See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/378614186

AI-Based Software Testing

Chapter · March 2024

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-8346-9_28

CITATION READS

1 1,009

6 authors, including:

Saquib Ali Khan Mahady Hasan

Independent University Independent University
1 PUBLICATION 1 CITATION 160 PUBLICATIONS 584 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Mahady Hasan on 18 August 2024.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 AI based Software Testing
Saquib Ali Khan1 , Nabilah Tabassum Oshin2 ,
Md Masum Musfique3 , Mahmuda Nizam4 , Ishtiaque Ahmed5 ,
Dr. Mahady Hasan6
1 Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering,, Independent University,
Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
2 Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering,, Independent University,
Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
3 Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering,, Independent University,
Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
4 Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering,, Independent University,
Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
5 Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering,, Independent University,
Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
6 Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering,, Independent University,
Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Contributing authors: 1821908@iub.edu.bd; 1830668@iub.edu.bd;

1920582@iub.edu.bd; 2020259@iub.edu.bd; 1720943@iub.edu.bd;
mahady@iub.edu.bd;

Abstract
As the complexity of software applications continues to increase, software testing
becomes more challenging and time-consuming. The use of artificial intelligence
(AI) in software testing has emerged as a promising approach to address these
challenges. AI-based software testing techniques leverage machine learning, nat-
ural language processing, and other AI technologies to automate the testing
process, improve test coverage, and enhance the accuracy of test results. This
paper provides an overview of AI-based software testing, including its benefits
and limitations, and discusses various techniques and tools used in this field. The
paper also highlights some of the current research and development efforts in
AI-based software testing, as well as future directions and challenges.

Keywords: AI, software testing, machine learning, natural language processing, test
automation, test coverage, accuracy, research, development, challenges

1
1 Introduction
Software testing is an essential part of the software development life cycle, ensuring
that software applications are functioning correctly and meeting the needs of users.
However, as software applications become more complex and sophisticated, tradi-
tional software testing methods are becoming less effective, time-consuming, and
resource-intensive. This is where artificial intelligence (AI) comes into play.

AI-based software testing is a growing area of interest and importance in the field
of software engineering. It leverages the power of machine learning, natural language
processing, and other AI technologies to automate the testing process, enhance test
coverage, and improve the accuracy of test results. With the help of AI-based software
testing, software development teams can accelerate the testing process, detect defects
and vulnerabilities more quickly and accurately, and improve the overall quality of
software applications.

Fig. 1 Features of AI-Driven QA/Test Tools

1.1 Background of the topic

Software testing is a crucial part of the software development process that ensures
software applications function as intended and meet user needs. However, the testing
process can be time-consuming, resource-intensive, and prone to human error. As
software applications become more complex, traditional testing methods become less
effective, which has led to the emergence of AI-based software testing.

AI-based software testing leverages machine learning, natural language processing,

and other AI technologies to automate the testing process, improve test coverage, and
enhance the accuracy of test results. This approach has the potential to revolutionize

2
the way software applications are tested and validated, leading to faster, more accurate
testing and improved software quality.

1.2 Objective
The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of AI-based software testing,
including its benefits, limitations, and challenges. We will explore various techniques
and tools used in AI-based software testing and highlight some of the current research
and development efforts in this field. Additionally, we will discuss the potential future
direction of AI-based software testing and the impact it could have on software devel-
opment practices. By the end of this paper, readers will have a good understanding of
AI-based software testing and its potential to transform the way software applications
are tested and validated.

2 Literature Review
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become an integral part of software development, and
its impact is increasingly being felt in the field of software testing. The literature
review aims to provide an overview of various research papers on AI-based software
testing, including defect prediction, test automation, and quality assurance.

From our literature review, we explore various applications and benefits of AI in

software testing, as well as the challenges and issues associated with its use.

The papers we reviewed cover various aspects of AI-based software testing, includ-
ing defect prediction, test automation, and quality assurance. The papers also discuss
the impact of AI on software testing, including its benefits and challenges.

Key takeaways:
• AI-based software testing can improve the accuracy and efficiency of software
testing.
• AI-based defect prediction can help identify defects early in the development process.
• Test automation using AI can help reduce the time and effort required for testing.
• Quality assurance for AI-based systems presents unique challenges due to the
complexity of AI algorithms.
• AI has the potential to transform the software testing landscape, but its adoption
requires careful consideration of the challenges and issues associated with its use.
The papers we reviewed for our literature review highlight the benefits and chal-
lenges of AI-based software testing. The use of AI in software testing can help improve
the accuracy and efficiency of testing, as well as reduce the time and effort required
for testing. However, its adoption requires careful consideration of the challenges and
issues associated with its use. Overall, AI-based software testing has significant poten-
tial to transform the software testing landscape, and further research is needed to fully
realize its benefits.

3
2.1 AI-Based Software Defect Predictors
The research paper focuses on defect prediction using the Naı̈ve Bayes classifier, chosen
for its simplicity, robustness, and superior accuracy on public datasets. The classifier’s
performance is evaluated using ROC curves to achieve perfect classification by identi-
fying defective modules while minimizing false alarms. The outcomes are summarized
in a confusion matrix, from which common performance measures are derived.

Actual Predicted Defective Predicted Defect-fee

Defective TP FN

Defect-free FP TN

Table 1 Confusion Matrix

The Probability of the Detection Rate (PD) is a measure of accuracy that indicates
how well the prediction model classifies defective modules correctly. It is calculated as
the ratio of true positives (TP) to the sum of true positives and false negatives (FN).
A high PD value close to 1 indicates accurate classification of defective modules.

PD = TP / (TP + FN)

On the other hand, the Probability of the False Alarm Rate (PF) measures the
accuracy of the model in identifying false alarms when misclassifying defect-free mod-
ules. It is computed as the ratio of false positives (FP) to the sum of false positives
and true negatives (TN). In software defect prediction models, it is important to
minimize high PF rates, as they would increase the testing effort.

PF = FP / (FP + TN)

Achieving the ideal case of 100% PD and 0% PF rates is rare in practice. When
the model is tuned to increase the PD rate, the PF rate tends to increase as well.
Therefore, the objective is to maximize the PD rate while keeping the PF rate at a
minimum.
In summary, the Probability of the Detection Rate (PD) and the Probability of
the False Alarm Rate (PF) are important measures of accuracy in software defect
prediction models. The goal is to achieve high PD rates while minimizing PF rates to
strike a balance between correctly classifying defective modules and avoiding unnec-
essary false alarms.

This research study created a defect prediction model for a telecom software system
using a metrics program and an open-source tool called Prest. The model utilized
a Naı̈ve Bayes classifier to predict defective files in a project’s current release. An
additional software metric incorporating version history flags was introduced to reduce
false alarms. The model achieved an 87% detection rate with a 26% false alarm rate.

4
The cost-benefit analysis showed that the model reduces time and effort compared to
random testing strategies. The model is a practical and valuable tool for testers.

Releases PD PF GE

2 77 33 58

3 92 21 81

4 82 23 78

5 75 15 74

6 87 18 83

7 83 21 71

8 98 33 68

9 88 29 72

10 97 41 68

Average (Std. Dev.) 87 (8.1) 26 (8.5) 72.5 (7.6)

Table 2 Performance of the prediction model

2.2 An Empirical Investigation of Trust Requirements and

Guide to Successful AI Adoption
Scholars have focused on understanding the acceptance and adoption of AI technology
in the field of information systems. To investigate how trust in AI can be increased in
the early stages without practical experiences, a qualitative approach was used. Semi-
structured interviews were conducted with experts from various companies, resulting in
a diverse sample of 12 participants. The interviews explored potential risks associated
with AI and mitigation strategies. The analysis followed two coding cycles, aligning
with the extended valence framework and previous research. The dimensions of trust
identified were ability, integrity, and benevolence.

Fig. 2 Research Model

5
Fig. 3 Participant Overview

The results found based on the several key determinants

• Access to knowledge: Trust in AI requires knowledge transfer and interdisciplinary
collaboration to address the lack of understanding among customers and regulatory
institutions.
• Transparency: Lack of transparency in AI poses a challenge to trust. Developing
interpretable systems and enhancing customer understanding are key to building
trust.
• Explainability: Explainable AI (XAI) is crucial for building trust, but challenges
exist in achieving transparency. Implementing parallel algorithms can help address
this challenge.
• System and Service Quality: Careful selection of training data, regular updates, and
prioritizing customer interests are important for increasing trust in AI.
• Reliability: Reliability is crucial, and human review should be conducted when AI
exceeds its limitations. Rule-compliant processes, monitoring systems, and external
oversight contribute to reliability.
• Data quality: Addressing bias in training data through benchmark datasets is
essential, but challenges exist in creating valid and representative datasets.
• Standards and Guidelines: Self-regulation and self-imposed AI standards are
important for building trust. Customized guidelines, balancing restrictions with
innovation, and addressing knowledge disparities are challenges.
• Certifications: Certifications can build trust in algorithms, but challenges include
conflicting effects and the need for standardized processes and datasets.
• Government regulation: Experts have doubts about the effectiveness of government
regulation, considering outdated regulations and challenges in regulating AI.

6
• Social responsibility: Organizations can build trust through self-imposed ethical
guidelines, openness, collaboration, and direct communication with the public.
• Ethical behavior: Raising awareness and fostering an ethical organizational culture
contribute to long-term trust perception in AI.
• Sustainability: Sustainability in AI is gaining importance, and certifications can
help identify sustainable algorithms. Prioritizing sustainability can enhance trust,
particularly in resource-intensive sectors.

Fig. 4 Results of the Research Model

Experts identified ability, integrity, and benevolence as key aspects for trust in AI.
Access to knowledge, transparency, and explainability contribute to ability. Standards,
guidelines, and certifications promote integrity. Social responsibility and ethics are
crucial for benevolence. Adhering to ethical standards and implementing certifications
can build trust and gain competitive advantages. Further research is needed to promote
responsible AI practices.

3 Methodologies
3.1 Research Design
The study employs a descriptive approach to offer a comprehensive overview of
AI-based software testing, encompassing its advantages, limitations, challenges, tech-
niques, tools, and current research efforts. This approach involves qualitatively
analyzing the experimental and resultant tables and charts of previous papers, along
with conducting a cyber ethnography to gather information from online sources. The
primary objective is to delve into the current state of AI-based software testing and
provide valuable insights into its potential future trajectories.

3.2 Participants
The study involves active participation from software development teams, small
software firms, and organizations interested in adopting AI-based software testing
techniques or tools. The sample includes a diverse range of published research papers,
academic articles, industry reports, and online resources related to AI-based software

7
testing. Furthermore, online forums, and blogs serve as conduits for cyber ethnog-
raphy, facilitating the gathering of insights and opinions from seasoned professionals
operating within the field.

3.3 Data Collection

The data collection process encompasses two principal methods: literature review and
cyber ethnography. From the data we found, we carefully examined and analyzed the
issues or problems small firms face while using AI-based software testing tools. We
thoroughly evaluated the analyzed issues and developed corresponding solutions.
• Literature Review:
A thorough literature review is conducted to identify pertinent research papers and
academic articles focused on AI-based software testing. Various electronic databases,
including IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and Google Scholar, are meticulously
searched utilizing keywords associated with AI, software testing, machine learn-
ing, natural language processing, test automation, test coverage, and accuracy. The
selected literature provides valuable insights into the benefits, challenges, techniques,
and tools employed within AI-based software testing.
• Cyber Ethnography:
Cyber ethnography is employed as a means to acquire qualitative data from online
sources, encompassing forums and blogs. These platforms are scrutinized for dis-
cussions, experiences, and opinions shared by professionals actively engaged in the
realm of AI-based software testing. The knowledge obtained through cyber ethnogra-
phy aids in comprehending the prevailing practices, challenges, and future directions
of AI-based software testing from a pragmatic standpoint.

Fig. 5 Flowchart illustrating the steps of the conducted research

8
3.4 Data Analysis
The data analysis process encompasses the following steps:
• Literature Analysis:
The amassed literature is subjected to thematic and qualitative analysis to discern
crucial concepts, benefits, limitations, challenges, techniques, and tools associated
with AI-based software testing. The findings extracted from the literature are syn-
thesized and presented coherently, furnishing an encompassing overview of the
present state of AI-based software testing.
• Cyber Ethnography Analysis:
Qualitative data procured through cyber ethnography is subjected to thematic
analysis. The discussions, experiences, and opinions shared by professionals are
meticulously categorized into themes and sub-themes pertinent to AI-based soft-
ware testing. This analysis facilitates a profound comprehension of the practical
challenges, implementation issues, and prospective solutions within the field.

