1936_LANG_Morphology 18th-Century Music
1936_LANG_Morphology 18th-Century Music
1936_LANG_Morphology 18th-Century Music
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
American Musicological Society and University of California Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to Bulletin of the American Musicological Society.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 194.27.18.18 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 23:23:44 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSICOLOGICAL SOCIETY
This content downloaded from 194.27.18.18 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 23:23:44 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSICOLOGICALSOCIETY 3
feature of the music of the Baroque period is continuous expansion.
Totality of a closed form is achieved by an uninterrupted "discursive"
development of the given musical material. Opposed to this style
stands the musical idiom of the socalled classical period. Here we
have to deal with the organization of sections into a whole. The
"bridge" or the "closing theme" of a sonata exposition are meaning-
less unless confronted with each other as organic members of a
larger constellation. The question of contrasting themes-usually
considered of great importance in the sonata-form-seems to have
been of secondary importance to the earlier members of the classical
school; their main concern was to establish clear sections divided by
tonalities rather than by themes.
Primitive Music
George Herzog
(MARCH 3RD, 1935)
THE GENERAL,THEORETICALSTATEMENTSmade in the
past are no longer
advanced in the study of primitve music against its cultural back-
ground. Thus it is no longer held that simple musical forms will
always develop into more complex ones, nor that comparatively
simple or complex musical forms will be found associated with com-
paratively simple or complex forms of other manifestations of human
culture. All evidence points to the wisdom of dispensing with
sweeping theoretical schemes and of inquiring in each case into the
specific historical processes that have molded the culture and musical
style of a nation or tribe. Historicity is the fundamental background
of primitive as of sophisticated culture, and thus also of primitive
music. Consequently, primitive musical forms cannot be taken either
as the primordial forms of musical development, or as the spontaneous
self-expression of a "primitive mind". Improvisation proper is not
common, outside of Africa; songs are very often committed to the
new generation through teaching, and are practiced meticulously
before performance.
Also the old theories of the origin of music have suffered in
prestige: Spencer's theory of speech-melody, Biicher's of the rhythm
of group labor, Darwin's of the sex instinct and Helmholtz's of the
upper partials as the fountainhead of musical development. Serious
studies of primitive musical styles have brought to the fore a sur-
prising amount and variety of musical form. So little is actually
known, however, that the main attention of this field is devoted to
increasing that little, and collecting more material before it all
disappears under the impact of Western civilization.
This content downloaded from 194.27.18.18 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 23:23:44 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions