Sign_Language_Detection_System__1___1___1___Copy_ - Copy
Sign_Language_Detection_System__1___1___1___Copy_ - Copy
The integration of biometric technology into banking systems has significantly enhanced
security and user convenience. This project proposes a fingerprint-based ATM machine
system designed to replace traditional ATM PINs with biometric identification. The
system aims to improve the security and ease of access to banking services by utilizing
a fingerprint scanner to authenticate users, ensuring that only authorized individuals
can perform financial transactions.
The system works by first enrolling the user’s fingerprint into a secure database.
When the user attempts to access the ATM, the system scans their fingerprint and
matches it against the stored data. Once authenticated, the user can proceed with
various banking functions, such as withdrawing money, checking account balances, and
transferring funds. The system leverages advanced fingerprint recognition algorithms
to ensure quick and accurate identification, reducing the risk of fraud and
First and foremost, I would like to extend my heartfelt thanks to my project guide
and mentor for their constant support, guidance, and encouragement throughout the
course of this project. Their valuable insights and expertise were crucial in shaping the
direction of this research. ”.
We are thankful to our family members for supporting and encouraging us and
for providing their guidance for Our Project. In the end we thank to all friends’ col-
leagues for providing their useful suggestions, which contributed greatly in making our
project successful.
i
Contents
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Problem Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.4 Project Scope and Limitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.4.1 Project Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.4.2 Limitation of Existing System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2 Literature Survey 4
2.1 Types of Machine Learning Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.1.1 Convolutional Neural Networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.1.2 Support Vector Machine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.1.3 Random Forest Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2 American Sign Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.2.2 Sign Language and Orientation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.3 System Working Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.3.1 Proposed Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
ii
3.1.3 Assumptions And Dependenciese . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.1.4 User Classes and Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.2 Functional Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.2.1 Business Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.2.2 User Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.2.3 Software Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.2.4 Hardware Requirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.3 System Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.3.1 System feature 1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.3.2 System feature 2: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.4 External Interface Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.4.1 User Interface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.4.2 Hardware Interfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.4.3 Software Interface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.5 Non-functional Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.5.1 Performance Requirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.5.2 Safety Requirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.5.3 Security Requirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.6 Software Quality Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.7 Analysis Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4 System Design 20
4.1 Model Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4.2 System Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.3 DFD Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.4 Use-case Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
4.5 Component Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
4.6 Sequence Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4.7 Collaboration Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
5 Technical Specification 28
5.1 Python . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
iii
5.2 Designed Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
5.3 Python Libraries used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
6 Software Implementation 31
6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
6.2 Modules and Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
6.2.1 Image frame acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
6.2.2 Hand segmentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
6.2.3 Hand Tracking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
6.2.4 Output Gestures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
6.2.5 Classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
6.2.6 Feature Extraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
6.2.7 Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
6.3 Selection Criteria of algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
6.4 About The Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
6.5 How Model Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
6.5.1 Dataset preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
6.5.2 Ensemble construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
6.5.3 Random sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
6.5.4 Random feature selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
6.5.5 Decision Tree Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
6.5.6 Voting and prediction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
6.5.7 Handling New Instances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
6.5.8 Model Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
6.6 Key Components of the Random Forest
Algorithm: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
iv
7.1.4 Integration Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
7.2 Testing Tool . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
7.2.1 Manual Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
9 Conclusion 49
9.1 Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
9.2 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
9.2.1 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
9.2.2 Future Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
v
List of Figures
8.1 Output:Letter A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
8.2 Output:Letter B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
8.3 Output:Letter C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
vi
List of Tables
vii
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1 Overview
Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) have become a staple in modern banking, providing
convenient and instant access to financial services. However, traditional ATM systems
rely on Personal Identification Numbers (PINs) for authentication, a method that can be
vulnerable to theft, hacking, or human error. With the increasing demand for higher
security and better user convenience, biometric technologies, particularly fingerprint
recognition, have emerged as a solution to enhance ATM security. A fingerprint-based
ATM machine offers a more secure and efficient method for user authentication by
utilizing an individual’s unique fingerprint for identity verification. Unlike PINs, which
can be forgotten or stolen, fingerprints are unique to each person and are extremely
difficult to replicate or forge. This makes fingerprint recognition an ideal biometric
authentication method for ATMs, as it ensures that only authorized individuals can
access their accounts.