3.5 Validity
To ensure the validity of the study, a multitude of strategies are employed. These
include the triangulation of data from various sources, such as literature review
and cyber ethnography, to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the subject
matter. Furthermore, the findings are diligently compared and cross-referenced with
established theories, frameworks, and existing research to bolster the credibility and
reliability of the study. The methodology elucidated above enables a systematic
exploration of AI-based software testing, encompassing both theoretical and prac-
tical perspectives. By amalgamating literature review and cyber ethnography, this
study presents invaluable insights into the benefits, limitations, challenges, techniques,
and tools employed within AI-based software testing, as well as its potential future
directions.

4 Problem Statement
4.1 Nature of the problem
Software testing is a crucial part of software development, ensuring that the software
product meets the quality standards and is free from bugs and errors. However, man-
ual software testing can be time-consuming, expensive, and error-prone. Therefore,
many software companies are adopting AI-based software testing techniques or tools
to automate the testing process and enhance the testing accuracy and efficiency.

The main nature of the problem is to identify the challenges and problems faced
by software companies in implementing AI-based software testing techniques or tools,
and to suggest solutions or recommendations to overcome these challenges. The target
beneficiaries of this study are small software firms or companies who are interested in
implementing AI-based software testing techniques or tools to improve their testing
process.

9
4.2 Characteristics of small software firms/companies towards
Al based software testing techniques:
Small software firms or companies have unique characteristics that affect their adop-
tion and implementation of AI-based software testing techniques or tools. Some of
these characteristics are:
• Limited budget and resources: Small software firms or companies often have limited
financial and human resources to invest in the development and implementation of
AI-based software testing techniques or tools.
• Lack of expertise: Small software firms or companies may not have the technical
expertise or knowledge to develop or implement AI-based software testing techniques
or tools.
• Time constraints: Small software firms or companies may face time constraints
in delivering software products to their clients, which may affect their ability to
implement AI-based software testing techniques or tools.
• Limited scalability: Small software firms or companies have limited scalability as
they have fewer resources, which means they cannot easily scale up or down their
software testing efforts to accommodate changing needs.
• Lack of access to quality data: Small software firms or companies may have limited
access to high-quality data that is necessary to train AI models for software testing
purposes.
• Risk aversion: Small software firms or companies may be risk-averse towards adopt-
ing new technologies, including AI-based software testing techniques, due to the fear
of potential failures or increased costs.
• Dependency on legacy systems: Small software firms or companies may be heavily
dependent on legacy systems that do not support AI-based software testing tech-
niques, making it difficult to integrate them into their existing software development
processes.
• Lack of industry standards: There is a lack of industry standards for AI-based soft-
ware testing techniques, making it difficult for small software firms or companies
to evaluate and compare different AI-based testing tools or techniques.

In summary, the characteristics of small software firms or companies can pose unique
challenges when it comes to adopting and implementing AI-based software testing
techniques or tools. These challenges need to be addressed to ensure the effective
use of AI in software testing and development.

4.3 Challenges faced by the firms/companies

There are several challenges and problems that software companies may face while
implementing AI-based software testing techniques or tools. Some of these challenges
are:
• Lack of data quality: AI-based software testing techniques or tools require a large
amount of high-quality data to train the algorithms. However, software companies

10
 may not have access to such data or may have poor data quality, which affects the
accuracy and reliability of the AI-based software testing techniques or tools.
• Integration issues: AI-based software testing techniques or tools may face integration
issues with the existing software development tools or processes, which may affect
the adoption and implementation of AI-based software testing techniques or tools.
• Bias and fairness issues: AI-based software testing techniques or tools may have bias
or fairness issues, which may affect the testing accuracy and reliability.

Fig. 6 Rich Picture of Existing Manual Software Testing

4.4 Summaries of different works/research

Several works and research have been conducted on the topic of AI-based software test-
ing and the challenges faced by software companies in implementing these techniques
or tools. Some of the key findings from these works are:
• AI-based software testing techniques or tools can significantly improve the testing
efficiency and accuracy, reducing the testing time and cost.
• Lack of data quality and integration issues are some of the major challenges faced by
software companies in implementing AI-based software testing techniques or tools.
• Bias and fairness issues in AI-based software testing can have a significant impact
on the testing accuracy and reliability, and therefore, it is essential to address these
issues.
• The development of AI-based software testing techniques or tools requires a
significant investment in time, money, and technical expertise.

