Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views15 pages

Ind Assg Fin544

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 15

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA PUNCAK ALAM

FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT

BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (HONS) FINANCE

ADVANCED CORPORATE FINANCE (FIN544)

INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT:

CASE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT OF ISKANDAR MALAYSIA

PREPARED FOR:

DR. SHAHSUZAN BIN ZAKARIA

PREPARED BY:

NUR AIN SUFIAH BINTI HAZMAN (2023365441)

GROUP:

BA242 3A

SUBMISSION DATE:

WEEK 13
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First and foremost, I would like to praise and gratitude to the Almighty
Allah S.W.T for giving the strength and because of His blessings, I finally
managed to accomplish this individual assignment. Without His blessings,
I wouldn’t have gone this far. This assignment completes with effort and
cooperation from my lecturer and other members too. In preparing this
case study for course FIN544 Advanced Corporate Finance, I wish to
express my sincere appreciation to Dr Shahsuzan, who guided me through
this assignment and provided valuable suggestions for me. I hope that all
the knowledge that I’ve gain from this course be beneficial in life and the
future. Without his lead and encouragement, this report would not have
been complete in the given period.

Furthermore, I would like to express gratitude to my beloved parents for


their moral, physical, and emotional support throughout the
implementation of this case study. I was able to finish the project and
make it a good and fun experience. Thanks to my lecturer that has guide
me to produce a good report with all his abilities and responsibilities.
Hopefully, all the efforts I’ve made for this assignment will give the best
results. Last but not least, an honourable mention to all my classmates
because they also help in giving ideas and comments in order to complete
my assignment.
TABLE OF CONTENT

1.0 DISCUSS THE CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROCESS..................................1

2.0 DISCUSS THE SCENARIO AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS........................2

3.0 CALCULATE THE OCF BASE, BEST AND WORST CASE........................3

4.0 CALCULATE THE NPV FOR BASE, BEST AND WORST CASE................4

5.0 EVALUATE THE SENSITIVITY OF BASE CASE OPERATING CASH FLOW


(OCF) TO CHANGES 10 PERCENT IN VARIABLE COST..................................5

6.0 BASED ON THE ANSWER ON SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS, DISCUSS THE


IMPACT TOWARDS IRDA..............................................................................6

7.0 CALCULATE BASE CASE FINANCIAL BREAKEVEN LEVEL OF OUTPUT.


WHAT IS THE DEGREE OF OPERATING LEVERAGE (DOL).............................7

8.0 ADVICE THE IRDA FOR TELUK BAHANG PROJECTS EITHER GOOD
INVESTMENT OR NOT BASED ON CALCULATION AND DISCUSSION.............9
1.0 DISCUSS THE CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROCESS

Capital investment refer to the process of investing money into long-


term assets to generate future benefits such as greater revenues, lower
costs, or higher productivity. It can include purchasing new equipment,
constructing a new facility, and they are crucial for companies looking to
expand or improve their long-term productivity and efficiency. The capital
investment process is an important aspect of strategic planning for
businesses seeking to expand and enhance their operations. It involves
evaluating, selecting, and deploying financial resources to acquire assets
or undertake projects that can generate long-term returns and drive
organisational growth.

Company must follow right steps in capital investment process to


choose the best investment option. Firstly, company must identify
investment opportunities. For instance, companies must consider
acquiring physical assets like machinery, equipment, real estate, or
infrastructure to improve operational efficiency or expand business
capabilities. Next, company must consider the assessing resource
limitations. It is evaluating the company’s ability to invest in capital
expenditures given the availability of funds and time. This involves
establishing baseline criteria for evaluating alternatives. Besides,
company must evaluate alternatives. To evaluate alternatives, businesses
will compare outcomes using measurement methods. The results will be
compared not just to other alternatives, but also to a predetermined rate
of return on investment set for each project under consideration. Also,
companies use capital budgeting analysis techniques like net present
value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR) and Payback Period to assess the
economic viability of potential capital investments. They evaluate factors
like expected returns, risks, and alignment with strategic objectives.

