bny-ahw-2408212033-0451811475-1
bny-ahw-2408212033-0451811475-1
bny-ahw-2408212033-0451811475-1
*1.How did the First World War help in the growth of the national movement in India?
1.The war created a new economic and political situation. It led to a huge increase in defence expenditure which was
financed by war loans and increasing taxes: customs duties were raised and income tax introduced.
2.Through the war years prices increased – doubling between 1913 and 1918 – leading to extreme hardship for the
common people.
3.Villages were called upon to supply soldiers, and the forced recruitment in rural areas caused widespread anger.
4.Then in 1918-19 and 1920-21, crops failed in many parts of India, resulting in acute shortages of food.
5.This was accompanied by an influenza epidemic. According to the census of 1921, 12 to 13 million people perished
as a result of famines and the epidemic.
People hoped that their hardships would end after the war was over.
2.Explain Gandhi’s Idea of Satyagraha.
1.The idea of satyagraha emphasised the power of truth and the need to search for truth. It suggested that if the cause
was true, if the struggle was against injustice, then physical force was not necessary to fight the oppressor.
2.Without seeking vengeance or being aggressive, a satyagrahi could win the battle through nonviolence .
3. This could be done by appealing to the conscience of the oppressor. People – including the oppressors – had to be
persuaded to see the truth, instead of being forced to accept truth through the use of violence.
OR
1. The First World War had ended with the defeat of Ottoman Turkey. And there were rumours that a harsh
peace treaty was going to be imposed on the Ottoman emperor – the spiritual head of the Islamic world
(the Khalifa).
2. To defend the Khalifa’s temporal powers, a Khilafat Committee was formed in Bombay in March 1919.
3. A young generation of Muslim leaders like the brothers Muhammad Ali and Shaukat Ali, began
discussing with Mahatma Gandhi about the possibility of a united mass action on the issue.
4. Mahatma Gandhi felt the need to launch a more broad-based movement in India. But he was certain that
no such movement could be organised without bringing the Hindus and Muslims closer together. One
way of doing this, he felt, was to take up the Khilafat issue.
5 . Gandhiji saw this as an opportunity to bring Muslims under the umbrella of a unified national
movement. At the Calcutta session of the Congress in September 1920, he convinced other leaders of the
need to start a non-cooperation movement in support of Khilafat as well as for swaraj.
5 . Describe Rowlatt Act.
1. This Act had been hurriedly passed through the Imperial Legislative Council despite the united opposition of
the Indian members. Gandhiji in 1919 decided to launch a nationwide satyagraha against the proposed Rowlatt
Act (1919).
Rowlatt Act
2.It gave the government enormous powers to repress political activities, and allowed detention of political
prisoners without trial for two years.
Indian Response
3. Mahatma Gandhi wanted non-violent civil disobedience against such unjust laws, which would start with a
hartal on 6 April.
4.Rallies were organised in various cities, workers went on strike in railway workshops, and shops closed down.
5. Alarmed by the popular upsurge, and scared that lines of communication such as the railways and telegraph
would be disrupted, the British administration decided to clamp down on nationalists.
6 .Explain Jallianwala Bagh incident .
1. On 10 April, the police in Amritsar fired upon a peaceful procession, provoking widespread attacks on banks,
post offices and railway stations. Martial law was imposed and General Dyer took command.
2.On 13 April the infamous Jallianwalla Bagh incident took place. On that day a large crowd gathered in the
enclosed ground of Jallianwalla Bagh.
Act of General Dyer
3. Dyer entered the area, blocked the exit points, and opened fire on the crowd, killing hundreds. As the news of
Jallianwalla Bagh spread, crowds took to the streets in many north Indian towns.
Government response
4.There were strikes, clashes with the police and attacks on government buildings. The government responded
with brutal repression, seeking to humiliate and terrorise people: 5.Satyagrahis were forced to rub their noses on
the ground, crawl on the streets, and do salaam (salute) to all sahibs; people were flogged and villages were
bombed.
*11 .When and why was Simon Commission constituted? Why did Indians oppose it? How did Indians
Oppose it?