The system works by enrolling a user’s fingerprint during the initial setup process,
storing it in a secure database. Each time the user accesses the ATM, their fingerprint
is scanned, and the system matches it to the stored data for authentication. Once
verified, the user can proceed with banking transactions such as withdrawing money,
checking balances, and transferring funds, all without the need for a PIN.
The introduction of fingerprint-based ATM machines aims to address concerns re-
lated to security, fraud, and user convenience. With the increasing threat of identity
1
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
theft and data breaches, replacing PIN-based systems with fingerprint-based systems
represents a significant advancement in ensuring the safety and integrity of financial
transactions. Additionally, it streamlines the user experience by eliminating the need
to remember PINs or worry about them being compromised.
1.2 Motivation
The most significant concern with PIN-based ATM systems is their susceptibility to
theft, fraud, and misuse. PINs can be easily forgotten, stolen, or exposed through
practices such as shoulder surfing or keylogging. Fraudulent activities such as ATM
card skimming and PIN code theft have become major issues in the banking sector,
leading to financial losses and a decrease in customer trust. As a result, there is a
growing need for a more secure, reliable, and user-friendly authentication method to
safeguard user the widespread use of Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) have rev-
olutionized the way we access and manage financial services. However, with these
advancements, security concerns have also grown. Traditional ATM systems rely on
Personal Identification Numbers (PINs) for user authentication. This technology holds
the potential to significantly reduce the risk of identity theft and fraud while improving
the overall user experience at ATMs.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
2
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
will be cross-verified with the stored fingerprint data.Access to the ATM system will be
granted only if the fingerprint matches an existing user in the database.Each transaction
will require confirmation by the user before execution, ensuring accuracy and security.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
3
Chapter 2
Literature Survey
literature survey on fingerprint-based ATM systems delves into the research, techno-
logical advancements, and real-world implementations of biometric authentication, par-
ticularly fingerprint recognition, in the banking sector. The literature highlights the
advantages, challenges, and existing applications of fingerprint technology for securing
ATM systems and improving user experience.
Overview: Biometric systems, such as fingerprint recognition, iris scanning, and facial
recognition, have been adopted by various industries, including banking, for enhanced
security. Fingerprint recognition, due to its uniqueness, ease of use, and maturity in
technology, has become a preferred choice for secure authentication.
4
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
5
A Support Vector Machine (SVM) can be used as part of the process to classify and
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
authenticate fingerprints in a fingerprint-based ATM machine. Here’s how SVM can be
integrated into fingerprint recognition for such ATM systems: An SVM is a supervised
machine learning algorithm primarily used for classification tasks. In the context of
fingerprint recognition, the SVM helps classify whether a given fingerprint matches a
stored one.
The key idea behind SVM is to find a hyperplane (decision boundary) that best sepa-
rates different classes in the feature space. In a fingerprint recognition system, it sepa-
rates genuine matches (the user’s fingerprint) from impostor matches (a non-matching
fingerprint).
When the fingerprint features are linearly separable, a linear SVM can be used. This
means that the features of genuine and impostor fingerprints can be separated with a
straight hyperplane.In cases where the features are not linearly separable, a kernel
trick is used to map the input features into a higher-dimensional space, where a linear
decision boundary can be found. In cases where the features are not linearly
separable, a kernel trick is used to map the input features into a higher-dimensional
space, where a linear decision boundary can be found. Common kernels include the
Radial Basis Function (RBF) and Polynomial kernel.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
6
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
The Random Forest Algorithm is another machine learning technique that can be effec-
tively used for fingerprint-based ATM authentication. Random Forest is an ensemble
learning method that combines multiple decision trees to classify or predict outcomes.
