above, see especially Garrett, The
Demise of the Devil, pp. 13-19; Gager, 'Introduction', pp. 24-25; and W.J. Lyons and
A.M Reimer, 'The Demonic Virus and Qumran Studies: Some Preventative Meas-
ures', DSD 5 (1998), pp. 16-32.
KLUTZ Reinterpreting 'Magic': An Introduction 3
modicum of respect for this emerging perspective, one may well wish to
ask what sort of contribution my collaborators and I imagined we could
make to this field of discourse. None of us, after all, provides between
these covers either a critical edition or a translation of a previously unpub-
lished or untranslated primary source; nor does any of us deviate in any
dramatic way from existing theories concerning 'magic'. What this collec-
tion does offer, however, is a very specific discursive concentration that
differs significantly from that of other recent works published in the same
broad field of research. To be more precise, while several recent publica-
tions have attempted to redescribe select corpora of ancient magico-
religious texts from the standpoint of the emerging theoretical perspective
mentioned above,11 none of these has concentrated on the problems posed
by 'magic'—either as a category of first-order, participant-orientated dis-
course or as one of second-order, observer-orientated analysis—for students
whose primary interest is to interpret the relevant portions of the Jewish
and Christian canons; nor, as a corollary, has any of them tried to bring
this latter set of interests into conversation with select extracanonical texts
whose ideas and values exemplify, at least roughly, what producers of the
canonical literatures probably would have derided as 'magical'.
Since several thorough treatments of the theoretical debates concerning
magic have already been published by others,12 and with various facets of
the same topic being picked up in the studies that follow here, a compre-
hensive overview of the matter would be superfluous in this context. Nev-
ertheless, a couple of issues closely related to this one—namely, whether
the growing scholarly reticence to continue using words like 'magic' to
11. See esp. Gager (ed.), Curse Tablets and Binding Spells; and Meyer and Smith
(eds.), Ancient Christian Magic.
12. For discussion that stays close to our interest in interpreting the biblical mate-
rials, see esp. Garrett, The Demise of the Devil, pp. 1-36; and S. Ricks, 'The Magician
as Outsider in the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament', in Meyer and Mirecki (eds.),
Ancient Magic and Ritual Power, pp. 131-44. For treatments that deal at length with
relevant theories and debates in the history of the social sciences, see G. Cunningham,
Religion and Magic: Approaches and Theories (New York: New York University
Press, 1999); F. Bowie, The Anthropology of Religion (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2000),
pp. 13-28; H.G. Kippenberg, 'Einleitung: Zur Kontroverse über das Verstehen fremden
Denkens', in H.G. Kippenberg and B. Luchesi (eds.), Magie: Die sozialwissenschaft-
liche Kontroverse über das Verstehen fremden Denkens (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1987),
pp. 9-51; J. Skorupski, Symbol and Theory: A Philosophical Study of Theories of Relig-
ion in Social Anthropology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976); and
Smith, 'Trading Places', esp. pp. 13-20.
KLUTZ Reinterpreting 'Magic': An Introduction 5
13. See, e.g., Amy Waldman, 'How in a Little British Town Jihad Found Young
Converts'(http.//www.nytimes.com/2002/04/24/international/europe/24BRIT.html);
and Andrew Sullivan, 'This is a Religious War', New York Times, 1 October 2001,
section 6, p. 44.
14. J. Fitzmyer (Luke the Theologian: Aspects of His Teaching [London: Geoffrey
Chapman, 1989], pp. 150-51), for instance, after describing Luke's demonic aetiology
of illness as symptomatic of'protological thinking', asserts that 'ancient folk, unable
to diagnose properly an illness or discern its secondary, natural causality, ascribed it to
a preternatural being, a spirit or a demon' (italics mine).
15. N. Chomsky, Deterring Democracy (London: Vintage, 1992), pp. 9-58,73-87,
215-48,357-401.
16. Although Chomsky himself, to my knowledge, nowhere addresses our particu-
lar concern explicitly, his discussion of academic inquiry into the relationship between
human language, intellectual endowment, and race ('Equality: Language Development,
Human Intelligence, and Social Organization', in J. Peck [ed.], The Chomsky Reader
6 Magic in the Biblical World
[New York: Pantheon Books, 1987], pp. 195-202) has direct implications that are con-
sistent with the inference I am drawing here.
