GSL MOD(R2P) MOD(Humanitarian Obligations) Judicial proceedings and state responsibility GSL Lobbying Diplomatic Foreign Point Of Order

ings and state responsibility GSL Lobbying Diplomatic Foreign Point Of Order Points & Questions (5) Transit Chits (5) Substantive Chits (5) Documentation (20) OTHERS VERBATIM Total Marks
PORTFOLIO Ranking
Research (3) Analysis (5) Guidance (2) Research (3) Analysis (5) Guidance (2) Research (3) Analysis (5) Guidance (2) Research (3) Analysis (5) Guidance (2) Research (3) Analysis (5) Guidance (2) (5) Courtesy (5) Policy (5) 5 R & A (3) Logic (2) Research (1) Analysis (3) Logic (1) Research (1) Analysis (3) Logic (1) Position Paper (5) Analysis Paper(5) Draft Article(10) 60 50 (110)
China 2 2 1 2.5 2 1.5 2 2 1 2.5 3 2 2 2 2 2.5 4 4 3 2 2 1 2 1.5 2 1.5 1 4 3.5 2 36 29.5 65.5 Best Delegate
India 2 2 1 1 2 1 2.5 3 1 2 3 2 2 2 1 2.5 4 4 4 2.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 2 1.5 4 4 2 37.5 27.5 65 Best Delegate
Japan 2.5 3.5 1 2 2 1 2.5 2 2 3 2 1.5 2 3 1 2 4 3 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 1.5 1 1.5 1.5 4 4 2 31 31 62 High Commendation I
Republic of Korea 2 2 1.5 1.5 3 2 3 2 1 2 3.5 2 2 3 1 2.5 4 3 2 1.5 2 1.5 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 4 3.5 2 30 31.5 61.5 High Commendation II
Sudan 2 3 1 1 2.5 1 1 2 1 2.5 2.5 2 2 3 1.5 2.5 4 4 0 0.25 0.5 1.5 1 0.5 1 1 1 4 2 2 25.25 28 53.25 Special Mention 1
Brazil 1 2 1 1 1 1.5 1.5 2.5 1 2 2 1.5 2 2 1.5 2 4 4 0 2 1 1.5 1.5 1 1 1.5. 1 4 1.5 2 26.5 23.5 50 Special Mention II
Türkiye 1 2.5 1 1 2.5 1 2 3 1 2.5 2 1 2.5 3.5 1 1.5 4 4 0 0.25 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 2.5 1.5 2 21.25 27.5 49.25 Special Mention III
UK 2 3 1 1 2 0.5 1.5 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 4 4 0 1 0.5 1.5 1.5 1 1.5 1 1.5 3 0 2 24.5 24 48.5 Special Mention IV
France 1 1.5 1 1 2 1 2 2.5 1 1 2 1.5 1 1.5 1 1.5 4 4 0 1.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 1 0.5 3 0 2 23 21 44 Verbal Mention
Romania 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1.5 4 4 0 1.5 0.25 1 1 0.5 1.5 1 0.5 3 0 2 21.75 22 43.75 Verbal Mention
Nicaragua 1 2 1 1 1 0.5 2.25 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 1.5 1.5 4 4 0 0.25 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 3 0 2 20.25 22.25 42.5
Albania 1 2 1.5 1 2.5 1 1 1 0.5 2 2 0.5 2 2 1 2 4 4 0 1.5 1 1.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 0 1.5 2 21.5 21 42.5
Central African Republic 2 2 1 1.5 3 1 1.5 2 1 1 2 0.5 1.5 1 1 2 4 3 0 2 1.5 1 1.5 1 0 0 0 0 1.5 2 19.5 22 41.5
Argentina 2 2 1 1 2 1 1.5 2 1 2 3 1 1 2 1.5 1.5 4 4 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1.5 2 17 24 41
Russia 1 1 2 1 2 0.5 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1.5 4 4 0 1 0.5 1.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 3 0 2 21.5 18.5 40.5
Andorra 2 2 1 1 2.5 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1.5 1.5 4 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 0 2 17 23 40
Moldova 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1.5 2 1 1 1.5 4 4 0 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 18.5 19.5 38
Marshall Islands 2 2 1 1 0.5 1 1 2 1 2 2 1.5 2 2 1.5 2 4 4 0 1.5 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 2 15.25 22.5 37.75
Barbados 1 3 1 1 2 0.5 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1.5 4 4 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 16 21.5 37.5
USA 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1.5 2 2 2 1 1 1.5 4 4 0 1 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 22.5 36.5
Norway 1 2.5 1 0.5 1 1 1 2 1.5 2 1 2 1 2 1 1.5 4 4 0 0.1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 2 2 16.1 20.5 36.5
DR Congo 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 0.5 1.5 2 1 2 4 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 22 36
Israel 2 1 1 1 0.5 1 2 2 1 2 2 0.5 2 2 1 2 4 4 0 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 2 15 21 36
Burkina Faso 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1.5 4 3 0 1.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 15.5 20 35.5
Iraq 1 2 1 2 1 1 1.5 2 1 2 2 1.5 2 2 1 1.5 4 4 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 12.5 23 35.5
Rwanda 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1.5 2 2 1 1.5 4 4 0 0.5 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 12.25 22.5 34.75
Algeria 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0.5 2 2 0.5 2 2 1 1.5 4 4 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 13 20 33
Ivory coast 2 2 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 2 1 0.5 1 2 1 1.5 4 4 0 1 1.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 13.75 17.5 31.25
S. No. Type Portfolio Verbatim (Speeches, Motions & POIs) Notes
STATE THE ATTACK ON THE PEARL HARBOUR SEC RESPONSE TERRORISM BRI HOTEL BLA ATTACK OF
HOTEL SOLUTION INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT intelligence gc ratify ILO IL VOILATE POLITICAL LEGAL
1 GSL BRAZIL DIPLOMATIC eto POI FROM: NICARAGUA : ROLE OF DOES YOUR COUNTRY PLAY ? ANS : R2P BREACHED IN .
ADHERENCE TO IL UNRWA FRANCE BLAME GAME BEST WE CAN DO. UK POI: HR ISSUES ETHIC MINORITY
BLAME ROMA VOILATION OF IL . ANSWER GENOCIDE IS GENOCIDE+DEPENDS
GEO TERRIOTRY MAY RESULKT IN A PRFIOUNF EFFECT R2P 2005 TO PREVENT LESSER STROCITY
THE STATE CANNOT PROTECT THEY MUST INTERVE ALBANIA IL NATION SECURITY R2P ADHERE
2 GSL ALBANIA OCCUR OF MASS ATROCITY APPORPRIATE EVENT GENOCIDE WAR CRIME T HE ACCORDANCE
INTERNATION INTERVENTION THEORY ?? INTERNATIONAL PEACE HR PREVENTION AND
PROTECTION AROUND THE WORLD AND WILL TO LEND A HAND DIGINITY OF HUNMANS
ETO IS AN IL STATES BEYOND THEIR OWN BORDERS ETO STATES HAVE A DUTY NOT ONLY TO THEIR OWN
PEOPLE BUT OUTSIDE CITIZENS RATIFIES THEIR TERITOY BUT ALSO INTERACTION WITH OTHEER
3 GSL NICARAGUA NICARAGUA VS USA : INDIRECT INTERVENTION MILITARY + PARAMILITARY IN ICJ MILITARY AND PARA .
MILITARY THE ICJ RULED IN FAVOR OF IL BY SUPPORTING MILITARY ACTIVITY IN NICARAGUA IN CONTEXT
BETWENN COUNTRIES USA VOILATION NICARAGUA SOVERINITY ICJ ORDER USA
LITIGATION IN THE CONTENT OF ETO AS MULTIPE JURISDICTION DIFF PRUDENCE +DICITION SLOW
(KYOBELVS VS ROYAL DUTCH USA SUPREME COURT) RES JUDI CARTEX RELITIGATION 2002 – 2013 10 YEARS
OF LITIGATION THE BASIC FLAW BEING SLOW PROPOSES AS ASLOWING ARBITRATION OUT OF COURT
4 GSL INDIA .
SETTLEMENT CHOICE TO PUT APPLICABLE LAW ARBITRATION SUBSDIARY 2 OFFICIAL PREZ OF TRIBUNAL
ISSUE OF LEAGALLY BINDING NY CONVENTION (152 STATES) PROCEDURE REWARD INCENTIVE : MASS
RATIFICATION SHOW INTENT. BETTER SLOUTION OFFERS A BETTER AND FASTER.
1. ETO OF STATES REFERS TO INTERNATIONAL LAW REFERS TO THE STATES STATES OFTEN HAVE
5 GSL Turkey INTENTION TO MISUSE ETO COMMON EG JUS AD BELLUM AND R2P TO JUSTIFY HENIOUS CRIMES THE IL
CANNOT BE CIRCUMVENTED HELPLESS VOICE OF FORSAKEN PALESTINIANS CONFILCTS CAUSING
ILC DELEGATES THE ILD HAS SET OUT VARIOUS TIMES TO MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE HAS PERSECUTED AND
THAT GENOCIDE AND WAR CRIMES, WE HAVE DONE A WHOLE MOD ON R2P THANK YOU (POI CAR: ILC HAVE
6 GSL Rawanda PROSECUTED CRIMES?. NICARAGUA: R2P solution your solution? ALBANIA POI: REBELLION SUPPORT Y NOT
REFUGEE
IL, HR AND GLOBAL PEACE HOLD CHUINA ACCOUNTABLE FOR IL EXTEND BEYOND BORDERS RTHICS AND
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (POI: BRAZIL POPULATION WAS DEPOPULATED? POI: INDIA: SS, FALKALNDS
7 GSL UK
UNNECESSARY INTERVENTION HINDERANCE OF IL ? CONTRADICTION?). APOLOGY FIN AID. DEFENSE AND
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS PURPOSE. TO PURSUE RESPECT OF HR ALL STATES. NORWAY
1. CONSIDERATION ON INTERNATIONAL ORDER BASED PEACE DEMOCRACY JUSTICE PLURALISM
8 GSL NORWAY
DEVELOPMENT AND SOLIDARITY TO UNHOLD AT A GLOBAL LEVEL.
PCIJ DISMISSED THE CLAIM OF FRANCE TO SHOW PROHIBITIVE RULE, TURKEY WAS ENTITLED TO JUSTIY ON
9 GSL JAPAN THE BASIS OF THEW RULING SLIGHT VARIATION AND THE NATION ICCPR 2(1) UPHOLDMENT. Question the
privacy of territory non refoulment, domestic context
: INDIA LAW. USA VOILATED HR BEYOND ITS BORDERS, ALBANIA GERNOCIDE OCCURRED FOR GOOD
MEANS NO GENOCIDE COMMITTED FOR GOOD R2P USA HAVE BEEN COMMITING ATROCITY CRIMES.
10 GSL SUDAN
INTERNATIONALLY WRONGFUL ACTS 2001 AND SHOULD BE USED IN A TIMELY AND AUTHORATIVE
MANNER, UN ESCR NO. ETO USA
ETO + IL + ROMANIA ACKNOWLEDGES THE NECESSITY TO HOLD TO LEGAL STANDARDS ENSHRINED IN THE
11 GSL ROMANIA UN CHARTER MUST BE CONDUCTED OF SS AND TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY With their International Obligations align
with global
1. GREETINGS; ETO RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTABILITY ETC, RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS, INDO EFFORTS TO
12 GSL IRAQ FULFILL ETO FOR MORDERN SLAVERY, INFRA GOOD, HR INDONESIA HAS MADE SIGNIFICANT EFFORT, NOT
UNRELATED. VERY IMP PART.
1. IMP IN LIBERATED WORLD, PRECEDENCITY AND UNCERTAINITY OUR COMMITMENT TO HUMAN RIGHT
NOT ONLY DEVASTATE CIVILIANS PERFERCT EXAMPLE BEING RUSSIA, THEY IGNORED THEM AND
13 GSL FRANCE
INTERFERENCE, WE MUST TAKE ONE THING IN MIND AST THE SAME TERMS FOR TECH AND MILITARY
POWER, AGGRIVATE, CRIME BAD ROME STATUE BAD SS IMP ORDER GLOBAL.
S. No. Type Portfolio Verbatim (Speeches, Motions & POIs) Notes
ETO ARE HRO OF A STATE CAR RECOG THE CHALLENGE THE RESPECT FOR STATE SOVERIGNITY, ILC IS
14 GSL CAR HERE WE KNOW THAT, WE RECOMMEND CLEAR GUIDELINES SS CAN BE OVERRIDDED???? UN CHARTER 2,51
AND WE ENCOURAGE TO WORK TO. DENY ALLEGATION TOGETHER
15 GSL Faso IL ISSUE
16 GSL DRC Profressional with the law
17 GSL RUSSIA IL THESE COUNTRIES AND THE MISUE OF POWER IS VERY CLEAR AND TRANSPERENT AND UK BLAME(
1. MIS APPICASTION CASUSES RELIGITAION PRECLUDES RE LITIGATION ETO DAU DEDERE AU JUDICARE TO
RATHER PROSECUTRE OR EXTRADICE FOLLOW ORDER BOTH EXHAUSTED BELVS SENEGAL ICJ BINDING
UPON SENEGAL ICJ HAGUE FORMULA EXTRASDICTION TO BE THE FIRST RESOLVE TO PRESECUTE THE
18 GSL ROK
STATE THEMSELVES THE CHOICE SHOULD BE EXTRADITE FORUM STATE??PRIMARY OBLI, PROSECUTION OF
THE OTHER DEFENDER THE 2 CONTENTION WE STATED THE DESCENING JUDGE ZUO BEL VS SENEGAL ICT,
SENEGAL.
1. ): INTERNATIONAL TREATIES THIS DISTINCTION IS OFTEN IGNORED CIL LEGAL BINDING NESS THE ISSUE
IS THAT NON BINDNING ARTICLE SUCH AS R2P, ASSUME LEGALING BUINDING THE PROBLE THAT WILL
19 GSL CHINA
ARRIVE IS THAT NO PRSACTICE WILL BE EMERGING,CUSTOM, THE PROBLEM OF STATE X AND Y ONCE X
RESOLVES THE ABC RESERVE THE STATE CAN EXEMPT THE CIL, EXPLOITING AND DENYING
20 MOD 1 - R2P
1. sit of world since the past r2p moisuse Libya against the govt operartion of the nato china criticize the usa the china and Russia
21 MOD SUDAN
vetoed Syria china Russia blocking veto ineffective
TREATIES CONFLICT THE LATTER ONE DRAWN LEX PROSTEROIO(POO) MORE SPECALIS(POO) THE PRINCIPLE
22 MOD JAPAN
OF NON EVLOVMENT THE DILEMMA WILL BE RESOLVED
ESCESSIVE HUMANITRAINA LOSS UNSCD SIT OF NO ACTION LIT OF RELATIONSHIUP BETWEEN ICC AND R2P
23 MOD CHINA ICC OPERATIONALIZE ICC R2P BY REGULATION BY USE OF R2P ICC AS A COUNTER FORCE CAN GUARD
AGAINST A manuplation comply with IHL, proportionality
1. WE MUST TAKE PART IN ETO’S OTHER COUNTRIES AND HUMANITARIAN MUST BE RECTIFIED MY THE
24 MOD RAWANDA
COUNCIL OF ALL COUNTRIES
1. LEGAL CORE OF R2P R2P IS NOT A LEGAL CONCEPT CRIMES AGFAINST HUMANITY THE ICC DA DAPP 3-1
SIMILAR LEGAL ABASIS THE CODIFA DE LEGAL ALTA CUSTOMARILY AS A SUBSET TO GENOCIDE ??