When applied to fingerprint recognition in an ATM system, it can help classify whether
a fingerprint is genuine (belongs to the user) or impostor (does not belong to the userThe
training process involves training a Random Forest model on a labeled dataset of fin-
gerprint feature vectors. Each feature vector represents the unique characteristics of
a fingerprint, and the corresponding label indicates whether the fingerprint is genuine
(from a specific user) or impostor (from another user).Random Forest is less prone to
overfitting compared to individual decision trees because it averages out the predic-
tions from multiple trees. This generally leads to improved accuracy and robustness in
fingerprint classification.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
7
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
2.2.1 Introduction
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
8
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
Interactive Buttons: The ATM interface could also incorporate touch buttons with sign
language icons, helping to guide users visually through the various steps of a transaction:
The ATM scans the user’s fingerprint and extracts unique features like ridges and
minutiae points:
• Cash Dispenser
• Banking
In the future, as machine learning, computer vision, and natural language processing
technologies continue to evolve, it may become easier to create more intuitive and accu-
rate systems for integrating sign language into ATM interactions. Sign language-based
systems could potentially become a standard accessibility feature for ATMs.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
9
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
10
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
11
Chapter 3
Software Requirement Specification
3.1 Introduction
3.1.1 Purpose
A sign language detection system serves to bridge communication gaps between individ-
uals who use sign language and those who do not. By translating sign language gestures
into spoken or written language, it enables real-time communication accessibility for
the deaf and hard of hearing community. This technology promotes inclusivity in vari-
ous domains such as education, public services, and customer interactions, empowering
individuals with deafness to engage more fully in social and professional contexts.
The project scope of a sign language detection system involves developing software or
hardware capable of accurately recognizing and interpreting sign language gestures in
real time. This encompasses the design, development, and testing phases of the sys-
tem, including the creation of algorithms for gesture recognition, integration of sensors
or cameras for capturing gestures, and implementation of user interfaces for interac-
tion. The scope also includes considering the diversity of sign languages and gestures,
12
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
The development and implementation of a sign language detection system rely on sev-
eral assumptions and dependencies. Firstly, there is an assumption of access to diverse
and comprehensive datasets containing sign language gestures for training accurate
models. The system’s effectiveness is heavily contingent upon the quality and quantity
of available data. Additionally, the system depends on suitable hardware components
such as cameras or sensors capable of capturing gestures accurately in various environ-
ments.
User Classes
The main user of this project are the specially abeled people which use this system
to Detect the Sign Language which would be easy to the other person communicating
with the other person.This can also be useful in sectors like
• Education
• Public Places
• Work Places
Characteristics
• Technological Development
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
13
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
• A sign language detection system utilizing the Random Forest algorithm must ful-
fill several business requirements. Firstly, it should accurately recognize and inter-
pret sign language gestures to facilitate communication for the hearing-impaired
community. The system must be efficient and responsive, providing real-time
interpretation to ensure seamless interaction.
• A sign language detection system utilizing the Random Forest algorithm aims
to accurately interpret hand gestures for improved communication accessibility.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
14
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
User requirements include real-time processing for seamless interaction, high ac-
curacy in recognizing diverse signs, adaptability to varying lighting conditions,
and compatibility with different sign languages.
• The system should offer intuitive user interfaces, supporting both learners and
proficient signers. Additionally, it should be capable of detecting subtle nuances
and variations in hand movements to ensure precise interpretation. Incorporating
feedback mechanisms for continuous learning and refinement is essential, ensuring
the system evolves to meet the needs of its users effectively.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
15
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
The system shall provide a simple interface to the user, where he or she can just put
the sign language as input, which will be processed by the back-end and the detected
sign will be given as output to the user interface, which is the Web interface.
1. Server side
The web application will be hosted on a web server which is listening on the web
standard port.
2. Client side
Monitor screen : the software shall display information to the user via the monitor
screen.
1. Server side
A web server will accept all requests from the client and forward them accordingly.
2. Client side
An OS that is capable of running a modern web browser that supports JavaScript
and HTML5.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
16
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
The performance of the functions and every module must be good. The overall perfor-
mance of the software will enable the users to work recently. The performance of the
encryption of data should be fast. The performance of the virtual environment should
be fast.
The application is designed in modules where errors can be detected and fixed easily.
This makes it easier to install and update new functionality if required
All data will be encrypted using strong encryption algorithm and according to location
encryption is done.
