SOIL_1_OldGT_Road2Chanda_Villege
SOIL_1_OldGT_Road2Chanda_Villege
SOIL_1_OldGT_Road2Chanda_Villege
a c 8
d
A
REPORT ON
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED
HIGH LEVEL BRIDGE OVER FALGU RIVER
IN BETWEEN OLD GT ROAD TO VILLAGE CHANDA
VIA BABHAN DEV JUNGLE
BLOCK SHERGHATI, DISTRICT GAYA, BIHAR
Submitted To:
Executed By:
)09334454475,*jfcpl.ranchi@gmail.com
8 a b 8
2621B_242060240B
Table of Contents
F Introduction………………………………………………………
1
F Project details…………………………………….. 2
F Laboratory Testings……………………………….. 4
F Test Results……………………………………………..……………………
10
F Site photograph……………………………………………..……………………
13
CHAPTER - I
1 INTRODUCTION:
1.1 In an attempt to facilitate the design of the proposed new
construction of the foundation structure of the :
1.2 The scope of the soil investigation consisted of making one nos. of
bore hole at this site.
1.3 The formation at the site is to be reported for various layers presented
at their respective depth along with their thickness. This would also
2.2 The bore holes of 150mm diameter (SX size) are initially sunk by hand
auger boring upto the water table and thereafter by rotary boring with
bentonite mud circulation.
In case rock encountered, bore holes of 150mm diameter (SX size) are
initially sunk by hand auger boring upto the refusal strata (N>100) in
line with specification. For further advancement of bore holes rotary
drilling technique is adopted upto the termination depth as directed by
the client. Drilling was done with standard G.O. type rotary drilling
machine as per IS: 6926. In this method the hole was advanced by
applied into the bottom of the hole through the hollow drill rods.
Water comes up through the annular space between the drill rods and
the bore hole and is collected in the water sump, from where it is re-
enters the hole and carrying cutting from the bottom of the hole on its
2.3 Ground water level in the bore holes within the explored depth below
the existing ground level was observed during boring work and also
3 LABORATORY TESTING:
2 Bulk Density.
3 Specific Gravity.
layer upto the depth of around 8.50m and fracture to fresh rock
formations along with the “N” values are shown in the field bore log
data sheets.
(A Maiti)
(ME, Soil Mech. Fdn. Engg.)
(Chartered Engineer)
Considering the nature of subsoil and type of foundation to be constructed at the site deep
foundation in the form of pile
EGL = 0.000 m
Such pile can be placed at = -11.500 m (Rl)
Cut off level = 4.00 m (bgl)
Effective length of the pile shaft = 7.50 m
Max. Scour level = = -4.00 m
(Rl)
The ultimate bearing capacity (Qu) of piles is given by the following formula:
D
Qu = Ap(0.5DgNg + PDNq) +SK PDitandAsi [ Cl. No 5.3.1.1
i =1 IS:2911(PartI/Sec2)-2010]
2
Where Ap = Cross sectional area of pile toe in cm
D = stem diameter in cm
g = effective unit weight of soil at pile toe in kg/cm3
Pd = Effective overburden pressure at pile toe kg/cm3
Nq, Ng = bearing capacity factors
K = coefficient of earth pressure
d = angle of wall friction between pile and soil
Asi = Surface area of pile stem in cm2
Sub-soil Properties
Effective Cohesion Angle of Sub.
From - To depth internal Density Nc Ng Nq
(m) 2 friction 3
t/m t/m
4.00 - 8.50 4.50 0 30 0.850
Considering the nature of subsoil and type of foundation to be constructed at the site deep
foundation in the form of pile
EGL = 0.000 m
Such pile can be placed at = -12.000 m (Rl)
Cut off level = 4.00 m (bgl)
Effective length of the pile shaft = 8.00 m
Max. Scour level = = -4.00 m
(Rl)
The ultimate bearing capacity (Qu) of piles is given by the following formula:
D
Qu = Ap(0.5DgNg + PDNq) +SK PDitandAsi [ Cl. No 5.3.1.1
i =1 IS:2911(PartI/Sec2)-2010]
2
Where Ap = Cross sectional area of pile toe in cm
D = stem diameter in cm
g = effective unit weight of soil at pile toe in kg/cm3
Pd = Effective overburden pressure at pile toe kg/cm3
Nq, Ng = bearing capacity factors
K = coefficient of earth pressure
d = angle of wall friction between pile and soil
Asi = Surface area of pile stem in cm2
Sub-soil Properties
Effective Cohesion Angle of Sub.
