Characterization of wettability alteration of calcite, quartz and kaolinite
Characterization of wettability alteration of calcite, quartz and kaolinite
Characterization of wettability alteration of calcite, quartz and kaolinite
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The paper addresses wettability alteration of calcite, quartz and kaolinite powders, with stearic acid
Received 29 December 2010 (SA), N,N-dimethyldodecylamine (NN-DMDA) and asphaltene as oil soluble additives. It is a challenge
Received in revised form 5 March 2011 to convert silicate based mineral surfaces from strongly water-wet to more oil-wet. Thermogravimetric
Accepted 8 March 2011
analysis (TGA) of the modified powders is used to quantify the monolayer adsorption and is suggest-
Available online 16 March 2011
ing the possible molecular orientation on the mineral surfaces. Characterization of the mineral surface
hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity due to modification is determined by the enthalpy of the water vapor
Keywords:
adsorption isotherm. From the quantity and the affinity to water vapor adsorption, a new wettability
Wettability
Calcite
index is suggested. The enthalpy of water adsorption relative to liquefaction enthalpy shows that stearic
Quartz acid and asphaltene deeply modify the calcite toward more oil-wet for treated humidified surfaces. It
Kaolinite is interesting to observe that although the presence of a water film on quartz and kaolinite surfaces,
Asphaltene enhance the adsorption of N,N-dimethyldodecylamine (NN-DMDA), does not eliminate but reduces the
Polar components asphaltene adsorption.
TGA © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Water adsorption isotherm
Water adsorption enthalpy
Surface energy
0927-7757/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.03.021
V. Alipour Tabrizy et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 384 (2011) 98–108 99
found to be sufficient to reach equilibrium as reported in the lit- interfacial tension SV ( ) of the same surface in contact with
erature [8,12,28]. The suspension was centrifuged for 30 min at adsorbing vapor V of a liquid L [19]:
4500 rpm/min. Then the solid phase was separated from the liq-
SV ( ) = S − SV ( ) (1)
uid, redispersed in toluene for washing, and centrifuged again for
10 min at 4500 rpm. Finally, the solid was dried under vacuum con- From the Gibbs surface energy and application of first and second
dition at 25 ◦ C. law of thermodynamic at constant temperature, the differential of
the interfacial tension is deduced [29]:
3.2. Gas and vapor adsorption isotherms
d = − i di (2)
The specific surface areas of the unmodified solid powders
where i is the excess adsorbed amount of component i per unit
were determined by nitrogen and krypton adsorption at 77 K using
area and i is the chemical potential of component i. In the case
manometric apparatus, ASAP 2010 and AUTOSORB-1, respectively.
of vapor adsorption on insoluble non-volatile solids, the surface
Vapor adsorption isotherm experiments also were determined by
pressure can now be obtained directly by integration of Eq. (2).
gravimetry at 25 ◦ C with a TGA Q 5000 apparatus both for unmodi-
At constant temperature, the surface pressure can be rewritten as
fied and modified samples to measure the surface areas and obtain
follows:
further information in terms of surface energy. The temperature for
treatment of unmodified and modified samples before water vapor
adsorption was adjusted to 60 ◦ C. The accuracy of TGA Q 5000 appa- SV ( ) = ()d (3)
=0
ratus is 10−5 mg. The average experimental error is about 11% with
5% standard deviation is added to the experimental part. If the vapor behaves ideally, then d = RT dln p and therefore:
High resolution Thermo Gravimetric Analyzer (TGA Q500 from In this equation, SV ( ) is the surface pressure (mN/m), R is the
TA instrument) was applied for the measurement and characteri- ideal gas constant (J/K/mol), T is the temperature (K), is the sur-
zation of adsorbates on modified and unmodified solid powders as face excess of vapor on the solid surface (mol/m2 ) and P is the vapor
a rapid procedure which can scan a wide variety of potential adsor- pressure (Pa). As it can be seen from this equation, the surface pres-
bates. The sample was placed in an alumina pan, equilibrated at sure at certain amount of adsorbed vapor follows directly from the
30 ◦ C and was heated at 6 ◦ C/min for high resolution under dried area under the adsorption isotherm plotted as versus ln p. The
air flow (40 ml/min) up to 600 ◦ C. The accuracy of TGA Q 5000 area under the adsorption isotherm thus determines the surface
apparatus is 10−5 mg. pressure [19].