• Accuracy:
The accuracy of sign prediction is crucial. The system should provide precise and
reliable predictions based on input sign language. High accuracy is essential for
specially abeled people who are eagerly willing for this system
• Reliability:
The system should consistently provide accurate predictions under different con-
ditions and with diverse sets of input signs. It needs to be dependable and trust-
worthy for users who rely on its language detection capabilities.
• Maintainability:
The application should be easy to maintain and update. This includes the ability
to update the dataset, retrain machine learning models, and fix bugs or security
vulnerabilities promptly.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
17
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
• Adaptability:
The system should be adaptable to changes in the dataset and evolving language
patterns. Regular updates to the machine learning models and the ability to
incorporate new data contribute to the adaptability of the system.
• Usability:
The user interface should be intuitive and user-friendly, allowing users to easily
input the signs, interpret results, and navigate the application. Usability is es-
sential for specially abeled people and individuals who may not have a technical
background.
• Security:
Given that the system deals with user-uploaded signs, it must prioritize the secu-
rity and privacy of the system data. Implement secure data transmission, storage,
and access controls to protect sensitive information.
• Testability:
The system should be designed with testability in mind, allowing for the creation
and execution of effective testing procedures. This ensures that any changes or
updates to the system can be thoroughly tested.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
18
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
19
Chapter 4
System Design
20
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
DFD 0 : Context Diagram is another name for DFD Level 0. It’s a high-level
overview of the entire system or process that’s being studied or modelled. It’s meant
to provide a quick peek of the system, portraying it as a single high-level process with
relationships to external entities.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
21
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
22
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
DFD 2: This level provides an even more detailed view of the system by breaking
down the sub-processes identified in the level 1 DFD into further sub-processes. Each
sub-process is depicted as a separate process on the level 2 DFD. The data flows and
data stores associated with each sub-process are also shown.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
23
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
In a use case diagram, actors are represented as stick figures, and use cases are
depicted as ovals. Lines connecting actors and use cases show the relationships and
interactions between them.
Use case diagrams are useful for understanding the functional requirements of a
system from a user’s perspective and for communicating those requirements to stake-
holders. They help in identifying different user roles, their goals, and the actions they
perform within the system. By outlining these interactions, use case diagrams aid in
the design and development of the system, ensuring that it meets the needs and expec-
tations of its users. Additionally, they serve as a foundation for more detailed system
specifications and test cases during the software development process.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
24
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
25
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
26
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
27
Chapter 5
Technical Specification
5.1 Python
Python is an interpreted high-level programming language for general-purpose program-
ming. Created by Guido van Rossum and first released in 1991, Python has a design
philosophy that emphasizes code readability, notably using significant whitespace.
Features:
• Python works on different platforms (Windows, Mac, Linux, Raspberry Pi, etc).
• Python has syntax that allows developers to write programs with fewer lines than
some other programming languages.
• Python runs on an interpreter system, meaning that code can be executed as soon
as it is written. This means that prototyping can be very quick.
28
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
1. Create a dataset:
This is the most important step, as the quality and size of your dataset will directly
impact the performance of your model. Your dataset should contain images or
videos of people signing different gestures. You can collect this data yourself or
find a public dataset online.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
29
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
• OpenCV: This library provides a variety of functions for image processing and
computer vision.
• TensorFlow: This library is used for building and training neural networks.
• PyTorch: This library is also used for building and training neural networks.
Specifications:
• Python (3.9)
• IDE (pycharm)
• Tensorflow (as keras uses tensorflow in backend and for image preprocessing)(version
2.0.)
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
30
Chapter 6
Software Implementation
6.1 Introduction
The proposed methodology in this project, to perform the analysis for sign generated
extracts using following steps:
2. Hand segmentation
3. Hand tracking
4. Output gestures
5. Classification
6. Feature extraction
7. Output
31
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
This phase involves the process of opening a frame to capture the gestures from users.
In the context of sign language detection, these images would likely be of hand gestures
which make sensible meaning.