17. See, e.g., N. Chomsky, Language and Mind (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovano-
vich, enlarged edn, 1972), pp. 112-14; and S. Pinker, The Language Instinct: The New
Science of Language and Mind (London: Penguin, 1994), pp. 25-31.
18. On the subtle but profound unity of Chomsky's political and linguistic ideas,
see J. Lyons, Chomsky (Modern Masters; London: Fontana/Collins, 1970), pp. 13-15.
19. E. Gellner, Relativism and the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1985), p. 101.
20. Gellner, Relativism and the Social Sciences, p. 101.
21. Gellner, Relativism and the Social Sciences, p. 101.
KLUTZ Reinterpreting 'Magic': An Introduction 1
Thomas C. Römer
9. For more details, see R. Albertz, 'Magie II: Altes Testament', in TEE, XXI, pp.
691-95; and D.N. Fabian, 'The Socio-Religious Role of Witchcraft in the Old Testa-
ment Culture: An African Insight', Old Testament Essays 11 (1998), pp. 215-39 (225-
30).
10. For this translation of 131?, see G. Fohrer, Elia (ATANT, 31; Zürich: Zwingli-
Verlag, 1957), p. 11.
11. F.H. Cryer, Divination in Ancient Israel and Its Near Eastern Environment: A
Socio-Historical Investigation (JSOTSup, 142; Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1994), p. 324.
12. K. Galling, 'Magie: 7. Im AT', in RGG3, IV, p. 601.
13. The word 'trend' should not be understood as meaning a vast, popular move-
ment. The Pentateuch was edited by a small group of elites who knew each other and
met in Jerusalem (and Babylon?).
RÖMER Competing Magicians in Exodus 7-9 15
14. For a presentation of present research on the Pentateuch, see T. Römer, 'La
formation du Pentateuque selon l'exégése historico-critique', in C. Amphoux and
J. Margain (eds.), Les premieres traditions de la Bible (Histoire du texte biblique, 2;
Lausanne: Editions du Zébre, 1996), pp. 17-55.
15. See, for instance, N.J. Tromp, Primitive Conceptions of Death and the Nether-
world in the Old Testament (BibOr, 21; Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1969).
16. E.g. Deut. 18.9-12: 'you shall not learn to do after the abominations of those
nations'; and Deut. 26.14, with its ban on 'feeding' the dead.
17. Cf. J. Van Seters, Abraham in History and Tradition (New Haven: Yale Uni-
versity Press, 1975), pp. 293-95.
16 Magic in the Biblical World
tion of the tomb for the genealogical identity of a group, but they trans-
form worship of the dead into a memorial to the Patriarchs.18
This divergence between P and D is still more evident regarding their
attitude towards magical rites. On the whole, for the D tradition, anything
involving magic is rigorously forbidden, as is clear from some examples.
a. 'You will not suffer a sorcerer (nBBaDD) to live' (Exod. 22.17). In
the law of the Book of Covenant,19 this is the only occurrence of
the feminine form of the word.20 This has led some exegetes to
consider the word here as a collective. It might suggest that there
were women excelling in witchcraft. The ban is religious and, as
in Deut. 18.9-14, means rejection of practices envisioned as non-
Yahwistic.21
b. 'There shall not be found with you any one that makes his son or
daughter to pass through the fire, one that uses divination (DOp),
one that practises augury, or an enchanter (OfDD), or a sorcerer
(*]ODE), or a charmer ("On), or a consulter of a deceased spirit
pIK ^80), that is one who consults dead people. For whoever
does these things is an abomination unto Yhwh' (Deut. 18.10-
12).22 It is difficult to tell precisely which magical practices this
list has in mind; it looks like an attempt to cover the widest range
of magical practices possible. These interdictions figure in the
context of the law regarding prophets and obviously aim at a dis-
tinction between 'true' prophecy and magical practices.
23. Cf. W.H. Schmidt, Die zehn Gebote im Rahmen alttestamentlicher Ethik
(Erträge der Forschung, 281; Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1993),
pp. 82-85.
24. Let us recall that the number ten comes from a certain synchronic reading, but
nowhere does that number appear in the text.
25. The end of the last plague is not easy to determine—a difficulty which favours
the thesis that the narrative has been elaborated on the basis of the story of the
massacre of the Egyptian firstborn in Exod. 12.