1.Tory government in Britain constituted a Statutory Commission under Sir John Simon in1927. Set up in response to
the nationalist movement.
i.The Commission was to examine the success of earlier Reforms( ACT OF 1909 and Act of 1919)
ii. And to suggest for Reforms for future.
Why did Indians oppose it
2.The problem was that the commission did not have a single Indian member. They were all British. So it was labeled
as ``All White Men Commission`` by Indians.
How did Indians Oppose it?
3.When the Simon Commission arrived in India in 1928, it was greeted with black placards and the slogan ‘Go back
Simon’. All parties, including the Congress and the Muslim League, participated in the demonstrations.
`4. The relationship between the poor peasants and the Congress remained uncertain. Why?
1. The poorer peasantry were not just interested in the lowering of the revenue demand.
2.Many of them were small tenants cultivating land they had rented from landlords. As the Depression continued
and cash incomes dwindled, the small tenants found it difficult to pay their rent.
3. They wanted the unpaid rent to the landlord to be remitted. They joined a variety of radical movements, often
led by Socialists and Communists.
4.Apprehensive of raising issues that might upset the rich peasants and landlords, the Congress was unwilling to
support ‘no rent’ campaigns in most places.
5.So the relationship between the poor peasants and the Congress remained uncertain.
15. What about the business classes? How did they relate to the Civil Disobedience Movement?
1.During the First World War, Indian merchants and industrialists had made huge profits and become
powerful. Keen on expanding their business, they now reacted against colonial policies that restricted business
activities.
.They wanted protection against imports of foreign goods, and a rupee-sterling foreign exchange ratio that would
discourage imports.
2. To organise business interests, they formed the Indian Industrial and Commercial Congress in 1920 and the
Federation of the Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industries.
3. Led by prominent industrialists like Purshottamdas Thakurdas and G. D. Birla, the industrialists attacked
colonial control over the Indian economy, and supported the Civil Disobedience Movement when it was first
launched.
4.They gave financial assistance and refused to buy or sell imported goods. Most businessmen came to see
swaraj as a time when colonial restrictions on business would no longer exist and trade and industry would
flourish without constraints.
5.But after the failure of the Round Table Conference, business groups were no longer uniformly enthusiastic.
They were apprehensive of the spread of militant activities, and worried about prolonged disruption of business,
as well as of the growing influence of socialism amongst the younger members of the Congress.
16. The industrial working classes did not participate in the Civil Disobedience Movement in large
numbers.
Why ?
1.The industrial working classes did not participate in the Civil Disobedience Movement in large numbers,
except in the Nagpur region.
2. As the industrialists came closer to the Congress, workers stayed aloof. But in spite of that, some workers did
participate in the Civil Disobedience Movement.
3.Selectively adopting some of the ideas of the Gandhian programme, like boycott of foreign goods, as part of
their own movements against low wages and poor working conditions.
4.There were strikes by railway workers in 1930 and dockworkers in 1932. In 1930 thousands of workers in
Chotanagpur tin mines wore Gandhi caps and participated in protest rallies and boycott campaigns.
5.But the Congress was reluctant to include workers’ demands as part of its programme of struggle. It felt that
this would alienate industrialists and divide the anti-imperial forces.
1.The Congress and the Muslim League made efforts to renegotiate an alliance, and in 1927 it appeared that such
a unity could be forged. The important differences were over the question of representation in the future
assemblies that were to be elected.
2.Muhammad Ali Jinnah was willing to give up the demand for separate electorates, if Muslims were assured
reserved seats in the Central Assembly and representation in proportion to population in the Muslim-dominated
provinces.
3.Negotiations over the question of representation continued but all hope of resolving the issue at the All Parties
Conference in 1928 disappeared when M.R. Jayakar of the Hindu Mahasabha strongly opposed efforts at
compromise.
4.When the Civil Disobedience Movement started there was thus an atmosphere of suspicion and distrust
between communities. Alienated from the Congress, large sections of Muslims could not respond to the call for a
united struggle.
5. Many Muslim leaders and intellectuals expressed their concern about the status of Muslims as a minority
within India. They feared that the culture and identity of minorities would be submerged under the domination of
a Hindu majority.