1
1.0 DISCUSS THE SCENARIO AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Scenario analysis and sensitivity analysis are two common approaches


in financial modeling for assessing the risks and probable outcomes of
company decisions. Scenario analysis involves analysing possible future
circumstances and predicting their outcomes based on various variables
and assumptions. It investigates the effects of adjusting numerous
variables simultaneously on a financial model. A crucial concern is
determining whether a corporation will be able to service its debt if the
economic climate in which it operates changes. Some of the variables that
may be stressed at the same time in a scenario analysis are exchange
rates, interest rates, inflation, resource availability for renewable energy
deals, and project availability for financing. Common scenario analysis
includes best case, base case and worst case. Scenario analysis allows
companies to test strategic proposals and provides a rational and
structured way to analyse the future and examine the potential impacts of
both negative and positive.

On the other hand, sensitivity analysis is an investigation that is driven


by data. It determines how various independent variable values of a
business can have an impact on the dependent variable under a given set
of assumptions. It explores the results of changing a single variable at a
time. This ultimately leads to changes in the output and profitability of the
business. Sensitivity analysis is important in the realm of financial
forecasting because sensitivity analysis helps finance teams better
understand how changes in costs, revenues, or other financial inputs can
affect profits, net worth, or other key financial metrics. Sensitivity analysis
help in risk management that identify which variables have the most
impact on your forecasts, helping to identify areas that need risk
mitigation strategies. Also, can make a better decision making to
understand the potential range of outcomes and make more informed
decisions by sensitivity analysis.

2
3
3.0 CALCULATE THE OCF BASE, BEST AND WORST CASE

Initial outlay Years Tax Variable Interest Rate of


Costs Return
RM1,500,00 10 35% RM3,000 17%
0

Salvage Depreciation Fixed cost Price Quantity


value
0 1,500,000/1 RM400,000 RM5,000/ 1000/unit
0 unit
=RM150,000

Calculation the best case and worst case NPV for the project
Base case Lower bound (- Upper bound
10%) (+10%)
Unit sales 1000 900 1100
(Quantity)
Price per unit RM5,000 RM4,500 RM5,500
Variable cost per RM3,000 RM2,700 RM3,300
unit
Fixed cost RM400,000 RM360,000 RM440,000

Calculation of operating cash flows


Formula: OCF= [Q (P-VC)-FC] (1-TAX) + Depreciation (TAX)
OCF Base Case = [1000 (5,000-3,000) - 400,000] (1-0.35) + 150,000
(0.35)
= RM1,092,500
OCF Best Case = [1100 (5,500-2,700) - 360,000] (1-0.35) + 150,000
(0.35)
= RM1,820,500
OCF Worst Case = [900 (4,500-3,300) - 440,000] (1-0.35) + 150,000
(0.35)

4
= RM468,500

5
4.0 CALCULATE THE NPV FOR BASE, BEST AND WORST CASE
Using financial calculator:

NPV

CF0 RM1,500,000 +/- enter ↓

C01 RM1,092,500 enter ↓

Base case F01 10 enter

NPV IRR 17 enter ↓

CPT NPV = RM3,589,524.46

CF0 RM1,500,000 +/- enter ↓

C01 RM1,820,500 enter ↓

Best case F01 10 enter

NPV IRR 17 enter ↓

CPT NPV = RM6,980,987.90

CF0 RM1,500,000 +/- enter ↓

C01 RM468,500 enter ↓

Worst case F01 10 enter

NPV IRR 17 enter ↓

CPT NPV = RM682,555.80

6
5.0 EVALUATE THE SENSITIVITY OF BASE CASE OPERATING
CASH FLOW (OCF) TO CHANGES 10 PERCENT IN VARIABLE
COST

Decrease in variable costs by 10%

Old OCF Base Case = [1000 (5,000-3,000) - 400,000] (1-0.35) + 150,000


(0.35)
= RM1,092,500
New OCF Base Case = [1000 (5,000-2,700) - 400,000] (1-0.35) + 150,000
(0.35)
= RM1,287,500

Sensitivity formula: New OCF – Old OCF


New VC – Old VC

Sensitivity = RM1,287,500 - RM1,092,500


RM2,700 - RM3,000
= (RM650)
Interpretation: If decrease by RM1 in variable costs, it will increase the
OCF by RM650