25 MOD KOREA
INCLUDED IN THE BROADER FRAMEWORK ETHIC CLEANSING INTENT : DOUGLAS SPECASLIC, R2P IS SOFT
LAW
NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL EFFORT THE GLOBAL NETWORK AND THE INTERNATIONAL LEVEL AND
26 MOD NORWAY RESPONSE WITHIN THEIR GOVT THE NORMATIVE PRINCIPLE OF R2P IS REFLECTED IS IT ALSO AN AIM OF
THESE ACTORS THE NATURE OF THE DOCTRINE.
1. THE PRINCIPLE OF R2P INCLUDING GENOCIDE ETHNIC CLEANSING AND R2P UNDERSCORES THAT IS NOT A
NEW LEGAL NORM, THE ILC PLAYS A PIVITOL NORM OF IMPLICATION KEY CONSTRUCTION OF THIS
27 MOD ROMANIA
INTEGRATE THE SAME THIS INCLUDE OUTLINING THE KEY SOURCE AND LATERAL ACTIONS INT
COMMITTEE.
application of the r2p, the int community must ensure r2p used to safeguard HR, It should nopt be used as a rule of regieme
28 MOD Russia
change adhere strictly
1. R2P THE DOCTRINE BORN FROM ACTION DEFINES THE R2P IT IS NOT MERELY A CONSTRUCT BUT A
29 MOD FRANCE MOIRAL IMPERATIVE THE INTERANTIONAL COMMITTEE MUST BE HASTFUL, HISTORY HAS SHOWN US THAT
WE MUST PRESENT INTERNATIONAL FRAMEWORKS, BY THE PRINCIPLES OF SOVERIGINITY ARE ALSO VITAL
R2P THIS DOCTRINE EMBODIES A FUNDAMENTAL SWIFT WHICH EXTENDS BEYOND THE INTERNATIONAL
BORDERS THE ETO OF STATES ARE CRUTIAL IN THE USE WE BELIEVE THAT STATES HAVE NOT ONLY
30 MOD UK RELIED BUT THE OBLIGATION TO ACT MUST BE UNDER THE BOUNDS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW WE MUST
ENSURE THAT THIS IS NOT USED AS AN EXCUSE, WE MUST ENSURE COLLECTIVE ACTION THAT RESPECTS
INTERNATIONAL LAW.
1. R2P PILLARS; SEA LEVEL ISSUE, THE MARSHALL ISLAND NEED HELP RELATED TO PAST ACTIONS, IN
31 MOD MARSHALL
SHORT r2P MEANS WORLD TO STAND BY MARSHALL ISLANDS
what is r2p it stands for responsibility to protect HR PROTECTION SOVERIGNITY ISSUES, UNAMIT SET UP WE CAN
32 MOD IRAQ
COMPILE THIS NEW SYSTEM R2P + POC
S. No. Type Portfolio Verbatim (Speeches, Motions & POIs) Notes
R2P EARLY 2000’S POPULATION SS NOT A PRIVILEDGE THE STATE fails to protect its population it refers to the duty of
33 MOD Nicaragua states HR extends to all individuals the issue is that HR Transends a formidable obsticale, Russia has be seen Syria that serves
their geo pol.
R2P WHAT IS INT COMMIUNITY DUTY BENEFITS OF R2P a. theory of intervention of r2p intervention is the state
34 MOD ALGERIA disagrees, for the purpose of heinous crimes, flaw of the r2p some of the critics have intervened Albania stands on r2p it has
adhered to the members of r2p protection
PRINCIPLE OF CAUSE OF QRONGFUL R2P DOCTRINE CREATES THE VERY ANALYSIS BETWEEN ICC R2P ICC
OPERATIONALZE R2P BY ITS VERY ESSENCE DEALS WIUTH THE ISSUE BY PREVENTING REGULATION
35 MOD INDIA COUNTERFORCE TO GUARD AGAINST IT ENSURING ALL PARTIES OF THE UNSC, PORPORTIONALITY WITH AN
R2P OPERATION TO ACHIEVE AN OVERALL TO REPORT THE LAW ORGANIZIONT THE DOCTRINE THAT AN
INTERVENTION HAS BEEN TO MORE DECISION TO REMOVE TO MORE HARM THAN GOOD.
WAR CRIMES ETHIC CLEANSING AND WAR CRIMES ON R2P MOLDOVA EMPHASIZED THE SAME THE
36 MOD MOLDOVA COUNTRY HAS ALSOP BEEN WORKING CLOSELY THE PROTECT RESPECT AND FULFILL THE SAME
HOWEVER IN THE CONTEXT
PROTECTION OF CITIZENS ARGENTINA WAS BEEN A SIGNATORY TO ICESCR AND PROTECTING HUMAN
37 MOD ARGENTINA RIGHTS WHICH REQUIRES COUNTRIES TO PROTECT ITS CITIZEN ALL STATES TO PAY ATTENTION. R2P IS A
POWERFUL FEELING WHILE THERE IS MUSCH WORK WHICH HAS BEEN
1. 2017 ROHINGYA MINORITYB THE WESTERN STATE OF ROHINGYA AND CALLED THE MYANMAR TO
ADDRESS THE ROOT CAUSE OF THIS CRISIS, THE R2P PRINCIPLE HAS BEEN USED TO ARGUE THAT THE
38 MOD USA
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE HAVE BEEN USED TO ARGUE THE SAME IT HAS BEEN USED AS A
MULTILATERAL APPROACH INT ORG COLLAB.
