Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Do Yen Vy- ex 22

    Uploaded by

    Đỗ Vy

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Do Yen Vy- ex 22

    Uploaded by

    Đỗ Vy
    1 views1 page

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    1 views1 page

    Do Yen Vy- ex 22

    Uploaded by

    Đỗ Vy

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    It is widely acknowledged that some charity doers opt to help needy people directly.

    However, some
    prefer providing help via a third-party organisation. This essay aims to address both views. Personally, I
    believe I feel it would be best if individuals could pick for relevant charitable techniques that meet their
    goals

    On the one hand, there are some justifications as to why individuals select to do charity in person. Firstly,
    they want to ensure their help can reach underprivileged people, avoiding fraud. There have been many
    assertions that some unreliable organisations and individuals have taken advantage of philanthropists to
    profiteer for their own sake instead of assisting disaster-stricken neighbourhoods. Secondly, with small-
    scaling areas, direct help from benefactors may be done more apace. Specifically, if needy families exist
    in the neighbourhood, benefactors in those areas can provide the needy with direct help. Support as
    such not only meets disadvantaged families’ demands but also serves as community-bonding activity.

    On the other hand, individuals who would rather send money or donate gifts such as clothes, and
    medicine via aid organizations may have their reasons. Firstly, geographical barriers are one of the
    primary reasons for this approach. To explain, it is not uncommon for many philanthropists could reach
    disaster-ravaged areas, which may sometimes located in far-flung destinations, to provide support.
    Therefore, by offering financial support through humanitarian organizations, they can join hands in
    aiding deprived people. Secondly, another obstacle that charity doers may encounter is time. This
    tendency is a worldwide struggle as people have to allocate time efficiently to their priorities, which
    precludes them from doing charity in person. Therefore, third parties, such as prestigious aid
    organizations, are selected to be their representatives to help disadvantaged people.

    In conclusion, from the aforementioned analysis, both options for doing charity have distinguished
    benefits and drawbacks. On balance, I believe it would be superior if individuals could opt for applicable
    charity methods that suit their purposes

    You might also like