Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views6 pages

2. 14-19

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 6

IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSR JEN) www.iosrjen.

org
ISSN (e): 2250-3021, ISSN (p): 2278-8719
PP 14-19

Design for Manufacturing and Assembly Technique Applicable


For a Gearbox
T. S. Shete1, P. R. Kulkarni2, P.V. Pawar3
1, 2 (Department of mechanical engineering, Walchand Institute of Technology, Solapur, India)
3(Manager Design (Gears) Laxmi hydraulics Pvt. Ltd, Solapur)

Abstract: In traditional manufacturing approach considered as a „over the wall approach „and it consist of
few steps and they are identification of Customer needs, conceptual design of the product, trial and error
developing and testing methods and after the successful testing of the prototype the actual manufacturing of the
product will start. Geoffrey Boothroyd stated that almost 30% of the product cost is dedicated to the design
stage. Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA) guidelines helps to optimize the product design and
development .DFMA guidelines combines the process and it results in part reduction and cost reduction. This
paper presents a guideline which used the concept of Design for Manufacturing and Assembly methodology for
specific application on design and manufacturing of gearbox. The main goal of this guideline was to orient the
engineers during the gearbox development phase, such that a better gearbox design is achieved. It aims to
improve the assembly for easy manufacturing of the gearbox with low cost, high quality and the best optimized
condition. A case study is shown to testify the advantages and benefits achieved when the proposed guidelines
are used.
Keyword: Cost reduction, DFA, DFM, DFMA

I. Introduction
The objective of the DFMA is to develop a method to study the assemblabilities and manufacturability
of the product. Now days every company wants to deliver a product as less cost and less time. This is where
DFMA comes into a picture, Design for manufacturing and assembly (DFMA) is a combination of two major
aspects i.e., DFA – design for assembly and DFM – design for manufacturing. According to Geoffrey
Boothroyd almost 30% of the total cost of the product is involved in the design of the product. [1] DFMA states
the methodology for conceptual product design. For theoretical approach designers can use the DFMA
guidelines and for analytical purpose DFMA software is also available. This software can be used for
investigating every possible process used for manufacturing and assembly. In this study DFMA software is used
for the analyses of assembly process and assembly time. A through DFMA analysis gives the categorical
approach to each step of the process. This software also rates the costs required for every possible process and
creates cost estimation and a process plan. To get the through idea about DFMA and its application an extensive
literature review has been carried out. And as described below.

II. Literature Survey


C. D. Naiju et al [2] conducted a study and analysis of a shopping cart design, manufacturing and cost
estimation. This cart is widely used in supermarkets, departmental stores and many more places; first priority of
this analysis was to reduce the part count of the cart and to reduce the cost. The CAD model of all the parts of
the cart was analyzed by using DFMA software as well as Boothroyd Principles. Redesign of the product is
manufactured by using a commercially available metallic weave instead of casting the parts. Redesign of some
parts causes ease of assembly and elimination of some expensive processes which leads to better and optimized
product than the existing one. Observed reduction in assembly time was 3178.82S i.e. 3.89% .Price of the
existing product was $327 and the price of the redesigned product was $314.Total reduction in the cost of the
modified product is 3.9%.This might seem a small changes but while manufacturing for mass production it
causes a lot of difference and end up in a considerable profit margin. [2]G BalaMurali et al [3] states that in
manufacturing process 30% of the total time is consumed in only assembly operation compared to all other
operations. Hence they have implemented a novel method to the automation of the assembly sequence and that
is a combination of AI (Artificial Intelligence) and DFA (Design for Assembly). This method reduces the
number of parts i.e., it merges the parts which satisfies DFMA principles because of that manufacturing and
assembly cost and its time gets reduced.