BURKINA
39 MOD Security challenges, third pillar of r2p, int community should take timely action, addressing
FASO
IVORY THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT R2P IS OFTEN MIS UNDERSTOOD TO HAVE A MORAL FRAMEWORK AS THE
40 MOD
COAST ATROCITY SUCH AS GENOCIDE ETHNIC CLEANSING OPERATES
R2P IS A INT PRINCIPLE AIMS AT PREVENTION THIS POLICY WHENA STATE FAILS DOCTRINE SOVERIGNITY
41 MOD ANDORA
HUMAN DIGNITY R2P IS A CALL TO ACTION.
INTEREXCIO, R2P ROBUST ENFORCEMENT AND MECHANISM R2P IS A POLITICAL ASPIRATION THESE FLAWS
42 MOD TURKEY
MUST BE EXPRESS IN A BETTER FASHIONCODEX IN IHRMS R2P ONGING HR EFFORTS
AS A DEVEL0PED NATION THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL HUMANITARINA LAW ISSUES ISREAL HAS NOT
43 MOD BRAZIL FACED CONSTANT ACTION ARTICLE 49 OF GC 4; IHL AND CIVILIIAN VETO P5 ALLY OF ISREAL LIMIT THE
POWER OF VETO
EMBRACED THE R2P NOIT BECAUSE IUT IS Easy buyt at a rsik of r2p recommend that just cause – state must be failing
44 MOD CAR
proper authority by the unsc little violence , reasonable justify bad.
COMMUNITY BY ITS NORMS AND STANDARS ARE GIVEN ON THE SAME BARBADOS MIGFHT FACE WHILE
USING THE SAME CONSAIDER THE IMPACT ON THE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ON THE SAME ACCORDING TO THE
45 MOD BARBADOS
PRINCIPLE OF THE ENVIORNMEWNTAL AND SOCIAL NORMS IN THEIR TERRITORIES AND THE EXTENSION OF
LOCAL LAW HISTORICALLYT THE PRIMARY APPLIED
46
47 MOD -2 HUMANITARIAN MOD
48 MOD ANDORA WORLD CHANGES
1. HUMANTARIAN OBLIGATION ETO SUCH AS MILITRARY OBLIGATION EVI PROTECTIOIN EVI DAMAGE
INDUS ACTIVITY CAN HAVE SERIOUS IMPOACT SIMILIARY TRADE HAS HUMANITARIAN IMPACT DISPITE
49 MOD AREGNTINA THE IMPORTANCE ETOS FACE CHALLENGES ONE IS ENFORCEMENT HOLDING COUNTRIES ACCOUNTABLE IS
DIFFICULT OBLLIGATION FROM STATES THEMSELVES IN CONCLUSION MANY ARE STILL PRESENT SO AS TO
NOT DIUSREGARD THE BORDER ISSUE
1. all individual complaint the international treaties, related to humanitarian acts such as the GC which is related to the safety and
50 MOD Faso
well being with thew 1951 refugee and the 1967 protocol natural and man made issues both issues are potent.
FAILURE COLLECTIVE TO UPHOLD INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATION WE MUST PRIORITISE HUMANITARIAN
51 MOD DRC ACTION AND ADDRESS SHORTFALLS AND SUPPORT ACTION AND DRC HUMANITARIAN CRISIS LET US
UPHOLD AND PROTECT HUMAN DIGNITY TOGETHER WWE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE
S. No. Type Portfolio Verbatim (Speeches, Motions & POIs) Notes
1. ETO, RESPONSIBILITY STATE BEYOND ITS BORDERS IL, envi protection here are some steps and action Barbados here
52 MOD BARBADOS
are such as Int Human rights economic social and HR under the int treaties Given in ETO content applicable
1. OBLIGATIOPNS ARE A CRUTIAL ASPECT TO UPHOLD THE SAME IHL AP1 1997, 2005 AND HAGUE ETO
JURISDICTION PROTECTION OF NATIONALS AND NON NATIONALS ABROAD HRO’S ARE ENSURE EFFECTIVE
53 MOD IRAQ
COPERARTION AND MANAGING THE SAME ONCE THE CAHALLENGE WAS IN SYRIA 2011, SDP, DISASTER
PREDICTION
1. HUMANITARIAN CRISI WEATHER IT BE A ECO DISASTER SUFFERING FAR REACHING OFTEN LEADING TO
THE SAME. HRO ARE NOT MORAL ONLY IL VIA TREATIES FOR STATES AND INDIVIDUALS AND THE REFUGEE
54 MOD USA CONVENTIOSN THAT GUIDE OUR RESPONSE ETHICAL HUMAN IMPERATIVE TO STOP SUFFERING PLIGHT OF
OTHER (GPT); EARLY WARNING SYSTEM COMPREHENSIVE MECHAISM ENSURING THE PROTECTION OIF
WOMEN CHILDREN
NUCLEAR TESTING ISSUE; ENVI DAMAGE; POPLUS USA HAS A RESPONSIBILITY TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES
THE THE SAFETY AND WELL BEING TO THE MARSHALL PEOPLE MANY SUFFER FROM ISSUES RELATED TO
55 MOD MARSHALL
THE TEST THE MEDICAL CARE IS AN ISSUE ADDITIONALLY WE MUST RESPECT AND SUPPORT THE
COMMERCIAL ISSUES OF THE MARSHALLISE HELP SUPPORT THEIR TRADITIONS. USA USA
COMPLEX INTERPLAY TO IHL INCLUDING GC AND ARMED ONF AND EFFORT INC THOSE FROM
56 MOD ISREAL
NEIGHBOURING STATES AND WILL INFLYENCE THE SAME SHAPES POLICY
ICCPR 2(1) STATES TO ENSURE TERRITORY AND JURISDICTION BOTH CRITERIA TO BE MET ON THE OTHER
HAND GENERAL COMMENT 31(AND.OR) ANY OF THE 2 CRITERIA NARROW CONSTRUCTION ICJ OPINIOPN TO
57 MOD ROK APPLY OVER THE OCCUPIED TERRITORY OF PLAESTINE SPECIALLY WAS NOT TO ALLOW INDIVIDUAL RIGHT
STATE OF RESIDENT THE REJUMPTY APPROACH ICESCR THE PRESUMPTION VCXLT ART 29 DIFFERENT
INTENTION ILC COMMENTARY.. COLONIAL
58 MOD RUSSIA Protects human rights and dignities, geopolitical tensions, humanitarian needs are met, our obligations do not end on our border
humanitarian obligations should not be obstructed, increase in weaponization, decrease in respect of workers, 4th Geneva
59 MOD Rwanda convention 1949 aims allowed humanitarian aids POO: RAWANDA: HUMANITARIAN WORKERS ARE BEING
EMPLOYED.
