Manuscript
Manuscript
Manuscript
The increasing clamour for sustainable development and the need to better protect the
environment to preserve its ability to sustain the plant and animal ecosystem dependent on it has
been driving efforts in environmental protection and management (Hu et al., 2023). Various
policy interventions such as the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 ( US EPA, 1990), the Federal
Environmental protection Agency Act Cap 131 LFN 1990 and The Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) decree No 86 of 1992, , have been made over the years to stem the increasing
devastating effects of the petroleum industry on the Nigerian environment with very little
achieved thus far.
Several physical, chemical and biological approaches have been developed over the years to
contain, clean up and ameliorate the damaging effects of oil spill/pollution (Asif et al., 2022).
Each of these approaches have achieved some measure of success.. Biological treatments
involve breakdown of contaminates into non-toxic form using microbiological process (Varjani,
Upasani and Pandey, 2020).
The low cost and environmental friendliness of biological methods have often served to
recommend such processes as the preferred methods of intervention. Bioremediation has been
particularly useful as it exploits the ability of natural indigenous or exogenous microorganisms to
degrade petroleum hydrocarbons. Hence, bioremediation can be defined as the application of
living organism to eliminate environmental contaminants from soil, water as well as gases. A
number of microorganisms are able to utilize the carbon in petroleum hydrocarbon as carbon and
energy source. The process of bioremediation is a slow process sometimes spanning several
months before appreciable quantities of the contaminants are degraded. A number of approaches
including biostimulation (involving the addition of nutrients; N, P, K to stimulate microbial
growth) and bioaugmentation (which introduces exogenous microorganisms to supplement the
native population of microorganisms) have been used to enhance the rate of bioremediation.
In the present work, a cell culture bioreactor was designed and fabricated locally and used to
optimally mass produce petroleum hydrocarbon degrading microorganisms. The crude oil
degrading bacteria was produced from previous cell stock cultures and a consortium of the three
best petroleum hydrocarbon degrading microorganism was made. Immobilization of degraders
onto the coconut fibre was carried out and the immobilized crude oil degrading microorganisms
were utilized in the treatment of crude oil sludge/ drilling cuttings contaminated soils. General
characterization of the crude oil sludge/ drill cutting was carried out and samples collected from
the bioremediation test site were analyzed for some selected parameters such as total petroleum
hydrocarbon (TPH), poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), total organic content, hydrocarbon
utilizing bacteria (HUB), total heterotrophic bacteria (THB), and other physico-chemical
properties.
2.0 Materials and Method
2.1 Materials
Haier Thermocool refrigerator, Complete grinding and pellet making machine (24 R Tim super Diesel
Engine R175AN), TEC generator (LL8GF-4A, 6.0KW model), Oven,Infra red sterilizer, Cell culture
bioreactor, garden shade, hand arguer rain boots, watering cans. Reagents; Sodium Chloride ,Potassium
Chloride,Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate, Sodium Nitrate, Deionized Water, Cobalt (II)
Sulphate, Calcium Carbonate, Copper Sulphate Hydrate, Boric acid, Zinc Sulphate heptahydrate,
Magnium Oxide , Manganous Sulphate Monohydrate,Ferrous sulphate heptahydrate,
Hydrochloric acid, Petroleum ether, Ammonium Nitrate, Nutrient Agar, Ethanol absolute, and
Agar No.1, all purchased from BDH, England.
2.2 Methodology
2.2.1 Characterization of the Coconut Fibre
The coconut was characterized for its water content, nitrogen content, phosphorus content,
porosity and pH.
The water content is the ratio of the weight of water to that of the solids in a given mass of
material. This ratio is expressed as percentage. In a typical determination a crucible, cleaned and
oven dried, was weighed (W1). The crucible was then filled with the dried meal of the cellulosic
materials, and weighed (W2). The crucible containing the cellulosic material was then kept in an
oven at a temperature between 105oC to 110oC for 24 hours. The final constant weight (W3) of
the container with the dried sample were then determined. The water (moisture) content W (%)
was determined from the relationship:
Clay was used as adhesive for the cellulosic material. The clay was collected from Eku, Delta
state. It was sun dried crushed using mortar and pestle to unequal sizes. The unequal particles
were sieved using sieve size of 0.4mm to get uniform particle sizes.
2.2.6 Sterilization of MSM and Trace Element Solutions
MSM and Trace element were prepared into separate containers and sterilized using auto clave
(YX-280A) at 0.165Mpa for fifteen minutes. This is to ensure contaminated free solutions.
2.2.7 Enrichment of Crude Oil Degrader Microbes
Into three conical flasks containing 2 ml of previously stocked crude oil degrading microbes
labeled C, F, and G, 100mi Mineral Salt Medium (MSM) was added. After which, sterile crude
oil (1 ml) was added. The cover was loosely placed to allow for air and incubated at 30oC.