8th National Conference on “Recent Developments in Mechanical Engineering” [RDME-2019] 14 | Page


Department of Mechanical Engineering, M.E.S. College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Design for Manufacturing and Assembly Technique Applicable For a Gearbox

a. Existing Topology b. Modified topology


Fig 1.Machine Frame Model. [3]

Boothroyd et al. [4] states that before the adoption of DFMA, design engineers would typically work
irrespective of manufacturing and assembly process, the objective of DFMA is to reduce cost in the overall life
of a product. There are number of approaches available on how this can be achieved. Most notably, authors were
a pioneer in formalizing such an approach. They provide criteria’s upon which each part must be examined. And
it is focused on part count reduction in increasing product Assemblability .However; every manufacturing
system will require the development of its own tailored tool. The authors concluded that no improvements in
operation can make a plant fully competitive if the product design is defective. Design for Manufacture and
Assembly can be the key to high productivity in all manufacturing industries. Claudio Favia [5], discussed “A
multi-objective design approach to include material, manufacturing and assembly costs in the early design
phase.” and states that Conceptual design is a crucial activity in the product development process. The design
freedom must consider a tradeoff analysis among several aspects such as assembly, manufacturing, and costs.
To create feasible design options for multi-objective design approach is the main intension. The approach is
based on the concept of the analysis of product modules and the theory of Multi Criteria Decision Making
(MCDM) approach. The main intension of this work is to define a multi-objective design approach which aims
to have a comprehensive analysis of the manufacturing aspects (including assembly, materials, processes, costs
and times).
H.Tasalloti et al [6] states that for adoption of Concurrent Engineering (CE) in design of welded
structures, a new model is proposed that integrates the Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA) with
Product Data Management (PDM) system. This product data management (PDM) system is integrated with
DFMA as a database of welding processes, materials, consumables, standard and guidelines as well as for
storing and tracking changes in weldments design [6] The proposed approach in this paper is also useful in
coordination with CAD applications and manufacturers Product Data Management (PDM) software to increase
the quality of a design of a weldments. And since this PDM it enhances the decision making as its use by
designers require only minimum welding and metallurgy knowledge. Zhenmin et.al[7]states that design for
manufacturing and assembly (DFMA) in prefabricated building design ,and it combines with parametric design
of Building Information Modeling(BIM) to develop the concept of DFMA oriented parametric design. Authors
have also stated that how to create a prefabricated building information model for construction and its precast
components information models for manufacturing, which have good manufacturability and Assemblability so
as to avoid the manufacture and assembly problems in later stages and improvement the one time success rate of
design. In comparison with the traditional manufacturing process this newly developed model is more
manufacturable and assemblable.WankhadeNiteshPrakash et al [8] have used DFMA to re-design a ball valve
fluid flow control valve and optimized its design to ensure reduced number of parts, safety, and reliability. Early
consideration of manufacturing issue also shorten product development time, minimize cost and ensure smooth
transition into production for quick time to market. Therefore optimum design, low cost and good quality with
quick delivery was outcome of this research work. Total no of parts present in the existing design are 23 and
after application of DFMA principles the part count is 6.This results in cost reduction. Observed changes in
assembly time is from 145 sec to 45 sec .i.e. 68% reduction.
AkshayHarlalkaa [9] suggests that significance of implementation of DFMA on an Indian consumer
product (in-market food processor). DFMA is considered as an effective cost reduction technique. While
studying existing design author notices that there is lot of opportunities where DFMA principles can be applied
so that cost of the product can be reduced. In accordance to DFMA principles Design objectives were proposed.
As a result there was a significant improvement in product architecture, assembly time & design efficiency. This

8th National Conference on “Recent Developments in Mechanical Engineering” [RDME-2019] 15 | Page