26. This idea is already present in Rashbam (eleventh and twelfth centuries); see on
18 Magic in the Biblical World
catastrophe Standing apart. The 'a' element (i.e. divine discourse about the
announced plague) is present in the first two plagues of each triad but
missing from the third; in plagues 1, 4 and 7, there is insistence on the
urgency of the announcement ("IpDD); and plagues 2, 5 and 8 all have the
imperative 'go to Pharaoh'. This composition shows that the final redactor
of the book of Exodus understood the pericope 6.28-7.13 as a prelude to
the plagues. But in fact, when one looks at the structure of this unit, one
realizes that it is built in a fashion very comparable to other episodes in
Exod. 7-12 (only the 6 a' element differs). Its place outside the cycle comes
from a preconception of Exod. 7-12 as a cycle of plagues and divine pun-
ishments. But this reading does justice to only some of the units assembled
in this corpus—namely, the pericopes of Deuteronomistic origin: as a
matter of fact there exists a certain consensus among scholars on Exodus
7-12 about distinguishing between priestly texts and non-priestly ones that
have similarities with the Deuteronomistic school.27
The Deuteronomists seem to have written an account in which there were
seven plagues,28 an observation supported by Pss. 78.44-51 and 105.28-38
since both allude to a cycle of seven plagues. As J. Van Seters has notably
demonstrated, this is a literary creation and not 'ancient tradition'. The
author got his inspiration from the expression 'signs and prodigies', which
he uses to sum up the exile out of Egypt and the catastrophes he has
adapted from Assyrian vassal treaties (cf. Deut. 28.21 -68).29 According to
the D composition, the manifestations of Yhwh in Exod. 7-12 are to be
understood as divine punishments caused by the obstinacy of Pharaoh (cf.
the use of the roots ÍM3 or^] in 7.27 [D]; 11.1 [D30]; 12.13-23 [D]).TheD
composition draws a parallel between the destruction of Judah and the
destruction of Egypt: catastrophe came to Judah because Israel did not
listen, and cataclysm came upon Egypt because Pharaoh did not listen
(Exod. 7.16). To this prophetico-deuteronomistic ideology of judgment
and punishment, P opposes a more irenic, indeed humorous, version of the
manifestations of Yhwh to the nations. Priestly texts in Exod. 7-12 never
mention plagues, but talk instead of signs and prodigies (7.3; 11.9). These
are Demonstrationswunder—that is, miracles which seek to demonstrate
Yhwh's power.31 In contrast to Deuteronomistic ideology, the Priestly
school is not concerned with the judgment of Israel and the nations (a
concern expressed, e.g., in the theology of the hardening of Pharaoh's
heart), but rather with the place and specificity of Israel among the nations.
This is why the Priestly school transforms the Deuteronomistic narrative
of the plagues into a contest of magicians.32
5. Competing Magicians
The Priestly version of the miracles in Egypt has five episodes, of which
7.1-13, often understood as a prologue on the level of a synchronic read-
ing, is the first.33 In each of these five scenes, Moses and Aaron come to
compete with the magicians of Egypt.
After Aaron's stick has been transformed into a 'dragon', Pharaoh sends
for the wisemen (D^DDn) and the sorcerers (D^SÖDÖ, cf. Deut. 18.10).
These two categories of specialists are called D^Dinn later on (Exod.
7.11). This word,34 which occurs repeatedly in the five episodes (7.22; 8.3,
14-15; 9.11), is usually translated as 'magician' and is probably a term
borrowed from Egyptian, designating a priest of high rank and in charge of
reading ritual instructions (Redford: 'chief lector priest'35). Aaron and the
31. H.-C. Schmitt, 'Tradition der Prophetenbücher in den Schichten der Plagener-
zählung Ex 7, l -11,10', in V. Fritz et al (eds.), Prophet und Prophetenbuch (Festschrift
O. Kaiser; BZAW, 185; Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1989), pp. 196-216 (203).
32. As argued by O.H. Steck, DerAbschluss der Prophetic im Alten Testament: Ein
Versuch zur Frage der Vorgeschichte des Kanons (Biblisch-theologische Studien, 17;
Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1991), p. 17, the P document was conceived
as an anti-Deuteronomist work.
33. Belongingthen to P,grossomodo, 7.19-22*; 8.1-3,11*; 12-15; 9.8-12. There is
an astonishing unanimity on this matter among exegetes.