From - To depth internal Density Nc Ng Nq
(m) 2 friction 3
t/m t/m
4.00 - 8.50 4.50 0 30 0.850
Considering the nature of subsoil and type of foundation to be constructed at the site deep
foundation in the form of pile
EGL = 0.000 m
Such pile can be placed at = -12.500 m (Rl)
Cut off level = 4.00 m (bgl)
Effective length of the pile shaft = 8.50 m
Max. Scour level = = -4.00 m
(Rl)
The ultimate bearing capacity (Qu) of piles is given by the following formula:
D
Qu = Ap(0.5DgNg + PDNq) +SK PDitandAsi [ Cl. No 5.3.1.1
i =1 IS:2911(PartI/Sec2)-2010]
2
Where Ap = Cross sectional area of pile toe in cm
D = stem diameter in cm
g = effective unit weight of soil at pile toe in kg/cm3
Pd = Effective overburden pressure at pile toe kg/cm3
Nq, Ng = bearing capacity factors
K = coefficient of earth pressure
d = angle of wall friction between pile and soil
Asi = Surface area of pile stem in cm2
Sub-soil Properties
Effective Cohesion Angle of Sub.
From - To depth internal Density Nc Ng Nq
(m) 2 friction 3
t/m t/m
4.00 - 8.50 4.50 0 30 0.850
Symbol
and DEPTH/RUN ( m) (m) Core recovered (m) Recovery sample/RQD Remarks
Depth
From To 0-15 15-30 30-45
0.00 0.50 - - - - - DS
8.50m
9.00 9.35 0.35 17, 35, 100 for 5cm N>100 SPT
Highly decomposed to
Drilling started from 9.00 m
decomposed product of
weathered rock
9.00 10.50 1.50 0.00 0% 0%-C
SPT - Standard Penetration Tests DS - Disturbed samples UDS - Undisturbed samples C - Core Samples
Type of sample
Depth (in m)
per IS:1498-
Type of soil as
Silt Factors
Rock (Kg/cm )
Test Particle Size Distribution Atterberg Limit NMC Shear Strength Consolidation
density(gm/cc
2
Bulk Density
Dry Density
No (%) (%) Parameter
Cohesion Charecteristic
Submersed
Strength of
Void ratio
Crushing
(in %) C
(gm/cc)
(gm/cc)
F
Specific
Gravity
Cc Cc/(1+e0)
Gravel
LL PL PI Kg/cm2 (degree)
Sand
Clay
Silt
)
SPT 1.50 SP 0.00 86.28 13.72 1.19 NON-PLASTIC - - - - 2.66 - 0 30 - - -
1.00 -
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
Percentage finer
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.002
0.075
0.425
4.75
0.00100 0.01000 0.10000 1.00000 10.00000 100.00000
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
Percentage finer
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.002
0.075
0.425
4.75
3.00
3.00
NORMAL SHEAR NORMAL SHEAR
2.50
2.50
0.50 0.28 0.50 0.40
Shear Stress (kg/cm 2)
1.00 1.00
X Y X Y
0.50
0.0 0.00 0.50
0.0 0.00
2.75 1.59 2.75 1.62
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00
2
Normal Stress (kg/cm )
Normal Stress (kg/cm2)
3.00
NORMAL SHEAR 3.00
NORMAL SHEAR
2.50
0.50 0.28 2.50
0.50 0.32
Shear Stress(kg/cm2)
2.00 2.00
1.50 0.80 1.50 1.02
2.00 1.27 2.00 1.23
1.50 1.50
1.00 1.00
X Y X Y
0.50
0.0 0.00 0.0
0.50 0.00
2.75 1.59 2.75 1.65
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00
2 2
Normal Stress(kg/cm ) Normal Stress(kg/cm )
JFC 12 a
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED
HIGH LEVEL BRIDGE OVER FALGU RIVER IN BETWEEN OLD GT ROAD TO VILLAGE CHANDA, VIA BABHAN
DEV JUNGLE BLOCK SHERGHATI, DISTRICT GAYA, BIHAR
SITE PHOTOGRAPH