HR TRANSCEND MAATRISCHT PRINCIPLE AS A STATE EXERCISE EFFECTING OF THE PLAESTINAIN PEOPLE
60 MOD TURKEY THIS WAS TO HOLD STATES SCCOUNTABLE FOR ETO MAJKE SURE HRO PORTECTED BY EMBRACKING THE
PRINCIPLE OF DUE DILIGENCE
THEREOFRE IT IS IMPERATIVE TO ENSURE THE RELATING TO DEVASTATION OUTCOMES ADDRESSING THE
CHALLEMNGES REQUIRE INTERNATIONAL COPERATION TO ENSURE THAT STATES COMPLY WITH HR
61 MOD FRANCE
STANDARD IS CRUTIAL THE ETO OF HR IS A COMPLEX BUT ESSENTIAL ASPECT OF GLOBAL LEGTAL FRAME
WORK TO UPHOLD THEM UNIVERSALLY.
NSA UNDEWR COMPLIANCE WITH HR HIGHLIGHT THES ISSUE UNDER IL IHL DEFINES ISSUES UDER ARMED
PARTIES THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTIOPN THIS PRINCIPLE SUGGEST THAT’S IHL ARE
LEGALLY BINGING IN NATUREE???? HOWEVER, THIS LEADS TO A FUNDAMENTAL ISSUE THE OFTEN LACK
62 MOD CHINA
ISSUES ABOUT THEM COMPLIANCE OF NSA IS A problem these states impose relative deprevative theory (rdt (WHAt the
fuck)) AS PARTIES TO STATES THE FACT THAT NSA ARE PRIVY TO THE SAME THE PERSPECTIVE OF NSA AS
THEY DID NOT CONSCENT TO THE SAME THIS LACK AS COMPLIANCE IS OFTEN DILIGENT TO COMPLIANCE.(
JUS COGENS NUREMBURG PRINCIPLES ILC TO CODIFY IS JUS COGENS WHICH PREVENT IL COMPELLING LAW
PREMETORY NORM ISSUE OF ASCCOUNTABLITY THE CAR PROPOSES THAT COPERATION BETWEEN STATES
63 MOD CAR JUS COGENS AND NUREMBURG PRINCIPLES AND USING EXISTING THE AND ENFORCE JUS COGENS AND
REPORT VOILATION OF THESE TO PROMORT ACCOUNTABILTY.
1. HRC MEMBER STATES AT CURRENT JUNCTURE THE UDHR EXTENT IS CUSDTOMARY BIN NATURE THE
BASELINE IS THAT IT’S A CUSMOTARY PROVISION THE EXISTS LIMITATION THAT HOLD ACCOUNTABILITY
64 MOD INDIA OF STATES AND BEGIN APPLIES THE TO ALL THAT STATE PARTIES RECOG ALL MEMBERS ALL MEMBERS
RIGHT TO HEALTH THE ICCPR 2(1) ICESCR THE OMMISSION DOES NOT APPER THIS RESPONSE. TEXT
CONVERGENCE. A worldwide character to give states a duty.
Argentina stronger humanitarian frameworks and better state cooperation is vague and lacks clarity many states are under funded
65 MOD BRAZIL integration ETO into domestic legal system to cooperate these frameworks in legal frameworks of which mining comes abroad
internationally.
S. No. Type Portfolio Verbatim (Speeches, Motions & POIs) Notes
THE UK REALIZES That implementation is not limited to the country’s borders they are bound to the rights of the people for
66 MOD UK example the UK intervenes internationally this involves protection in war turned area and are responsible in said area for our
country and also provide people protection.