In a closed system, the adsorbed film near the saturation pres-
3.4. Enthalpies of adsorption sure can therefore be in equilibrium with a droplet of bulk liquid.
The liquid droplet in equilibrium with the vapor phase and solid
Interaction of water vapor on the modified sample with differ- surface can be characterized by the contact angle ˛ [19]. By applying
ent organic adsorbates can be compared with unmodified sample the Young–Dupre equation in the presence of three phases (solid,
in terms of adsorption enthalpy. The experimental results are inter- liquid and vapor), surface pressure can be linked to the contact
preted by coupling of heat effects measured by microcalorimetry angle as follows:
and the amount of water adsorbed on the sample from adsorption
LV cos ˛ = SV − SL (5)
isotherms. The schematic of microcalorimetric set up is shown in
Fig. 1. To perform the experiment, the sample was introduced inside In this equation, is interfacial tension (mN/m) and S, L and V
the calorimetric cell and was dried under nitrogen flow (25 ml/min) denote for solid, liquid and vapor, respectively. By substitution of
until thermal equilibrium was observed. In order to control vapor Eq. (1) in Eq. (4):
pressure inside calorimetric cell, mass flow meter (MFC provided by
LV cos ˛ = S − SV ( ) − SL (6)
Bronkhorst) has been used to inject water continuously. Distilled
water for this mass flow meter was supported from small reser- For a system, where contact angle (˛) between liquid phase and
voir near the calorimeter and Helium gas bottle supplies the back vapor phase is close to zero, the surface pressure can be expressed
pressure of this reservoir. Nitrogen was provided by another bot- as follows:
tle and performed as a carrier gas. Digital acquisition system was
used to record calorimetric signal, water relative humidity inside SV ( ) = S − ( LV + SL ) (7)
the calorimetric cell and flow properties. If we assume that the liquid (in the presence of vapor phase at equi-
librium) can completely wet the surface, the interfacial pressure of
4. Theory liquid on the solid can be expressed as follows:
Wi = SVw ( ) + VW (10)
If a solid and water interface are brought into contact, we are deal- 0.5
hydrophobic surface. This wettability index can be interpreted as Quartz 0.62 0.67 0.65
the fraction of the solid surface which remains hydrophilic after Kaolinite 8.56 9.47 9.95
Calcite 0.76 0.64 0.23
modification.
102 V. Alipour Tabrizy et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 384 (2011) 98–108
300 100.2
250
Surface pressure (mN/m)
100
200
Weight (%)
150 99.8
Unmodified quartz
Unmodified calcite
100
Unmodified kaolinite Dreid calcite modified by SA
99.6 Dried calcite modified by Asph.
50 Unmodified calcite
Dried calcite modified by SA and Asph.
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 99.4
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Adsorbed amount (µmole/m2 ) o
Temprature ( C)
Fig. 3. Surface pressure calculated from adsorption isotherms for unmodified min-
erals. 100.2
nitrogen and krypton using Eq. (13), respectively. The surface area
100
of powder can be calculated also from water vapor adsorption
(≈3%) and kaolinite (≈13%) compared to calcite (≈69%). In case of Dreid calcite modified by SA
calcite, the calculated specific surface areas vary from 0.76 m2 /g 99.6 Dried calcite modified by Asph.
for N2 to 0.64 m2 /g for Kr and 0.23 m2 /g for H2 O. The difference in Dried calcite modified by SA and Asph.
the specific surface areas using N2 and Kr for calcite is near to 15%,
which may be considered to be within the calculated difference of 99.4
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
about 13% that is obtained in the case of kaolinite (including the
o
water vapor adsorption isotherm). The observation of the differ- Temprature ( C)
ence in the obtained surface areas for calcite by water and nitrogen
Fig. 4. Thermogravimetric analysis for modified and unmodified calcite mineral for
adsorption isotherms has also been reported by Hansen et al. [20]
dry treatment.
and Hamouda et al. [12].