Further enrichment was achieved, after microbe growth was observed in13 days. The MSM (2
ml) broth culture was transferred from each of growth flasks into fresh MSM (100 ml) in sterile
conical flasks and labeled C2, F2, and G2 respectively and were all incubated at 30 oC. The covers
were loosely placed to allow for air.
Growth was observed after incubating the MSM broth culture for 17 days after which the MSM
(5ml) broth culture (5ml) was transferred from each of the growth flasks into fresh MSM
(1000ml) in sterile conical flasks and labeled C3, F3 and G3 respectively. They were covered
with cotton wool and aluminum foil and incubated at 30 oC for 30 days. This was repeated five
times and a total of fifteen litres of oil degrader microbes are in stock.
2.2.8 Immobilization of Microbial Isolates on Sterile Coconut Fibre
The immobilisation method of simple mixing reported by (Mishra et al., 2001) was adopted. The
consortium 15 ml made from the isolates C, F, and G was transferred onto a sterile coconut fibre
(carrier material) (1:1 v/w) and mixed. The seeded carriers were stored in the refrigerator for
future use.
2.2.9 Production of Immobilized Microbial Isolates pellets
This process involved compressing or molding a material into the shape of a pellet. Various
ratios of crude oil degrading microbial isolates, coconut fibre (Carrier), binding agent (pellet
composition) were mixed until the appropriate mixture with the desired shape was obtained
which was in the ratio of 2.4:1:0.6 for the microbial isolates, coconut fibre and binding agent
respectively.
2.1.10 Field Test Procedure:
A parcel of land measuring 144 m 2 was contaminated with 380 litres of crude oil (Escavos light).
One week after contamination, the soil was tilled to a depth of 15cm with garden fork and shade.
After tilling, a consortium of crude oil degrading microorganism immobilized in coconut fibres
in a ratio of 1:1 was applied to the soil. Nutrient (fertilizer NPK 15-15-15) was added to the soil
thrice weekly and tilled twice a week to a depth of 15cm using garden fork after addition of
nutrient. Soil samples were collected on a weekly interval with soil auger for laboratory analysis
of physico-chemical properties of the soil, microbial count and other parameters.
2.2.11 Bacteria Cell Loading
The bioreactor was sterilized with appropriate disinfectant and wash severally with sterile
distilled water. Water was put into the thermal jacket through the inlet hose and connect the air-
pipe of bioreactor into the air-outlet of the air pump. Thereafter, the bioreactor was loaded with
bacteria culture and cover the bioreactor with lids. The heater was set to the required
temperature, switch on the heating system and agitation system by push of the knobs on the
panel. After the power is switched on the air pump started to supply air and oxygen evenly in the
bioreactor.
2. 2.12 Immobilization of Microbes into Coconut Fibre (Carrier)
About 20 litres of the harvested hydrocarbon degrading bacteria was immobilized into about
20kg of coconut fibre in a plastic container, stirred with wooden stirrer and stored.
2.2.13 Field Test of HC Degrader on Crude Oil/Drill Cuttings
Samples of crude oil sludge mixed with drill cuttings were collected with six plastic buckets (20
litres) from an Oil Servicing Company in Delta State. A parcel of land was cleared at the
Petroleum Training Institute Effurun, Delta State. A polythene measuring 3.5m x 2.6 m was laid
on the soil and the crude oil sludge /drill cutting was put on it. Sample of crude oil/drill cutting
were collected with hand arguer for characterization and analysis. After tilling the soil, a
consortium of crude oil degrading microbes seeded in coconut fibres (20 litres in 20kg coconut
fibre mill) in the ratio of 1:1 was applied to the crude oil/ drilling cutting and nutrient (NPK 15-
15-15 fertilizer) solution was added at interval of 4 days with tilling using garden fork and
samples collected for analysis. The untreated and treated crude oil sludge/drill cutting samples
collected were analyzed for, physico-chemical properties, microbial count and hydrocarbon
content using the Gas Chromatography Flame Ionization Detection (GC -FID) and other analysis
methods.
2.2.14 Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Drill Cuttings
The Parameters determined include: Total Phenolic hydrocarbon, (TPHs) poly aromatic
hydrocarbon (PAHs) benzene, toluene, Ethyl benzene, xylene, (BTEX), heavy metals, pH,
Temperature, Heterotrophic bacteria count, Hydrocarbon degrading bacteria, Hydrocarbon
degrading fungi, total organic compounds.