11
 Overall, AI-based software testing is a promising field that can significantly improve
the testing process’s efficiency and accuracy. However, software companies must be
aware of the challenges and problems associated with implementing AI-based software
testing techniques or tools and take proactive measures to overcome these challenges.

5 Researchable Issues
5.1 What are the Issues to address?
• Test coverage: In software testing, the issue of test coverage is crucial. Traditional
testing strategies frequently struggle to offer sufficient test coverage, which results
in flaws in the finished product. By automatically identifying test cases that cover
the most important components of the software, AI-based software testing can assist
increase test coverage.
• Test case choice: Another important problem in software testing is choosing the
best test cases. The selection of manual test cases can be time-consuming and error-
prone. By automatically choosing the most successful test cases using historical data
and machine learning techniques, AI-based software testing can help to enhance test
case selection.
• Management of test data: Generating and maintaining test data is yet another
difficult task in software testing. Through the automated generation of test data
that simulates a variety of scenarios and settings, AI-based software testing can
assist in improving test data management.
• Test environment management: Maintaining a stable and well configured test
environment can be difficult, especially for complex systems. By autonomously con-
figuring and controlling the test environment based on historical data and machine
learning algorithms, AI-based software testing can contribute to improving test
environment management.
• Detecting flaws: Conventional testing methods frequently have trouble finding flaws
that aren’t addressed by current test cases. By automatically detecting patterns
and abnormalities in the code that may point to the presence of faults, AI-based
software testing can help enhance defect identification.
• Test maintenance: Another significant problem in software testing is test mainte-
nance. Test cases could become obsolete or less useful when the software changes.
Through the automatic updating of test cases in response to software modifications
and past data, AI-based software testing can aid in bettering test maintenance.

5.2 Detail analysis on the issues and their impact on the topic
Test coverage, which measures how thoroughly a software system has been tested, is
an important aspect of judging the caliber of the finished product. Particularly in
complex systems, traditional testing methodologies can struggle to provide appropri-
ate test coverage. This may result in final product flaws that are not discovered until
after the program has been made available.

12
 A lack of sufficient test coverage may have serious consequences. Software failures,
customer discontent, and even safety risks can result from flaws that go undetected
during testing. Defects that need to be fixed after a product has been released typ-
ically cost more and take longer to fix. Software flaws can also harm a company’s
brand and result in lost revenue.

By automatically identifying test cases that cover the most important components
of the software, AI-based software testing can assist increase test coverage. AI-based
testing solutions can find patterns and connections that conventional testing methods
may miss by examining previous data and machine learning techniques. This can
ensure that the software’s most crucial components are extensively tested, producing
a final result of superior quality.

Improved test coverage can have a big impact. Organizations can save time and
money by resolving problems before they become more complicated and expensive to
address by identifying faults early in the development process. Additionally, increased
test coverage might result in a final product of greater quality, lowering the possibility
of software failures and user unhappiness.

Software testing with AI, however, is not a cure-all. AI-based testing implementa-
tion can be challenging and requires specialized training and experience. Additionally,
AI-based testing systems could need regular maintenance and upgrades and might not
always produce correct results.

5.3 Approach to mitigate the Issues

To mitigate the software testing related issues, here are some approaches that can be
taken:
• Test coverage: AI-based methods like genetic algorithms, fuzzy logic, and machine
learning can be used to prioritize test cases and pinpoint the parts of the software
that are most likely to have flaws in order to improve test coverage.
• Test case selection: AI-based techniques like model-based testing and combinatorial
testing can be used to create test cases that cover many scenarios and decrease the
amount of redundant test cases in order to improve test case selection.
• Test data management: AI-based techniques like data mining and machine learning
can be used to generate synthetic test data and decrease the time and effort needed
to create test data, which will help test data management.
• Test environment management: To develop a more adaptable and scalable test-
ing environment, AI-based solutions like virtualization and containerization can be
deployed.
• Defect detection: AI-based methods like machine learning and natural language
processing can be used to examine code and spot potential flaws before they arise
in order to improve defect detection.
• Test maintenance: AI-based approaches like test case generation and defect predic-
tion can be used to improve test maintenance by lowering the time and effort needed
to maintain test suites.

13
 Defect detection, test maintenance, test coverage, test case selection, test data
management, test environment management, and other challenges linked to software
testing can all be mitigated by applying AI-based methodologies. These methods can
be applied at different phases of the software development lifecycle to boost software
testing’s effectiveness and efficiency. Software testing can be made more automated,
accurate, and produce software of a higher caliber by applying AI-based methodologies.