Increase in variable costs by 10%

Old OCF Base Case = [1000 (5,000-3,000) - 400,000] (1-0.35) + 150,000


(0.35)
= RM1,092,500
New OCF Base Case = [1000 (5,000-3,300) - 400,000] (1-0.35) + 150,000
(0.35)
= RM897,500

Sensitivity = RM897,500 - RM1,092,500


RM3,300 - RM3,000

= (RM650)

7
Interpretation: If increase by RM1 in variable costs, it will reduce the OCF
by RM650

8
6.0 BASED ON THE ANSWER ON SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS,
DISCUSS THE IMPACT TOWARDS IRDA

Based on the sensitivity analysis, the impact towards IRDA is the


decrease in variable costs will increases operating cash flows. In this
scenario, reducing variable costs by RM 300 per unit resulted in an
increase in OCF from RM 1,092,500 to RM 1,287,500. Hence, the increase
in OCF increases the NPV. It shows that operating cash flow (OCF) and Net
Present Value (NPV) of Teluk Bahang project are affected by variable
costs. Therefore, IRDA must overseeing and make sure these costs do not
affect the financial feasibility of the project. Overall, IRDA having negative
sensitivity. If IRDA increase by RM1 in variable cost, it will reduce the OCF
by RM650 for IRDA which means unsustainable for the project and less
profitability. If the variable cost decrease by RM1, it will increase the OCF
by RM650 which means improvement in profitability due to lower
operational costs and it has better financial performance and better return
on investment. To conclude, IRDA can improve risk management to
minimize risk, make more informed decisions, strategically plan for
multiple situations, boost stakeholder confidence, and optimize project
performance.

9
7.0 CALCULATE BASE CASE FINANCIAL BREAKEVEN LEVEL
OF OUTPUT. WHAT IS THE DEGREE OF OPERATING LEVERAGE
(DOL)

Step 1: Calculate EAC

Using financial calculator

RM1,500,000 +/- PV

10 N

17 I/Y

CPT PMT = RM321,984.90

Step 2: Calculate FBE

Financial Break-even = EAC + FC (1-T) - DT

(P-V) (1-T)

= 321,984.90 + 400,000 (1-0.35) – (150,000 × 0.35)


(5,000-3,000) (1-0.35)
= 407.30 units

Degree of Operating Leverage

Step 1: Find OCF

OCF = [((P-VC) × Q) – FC] × (1-T) + DT

= [((5,000-3,000) × 407.30) – 400,000] × (1-0.35) + (150,000 × 0.35)

= RM321,990

Step 2: Find DOL

[ FC ( 1−T )−Depreciation ( T ) ]
DOL = 1 +
OCF

[400,000 ( 1−0.35 )−150,000 ( 0.35 )]


= 1+
321,990

10
= 1.6444%

When ignoring taxes:

FC
DOL = 1+
OCF

400,000
=1+
321,990

= 2.2423%

If sales increase by 1% hence the Operating Cash Flow will increase by 2.2423%. The DOL
is inversely related to the variability in operating cash flow. The DOL's indicates that the
operating cash flow will increase by 2.2423% for every 1% increase in sales. This calculation
indicates the operating leverage is moderate.

11
8.0 ADVICE THE IRDA FOR TELUK BAHANG PROJECTS
EITHER GOOD INVESTMENT OR NOT BASED ON CALCULATION
AND DISCUSSION

From the computations and analysis made in the two sections above,
the proposal to invest in the Teluk Bahang project seems favourable to
IRDA. In this regard, the project shows that it is likely to be value creating
through an analysis of NPV under the base and the best case and even
the worst-case scenario. The OCF analysis of this project demonstrates
the ability to maintain adequate amounts even in the wake of major
alterations of variable costs. However, it should still stay cautious of the
costs to avoid any risks linked with volatile variable costs as per the
experience of IRDA. All things considered, IRDA can consider the Teluk
Bahang project as a suitable and profitable investment provided that
proper cost-reducing measures are adopted, and the situation is
monitored consistently. In my opinion, the project of Teluk Bahang is a
good investment for IRDA because the NPV is positive for all cases,
proving that it is an investment that will result in profit. For sensitivity
analysis, it is shown that the project is sensitive to changes in variable
costs. Even with the fluctuation in variable costs, the net present value is
still positive and shows the very high NPV of RM 6,980,987.90 is obtained
in the best-case scenario.

12

You might also like