The surface pressure values are calculated by integrating the
areas under the adsorption isotherm curves for the unmodified steps for weight loss can be recognized due to temperature increase
minerals as shown in Fig. 3. Surface pressure of quartz is esti- from 30 ◦ C up to 600 ◦ C. The minor step belongs to the physisorbed
mated to be 265 mN/m, which is approximately twice as high as molecules on the surface of minerals which occurs between about
that for kaolinite (140 mN/m) and three times higher than calcite 30 ◦ C and 195 ◦ C. This may be related to the evaporation of the used
(75 mN/m). solvents such as n-decane and toluene and/or to the excess of mod-
The estimated immersional and adhesional work of wetting ifying organic compounds which were not removed completely by
(Wi , Wa ) for quartz are 337 mN/m and 409 mN/m, respectively, toluene during the washing step of the surface modification.
and those for kaolinite are 212 mN/m and 284 mN/m, respectively. The major weight loss, which is used in calculation of the surface
The high surface pressure and works of wetting for kaolinite and coverage, occurs above 195 ◦ C. High-temperature weight loss may
quartz may be related to strong hydrogen bond between water and indicate the presence of strong ionic or chemical bond (chemisorp-
OH groups at the surface of the silica. These results are compa- tion). For the calcite mineral modified by stearic acid (SA), the
rable to the literature. In case of some hydrophobic surfaces like weight loss occurred between about 195 ◦ C and 300 ◦ C while as for
graphite and carbon the range of 20–150 mN/m for surface pres- the modified calcite surface by asphaltene, the weight loss occurred
sure is reported by Kelebek et al. [32]. For calcite, Rezaei Gomari at higher temperature, between about 300 ◦ C and 450 ◦ C. The final
et al. (2006) also reported the value of 62 mN/m as surface pres- weight loss is recorded at about 580 ◦ C, which corresponds to the
sure, which is close to the value obtained in this work [12]. For decomposition of calcite mineral. The observation of the weight
hydrophilic solids such as mica (Rezaei Gomari et al., 2006), silica loss regions is in a good agreement with the literature [3,12]. It is
(Schlangen et al., 1993), and talc (Douillard et al., 2002) the high also shown in Figs. 5 and 6, the thermal desorption behavior of the
values of surface pressure of 193, 160, and 137 mN/m were also dried quartz and dried kaolinite modified by NN-DMDA, asphaltene
reported in the literature, respectively [12,19,33]. and co-presence of NN-DMDA and asphaltene. Thermal desorption
of NN-DMDA occurs between about 195 and 250 ◦ C, which is low
5.2. Modified surfaces compared to the interval of desorption for stearic acid. Thomas et al.
(1993) also observed that thermal desorption of amines occur at
Three methods (thermo gravimetric analysis, vapor adsorption lower temperature comparing to carboxylic acids [22]. At temper-
isotherm and microcalorimetry) were combined to determine the ature of about 500 ◦ C, constitutional OH in the kaolinite may be
amount of grafted organic adsorbates over the mineral surface and lost. In the case of quartz, thermal decomposition does not seem to
to quantify the modification (described in Section 3.1) in terms of occur in the studied range of temperature.
surface energy. The TGA results for unmodified and modified calcite The adsorptions of asphaltene, stearic acid and NN-DMDA over
samples by stearic acid (SA), asphaltene (Asph.) and co-presence the minerals may be classified as chemisorbed with a reducing
of these organic components are illustrated in Fig. 4. Three main strength from asphaltene (Asph.) to stearic acid (SA) and amine
V. Alipour Tabrizy et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 384 (2011) 98–108 103
100.1
100
Weight (%)
99.9
99.6
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
o
Temprature ( C)
100.1 Fig. 7. Estimated amount of adsorbed stearic acid on calcite calculated from TGA
results in the temperature range of 195–300 ◦ C.