1. HR INTERVENTION STATES OWNS IT TO THOSE WHO ARE IN DISTRESS IT IS ALSO CAST IN LEGAL NORMS
AND CONTROVERSY OF ETHICS OR RELIGION, ONE OF THE MOST FORMULATED BELIFS ESPICALLY WHEN
67 MOD Albania THEIR LIVERS ARE IN DANDER ANCHORED MANNERS IN WHICH CIVILIANS ARE BEING TREATED DURING
WARFARE CLAIMS AND THE CONFLICTS WITH FURTHER IN THE BALKANS. R2P orders from the UNO, these things
don’t face more crisis or the GC. ARE COUNTRY DONATE AS MUCH AS WE CAN POSSIBLY TO UNRWA
UK HIGH COURT ROLED AND APPEALED BY ARMENIA; ONGING CONF SIGNNIFICANT FAILURE VOILATE
68 MOD SUDAN INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW. CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT IHL POSING SIGNIFICATION
RESPONOSE TO IHL crisis GC article 1 to the fourth G
lex specalis how the principal is to be diff breach of IL the 2 bodies of law are complementary to one another lex principle Ihl
69 MOD Japan
effectively displaces IHRL it can be understood as a complementary approach lack of clarity by the ICJ.
1. hro calls upon us to lend a helping hand to prevent conflict IHL humanitarian obligation refers to the moral obligation have to
70 MOD NICARAGUA promote espically those which involces providing support to those in need here Saudi arab rebel legality and debatibility and
foreign military environment we as a global community and need of hr aid measns of unity and shared res
WELCOME THIS OPPORTUNITY COMMITTEES DRAFT GENERAL COMMENT THE NO OF ARMED GENERAL
GROUPS THE UNHCR 130M FORCIABLE DISPLACED BY THE END OF 2024 IS INCREASLY THREATENED AND BY
71 MOD NORWAY
HUMANITIZING PRINCIPLES IS BEIUNG CARRIED IT IS IMPORTANT FOR THE GOVT TO CONTRIBUTE TO
ADDRESS ACT IN SOLD
I STAND BEFORE U TO DISCUSS THE LEARNING OF THE Il PARTICILURARLY THE GLOBAL
JURISDICTION THE GLOBAL SERVICE LEARNING PROGRAMME BY INTWERROGATING PARTICLUAR
SERVICE WITH THE ACADEMIC LEARNING WITH THE SKILLS TO ADDRESS GLOBAL CHALLENGES
72 MOD Ivory
WITH THE INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL PRINCIPLES, DIRECTLY THE COMMUNITIES CONTRIBUTING,
OF THE IVOERY COAST TO PROMOTE LEGAL AND COLLAB EFFORT ACROSS BODERS.
INTERNASTIONAL ISSUES
73
74 MOD - JUDICIAL PROCEDINGS LAW
75
dispute act, courtsmake judgmenets on wjhat has been said, principle of moralituy, free disposition, request for relief that has ben
76 MOD Norway
envoked, litigation platforms 2019, enabling counsel
article 2 4 of un charter, 3 factors first states must be under a legal duty, state muist cimmit a act, proceedings were as of world
77 MOD Turkiye
war 2, icj rulings were undiplomatic, ilc laws being breached
78 MOD Sudan Congo Uganda phase 2005,ihl compilation, notable absence of consensus, soft laws multi national
79 MOD Romania effective int justice, strenghtening int courts, binding treaties, establishiment of meditatiom and negotiation, Romania reinforced
TRAINING TRANSPERENCY RIGHTS OF VITS CITIZENS LEGAL PROFS LEGAL RIGHTS STRONG LEGAL
80 MOD RUSSIA
ARGUMENT
81 MOD RAWANDA trails were taken to Tanzania, rawanda for the follow up and breach of confidential information
82 MOD ALBANIA ICJ is a critical orgen of united nation , Albania may not agree to the ratification
83 MOD NICARAGUA legal aid should be provided to every individual
MARSHALL site of nuclear testing by the united states , judicial proceeding are necessary to ensure THAT DISPUTES are addressed fairly ,
84 MOD
ISLANDS international courts play a crucial role in these proceedings ,
jusrisdiction determines a authority to hear and decide a particular case ,doctrine is evoked when majority of evidences are
85 MOD USA
located elsewhere , forum selection clause can be included by parties to avoid judictional battles
state responsibility it is vital to recognize restponsibility of IL renforcing IL related to state responsibility they are not merely
86 MOD UK responsibility they remain free from political advantage tis requires careful legal analysis and robust international legal
mechanism the UK belif they
SR5 JUDICIAL PRO JUSTIUCE Add numerous cases, for instance, the supreme courts ability to review and ensure state
87 MOD ISREAL
responsibility firstly strengthening that judges and procesutrs
S. No. Type Portfolio Verbatim (Speeches, Motions & POIs) Notes
nations often, internationally envi law judicial law due to Int community despite the stratery holding accountable for nations
88 MOD Brazil
allowing due diligence
BEFORE LOCAL CANT DO ANYTHING FOR THE CRIMES COMMITTED IN THE COUNTRY “KEOBIL VS ROYAL
89 MOD AGENTINA
DUTCH PROSECUTION” OUTSIDE USA MANY
BEFORE LOCAL CANT DO ANYTHING FOR THE CRIMES COMMITTED IN THE COUNTRY “KEOBIL VS ROYAL
90 MOD France
DUTCH PROSECUTION” OUTSIDE USA MANY
/STATES LEVEL OF CONTROL OF THOSE OF THE
FIRSATLY THE JURISDICTION RELATED TO FOREIGN TERRITORY THAT VSTURKEY TURKEY RIGID MILITARY
NATIONA TERRITOTY WILL Apply the occupiers
91 MOD Rok CONTROL FULL EFFECTIVE CONTROL STATES WILL IGNORE THIS WILL LEAD TO ACCOUNTABILITY THE
STATE WILL NOT BE EXCERSICING PROVIDE OR SUPPLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH primary obligationwith regards to the local asuthority
powert
– the legal proceding begin with the legal issues with the the state must safeguard the legal preceding the state must provide with
92 MOD Moldova
the state.