2.2.15 Estimation of Total Heterotrophic Bacteria (THB) by Plate Count Technique
1.0 gm. of the soil sample was rehydrated with 9ml sterile distilled water in a MacCartney bottle
containing some glass chips (i.e. 10-1 w/v in the first instance). Hundred folds serial dilution of
the suspension was carried out five times in a set of MacCartney bottles each containing 9.9ml
sterile distilled water. Same dilution was carried out on each of the water samples. 1 mm of each
diluent was plated out respectively in duplicates employing the use of nutrient agar medium
(sterile) kept in molten form. Pour plate method was adopted.
The culture plates, having allowed the agar medium to set, were incubated aerobically at 28 oC
for 36-48 hours. Thus enumerating for only aerobes and facultative heterotrophic bacteria. The
culture plates were observed for growth and selected for count after the expiration of the
incubational period. The culture plate on which the number of colonies was less than 300,
starting from the least to the erml diluted and its duplicate for each sample was selected. The
averaged count was multiplied by the dilution factor of that dilution and expressed as cell
forming unit (CFU) per gram or milliliter of the original sample. This is a viable count.
The same procedure used for the estimation of THB was used also for the estimation of THF.
The differences are, however, as follows:
Culture Medium: Bushnell-Haas broth in which 15g/l agar, 30mg/l fungusol miconazale Nitrate
B.P (2%) and varying concentrations of NaCl for fresh and salt-water environment were
incorporated. 15ml/l sterile crude oil was also added as carbon source.
Culture Medium: Bushnell-Haas broth in which 15g/l agar, 50mg/l streptomycin and varying
concentrations of NaCl for fresh and salt-water environment were incorporated. 15ml/l sterile
crude oil was also added as carbon source.
Fig 3 (a) Plot of removal efficiency of hydrocarbon (%) against time, (b) Plot of Log of Total
Hydrocarbon Utilizing Bacteria Count (HUBC) and Log of Total Heterotrophic Bacteria Count
(HBC) against Period (weeks)
c d
Fig. 3 ( c) Plot of Total Hydrocarbon against period,(d) Plot of poly aromatic hydrocarbons
against period
e f
Fig. 3 (e) Plot of total benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene against period, (f) Plot of total
organic carbon against period
g h
Fig. 3 (g) Plot of pH against period, (h) Plot of concentration of heavy against period
j
i
Fig. 3(i) Plot of total heterotrophic bacteria count against period, (j) Plot of hydrocarbon utilizing
bacteria count against period
k
Fig. 3(k) Plot of Nitrate concentration against period, (l) Plot of Phosphorus against period
n
m
Fig. 3 (m) Plot of total petroleum hydrocarbon degraded per week, (n) Plot of poly aromatic
hydrocarbon degraded per week
Fig. 3 (o) Plot of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylene degraded per week
The quality of soil was not adversely affected by remediation with the immobilized products.
The results show that the consortium of these isolates has high proficiency in bioremediation
processes.
Crude oil being a complex mixture of hydrocarbon and non-hydrocarbon molecules when spilled
affects the soil adversely as shown in Fig4a. After one week of contamination, the plants and
probably some others microorganisms could have been destroyed as the soil is laid bare.
Treatment of the contaminated soil with the immobilized microorganism in coconut fibre is
intended to reduce these hydrocarbon molecules which are toxic and major pollutants to the
immediate environment. The potentiality of the bacteria in degrading hydrocarbon is based on
the fact as it serves as energy source to the hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria. Based on the ease of
application of the immobilized microorganism on the crude oil contaminated soil Fig.4b and
steady recovery of the soil and consequent growth of plants Fig4c and Fig4d after seven weeks
and thirteen weeks of treatment respectively. Therefore, bioremediation an effective, low cost
a b
process for rapid remediation of contaminated soil could be adopted as a process for sustainable
ecosystem management.
c d
Fig 4 (a)Parcel of crude oil contaminated land after one week, (b) Site after application of crude oil
degrading microorganism (c) Site after four weeks of treatment (d) Crude oil contaminated site, seven
weeks after treatment
To test the effect of petroleum degrading bacteria on oil removal, active bacteria were introduced
to the crude/drill cutting put on about 9 m 2 polythene lining on the soil. A control sample, made
up of crude oil/drill cuttings (22 litres plastic bucket) put on 1m 2 land but containing no
petroleum hydrocarbon degrading microorganisms.
Fig5a show the relationship between oil residual concentration of petroleum hydrocarbon verse
bioremediation time. The hydrocarbon groups lost may be linked to oil volatilization as well as
aerial oxidation. But most importantly, the concentration of petroleum materials as can be seen
from the plots increased linearly during the days this indicates that the immobilized petroleum
hydrocarbon degrading bacteria contributed to removal of petroleum hydrocarbons, in
comparison to residual concentration of petroleum hydrocarbon in the control and so, after 16
days of treatment, about 77.94%, 55.56% and 48.92% of PAHs, Aliphatic and TPH respectively
have been removed from the drill cuttings compared to 33.21%, 11.26% and 11.69 %
respectively of the control.