100
to 9.78 mol/m2 in case of quartz and kaolinite, respectively. In
Weight loss (%)
100
99
98
Weight (%)
97
96 Unmodified kaolinite
93
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
o
Temprature ( C)
Fig. 6. Thermogravimetric analysis for modified and unmodified kaolinite mineral Fig. 8. Estimated amount of adsorbed N,N-dimethyldodecylamine on quartz and
for dry treatment. kaolinite calculated from TGA results in the temperature range of 195–250 ◦ C.
104 V. Alipour Tabrizy et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 384 (2011) 98–108
Table 3
Calculated surface area coverage (Å2 /molecule) per molecule of organic adsorbate
for dried and wet system.
Dried system
Stearic acid 27.81
N,N-Dimethyldodecylamine 30.75 27.01
Asphaltene 48.10 53.63 51.36
Wet system
Stearic acid 16.58
N,N-Dimethyldodecylamine 18.68 16.97
Asphaltene 30.36 68.26 61.25
300 the amount of vapor adsorbed on the surface and the degree of
hydrophilicity may be classified by the following order: unmodi-
250 fied quartz > dried quartz modified with NN-DMDA > dried quartz
modified with asphaltene > dried quartz modified by co-presence
Surface pressure (mN/m)
60
The application of this calculation shows that asphaltene and
50 NN-DMDA have higher affinity to change the wettability of kaoli-
nite toward oil-wet as the surface pressure of modified kaolinite
40 Dried calcite
by NN-DMDA is estimated to be 92 mN/m and the surface pres-
30 Dried calcite modified by SA sure of modified kaolinite by asphaltene is near to 47 mN/m. It
is interesting to see that modification of calcite with stearic acid
20 Dried calcite modified by Asph.
and asphaltene is shown to be more hydrophobic compared to the
10
Dried calcite modified by SA and Asph. treated quartz and kaolinite with NN-DMDA and asphaltene where
the surface pressure of modified calcite by SA and modified calcite
0 by asphaltene are varying from 32 mN/m to 8.7 mN/m, which cor-
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 respond to 1.56 and 0.66 water layers, respectively. These results
2
Adsorbed amount (µmole/m ) are comparable to number of water layers which have been calcu-
lated by Rezaei Gomari et al. (2006) for modified calcite by different
Fig. 12. Comparison of water vapor surface pressure curves on modified calcite
long chain fatty acids [12].
minerals.
A suggested method to estimate the wettability index (WI) is
using Eq. (16). WI is defined here as the ratio of the adsorbed mono-
asphaltene appear to be type III according to IUPAC classification layer of water of a modified surface to that of unmodified surface.
where the amount of water adsorbed is very low near the satura- This also gives indication of the remained unmodified areas after
tion pressure. The surface modification in terms of hydrophilicity
and hydrophobicity is compared from the relative position of
the surface pressure curves. As it can be seen from the figure,
150
120
Surface pressure (mN/m)
90
60
Dried kaolinite
Dried kaolinite modified by N,N-DMDA
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
2
Adsorbed amount (µmole/m )
Fig. 13. Comparison of water vapor surface pressure curves on modified kaolinite Fig. 14. Comparison of wettability index for modified quartz minerals for the dried
minerals. and wet systems.
106 V. Alipour Tabrizy et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 384 (2011) 98–108
Dried calcite
20
Dried calcite modified by SA
Fig. 17. Enthalpies of water adsorption for modified and unmodified minerals for dried modification.
120
Dried kaolinite
Dried calcite
Adsorption enthalpy
80
Wet quartz modified by Asph.
(KJ/mol)
this work at MADIREL. We acknowledge Inger Johanne Olsen from [21] M.M. Thomas, J.A. Clouse, Thermal analysis of compounds adsorbed on
University of Stavanger for getting the chemicals needed in time, low-surface-area solids. Part 1. Measurement and characterization by TGA,
Thermochim. Acta 140 (1989) 245.
Estelle Soubeyrand and Dominique Vincent from MADIREL for the [22] M.M. Thomas, J.A. Clouse, J.M. Longo, Adsorption of organic compounds on
microcalorimetry experimental work. carbonate minerals: 1. Model compounds and their influence on mineral wet-
tability, Chem. Geol. 109 (1993) 201.
[23] F. Rouquerol, J. Rouquerol, K.S.W. Sing, Adsorption by Powders and Porous
References Solids, Academic Press, London, 1999.