Department of Mechanical Engineering, M.E.S. College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Design for Manufacturing and Assembly Technique Applicable For a Gearbox

paper concludes that, by using DFMA principles an increase in DFA index is from 15.99 to 19.93 overall costs
saving if 0.25 USD (INR 16.79) and reduction of 108.49 sec in total assembly time was achieved. [9]
MohdNazri [10] stated that significance of the DFMA is to reduce the total part count. This analysis
contributes to the reduction to the manufacturing cost, Assembly time and material, hence author conducted
analysis of the water nozzle as a case study, and used Lucas-Hull methodology. The original design is reviewed,
analyzed and redesigned. By the analysis author concluded that redesigned assembly is consisting of fewer parts
13 to 8, and total reduction in cost is almost 40%. This cost reduction will results in to the profit margin. As per
the study of literature survey of DFMA, for methodology development the subassemblies of the gearbox are
studied. First the assembly sequence of the gearbox is predicated in the CAD atmosphere. The generated
random sequence is then assessed by the DFA, and after satisfying these criteria the new assembly sequence will
be generated with reduced no of assembly levels. Gearbox a case study

III. DFMA overview


Design for manufacturing and Assembly is a combination of two aspects and these aspects are Design for
manufacturing and Design for assembly. The Design for assembly guidelines are as stated below [12]
● Minimize number of parts
● Design for Ease of Handling
● Design for Ease of Insertion
● Standardize parts
● Design for current process capabilities
● Maintain awareness of alternative process capabilities
● Watch for free handling space
● Make sure of pre-positioning
● Ensure easy access for testing
● Provide modular component structure
● Differentiate variants at the end of process
● Check material compatibility
● Prefer flow parts instead of single parts

Industry always tries to learn new methods and procedures that may help then reduce the overall
expenditure of the manufacturing process hence they intend to believe in continuous learning process. In order
to reduce the expenses increasing the productivity is an important step one of the aspect to increase the
productivity is application of six sigma.
The DFMA can run activities in a parallel form at the same time while task sequencing. It also allows
us the use of simulation techniques and co-working of different teams such as design team, production team,
sales and marketing team, finance team etc. This underlines the factors affecting project failures and allows us to
eliminate the causes. It also makes it possible to eliminate those factors. The procedure for application of DFMA
is as follows.
Step 1 - product information.
- Functional analysis.
- Identify parts that can be standardized.
- Determine part count efficiencies.
Step 2 - Determine your practical part count.
Step 3 - Identify quality (mistake proofing) opportunities.
Step 4 - Identify handling (grasp and orientation) opportunities.
Step 5 - Identify insertion (locate and secure) opportunities.
Step 6 - Identify opportunities to reduce secondary operations.
Step 7 - Analyze data for new design.
Efficiency of the design is calculated by DFA index,
𝑁 ∗𝑡
DFA index = 𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑎 ……………………… (1)
𝑡 𝑚𝑎
N min is a theoretical minimum no of parts,
tais the basic assembly time for one part, and
tma is the essential time to complete the assembly of the actual product.
DFMA software is developed by Boothroyd Inc. This software optimizes the manufacturing and assembly
process. It is one of the most important software used by designer to decide the optimum design, manufacturing
process. DFMA is used for acquiring the high manufacturability level of a product. Designer goes through a lot
of experiences while designing any product the mistaken decisions , misinterpreted data , improvement
opportunities or just a really nice ideas are developed while product design and development areas. The integral
8th National Conference on “Recent Developments in Mechanical Engineering” [RDME-2019] 16 | Page
Department of Mechanical Engineering, M.E.S. College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Design for Manufacturing and Assembly Technique Applicable For a Gearbox

part of the DFMA is that the teamwork between different teams in the industry. This all factors of application of
DFMA can be validated from the gearbox analysis in next segment.

