2.image_processing_tech_glaucoma
2.image_processing_tech_glaucoma
net/publication/220790076
CITATIONS READS
83 4,855
4 authors, including:
S. R. Nirmala
Gauhati University
78 PUBLICATIONS 512 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Madhusudhan Mishra on 05 June 2016.
1 Introduction
Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy leading to visual field changes due to the
damage retinal ganglion cells and axons [1]. From the survey it is found that nearly 1-
million Indians, age 40 and over, have glaucoma [2].With disease progression the
interconnection between the photo receptors and the visual cortex is reduced. This
reduces the functional capabilities of the retina and changes the size of the cup. So
cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) is used for measuring glaucoma progression. Fig.1 shows
how the objects are perceived by normal vision and a patient having glaucoma.
Raised intra-ocular pressure (IOP) is classified as a risk factor but is not part of the
definition. However it causes typical structural changes of the optic nerve head
(ONH) and the nerve fiber layer affecting the visual field of the subject [3]. The
structural changes are the outcome of the slowly diminishing neuroretinal rim
manifesting a degeneration of axons and astrocytes of the optic nerve resulting in
expansion of cup size of the optic disc, as shown in fig. 2. However blood vessels are
least affected.
The CDR expresses the proportion of the disc occupied by the cup and it is widely
accepted index for the assessment of glaucoma [3]. For Normal eye it is found to be
0.3 to 0.5 [14] .The CDR value increases with the increase in neuro-retinal
degeneration and the vision is lost completely at the CDR value of 0.8. Several
methods of feature extraction from fundus images are reported in the literature [1, 3, 5,
6, 9, 10, and 11]. Techniques described in the literature for optic disk localization are
A. Abraham et al. (Eds.): ACC 2011, Part III, CCIS 192, pp. 365–373, 2011.
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
366 M. Madhusudhan et al.
Fig. 1. Normal vision vs. patient having glaucoma Fig. 2. Major Structures of the ONH
where peripheral vision is lost.[7] visible in color fundus image
typically aimed at either identifying the approximate center of the optic disk or placing
the disk within a specific region such as a circle or square. Lalonde et al., uses canny
edge detector and Ghafar et al., uses Circular Hough-transform to detect the optic
disc(OD)[5][6]. By analyzing the various local maxima in the Hough space, one can
find the best fitting circular approximation of the optic disk. Walter and Klein uses
color space transformation and morphological filtering for optic disk localization. Here
luminance channel of hue-luminance-saturation color space is used for localizing optic
disk. Then thresholding is applied to locate locus of optic disk. Precise contour is
determined using green channel of RGB color space via watershed transformation. In
this method slight distortion occurs due to outgoing vessels or low contrast. Youssif et
al., detects OD by using the blood vessel's direction matched filter where a mask is
generated [1]. The mask labels the pixels belonging to the region of interest and
excludes the background for further processing. Then opening, closing and erosion are
applied respectively using small kernel to obtain final ROI. These methods are based
on exploiting the edge characteristics. These papers do not discuss about the glaucoma
progression or classification. Bock et al., uses the concept of principal component
analysis (PCA), bitsplines and fourier analysis for feature extraction and support vector
machine (SVM) classifier for glaucoma predication[3]. This method attains an
accuracy of 88 %. However different methods for features extraction and use of
classifiers make this system more complex. Our proposed methods for glaucoma
detection are simple, easy to implement and give favorable results.
In this paper three different image processing techniques namely multi-
thresholding, active contour model and region based segmentation methods are
proposed for detection of glaucoma. The comparative study of these proposed
techniques are done with respect to their approaches and results. The rest of this paper
is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces all the three methods for glaucoma
detection. Experimental results are shown in Section 3 and conclusions are presented
in Section 4.
system which follows a standard 3-step image analysis pipeline consisting of (i)
preprocessing; (ii) segmentation of preprocessed image and (iii) classification based
on evaluation of CDR. Three different techniques i.e. multi thresholding, active
contours and region growing methods are applied for the segmentation of pre-
processed fundus image in order to detect the disease by computing CDR.