34. Translated by LXX as eTiaoiSos, which may be a neologism; cf. J. Lust et al, A
Greek-English Lexicon of the Septuagint, Part /(Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft,
1992), p. 165.
35. D.B. Redford, A Study of the Biblical Story of Joseph (Genesis 37-50),
(VTSup, 20; Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1970), p. 203.
20 Magic in the Biblical World
D n ftft"in thus have a double identity: they are both priests and 'magicians'.
What makes them differ is the origin of their knowledge: Egyptian magi-
cians base their performance on occult sciences (D^EDf"!]1?, cf. 7.11,22; 8.3,
1436), whereas Aaron can rely on Yhwh's word as transmitted by Moses
(7.9,15; 8.1,12). The author clearly wants to show that Aaron holds the
best cards from the first round on, since his stick will eat up that of the
magicians (7.13). All the same, Pharaoh's sorcerers are taken seriously,
since the second and third confrontations end in a draw. Just like Moses
and Aaron, they succeed in transforming water into blood (7.22) and have
the frogs come up (8.2). This means that the author takes the magical
capacities of the Egyptians seriously and that, for him, magic as such is no
problem.37 Indeed, what he wants to prove is that the magic of God's word
is more effective than the magic of the Egyptians.
So, in the fourth plague, the magicians of Egypt are unable to imitate
Aaron's magical gesture—namely, the transformation of dust into mosqui-
toes (Exod. 8.13-14). They acknowledge Moses and Aaron's (and their
God's) superiority when they declare to Pharaoh, 'This is the finger of
God [elohim}' (8.15). This expression, attested in Egyptian magical for-
mulas, undoubtedly points to Aaron's stick,38 whose superiority the sorcer-
ers acknowledge. They do not use the tetragrammaton but rather the more
universal name elohim used by P in reference to pre-Msosaic settings and
the gods of other peoples. As in the Joseph novel (Gen. 37-50), elohim is
the word that allows the Hebrews and Egyptians an area of theological
agreement. In contrast to Pharaoh (whom Yhwh has hardened), the magi-
cians begin to understand their adversaries' superiority.
The defeat of the Egyptian magicians is finally confirmed in the fifth
episode, where they are themselves affected by the ashes of the furnace
that Moses and Aaron transform into a vehicle of skin disease (9.10-11).
This last episode differs from the preceding ones: it offers no trace of the
customary reference (7.11,22; 8.3,14) to the occult sciences of the Egyp-
36. These are the only occurences of the word in the plural in the whole Hebrew
Bible.
37. Cf. W.H. Schmidt, 'Magie und Gotteswort: Einsichten und Ausdrucksweisen
des Deuteronomiums in der Priesterschrift', in I. Kottsieper et al (eds.), 'Wer ist wie
du, HERR, unter den Göttern?' Studien zur Theologie und Religionsgeschickte Israels
(Festschrift O. Kaiser; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1994), pp. 169-79 (178);
the opposition he constructs between magic and word of God stems from his dogmatic
presuppositions.
38. So, convincingly, B. Couroyer, 'Le "doigt de Dieu" (Exode, VIII, 15)', RB 63
(1956), pp. 481-95.
RÖMER Competing Magicians in Exodus 7-9 21
39. J. Van Seters, 'A Contest of Magicians? The Plague Stories in P', in D.P.
Wright, D.N. Freedman and A. Hurvitz (eds.), Pomegranates and Golden Bells:
Studies in Biblical, Jewish, and Near Eastern Ritual, Law, and Literature in Honor of
Jacob Milgrom (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1995), pp. 569-80.
40. Blum, Studien zur Komposition des Pentateuch, pp. 250-52.
41. I do not understand why Blum wants to cut out 7.8-13.
42. J. Reindl, 'Der Finger Gottes und die Macht der Götter: Ein Problem des
ägyptischen Diasporajudentums und sein literarischer Niederschlag', in W. Ernst etal.
(eds.), Dienst der Vermittlung: Festschrift Priesterseminar Erfurt (Erfurter Theolo-
gische Studien, 37; Leipzig: St Benno, 1977), pp. 49-60.
