Introduction and Methodology of Accounting Theory

1. Introduction

Theory may be described as “a cohesive set of hypothetical, conceptual and pragmatic

principles forming a general frame of reference for a field of study.”

Accounting theory refers to the framework of assumptions, methodologies, and

principles used in the study and application of financial reporting. It serves as the
foundation for developing and applying accounting practices, standards, and
procedures. Accounting theory helps to explain and predict accounting practices,
ensuring that they are logical, consistent, and applicable to real-world financial
reporting needs.

1.1 Objectives of Accounting Theory:

- To explain current accounting practices.

- To provide a guide for the development of new accounting procedures.

- To enhance the understanding of financial statements by users (investors, regulators,

managers, etc.).

1.2 Importance of Accounting Theory

 Establishes the Rules for Making Financial Statements

Accounting theory gives us the basic rules that help companies prepare their
financial statements (like the balance sheet, income statement, etc.). Without
these rules, each company might do things differently, making it hard to
understand or compare their financial information.
 Ensures Clear, Consistent, and Comparable Financial Reports
When everyone follows the same rules, it makes financial reports transparent
(clear and honest), consistent (done the same way over time), and comparable
(easy to compare with other companies). This helps people like investors and
regulators trust the numbers and make good decisions.
 Helps Create Accounting Standards (Like GAAP or IFRS)
Accounting theory is the base for creating official standards like GAAP
(Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) and IFRS (International
Financial
Page 1 of 10
 Reporting Standards). These standards make sure companies around the world
follow the same guidelines, so financial reporting is uniform everywhere.
 Solves Disagreements in Accounting
Sometimes, there are disagreements on how to record something in financial
statements. Accounting theory provides guidance to resolve these issues. For
example, if there’s confusion about how to report revenue, accounting
theory helps clarify the correct approach.
 Shapes How People Make and Use Financial Reports
Accounting theory influences how accountants prepare financial statements and
how users (like investors or lenders) interpret them. If theory says transparency
is important, accountants will ensure they present accurate and clear
information, and users will trust and rely on these reports.

Accounting theory gives us the rules, guides standards, and ensures everyone prepares
financial statements the same way. This makes it easier to understand and compare
financial information across companies and helps solve any issues that might come up
in financial reporting.

1.3 Why It Is Important for Accounting Students to Study Accounting Theory:

Studying accounting theory is important for accounting students for several reasons:

1. Understanding the basics: Accounting theory provides the underlying

principles and concepts that guide how financial information is prepared and
reported. This helps students understand why certain methods are used.

2. Critical Thinking: It encourages students to think critically about accounting

practices. By understanding the "why" behind the rules, they can better analyze
financial situations and make informed decisions.

3. Adaptability: Accounting standards and regulations can change. A solid grasp of

accounting theory helps students adapt to new rules and understand the
rationale behind them.

Page 2 of 10
 4. Ethical Understanding: It helps students recognize the ethical implications of
accounting practices. Understanding theory can guide them in making ethical
decisions in their future careers.

5. Communication Skills: Knowledge of accounting theory enables students to

communicate financial information more effectively, whether they're explaining
it to clients, colleagues, or stakeholders.

Overall, accounting theory equips students with the knowledge and skills they need to
succeed in their careers and contribute to the field of accounting.

2. The Process of Theory Construction

A theory, according to the definition of Webster’s Third International Dictionary, provides

“general frame of reference for a field of enquiry”. It does not however, give specific
prescription for a specific problem. Social Science is not concerned with isolated events,
but with the commonality of a series of problem. The process of generalization is
arrived at through the following stages:

(i) Observation: There are many disputes over the way in which theories are
constructed. But the construction of most of theories, as also the “laws of nature”, begins
with observation of the phenomenon. We all know the study behind Newton’s discovery
of the law of gravitation. He observed the phenomenon that all objects tossed up come
down. This provoked his inquiry which ultimately led to the cause.

(ii) Defining the problem: Careful definition of the problem will provide objectivity
or a track through which inquiry may be conducted. If identification of problem is
wrong or imprecise it would be very difficult to reach meaningful conclusions.