• Ensures that the hand gestures shown by the user are clear and visible to take
the input
This phase involves the hand tracking by the system which is shown by the user to the
system .It plots the coordinates on the and and join all the plotted points by the inbuilt
libraries given to the system preset.By this phase the hand gesture is tracked by the
system
When the user gives the input in the previous phase the system captures the data and
using the random forest algorithm features the system links the data from various files
to give the accurate output to the user on the basis of the input
6.2.5 Classification
Data Classification:
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
32
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
• Train the classification model using a labeled dataset, where images are associated
with their respective signs.
• Evaluation metrics such as accuracy,and precision help assess the model’s perfor-
mance.
The images taken input by the user are matched with the datasets in the file and the
features are extracted from it .When the features of a specific dataset are matching to
the input the label of the dataset is given to the image and the output is shown to the
user.
6.2.7 Output
When the above mentioned steps are completely fulfilled by the system the user gets
the required output as the labelling of the gestures given by the user .
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
33
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
34
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
bustness positions it as a powerful and reliable tool in the realm of supervised machine
learning. Its ability to effectively handle diverse tasks, including classification, regres-
sion, and feature selection, makes it an indispensable asset in various domains, from
finance and healthcare to marketing and beyond.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
35
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
• Dataset preparation
• Ensemble Construction
• Random Sampling
• Model evalution
The algorithm requires a labeled dataset with input features (independent variables)
and corresponding labels (dependent variables). The dataset is divided into a training
set and, optionally, a separate validation or test set.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
36
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
The Random Forest algorithm constructs an ensemble of decision trees. The number
of trees in the ensemble called the ”number of estimators,” is a hyperparameter that
needs to be specified.
For each decision tree in the ensemble, a random subset of the training data is selected.
This sampling is performed with replacement, which means that each data point in the
training set can be selected multiple times, and some data points may not be selected
at all.
At each split point of a decision tree, a random subset of features is considered. The
number of features to consider at each split is usually controlled by a hyperparameter,
often the square root of the total number of features. This random feature selection
helps to introduce diversity among the trees.
Using subset of training data and the randomly selected features, each decision tree is
constructed independently. The tree-building process follows a standard decision tree
algorithm (e.g., ID3, CART) and involves recursively partitioning the data based on
the selected features. The splitting criterion may be based on information gain, Gini
impurity, or other measures of impurity or diversity.
Once all the decision trees are constructed, predictions are made by aggregating the
outputs of each tree. The aggregation process depends on the task type:
• Classification: For classification tasks, each decision tree predicts the class label
of an input sample. The class with the majority of votes among all the trees is
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
37
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
• Regression: For regression tasks, each decision tree predicts a continuous value.
The final prediction is typically the average (or median) of the predicted values
from all the trees.
When a new instance needs to be classified or predicted, it is passed through each deci-
sion tree in the Random Forest. The instance follows the decision rules at each internal
node and traverses down the tree until it reaches a leaf node. The final prediction is
then made based on the aggregation scheme discussed earlier.
The performance of the Random Forest model is assessed using appropriate evaluation
metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score (for classification tasks), or mean
squared error (MSE) (for regression tasks).
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
38
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
• Random Feature Selection: In addition to sampling the data, Random Forest also
randomly selects a subset of features at each split point in the decision tree. This
technique, known as feature bagging, further enhances the diversity among the
trees and improves their robustness.
• Decision Tree Ensemble: The strength of the Random Forest lies in its ensemble
of decision trees. By combining the predictions of multiple trees, the algorithm
leverages the wisdom of the crowd, reducing the bias and variance of individual
trees and improving the overall prediction accuracy.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
39
Chapter 7
Software Testing Validations
• Works as expected
Software testing can be done at any point during the development process, depending
on the testing approach used. Traditionally, the majority of testing occurs after the
requirements have been determined and the coding process has been done, however in
Agile techniques, the majority of testing occurs throughout the process. As a result,
the test technique is dictated by the software development methodology used. Various
40
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
software development models will concentrate testing efforts at various stages of the
development process. Test-driven development is commonly used in newer development
methods, such as Agile, and places an increased percentage of the testing in the hands
of the developer before it reaches a formal team of testers. In a more traditional model,
most of the test execution occurs after the requirements have been defined and the
coding process has been completed.