IV. Analysis Of The Existing Design


The gearbox under consideration is a 4 stage gearbox containing helical gears. The existing design of a
gearbox contains 4 stages. With a parallel shafts and a vertical offset. The input rpm provided to the gearbox is
1390 and the output required is 1.17 RPM. The frame of this gearbox is MFO225-L1-71P4. The four gears
stages are designed accordingly. The existing assembly process used for this gearbox is manual assembly
process. Since this is a manual assembly process there is a scope for lean manufacturing as well as the
application of design for assembly guidelines. The gearbox housing of this gearbox is made up of 3 parts. The
assembly process can be divided into the different subassembly procedure The DFA analysis of the existing
gearbox is as follows

Table 1 – DFA Analysis Of Existing Design


Entries Including Repeats
Parts meet minimum criteria 30
Parts are candidates for elimination 53
Analyzed subassemblies 5
Separate assembly operations 0
Total entries 88
Assembly labor time, s
Parts meet minimum part criteria 297.52
Parts are candidate for elimination 622.15
Insertion of analysed subassemblies 17.70
Separate ssembly operation 0
Total assembly labor time 937.37
Design Efficiency
DFA index 11.73

V. Suggestions For The Improvement In The Design Efficiency


In order to improve the design efficiency of the gearbox. The gearbox is analysed in the DFMA
software. For the ease of assemblabilities of the gearbox the entire assembly is mainly divided in to 4
subassemblies, as it is easy to assembly the subassemblies and it also reduces the total assembly time and the
DFA index. Fasteners usually cost 5% of the total assembly cost. It is beneficial if designer is using the standard
fasteners in the assembly as it reduces the no of parts, fewer orders to the vendors, less inventory cost, less
documentation and the total reduction in the cost. After the changes the new design consists of lesser no of parts
and lesser assembly time. The DFA index of the updated design is also increased. The DFA of the updated
design is as follows

Table 2 – DFA Analysis of Improved Design


Entries including repeats
Parts meet minimum part criteria 19
Parts are candidates for elimination 41
Analyzed subassemblies 4
Separate assembly operation 0
Total entries 64
Assembly labor time, s
Parts meet minimum part criteria 185.88
Parts are candidates for elimination 415.95
Insertion of analyzed subassemblies 28.16
Separate assembly operation 0
Total entries 629.99
Design efficiency
DFA index 23.40

8th National Conference on “Recent Developments in Mechanical Engineering” [RDME-2019] 17 | Page


Department of Mechanical Engineering, M.E.S. College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Design for Manufacturing and Assembly Technique Applicable For a Gearbox

VI. Graphical comparison

Updated
Original
Fig 2.Graphical Comparison

VII. Advantages
Today products are becoming more complex, and also the requirement of the products is increasing as
population is increasing. There is an aggressive competition in market hence it is important to satisfy wide range
of variations in user population. Through DFMA it is possible to produce competitively priced, high
performance product at a minimal cost. The advantages of applying DFMA during product design are as
follows.
● DFMA not only reduces the manufacturing cost of the product but it helps to reduce the time to market and
quality of the product.
● DFMA provides a systematic procedure for analyzing a proposed design from the point of view of
assembly and manufacture.
● Any reduction in the number of parts reduces the cost as well as the inventory.
● DFMA tools encouraged the dialogue between the designer and manufacturing engineer during the early
stages of design

VIII. Conclusion
This paper presents a customized specific tool for DFMA application in Gearbox manufacturing. After
the analysis it is observed that, there are considerable changes in the assembly process, which can reduce total
part count of the gearbox, as a result there is a reduction in total assembly time. Earlier the total assembly time
was 940 seconds and after DFMA application the improved assembly time is 630 seconds, it is observed that
there is 32% decrease in the assembly time.The efficiency of the design is indicated by the DFA index. The
DFA index of existing assemblies is 11.73 and for the improved assembly it is 23.40. Being a specific and
customized tool for any industry ,the DFMA guidelines can help in identification and orientation of the solutions
for manufacturing and assembly problems, and mostly for difficulties identified before production .Hence it can
be concluded that, DFMA technique plays a vital role in a product design and development process.

Acknowledgements
Authors are thankful to the Management, Principal Dr. S. A. Halkude of Walchand Institute of Technology.
Authors also wish to acknowledge Laxmi Hydraulics Pvt. Ltd. Solapur.