22 Magic in the Biblical World
competition in Exod. 7-9; the reader discovers there that the magical skill
of the Jews is superior to that of the specialists in the great cultures (for
Joseph and Daniel, it is mainly a matter of oneiromancy). Besides, the
author of Exod. 7-9 seems to know quite well a certain popular Egyptian
culture.43 Thus, the first episode in Exod. 7.8-13 shows some parallels with
a story in Papyrus Westcar, where an Egyptian changes a wax crocodile
into a real one by throwing it into the water; when he takes it out of the
water, the crocodile turns back to wax.44
In this way Exodus 7-12 can be understood as a dialogue with Egyptian
culture. The author accepts, and maybe admires, the magical knowledge of
the Egyptian priests; but he wants to convince his readers that belief in
Yhwh, the only God, can integrate and exceed such knowledge in might.
43. M. Görg, Die Beziehungen zwischen dem Alten Israel und Ägypten: Von den
Anfängen bis zum Exil (Erträge der Forschung, 290; Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche
Buchgesellschaft, 1997), p. 149.
44. The link with this narrative might explain the use of "pfl instead of 013; cf.
A. Jirku, Altorientalischer Kommentar zum Alten Testament (Hildesheim: Gerstenberg,
1972), p. 83.
45. Graf, La magie, pp. 14-16.
1 SAMUEL 28 AND THE CONDEMNATION
OF NECROMANCY IN PERSIAN YEHUD*
Christophe L. Nihan
This paper deals with the topic of divination in the Old Testament, a prac-
tice which undoubtedly played a decisive part in the social, political and
religious life of the ancient Near East, and one well attested in the Old
Testament.1 In what follows, I shall take up this issue by focusing on a
specific divinatory practice—namely, necromancy. It seems to me, indeed,
that this aspect of Israelite divination has been somewhat overlooked by
F. Cryer in his recent treatment of the subject.21 shall try to show for my
part that necromancy is very likely to have played an important role among
the divinatory methods in use in ancient Israel—something already sug-
* I would like to thank H. Lubell and A.-L. Nihan for their helpful comments on
my translation, as well as Dr T. Klutz, who kindly revised my English.
1. See, for instance, the well-known apodictic law of Deut. 18.10-11, where divina-
tion is mentioned several times among the practices prohibited by the Deuteronomistic
school: esp. divination (DDp), auguries (5ÖTT3), and consultation of the dead.
2. F.H. Cryer, Divination in Ancient Israel and its Near Eastern Environment: A
Socio-Historical Investigation (JSOTSup, 142; Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1994). How-
ever, many important studies have been devoted to this question in the past years; see,
among others, T. J. Lewis, Cults of the Dead in Ancient Israel and Ugarit (HSM, 39;
Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1989); J. Tropper, Nekromantie: Totenbefragung im Alten
Orient und im Alten Testament (AOAT, 223; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener
Verlag, 1989); O. Loretz, 'Nekromantie und Totenevokation in Mesopotamien, Ugarit
und Israel', in B. Janowski, K. Koch and G. Wilhelm (eds.), Religionsgeschichtliche
Beziehungen zwischen Kleinasien, Nordsyrien und dem Alten Testament: Internation-
ales Symposion Hamburg, 17-21 März 1990 (OBO, 129; Freiburg: Universitätsverlag;
Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1993), pp. 285-318; B.B. Schmidt, Israel's
Beneficent Dead: Ancestor Cult andNecromacy in Ancient Israelite Religion and Tra-
dition (Forschungen zum Alten Testament, 11; Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1994); and a
recent study by M. Morisi, 'II culto siro-palestinese dei morti e il culto greco degli eroi:
Pinquieta(nte) ricerca del sovrumano tra pietá privata e ufficialitá', Henoch 20 (1998),
pp. 3-50.
24 Magic in the Biblical World
gested by the fact that the exilic and postexilic editors of the Old Testa-
ment, despite the partiality of their accounts about Israel's past, mention
necromancy several times (mainly to condemn it vigorously). At the same
time, necromancy represents an interesting problem to Old Testament
scholarship since the key witness to this form of divination in the Old
Testament—namely, the report on Saul's consultation of Samuel's spirit at
En-Dor in 1 Sam. 28—raises many questions regarding the origin and the
intention of this text, which are still widely debated. Therefore, the follow-
ing discussion is devoted mainly to analysis ofthat chapter, along with
related texts, whose close examination will afford more general insight
into necromancy, postexilic Judea, and the formation of biblical texts con-
cerned with divination. However, it is first necessary to introduce some
preliminary considerations on the notion of 'necromancy' in the ancient
Near East in general and Israel in particular.