[24] D.H. Everett, Thermodynamic of interfacial phenomena, Pure Appl. Chem. 53
(1981) 2181.
[1] W.G. Anderson, Wettability literature survey. Part 1. Rock/oil/brine interactions
[25] R. Denoyel, I. Beurroies, D. Vincent, Microcalorimetric methods for studying
and the effects of core handling on wettability, J. Petrol. Technol. (1986) 1125.
vapor adsorption and wetting of powders, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 70 (2002)
[2] N.R. Morrow, Wettability and its effect on oil recovery, J. Petrol. Technol. (1990)
483.
1476.
[26] B. Fubini, Adsorption calorimetry in surface chemistry, Thermochim. Acta 135
[3] C. Legens, T. Palermo, H. Toulhoat, A. Fafet, P. Koutsoukos, Wettability change
(1988) 19, 184.
related to the adsorption of organic acids on calcite: experimental and ab initio
[27] A.S. Waxler, J.H. Seinfeld, Second-generation inorganic aerosol model, Atmos.
computational studies, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 20 (1998) 277.
Environ. A 25 (1991) 2731.
[4] K. Kowalewski, T. Holt, O. Torsæter, Wettability alterations due to an oil soluble
[28] L. Madsen, L. Grahl-Madsen, C. Grøn, I. Lind, J. Engell, Adsorption of polar aro-
additive, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 33 (2002) 19.
matic hydrocarbons on synthetic calcite, Org. Geochem. 24 (1996) 1151.
[5] E.A. Chukwudeme, A.A. Hamouda, Oil recovery from polar components (asphal-
[29] P.H. Emmett, S. Brunauer, The use of low temperature van der Waals adsorption
tene and SA) treated chalk rocks by low salinity water and water containing
isotherms in determining the surface area of iron synthetic ammonia catalysts,
SO4 2− and Mg2+ at different temperatures, Colliods Surf. A (2009) 174.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 59 (1937) 1553.
[6] S.G. Roussis, L.J. Lawlor, Patent WO0248698, Direct Determination of Acid
[30] S. Brunauer, P.H. Emmet, E. Teller, Adsorption of gases in multi molecular layers,
Distributions in Crudes and Crude Fractions, ExxonMobil Research and Engi-
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60 (1938) 309.
neering Company, 2002.
[7] J. Zheng, Mechanisms that affect the wettability of quartz exposed to coal [31] O. Karoussi, L. Skovbjerg, T. Hassenkam, S.L. Svane Stuipp, A.A. Hamouda, AFM
derived NAPL, Ph.D. Thesis, Clarkson University, New York, 2001. study of calcite surface exposed to stearic and heptanoic acids, Colloids Surf. A
[8] S. Kokal, T. Tang, L. Schramm, S. Sayegh, Electrokinetic and adsorption proper- (2008) 107.
ties of asphaltenes, Colliods Surf. A (1994) 253. [32] S. Kelebek, G.W. Smith, J.A. Finch, S. Yoruk, Sep. Sci. Technol. 22 (1987)
[9] A. Saada, B. Siffrt, E. Paprer, Comparison of the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity 1527.
of illites and kaolinites, J. Colloid Interface Sci. (1995) 185. [33] J.M. Douillard, M. Elwafir, S. Partyka, Contact angle and film pressure: study of
[10] Y. Liu, J.S. Buckley, Wetting alteration by adsorption from crude oil, in: Inter- a talc surface, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 164 (1994) 238.
national Symposium on Reservoir Wettability and its Effect on Oil Recovery, [34] K.A. Rezaei Gomari, A.A. Hamouda, T. Davidian, D.A. Fargland, Study of the effect
Laramie, WY, September 21–23, 1994. of acidic species on wettability alteration of calcite surfaces by measuring par-
[11] J.S. Buckley, Asphaltene precipitation and crude oil wetting, SPE Adv. Tech. Ser. titioning coefficients, IFT and contact angles, in: K.L. Mittal (Ed.), Contact Angle,
(1995) 53. Wettability, and Adhesion, vol. 4, VSP, Leiden, 2006.