8th National Conference on “Recent Developments in Mechanical Engineering” [RDME-2019] 18 | Page


Department of Mechanical Engineering, M.E.S. College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Design for Manufacturing and Assembly Technique Applicable For a Gearbox

Conflict of interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this
paper.

References
[1]. Geoffrey Boothroyd ,Product Design for Manufacturing and assembly‟,Published by Copyright © 2002 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. All
Rights Reserved
[2]. C .D NaijuPranav.V.Warrier and V. Jayakrishnan, School of Mechanical Engineering, VIT University, Vellore, India ,“Redesigning
of Shopping Cart for Cost Reduction Using DFMA”, MATEC Web of Conferences 95,ICMME 2016 10003 (2017) 10003,
[3]. G BalaMurali, B V L Deepak, M V A RajuBahubalendruni, BibhutiBhusan Basal, Product Design and Development Laboratory
,National Institute of Technology- Rourkela, India-769008 .“An Intelligent Strategy for Automated Assembly Sequence Planning
While Considering DFA Concept”
[4]. Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P, Knight W (2014) “Product design for manufacture and assembly”, 1st edn. M. Dekker, New York
[5]. Claudio Favi, Michele Germani, Macro Mandolini, “Design for manufacturing and assembly Vs.Design to cost : toward a multi-
objective approach for decision –making strategies during conceptual design of products.”, 26th CIRP Design Conference 2016,
Elsevier, doi- 10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.190
[6]. H. Tasalloti , H. Eskelineni, P. Kah, J. Martikainen H. Tasalloti , H. Eskelinen, P. Kah, J. Martikainen Lappeenranta University of
Technology, P. O. Box 20, 53851 Lappeenranta, Finland, journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jmad “An integrated
DFMA–PDM model for the design and analysis of challenging similar and dissimilar welds”
[7]. ZhenminYuana, ChengshuangSunb, c, d, YaowuWangb, c, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China, journal
homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/autcon. “Design for Manufacture and Assembly-oriented parametric design of prefabricated
buildings”
[8]. WankhadeNiteshPrakash, V. G. Sridhar and K. Annamalai, School of Mechanical and Building Sciences, VIT University, Chennai,
India. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. “New Product Development By DFMA And Rapid Prototyping”
[9]. AkshayHarlalkaa, C. D. Naijua, MukundNilakantanJanardhananb and IzabelaiNielsenb, Production & Manufacturing Research: An
Open Access Journal, 2016. VOL . 4, NO .1 209–227, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2016.1261052, “Redesign of an in-
market food processor for manufacturing cost reduction using DFMA methodology”
[10]. MohdNazri Ahmad, M. Hairi Osman, NurulAinMaidin, M. Khalid Wahid , Faculty of Engineering Technology, UniversitiiTeknikal
Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, MALAYSIA. “Reducing product cost by implementing DFMA
methodology – Lucas hull: a case study
[11]. V. Jayakrishnan and Pranav. V. Warrier C. D. Naiju SMEC, VIT University, Vellore, India “DFMA for Early Cost Estimation of
Pedestal Fan - A Case Study” Journal of Industrial and Intelligent Information Vol. 5, No. 1, June 2017
[12]. Geoffrey Boothroyd ,Peter Dwehurts, Winston Knight , Product Design for Manufacturing and Assembly .(Taylor & Francis ,New
York, 2002)
[13]. Karl T. Ulrich , Steven D. Eppinger , Product Design and Development .(McGraw Hill Education(India) Edition ,2016)
[14]. Kevin Otto, Kristin Wood , Product Design – techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development ,(Person Education
Inc., 2018)

8th National Conference on “Recent Developments in Mechanical Engineering” [RDME-2019] 19 | Page


Department of Mechanical Engineering, M.E.S. College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

You might also like