Fig. 3. Processing pipeline in detail: glaucoma risk calculation comprises of steps: (i)
Preprocessing of input images for eliminating disease independent variations, (ii) Segmentation
of preprocessed image and (iii) Classification based on CDR for generating Glaucoma Risk
Index (GRI)
The variations not related to the glaucoma disease are excluded from the images in a
preprocessing step for emphasizing the desired characteristics. This includes
variations due to image acquisition, such as inhomogeneous illumination and the
blood vessels which are not directly linked to glaucoma. The main objective of
preprocessing is to attenuate image variation by normalizing the original retinal image
against a reference model or data set for subsequent viewing, processing or analysis
[12]. The preprocessing retinal images may be classified in terms of the correction for
non-uniform illumination, contrast enhancement and color normalization.
(a) Fundus image (b) Illumination corrected (c) Blood vessels removed
The preprocessed images are used for the segmentation of optic disc and cup which
helps in classification of glaucoma. In this subsection, the three different techniques
for glaucoma detection are discussed.
(a) Blood vessels removed (b) Optic disc detection (c) Cup detection
It has shown correct segmentation for 19 images out of 25 set of images. The
accurate segmentation was not possible for rest of 6 images as the optic disc and some
portions of background image have similar illumination level. The quality of original
images was also one of the reasons for improper segmentation. The major demerit of
the method is the manual thresholding based on the pixel intensity values. Hence
other techniques like active counter method based on adaptive thresholding and
region growing segmentation methods are applied for cup and disc segmentations
from the preprocessed fundus image for glaucoma classification.
segmentation of the image [20]. Fig.7 shows the results of successful implementation
of this technique, used in detecting cup and disc of fundus images for evaluation of
CDR, a measure for glaucoma detection.
Fig. 7. Results of Active contour methods for cup and disc detection
The processed image obtained as discussed earlier is used to determine the CDR by
finding the number of ones present in the cup region to that of number of ones in disc
Image Processing Techniques for Glaucoma Detection 371
Table 1. Shows the comparative results of three methods namely (i) Multi-thresholding; (ii)
Active contours and (iii) Region growing segmentation
Table 2. Shows the comparative accuracy of three methods namely (i) Multi-thresholding; (ii)
Active contours and (iii) Region growing segmentation
Active contour method is applied for detecting the cup and disc from the preprocessed
fundus images as discussed in the subsection 2.2.2. Their effective radii are calculated
for evaluation of CDR needed for the classification. The obtained results are found to
be better in-comparison to multi thresholding technique as it is based on adaptive
thresholding. Efficiency of this method in identifying true positive and true negative
is shown the column-II of the table-I. The accuracy measure of this second proposed
method with sensitivity and specificity of 89.47 and 83.33 % respectively is
summarized in column-II of table-II.
Region growing segmentation technique is applied to estimate radius of cup and disc
from the pre processed fundus image as discussed in subsection 2.2.3. Like the other
two methods, CDR evaluation was the criteria for the classification of the disease.
The results obtained by this third proposed method are better compared to other two
mentioned techniques as it is based on clustering of homogeneous regions. It is able to
classify all eighteen abnormal images as abnormal but two images were misclassified
out of seven normal images. Efficiency of this method in identifying true positive and
372 M. Madhusudhan et al.
true negative is shown the column-III of the table-I. The performance measure of this
method with sensitivity and specificity of 94.73% and 100% respectively is
summarized in column-III of table-II.
4 Conclusion
In this paper, an efficient framework for early detection of glaucoma has been
developed. The CDR, an important glaucoma parameter of fundus images publically
available from messidor and optic data bases were evaluated using three different
methods namely morphological operations based on multi-thresholding techniques,
active contour models and region growing segmentation techniques. As a comparative
study to these methods for glaucoma classification, we observed that region growing
segmentation technique gives better result in comparisons to other two methods. The
proposed methods are simple and easy to implement. The results obtained can be used
as an initial investigation step in the automated diagnosis of glaucoma especially in
the screening programs. These proposed methods may further be combined with some
other techniques for achieving better results with large databases.