in the ancient Near East by broadening the term's range to include a wide range of
diverse practices, some of which are only loosely related to necromantic divination or
conjuration of the dead. However, Tropper is right in pointing out that necromantic
divination requires prior evocation of the defunct person, and that it therefore has to
be understood in relation to the wider body of ritual practices designed to establish
a link between the world of the dead and the world of the living. See, for instance,
J.A. Scurlock, 'Magical Uses of Ancient Mesopotamian Festivals of the Dead', in
M. Meyer and P. Mirecki (eds.), Ancient Magic and Ritual Power (Religions in the
Graeco-Roman World, 129; Leiden: EJ. Brill, 1995), pp. 93-107, who shows very
well how in Mesopotamia the yearly festival of the dead served various functions for
the community of the living, and how divinatory inquiries could be pursued on this
occasion.
6. So Bourguignon, 'Necromancy', pp. 345-47; Tropper, Nekromantie, pp. 3-23.
7. In view of the importance assigned to the worship of ancestors in Egypt and
Mesopotamia, it is difficult to accept the thesis recently defended by Schmidt, Israel 's
Beneficent Dead, that such worship never occurred in Syria-Palestine. In Ugarit, for
instance, ancestors could be deified, at least in the sphere of the royal family, as is
indicated by the mention of the 'il 'ib (see mainly the Ugaritic 'King List', KTU 1.113);
and some kind of help could be expected from them in return (see, e.g., the case of the
rp'um). Schmidt's proposal to understand the expression 'il'ib as 'the gods (of) the
fathers' (pp. 53-59, taking 'U 'ib as an abridgment for a collective instead of a reference
to a single deity) seems unlikely on grammatical grounds, and the traditional reading
'divine ancestor' seems preferable. In addition, Schmidt's interpretation of the syntagm
'il + a royal name in KTU 1.113 as refering to the personal god of the royal figure
mentioned is not convincingly supported.
The debate on the identity of the rp 'urn is far too complicated to be given full
treatment in this essay. But in brief I should say that these figures are best understood
as being closely associated with the dead and with the divinities of the underworld, as
is indicated clearly for instance in the Funerary Liturgy of KTU 1.161. The usual ety-
mology deriving the term rp 'urn from the root rp ', 'to heal', remains the most satis-
fying solution; Schmidt's proposal, taking rp 'to be cognate to Akkadian rabä 'um, 'to
be large, great', takes rp'um to mean 'the Great Ones' or 'the Mighty Ones' (see
p. 92), but this etymology is less likely. Most likely, then, the rp 'urn were mythical
warrior-heroes and kings from the past, who had obtained after death a divine or
'quasi-divine' status and from whom some kind of help could be expected on certain
occasions (esp. in crucial times for the royal house, when, e.g., the succession to the
throne was endangered by the absence of a heir, as in KTU 1.20-22, or at the death of
the king, as in KTU 1.161). In fact, in the Ugaritic texts kings are sometimes repre-
sented in exactly the same way divinities are: they were 'eternal' (KTU 1.108.1), they
received sacrifices, they had a variety of cultic functions (e.g. protective, oracular), and
on the whole they played a central part in the royal worship. On the rp 'urn, see, for
instance, H. Rouillard, 'Rephaim', in K. van der Toorn, B. Becking and P.W. van der
26 Magic in the Biblical World
Horst (eds.), Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible (Leiden: EJ. Brill, 1999),
pp. 692-700.
More generally, the potential perceived in Syria-Palestine of the dead to be malevo-
lent to humans (acknowledged by Schmidt on p. 49) and the concomitant necessity that
they be treated with special care, an additional incentive being that some kind of bene-
faction could be expected from them in return (as is made clear in the final lines of
KTU 1.161), demonstrates that although death was certainly considered a state of weak-
ness in this context, as in Mesopotamia the dead were not completely deprived of
power.
I therefore can see no convincing reason to think Syria-Palestine might not have
shared with the rest of the ancient Near East a form of ancestor worship similar to the
worship displayed towards divinities. Certainly, in view of the evidence at our dis-
posal, the question of the exact status of such deified ancestors among the numerous
deities of the underworld remains to be answered (see, e.g., Morisi's observations ['II
culto siro-palestinese dei morti'] on the 'limited immortality' of the dead ancestors—
observations that are at least broadly relevant to Mesopotamian practice as well); but
this difficulty scarcely forms sufficient reason to dispute the possibility, at least in the
context of the royal cult, that certain illustrious ancestors became the object of a special
worship.