The crude oil sludge/drill cutting samples inoculated with immobilized petroleum degrader
displayed higher oil removal efficiency. The TPH and PAHs removal efficiencies were 64.75%
and 40.55% after 8 days of inoculation. The immobilized petroleum degrader rapidly adapted to
the environment efficiently degrading hydrocarbons compounds. Fig5b shows that the
degradation efficiency of TPH and PAHs increased gradually, which indicates that the crude
oil/drill cutting provides an appropriated environment for bacterial growth. Between 48.92% and
77.94% of hydrocarbons were degraded during the first 16 days of bioremediation while the
degradation efficiency of the control was only 11.26% - 33.21%. It is clear that the hydrocarbons
were degraded mainly by the petroleum-degrading active bacteria.
a b
Fig5 Plot of residual concentration of aliphatics, TPH, PAHs against time (days) in , (a) control
sample (b) contaminated sample
4.0 Conclusion
The studies have developed bacterial products with a batch bioreactor which has distinct merits
over conventional method of bioremediations. The product can be quickly applied for
remediation of crude oil polluted site and the deployment showed that it is effective in the
remediation of soils contaminated with crude oil having removed about 91.29% content of crude
petroleum contaminants in seven weeks compared to removal of about 17.36% crude petroleum
content by free residence bacteria cells. The resultant products have great potentials for usage as
preferred product to remediate crude oil polluted sites. And can serve as an effective and fast
remediation tool for cleaning up crude petroleum polluted site at low cost.
Acknowledgement
We wish to express our profound gratitude to the PTDF for providing the fund for this research.
We also thank the management of the Petroleum Training Institute, Effurun, Delta State for their
support and encouragement.
References
Agiri, Gabriel, Mamah, S. (2015) ‘Performance evaluation of oil degrading microbes isolated from crude
oilcontaminated soil in Niger delta area of Nigeria’, Elixir International Journal, 80(30945–30948).
Apul, O. G. et al. (2022) ‘Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in a weathered, unsaturated soil is inhibited by
peroxide oxidants’, Journal of Hazardous Materials. Elsevier, 433, p. 128770. doi:
10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2022.128770.
Asif, Z. et al. (2022) ‘Environmental Impacts and Challenges Associated with Oil Spills on Shorelines’, Journal of
Marine Science and Engineering 2022, Vol. 10, Page 762. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 10(6), p.
762. doi: 10.3390/JMSE10060762.
Hu, F. et al. (2023) ‘Bioremediation of environmental organic pollutants by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Mechanisms,
methods and challenges’, Environmental Research. Academic Press, 239, p. 117211. doi:
10.1016/J.ENVRES.2023.117211.
Mishra, S. et al. (2001) ‘Evaluation of Inoculum Addition To Stimulate In Situ Bioremediation of Oily-Sludge-
Contaminated Soil’, APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 67(4), pp. 1675–1681. doi:
10.1128/AEM.67.4.1675-1681.2001.
No clean up, no justice: Shell’s oil pollution in the Niger Delta - Amnesty International (no date). Available at:
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/06/no-clean-up-no-justice-shell-oil-pollution-in-the-niger-delta/
(Accessed: 23 February 2024).
Summary of the Oil Pollution Act | US EPA (no date). Available at: https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-
oil-pollution-act (Accessed: 23 February 2024).
Ukhurebor, K. E. et al. (2021) ‘Environmental implications of petroleum spillages in the Niger Delta region of
Nigeria: A review’, Journal of Environmental Management. Academic Press, 293, p. 112872. doi:
10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2021.112872.
Ukhurebor, K. E. et al. (2023) ‘Petroleum spills and the communicative response from petroleum agencies and
companies: Impact assessment from the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria’, The Extractive Industries and Society.
Elsevier, 15, p. 101331. doi: 10.1016/J.EXIS.2023.101331.
Umar, H. A. et al. (2021) ‘Environmental and socioeconomic impacts of pipeline transport interdiction in Niger
Delta, Nigeria’, Heliyon. Elsevier, 7(5), p. e06999. doi: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2021.E06999.
Varjani, S., Upasani, V. N. and Pandey, A. (2020) ‘Bioremediation of oily sludge polluted soil employing a novel
strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and phytotoxicity of petroleum hydrocarbons for seed germination’, Science of
The Total Environment. Elsevier, 737, p. 139766. doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.139766.