References
1. Youssif, A.A.-H.A.-R., Ghalwash, A.Z., Ghoneim, A.A.S.A.-R.: Optic disc detection from
normalized digital fundus images by means of a vessels’ direction matched filter. IEEE
Transactions on Medical Imaging 27, 11–18 (2008)
2. http://www.medindia.net/patients/patientinfo/Glaucoma.htm
3. Bock, R., Meier, J., Nyúl, L.G., Hornegger, J., Michelson, G.: Glaucoma risk index:
Automated glaucoma detection from color fundus images. Medical Image Analysis 14,
471–481 (2010)
4. http://www.optic-disc.org
5. Lalonde, M., Beaulieu, M., Gagnon, L.: Fast and robust optic disc detection using
pyramidal decomposition and haussdroff based template matching. IEEE Transactions on
Medical Imaging 11, 1193–1200 (2001)
6. Ghafar, R.A.A., Morris, T., Ritchings, T., Wood, I.: Detection and characterization of the
optic disc in glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. In: Medical Image Understand Annual
Conference, London, UK, pp. 23–24 (September 2004)
7. http://www.nei.nih.gov/
8. Banerjee, B., Bhattacharjee, T., Chowdhury, N.: Color Image Segmentation Technique
Using Natural Grouping of Pixels. International Journal of Image Processing (IJIP) 4(4),
320–328 (2010)
9. Hoover, A., Kouznetsova, V., Goldbaum, M.: Locating blood vessels in retinal images by
piecewise threshold probing of a matched filter response. IEEE Transaction on Medical
Imaging 19, 203–210 (2000)
10. Rangayyan, R.M., Zhu, X., Ells, A.L.: Detection of the optic nerve head in fundus images
of the retina using the Hough transform for circles. Journal of Digital Imaging, 132–140
(February 2009)
11. Mendonca, A.M., Campilho, A.: Segmentation of retinal blood vessels by combining the
detection of centerlines and morphological reconstruction. IEEE Transaction on Medical
Imaging 25, 1200–1213 (2006)
Image Processing Techniques for Glaucoma Detection 373
12. Salvatelli, A., Bizai, G., Barbosa, G., Drozdowicz, B., Delrieux, C.: A comparative
analysis of pre-processing techniques in color retinal Images. In: 16th Argentine
Bioengineering Congress and the 5th Conference of Clinical Engineering. IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference series, vol. 90 (2007)
13. Kubecka, L., Jan, J., Kolar, R.: Retrospective Illumination Correction of Retinal Images.
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging 2010, Article ID 780262, 10 pages (2010)
14. Vanajakshi, B., Sujatha, B., Srirama, K.: A Study on Implementation of Advanced
Morphological Operations. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and
Network Security 10(3), 6–9 (2010)
15. http://www.optic-disc.org/tutorials/glaucoma evaluation
basics/page13.html
16. Criminisi, A., Pérez, P., Toyama, K.: Region Filling and Object Removal by Exemplar-
Based Image Inpainting. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13(9) (2004)
17. Bertalmio, M., Sapiro, G., Caselles, V., Ballester, C.: Image inpainting. In: Proceedings of
the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques,
SIGGRAPH, New Orleans, USA, pp. 417–424 (2000)
18. Meier, J., Bock, R., Michelson, G., Nyúl, L.G., Hornegger, J.: Effects of Preprocessing
Eye Fundus Images on Appearance Based Glaucoma Classification. In: Kropatsch, W.G.,
Kampel, M., Hanbury, A. (eds.) CAIP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4673, pp. 165–172. Springer,
Heidelberg (2007)
19. Kass, M., Witkin, A., Terzopoulos, D.: Snakes: Active contour models. International
Journal of Computer Vision 1, 321–331 (1988)
20. Chan, T.F., Vese, L.A.: Active Contours Without Edges. IEEE Transaction on Image
Processing 10(2) (February 2001)