Fig. 7 Rich Picture of AI Based Software Testing

6 Proposed Suggestion
6.1 Background of the problem by linking the Issue
By identifying flaws and faults, software testing is an essential step in ensuring the
quality of software products. The manual testing methods used in traditional software
testing methodologies can be time-consuming, expensive, and error-prone. Due to
the ever-increasing complexity of software applications, there is now a greater need
for more efficient and effective software testing approaches.The problem with typical
software testing methods is that they frequently don’t provide appropriate test cov-
erage, leading to overlooked flaws and mistakes. The appropriate set of test cases can
help increase test efficiency and effectiveness. Test case selection is another crucial
component of software testing. Another problem is test data management, where it
can be difficult to create, maintain, and secure test data, especially for complicated
software systems.

14
 These problems can be solved by using AI-based software testing methodologies
that offer more effective and efficient testing procedures. Prioritizing test cases, identi-
fying untested code pathways, spotting coverage gaps, producing synthetic test data,
safeguarding sensitive data, and producing various test data sets are all tasks that can
be accomplished using AI-based methodologies.

6.2 Proposed suggestion to overcome the problems

The following solutions are made in light of the problem statement and the difficulties
small software firms or businesses have in implementing AI-based software testing
techniques or tools:
• Invest in training and skill advancement: Small software firms or companies should
invest in training and skill development programs for their employees to acquire
the necessary technical expertise to develop or implement AI-based software testing
techniques or tools. The quality of software testing and development will be raised
as a result of this investment, which will also assist in overcoming a lack of expertise.
• Explore Open-Source AI-based Testing Tools: at Small software firms or businesses
can investigate open-source AI-based testing tools, which are frequently more acces-
sible and affordable than commercial solutions, to address the issue of limited
budgets and resources. Small businesses can take advantage of AI-based software
testing methods without making sizable financial investments by using open-source
tools, which are often more affordable.
• Collaborate with academic institutions or institutes conducting AI research: Uni-
versities or AI research centers are a good source of high-quality data, research, and
expertise for small software firms or businesses. Through this partnership, they can
successfully train their AI models and get past obstacles like poor data quality and
a lack of experience.
• Adopt agile software development practices: Agile software development method-
ologies can assist small software firms or companies in managing time constraints
and enhancing their capacity to implement AI-based software testing techniques
or tools. Agile development methodologies place a strong emphasis on iterative
development and continuous improvement, which can make it easier to incorporate
AI-based testing methods into the software development process.
• Establish industry best practices and standards: Small software firms or companies
can collaborate with industry associations and peers to establish industry standards
and best practices for AI-based software testing techniques or tools. These standards
can help them evaluate and compare different AI-based testing tools or techniques
more effectively and make informed decisions about their adoption.
• Address issues with bias and justice: Small software firms or companies should
actively work to address bias and fairness issues in AI-based software testing tech-
niques or tools. This can involve conducting regular audits of their AI models,
ensuring diverse representation in their training data, and implementing techniques
to mitigate bias and improve fairness in their AI-based testing processes.

15
6.3 Result Analysis
Implementing these solutions and recommendations can help small software firms or
companies overcome the challenges and problems associated with adopting and imple-
menting AI-based software testing techniques or tools. As a result, these companies
can expect the following benefits:
• Improved testing efficiency and accuracy: By using AI-based software testing tech-
niques or tools, small software firms or companies can significantly improve their
testing efficiency and accuracy, leading to reduced testing time and cost.
• Enhanced product quality: Implementing AI-based software testing techniques
or tools can help small software firms or companies identify and fix bugs and
errors more effectively, leading to better product quality and increased customer
satisfaction.
• Increased competitiveness: By adopting AI-based software testing techniques or
tools, small software firms or companies can keep up with the rapidly evolving
technology landscape and remain competitive in the market.
• Better resource management: With the adoption of AI-based software testing tech-
niques or tools, small software firms or companies can optimize their limited
resources, enabling them to focus more on core software development activities.