8. 'Funerary cult' refers here to the body of rituals intended for the dead: funerary
rites, rites concerning the preservation of the sepulchre, rites for supplying the dead
with food and water, and rites of commemoration. On the distinctions between these
ritual activities, see Schmidt, Israel's Beneficent Dead, pp. 4-13.
9. On the funerary cult of the dead in relation to the conception of the afterlife
in the netherworld in Mesopotamia and Syria-Palestine, see inter alia J. Bottéro, 'La
mythologie de la mort en Mésopotamie ancienne', in B. Alster (ed.), Death in Mesopo-
tamia: Papers Read at theXXVIe Rencontre assyriologique internationale (Copenha-
gen Studies in Assyriology, 8; Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag, 1980), pp. 25-52; A.
Tsukimoto, Untersuchungen zur Totenpflege (kispum) im alten Mesopotamien (AOAT,
216; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1985); K. Spronk, Beatific Afterlife in
Ancient Israel and in the Ancient Near East (AOAT, 219; Neukirchen-Vluyn:
Neukirchener Verlag, 1986); and Lewis, Cults of the Dead.
10. In Schmidt's view we do not have any clear witness for the deification of
ancestors in the ancient Near East (cf. Israel's Beneficent Dead, pp. 210-14); against
this judgment, however, it is normally assumed that ancestor worship did in fact take
place in the ancient Near East—an assumption which, if correct, significantly weakens
Schmidt's case against the practice's existence in Syria-Palestine in particular since the
latter is very unlikely to have remained uninfluenced in this regard by its powerful
NlHAN 1 Samuel 28 and the Condemnation of Necromancy 27
death supernatural powers, from which their lineage could benefit. ** Among
the powers usually 'conferred on them', some sort of superior knowledge
was often attributed to the dead because of their proximity to, and acquaint-
ance with, the deities of the underworld; besides, the gods themselves
played a decisive role in evoking the spirit of the deceased for divinatory
purposes.12 Therefore, in the ancient Near East necromancy had its setting
in the cultic community formed by both the living and the dead of individ-
ual family clans; we shall see later the significance of this observation for
dealing with necromancy in the Old Testament. Although the evidence at
our disposal is rather limited, it seems to indicate that necromancy (in the
restricted sense defined above) was practised throughout the ancient Near
East.13 It is possible that the practice of necromantic divination enjoyed a
decisive expansion during the Neo-Assyrian period;14 the writing down of
various necromantic rituals might thus indicate that necromancy was then
recognized as the equal of the other divinatory 'sciences'.15 A fragment of
a letter dating from the reign of Esarhaddon (LAS 132.1-11) even shows
that the problem of the royal succession was decided by resorting to the
spirit of Esarhaddon's recently deceased widow, a strategy suggesting that
necromancy at that time was highly esteemed in the royal court.16
tamia and Ugarit, see J.F. Healey, 'The Sun Deity and the Underworld: Mesopotamia
and Ugarit', in Alster (ed.), Death in Mesopotamia, pp. 239-42.
13. For ancient Mesopotamia, we have a passage in the Gilgamesh Epic, a fragment
from a letter of Kültepe (see TC 1, 5), the neo-assyrian letter LAS 132, and several
references to the necromancer in the 'List of Lu', an enumeration of professions from the
second millennium BCE; on this, see Finkel, 'Necromancy in Ancient Mesopotamia', pp.
1-17; and Tropper, Nekromantie, pp. 58-76. Tropper also analyzes various Mesopota-
mian rituals united by an interest in how to deal with ghosts; some of these rituals have
an oracular function (i.e. they serve to elicit an oracle from the dead) and can therefore
be considered necromantic in nature. For Ugarit, see the so-called 'Protocol of a Necro-
mancy', KTU 1.124, and the critical edition of this text by M. Dietrich and O. Loretz,
Mantik in Ugarit: Keilalphabetische Texte der Opferschau, Ommensammlungen,
Nekromantie (Abhandlungen zur Literatur Alt-Syrien-Palästinas, 3; Munich: Ugarit-
Verlag, 1990), pp. 205-40; many Ugaritic texts also allude to ancestor worship (see ATI/
1.17; KTU 1.161, etc.), though they are not concerned specifically with necromancy.