FAILOS TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE PROBLEM WITH JURISDICTIONAL PROCEDING THE CONTINUATUION OF
THE ARBIT SOLUTION AFOREMENTION MODEL SAME MODEL OF THE PCA THE SPECIALIZED BY THE ETO
THE ORG SHALL WORK UNDER THE DEFINITON OF THE TEXT CONVERGENCE THE ARWISA THYE NY DOC
93 MOD India
FOR MAKING THE AWARD BINDING IN NATURE THE SET OF THE SUBSIDARY ORGAN SHALL WORK UPTO
THE SAME MODEL TO CHOOSE THE EQUAKL TO OF ARBIUTRATION THEROY OF BIAS (MOOT) THE
COMMITTEE FASILS TO UNDERSTANDS LIGITATION ISSUE, choice of applicable law.
THE DRC REFRAMES ITS COMMITTEE TO UPHOLD ITS PRINCIPLE OF UPHOLDING THE JUSTICE WHICH HAS
94 MOD Congo CONSTANTLY HELD THAT STATES HAVE CONSTANTLY HELD THE SAME WE URGE THAT STATES UPHOLD
THEIR OBLIGATION IN THE CONCEPT OF THE DRC.
– RUSSIA ADDRESSES THE INVASION ISSUE CHINA ETO THEY NEED FOR STATE RESPONSIBILITY
95 MOD CAR THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY EVIDENCE SHOULD HAVE SAQNCTION POWEER TECHNICAL
AND FINANCIAL
TWO TIMES OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS, PRE-INTERVENTIONS AND UNSC PROCEEDINGS, WORNGFUL
ACTING STATES AND INFLUENCE THE ICJ, UNSC IS A VETO-BIASED COUNCIL AS SEEN IN USA NICARGUA
96 MOD China CASE, WITH REGARDS TO ROME STATUTE, UNLAWFUL ACTS COMMITTED BY A COUNTRY, A STATE SHOULD
BE AUTOMATICALLY LIABLE OR SHOULD IT BE UNDER NEGLIGENCE
RAINBOW WARRIOR INCIDENT VIOLATION OF SOVEREIGNTY VIOLATION AND SG COMPENSATION,
97 MOD Japan CONCEPT OF ATTRIBUTION IS A LEGAL FICTION, ART 4 OF THE ILC, THE INTERNATIONAL COURT IN
APPLICABILITY OF CASE, RISES TO THE RESPONSIBILITY OF STATE
IT IS USED IN MAINTAINING STATE COOPERATION AND MAINTAINS ACCOUNTABILITY OF STATES. FORCES
98 MOD Ivory Coast THEM TO FOLLOW A PARTICULAR MECHANISM, HOLDING STATES ACCOUNTABLE REPRESENTS STABILITY,
OUR INTERPRETATION SHOULD BE EQUITABLE AND RESPONSIBLE.
SOVEREIGN RESPONSIBILITY, INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS, IMPLIANCE WITH JUDGEMENT, 1986 CASE,
99 MOD IRAQ
ESTABLISH SPECIALISED TRIBUNALS
BURKINA FASO HAS COURTS SUCK AS LOWER COURT THAT INCLUDES CIUVIL CRIMES AND COMMERCIAL
100 MOD BURKINA
COURTS
S. No. GSL Mod 1 Mod 2 GSL Mod 3
1 Brazil sudan ANDORA NORWAY Norway
2 Albania japan AREGNTINA USA Turkey
3 nicargua china Faso ROK Sudan
4 India rwanda DRC TURKEY Romania
5 Turkiye korea BARBADOS Sudan Russia
6 Israel norway IRAQ ROMANIA Rwanda
7 Rawanda romania USA RAWANDA Albania
8 UK russia MARSHALL RUSSIA Andorra
9 Norway france ISREAL IVORY Nicaragua
10 Japan uk ROK JAPAN Marshall islands
11 Sudan marshall RUSSIA NICARAGUA USA
12 Romania iraq Rwanda MARSHALL UK.
13 Iraq nicaragua TURKEY MOLDOVA Israel
14 France albania FRANCE UK Brazil
15 CAR india CHINA CAR Argentina
16 Faso Moldova CAR CHINA France
17 DRC andora INDIA DRC ROK
18 Agentina argentina BRAZIL FRANCE Moldova
19 Barbados USA UK INDIA India
20 Andora ivory Albania IRAQ Congo
21 USA burkina SUDAN ISREAL CAR
22 Russia CAR Japan BURKINA China
23 ROK Israel NICARAGUA BRAZIL Japan
24 China DRC Norway BRABADOS Ivory
25 Modova Turkey IVORY COAST ARGENTINA Iraq
26 Marshall Barbados Romania ANDORA Burkina
27 ALBANIA