6.4 Future prospect to implement

The future prospects of implementing AI-based software testing are promising, and
there is great potential for further research and development in this area. Here are
some potential future prospects for implementing AI-based software testing:
• More automation: The application of AI-based techniques may result in more
automation of software testing. Through improved test coverage, earlier fault
detection, and reduced testing time and effort, these benefits can all be achieved.
• Greater accuracy: When compared to manual testing methodologies, AI-based solu-
tions can deliver more accurate results. By lowering the possibility of introducing
flaws into the finished result, this can help to improve the quality of software
products.
• Machine Learning: To increase the precision of defect prediction and test case selec-
tion, machine learning techniques can be used in software testing. By doing so,
testing time and effort may be cut down, and the overall quality of software products
can be raised.
• Use of Natural Language Processing (NLP): Test cases can be created by analyzing
customer requirements using NLP techniques. This can help to increase the precision
of test cases and guarantee that the user’s needs are met by the product.
In conclusion, integrating AI-based software testing has a very bright future. Increased
automation, increased accuracy, integration with DevOps processes, usage of machine
learning, and NLP techniques are some of the potential advantages of employing AI-
based techniques. Additional investigation and development in this field may result in
software testing procedures that are more effective and efficient and raise the caliber
of software output.

16
Fig. 8 Benefits of using AI in Software Testing

7 Conclusion
7.1 Overall summary of the problem and suggestion relating
the topic
In summary, the problem of software testing is the challenge of ensuring that software
meets the desired quality and functionality. Traditional software testing methods rely
heavily on manual testing, which can be time-consuming and expensive. AI-based
software testing offers a promising solution to this problem by leveraging the capabil-
ities of AI algorithms to automate and streamline software testing.

AI-based software testing has made significant progress in recent years, with
advances in automation, improved accuracy, enhanced efficiency, predictive mainte-
nance, and integration with existing systems. However, there are also limitations to
AI-based software testing, including dependence on data quality, lack of contextual
understanding, complexity of software systems, ethical considerations, and cost.

Looking ahead, there are several areas for future research and development in
AI-based software testing, including improving the interpretability of AI algorithms,
addressing ethical concerns, and exploring new testing techniques that leverage the
unique capabilities of AI. As AI continues to evolve and improve, it will be increas-
ingly important to ensure that these advances are used in a responsible and effective
manner to improve the quality and reliability of software.

In conclusion, AI-based software testing is a promising solution to the challenges

of software testing, offering improved accuracy, efficiency, and scalability. However,
it is important to address the limitations and ethical considerations associated with
AI-based software testing to ensure that it is used in a responsible and effective manner.

7.2 Progress made and limitations

AI-based software testing has made significant progress in recent years and has shown
promise in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing. Here are some
of the key progress made in AI-based software testing:

17
1. Test generation: AI-based techniques such as evolutionary algorithms, genetic algo-
rithms, and neural networks can generate test cases automatically. These techniques
can also optimize test suites to cover maximum code coverage with minimum test
cases.
2. Prioritizing tests: AI-based algorithms can rank test cases according to how likely
they are to find flaws. Because of this, testing takes less time and effort.
3. Fault detection: AI-based techniques can detect faults in software by analyzing code
changes, execution traces, and other data sources. This helps in identifying faults
that may have been missed by manual testing.
4. Test maintenance: AI-based techniques can automatically update test cases as the
software evolves, reducing the need for manual intervention.
Despite the progress made, there are still some limitations to AI-based software
testing:
1. Lack of human intuition: AI-based techniques rely solely on data and algorithms
and may miss faults that require human intuition to detect.
2. Limited domain knowledge: AI-based techniques are only as good as the data they
are trained on. They may miss faults that are outside the scope of their training
data.
3. High initial cost: Developing and implementing AI-based software testing tech-
niques can be expensive and requires specialized expertise.
4. Difficulty in interpreting results: AI-based techniques can generate a large amount
of data, making it difficult to interpret the results and make informed decisions.
In summary, AI-based software testing has made significant progress in recent
years, but it still has some limitations that need to be addressed. It is likely that AI-
based techniques will continue to play an important role in so+ware testing in the
future.

7.3 Recommendation of future work

1. Enhancing Test Coverage: AI-based software testing can be used to enhance test
coverage by spotting edge cases and intricate situations that human testers might
overlook. Future research in this area can concentrate on creating more sophis-
ticated algorithms for test generation and optimization that can automatically
identify and prioritize test cases that are most likely to find bugs.
2. Enhancing Test Automation: AI-based software testing can be used to automate a
number of processes involved in testing, including the creation of test cases, test
execution, and defect detection. Future research in this field can concentrate on
creating more clever and effective testing frameworks that can instantly adapt to
shifting software requirements and environments.
3. Exploring New Testing Methods: AI-based software testing can be used to investi-
gate novel testing methods like fuzz testing, symbolic execution, and model-based
testing. Future research in this field can concentrate on analyzing how well
these techniques work across various software domains and figuring out how to
incorporate them into current testing workflows.