Necromancy is not attested in Egypt before the first half of the first millennium, but see
the famous 'Letters to the Dead', which, though they are not directly relevant to the issue
of necromancy, cast valuable light on the more general problem of communication
between the living and the dead in the ancient Near East.
14. So, e.g., B.B. Schmidt, 'The "Witch" of En-Dor', in Meyer and Mirecki (eds.),
Ancient Magic and Ritual Power, pp. 111-29 (117).
15. As suggested by Tropper, Nekromantie, p. 103.
16. Against Schmidt, Israel's Beneficent Dead, pp. 138-43, 284-86, this obser-
vation does not warrant the claim that necromancy would have been imported to Judah
by the Assyrians (under the reign of Manasseh for instance). Since necromancy takes
place mainly in the sphere of the family cult, rather than in the context of the official
cult, it is unlikely to have arisen due to Assyrian influence. Despite their paucity, the
existence of documents attesting to necromantic practice in various parts of the ancient
Exploring the Variety of Random
Documents with Different Content
pantalon. C’est le costume andalou, et Andalous ils sont presque
tous.
L’Andalousie est réputée pour ses toreros. Les courses de Séville
passent pour les meilleures d’Espagne. Là fut fondée en 1830 une
fameuse école de tauromachie sous la direction des illustres maîtres
Candido et Pedro Romano. C’est à Séville que Joaquim Rodriguez
inventa, voici cent ans, un coup fameux, but des études de toutes
les espadas : frapper le taureau de telle sorte qu’aucune goutte de
sang ne rougisse sa peau et qu’il meure comme s’il demandait grâce
en tombant sur ses genoux.
Une autre école célèbre formait de bonnes épées dans la vieille
ville andalouse de Ronda.
C’est aussi en Andalousie, en pleins champs, au milieu de
grands troupeaux de taureaux, que s’apprend le dangereux art.
On joue de la cape comme dans les courses ordinaires et l’on fait
avec des baguettes le simulacre de planter les banderilles ; un bâton
remplace l’épée. Les propriétaires des troupeaux, leurs femmes,
leurs filles assistent à ces « entraînements » sur des estrades
improvisées ou derrière de fortes barrières, quelquefois à l’ombre,
sous l’arche d’un pont. Il y a toujours quelques coups de corne, un
peu de sang répandu, ce qui procure des émotions dont raffole toute
vraie fille d’Ève, qu’elle s’appelle Mary, Marie, Meriem ou Mariquita,
qu’elle ait les yeux bleus, verts ou noirs. Quand les élèves se
sentent assez forts, ils s’essayent dans les petites villes et
bourgades ; les courses ont lieu sur une place publique, à défaut
d’une Plaza de Toros, et ce ne sont pas les moins émouvantes.
On barricade de planches les rues adjacentes, on dresse des
estrades, et croisées, balcons, toitures se garnissent de spectateurs.
Puis ils donnent des courses de novillos, jeunes taureaux de quatre
à cinq ans, plus faciles à tuer que les autres.
La meilleure époque est le printemps, quand l’animal est dans
toute sa fougue. Les courses, d’après ce que m’ont dit les toreros
eux-mêmes, seraient aussi intéressantes si l’on ne tuait pas, mais il
faut satisfaire la férocité du bas peuple. Quand on se laisse
surprendre par la nuit, on ne tue pas le taureau, l’effet serait
manqué ; on l’emmène par le procédé ordinaire et on l’égorge dans
le toril.
Les taureaux coûtent de 9000 à 10 000 réaux (2500 francs), les
novillos de 6 à 7000. Les chevaux sont fournis par un entrepreneur
qui reçoit de 15 000 à 20 000 réaux par course. Il doit en fournir
autant qu’il est nécessaire. C’est pourquoi il est de son intérêt de
faire resservir les blessés qui peuvent encore se tenir debout.
Après la course, il faut faire une visite au desolladero ; c’est là
qu’on écorche, et l’on procède rapidement à la besogne. La chair est
donnée aux hôpitaux ou aux troupes, à moins qu’un torero n’ait été
blessé ; alors elle lui appartient comme juste dédommagement.
XIX
L’ESCORIAL
JUPON