(iii) Formulation of hypothesis: “Science is a method of approach to the entire

empirical world, i.e., to the world which is susceptible of experience by man”, that we
call a hypothesis. It is the preliminary assumption adopted for the explanation of a
phenomenon. It is formulated before empirical evidences or facts are gathered.

(iv) Experimentation or testing the hypothesis: A hypothesis established around the

preliminary assumption must be tested for probable conclusions. It is important to
select the appropriate method for testing the validity of hypothesis.

Page 3 of 10
 (v) Verification: The final stage in the formulation of theory is generalization through
verification. If the observed phenomenon after repeated trial or experimentation
produces the desired result the hypothesis is then said to be confirmed, the logical
consistency of the hypothesis is generalized to formulate a theory. “Scientific theories
provide certain “expectations” or “predictions” about phenomena and when these
expectations occur, they are said to “confirm” the theory. When unexpected results
occur, they are considered to be anomalies which eventually require a modification of
the theory or the construction of a new theory.

3. Characteristics of a Good Theory

A good theory should fulfill the following criteria:

(i) It should explain or predict phenomena, i.e., they should be empirical.

(ii) Theories should be capable of being tested empirically. Theories which fail tests
are not of universal applicability, therefore, must be replaced by better or non-refutable
theories.

(iii) Theories should be consistent both internally and externally. Internal

consistency is present when the analytical properties of theory ensure that the given
theory predicts the same outcome in every identical case.

External consistency implies that the theory should be consistent with theories in other
disciplines.

(iv) A theory should cover the full range of variations relating to the nature of the
phenomena is question.

(v) Theory should be helpful in providing guidelines for research into empirical
problems.

4. Levels of Accounting Theory

Accounting theory operates at various levels, with each addressing different aspects of
financial reporting and decision-making.

4.1 Descriptive Level

 Focuses on observing and explaining existing accounting practices.

Page 4 of 10
  Provides insights into how financial transactions are recorded and reported.

 Does not attempt to prescribe changes or improvements but rather documents

the current state of affairs.

4.2 Normative Level

 Concerned with the development of standards and recommendations on how

accounting should be practiced.

 Proposes ideal methods of accounting based on theoretical frameworks and

principles.

 Often involves ethical considerations, focusing on "what should be" rather than
"what is."

4.3 Pragmatic Level

 Involves the application of accounting principles in practical scenarios.

 Emphasizes the utility and impact of accounting in decision-making.

 Takes into account the behavior of users of financial statements, such as

investors, managers, and regulators.

4.4 Positive Level

 Focuses on understanding why certain accounting practices are followed.

 Investigates the cause-effect relationships in accounting practices, such as the

impact of tax laws or regulations on financial reporting.

5. Theories and Approaches to Accounting Structure

Theories and approaches to accounting help in understanding the conceptual framework

and methodologies used to structure accounting information. There are several key
theories in this domain:

Page 5 of 10
5.1 Classical or Traditional Approach

 Based on historical cost accounting where assets and liabilities are recorded at
their original cost.

 Relies on well-established principles like the matching concept, realization

principle, and going concern.

5.2 Decision-Usefulness Approach

 Focuses on providing financial information that is useful to decision-makers,

particularly investors.

 Emphasizes relevance and reliability of financial data.

5.3 Ethical Approach

- Focuses on the moral implications of accounting decisions and how they affect
various stakeholders.

- Emphasizes fairness, transparency, and the social responsibility of accountants.

5.4 Behavioral Approach

- Examines how individuals (both accountants and users of financial information)

behave in response to accounting policies and financial information.

- Example: How financial reports influence investor confidence or managerial

decision- making.

5.5 Agency Theory

 Based on the relationship between principals (owners) and agents (managers)

where agents may not always act in the best interest of principals.

 Accounting serves as a tool to reduce information asymmetry between the two

parties and ensure accountability.

5.6 The Proprietary Theory:

- Views the business as the property of the owners.

Page 6 of 10
 - The accounting focus is on the owner’s equity and how it changes through
transactions.

- Financial statements primarily reflect the interests of the owners or shareholders.

5.6 The Entity Theory:

- Treats the business as a separate entity, distinct from its owners.

- Emphasizes the company’s financial position and performance independent of the

owners.