18
4. Enhancing Test Oracle Generation: Test oracles are used to assess whether a soft-
ware system performs as intended. The creation of more precise and effective test
oracles is possible with AI-based software testing. The development of methods for
automatic oracle generation that can lessen the manual labor needed for creating
and maintaining test oracles can be the main goal of future work in this field.
5. Addressing Ethical and Social Implications: As AI-based software testing spreads,
it’s critical to discuss the ethical and social issues raised by concerns over privacy,
security, and fairness. The development of standards and best practices for the
ethical and responsible use of AI in software testing can be the main objective of
future research in this field.

Fig. 9 Advantages of AI Automation Testing

References
1. Tao, C., Gao, J., & Wang, T. (2019). Testing and quality validation for ai
software–perspectives, issues, and practices. IEEE Access, 7, 120164-120175.
2. Hourani, H., Hammad, A., & Lafi, M. (2019, April). The impact of artificial
intelligence on software testing. In 2019 IEEE Jordan International Joint Conference
on Electrical Engineering and Information Technology (JEEIT) (pp. 565-570). IEEE.
3. Battina, D. S. (2019). Artificial intelligence in software test automation: a
systematic literature review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and
Innovative Research (www. jetir. org— UGC and issn Approved), ISSN, 2349-5162.
4. Tosun, A., Bener, A., & Kale, R. (2010, July). Ai-based software defect predic-
tors: Applications and benefits in a case study. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference
on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 1748-1755).

19
 5. Khaliq, Zubair, Sheikh Umar Farooq, and Dawood Ashraf Khan. ”Artificial
intelligence in software testing: Impact, problems, challenges and prospect.” arXiv
preprint arXiv:2201.05371 (2022).
6. Sugali, Kishore. ”Software testing: Issues and challenges of artificial intelligence
& machine learning.” (2021).
7. Jalil, S., Rafi, S., LaToza, T. D., Moran, K., & Lam, W. (2023). Chatgpt and
software testing education: Promises & perils. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03287.
8. Pandit, M., Gupta, D., Anand, D., Goyal, N., Aljahdali, H. M., Mansilla, A. O.,
... & Kumar, A. (2022). Towards design and feasibility analysis of DePaaS: AI based
global unified software defect prediction framework. Applied Sciences, 12(1), 493.
9. Felderer, M., & Ramler, R. (2021). Quality assurance for AI-based systems:
overview and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.05351.
10. Bedué, P., & Fritzsche, A. (2022). Can we trust AI? An empirical investiga-
tion of trust requirements and guide to successful AI adoption. Journal of Enterprise
Information Management, 35(2), 530-549.
11. Li, J. J., Ulrich, A., Bai, X., & Bertolino, A. (2020). Advances in test automa-
tion for software with special focus on artificial intelligence and machine learning.
Software Quality Journal, 28, 245-248.
12. Srivastava, P. R., & Baby, K. (2010, December). Automated software test-
ing using metahurestic technique based on an ant colony optimization. In 2010
international symposium on electronic system design (pp. 235-240). IEEE.
13. Felderer, M., & Ramler, R. (2021). Quality assurance for AI-based systems:
overview and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.05351.
14. Ahmad, K., Abdelrazek, M., Arora, C., Bano, M., & Grundy, J. (2023).
Requirements engineering for artificial intelligence systems: A systematic mapping
study. Information and Software Technology, 107176.
15. Abioye, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Akanbi, L., Ajayi, A., Delgado, J. M. D.,
Bilal, M., ... & Ahmed, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the construction industry:
A review of present status, opportunities and future challenges. Journal of Building
Engineering, 44, 103299..
16. ”Software testing: Issues and challenges of artificial intelligence & machine
learning.” (2021).
17. Khatibsyarbini, M., Isa, M. A., Jawawi, D. N., Hamed, H. N. A., & Suffian,
M. D. M. (2019). Test case prioritization using firefly algorithm for software testing.
IEEE access, 7, 132360-132373.

20

View publication stats