[12] A.A. Hamouda, K.A. Rezaei Gomari, Influence of temperature on wettability [35] P. Somasundaran, E.G. Agar, The zero point of charge of calcite, J. Colloid Inter-
alteration of carbonate reservoirs, in: SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil face Sci. 24 (1967) 433.
Recovery, Tulsa, OK, April 22–26, 2006, Paper 99848. [36] L.L. Schramm, K. Mannhardt, J.J. Novosad, Electrokinetic properties of reservoir
[13] O. Karoussi, A.A. Hamouda, Imbibition of sulphate and magnesium ions into rock particles, Colloids Surf. 55 (1991) 309.
carbonate rocks at elevated temperatures and their influence on wettability [37] E.H.M. Wright, N.C. Pratt, Solid/solution interfaces equilibria for aromatic
alteration and oil recovery, J. Energy Fuels 21 (4) (2007) 2138. molecules adsorbed from non-aromatic media, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.
[14] K.A. Rezaei Gomari, A.A. Hamouda, Effect of fatty acids, water composition and 74 (1974) 1461.
pH on the wettability alteration of calcite surface, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 50 (2006) [38] J.P. Dicike, M.N. Heller, T.F. Yen, Electron microscopic investigation on the
140. nature of asphaltene, J. Colloid Interface Sci. (1969) 475–484.
[15] K.A. Rezaei Gomari, O. Karoussi, A.A. Hamouda, Mechanistic study of inter- [39] J.G. Speight, On the nature of molecular weight of asphaltene, Adv. Chem. Ser.
action between water and carbonate rocks for enhancing oil recovery, in: SPE (1981) 15.
Europec/EAGE Annual, Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, June 12–15, [40] S. Parkash, S. Moschopedis, J.G. Speight, Physical properties and surface char-
2006, Paper 99628. acteristic of asphaltene, Fuel (1979) 877.
[16] K.A. Rezaei Gomari, R. Denoyel, A.A. Hamouda, Wettability of calcite and mica [41] S.H. Collions, J.C. Melrose, Alteration of rock properties by adsorption of
modified by different long-chain fatty acids (C18 acids), J. Colloid Interface Sci. petroleum heavy ends, in: SPE/DOE Symposium on Oil Field Geothermal Chem-
297 (2006) 470–479. istry, Denver, CO, June 1–3, 1983, Paper 11800.
[17] G. Buckton, Contact angle, adsorption and wettability – a review with respect [42] E.Y. Sheu, Petroleum asphaltene properties, characterization, and issues, J.
to powders, Powder Technol. 61 (1990) 237. Energy Fuels (2002) 74.
[18] M. Fuji, H. Iwata, T. Takei, T. Watanabe, M. Chikazawa, Wettability of fine silica [43] R. Denoyel, Microcalorimetry and ellipsometry in surfactant adsorption stud-
powder surfaces modified with several normal alcohols, Adv. Powder Technol. ies, Colloids Surf. A (2001) 61.
8 (1997) 325. [44] K. Klier, J.H. Shen, A.C. Zettlemoyer, Water on silica and silicate surfaces. I.
[19] L.J.M. Schlangen, L.K. Koopal, M.A. Cohen Stuart, J. Lyklema, Wettability: ther- Partially hydrophobic silicas, J. Phys. Chem. 77 (1973) 1458.
modynamic relationships between vapor adsorption and wetting, Colloids Surf. [45] T. Pernyeszi, O. Patzk, A. Berkesi, I. Dekany, Asphaltene adsorption on clays and
A 89 (1994) 157. crude oil reservoir rocks, Colloids Surf. A 137 (1-3) (1998) 373–384.
[20] G. Hansen, A.A. Hamouda, R. Denoyel, Effect of pressure on contact angles [46] J. Bantignies, C.C. Moulin, H. Dexpert, Wettability contrast between illite and
and wettability in the mica/water/n-decane system and the calcite + stearic kaolinite clays: characterization by infrared and X-ray spectrometries, J. Petrol.
acid/water/n-decane system, Colloids Surf. 154 (1999) 353. Sci. Technol. 20 (1998) 233.