- Liability and equity are considered in relation to the company’s assets.

5.7 The Fund Theory:

- Applied mostly in governmental and nonprofit accounting.

- Focuses on the accountability of resources or funds, rather than profit.

- Tracks how resources are received, allocated, and used within specific funds.

5.8 The Residual Equity Theory:

- Focuses on the residual interest of shareholders after all liabilities have been
satisfied.

- Useful for understanding the impact of financial transactions on shareholders’

wealth.

6. The Efficient Markets Hypothesis (EMH)

The Efficient Markets Hypothesis is an important concept in accounting and finance that
suggests that financial markets are efficient in reflecting all available information.

6.1 Forms of EMH

a. Weak Form Efficiency: Prices reflect all historical market data (e.g., past prices,
volumes).

b. Semi-Strong Form Efficiency: Prices reflect all publicly available information

(e.g., financial statements, news).

Page 7 of 10
 c. Strong Form Efficiency: Prices reflect all information, both public and private
(including insider information).

6.2 Implications for Accounting

 Disclosure and Transparency: If markets are efficient, accounting information

must be accurate and timely to contribute to decision-making. Emphasizes
transparency and the quality of financial disclosures, since new information will
quickly adjust market prices.

 Investor Decision Making: If markets are efficient, investors rely heavily on

public financial reports to make decisions.

 Predictability of Returns: In an efficient market, it is nearly impossible to

consistently outperform the market through stock selection or timing based on
available information.

7. Controversy in the Development of Accounting Principles and Procedures

The development of accounting principles has been marked by several controversies, often
arising from differences in opinion regarding the role of accounting, the nature of
financial information, and the interests of different stakeholders.

Key Areas of Controversy

Accounting principles and procedures have evolved over time, and this evolution has been
marked by several key controversies:

 Rules-Based vs. Principles-Based Accounting

- Rules-Based: Systems like US GAAP have detailed rules and standards, leaving little
room for interpretation.

- Principles-Based: Systems like IFRS provide broader guidelines based on underlying

principles, allowing for professional judgment.

- Controversy: Rules-based accounting is criticized for being too rigid, while

principles- based accounting is seen as being too subjective.

Page 8 of 10
  Fair Value vs. Historical Cost Accounting

- Fair Value Accounting: Assets and liabilities are reported at their current market value.

- Historical Cost Accounting: Assets and liabilities are recorded at their original
acquisition cost.

- Controversy: Fair value provides more relevant information but is often criticized for
its volatility and subjectivity, while historical cost is more reliable but less relevant.

 Conservatism vs. Neutrality

- Conservatism: Requires more rigorous verification before recognizing profits,

leading to potential understatement of assets and income.

- Neutrality: Financial reporting should not favor any particular outcome.

- Controversy: Conservatism is valued for its prudence, but neutrality is essential for
unbiased financial reporting.

 Revenue Recognition

- Controversies arise over when and how to recognize revenue, particularly in

industries with long-term contracts or complex transactions.

- The shift towards performance-based revenue recognition (as seen in IFRS 15) has
led to significant changes in accounting practices.

 Impact of Globalization

- The increasing convergence of accounting standards (GAAP and IFRS) faces

resistance from different jurisdictions due to local economic, political, and regulatory
differences.

- Controversy: Should the world have a single set of accounting standards, or should
there be regional adaptations?

 Earnings Management and Financial Reporting Manipulation:

- Some companies may engage in earnings management by manipulating financial

statements to present a more favorable financial picture.

- This raises ethical concerns and undermines trust in financial reports.

Page 9 of 10
 - Debates on how best to regulate, audit, and prevent such practices continue to shape
accounting standards.

8. Conclusion

Understanding the levels of accounting theory, approaches to accounting structure, and the
controversies surrounding the development of accounting principles provides a robust
foundation for analyzing the role of accounting in financial reporting and decision-
making. By appreciating the interaction between theory and practice, accountants can
better navigate the complex landscape of modern financial reporting.

Key References

1. Scott, W.R. (2015). Financial Accounting Theory. Pearson Canada.

2. Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice-Hall.

3. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical

Work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.

Page 10 of 10