White-Box testing, also known as clear box testing, glass box testing, transparent box
testing, and structural testing, examines a program’s internal structures and workings
rather than the functionality that is visible to the end user. White box testing for a sign
language detection system utilizing the Random Forest algorithm involves scrutinizing
the internal logic and structure of the model to ensure its reliability and accuracy. In
this approach, testers delve into the intricate workings of the Random Forest classifier,
examining its decision-making process and feature importance. This entails scrutiniz-
ing the individual decision trees within the ensemble, assessing how they contribute to
the final classification outcome. Testers verify that the input features are appropriately
encoded and processed, ensuring consistency and relevance in sign language recogni-
tion. Additionally, they validate the training data quality, verifying that it adequately
represents the diversity of sign language gestures and scenarios. Furthermore, testers
assess the robustness of the model against various edge cases and potential biases, such
as variations in lighting conditions, hand orientation, and background clutter. By thor-
oughly analyzing the inner workings of the Random Forest model, testers can identify
potential weaknesses, vulnerabilities, or areas for improvement, enabling them to re-
fine the system’s performance and enhance its effectiveness in real-world sign language
recognition tasks
Black box testing for a sign language detection system employing the Random Forest
algorithm involves evaluating the system’s performance without needing to understand
its internal workings. In this approach, the focus is on examining the system’s inputs
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
41
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
and outputs to ensure it behaves as expected, regardless of the intricacies of its under-
lying algorithms. Test cases are designed to cover various scenarios, such as different
sign gestures, variations in lighting conditions, and diverse backgrounds. Inputs rep-
resenting sign gestures are fed into the system, and the outputs, which should ideally
correspond to the correct interpretation of the signs, are analyzed. Metrics like accu-
racy, precision, recall, and F1 score are computed to gauge the system’s performance.
Additionally, boundary and stress tests are conducted to assess the system’s robustness
against outliers and extreme conditions. The goal is to ensure that the sign language
detection system delivers reliable results across a wide range of real-world situations.
Through meticulous black box testing, potential issues such as misclassifications, bi-
ases, or overfitting can be identified and addressed, ultimately enhancing the system’s
usability and effectiveness for its intended users.
Unit testing, commonly referred to as component testing, is a type of test that verifies
the functionality of a specific section of code, usually at the function level.Unit testing
for a sign language detection system utilizing machine learning, particularly the Ran-
dom Forest algorithm, is crucial for ensuring its reliability and accuracy. The process
involves breaking down the system into individual components or units and subjecting
each unit to various test cases. These tests verify that each unit functions correctly and
produces the expected output. In the context of a Random Forest-based sign language
detection system, unit testing may include evaluating the preprocessing steps such as
image normalization and feature extraction to ensure they properly prepare the data
for input into the classifier. Additionally, testing the training phase of the Random For-
est algorithm involves verifying that it learns from the data effectively and produces a
model capable of accurately classifying sign language gestures. Furthermore, unit tests
should validate the prediction process, ensuring that the system can correctly classify
unseen sign language gestures with a high degree of accuracy. Through comprehensive
unit testing, developers can identify and rectify any issues or bugs in the system early
in the development cycle, leading to a more robust and reliable sign language detection
system.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
42
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
Any sort of software testing that aims to check the interfaces between components
against a programme design is known as integration testing. Software components might
be implemented in stages or all at once. Integration testing for a sign language detection
system utilizing the Random Forest algorithm involves comprehensive validation of its
functionality within the broader application environment. This process ensures seamless
interaction between various system components, including data pre-processing, feature
extraction, model training, and real-time inference. Initially, integration testing verifies
the system’s ability to ingest input data streams effectively, accommodating diverse sign
language gestures. Next, it examines the pre-processing pipeline’s capability to cleanse
and standardize input data, ensuring uniformity for downstream analysis. Feature
extraction modules are then evaluated to confirm their capacity in capturing salient
characteristics from sign language images or videos. Subsequently, integration testing
focuses on training the Random Forest model using extracted features, assessing its
learning capability and generalization across different sign language gestures. Once
the model is trained, integration tests validate its integration with the overall inference
pipeline, ensuring efficient classification of new sign language inputs. Finally, real-world
scenarios are simulated to assess the system’s robustness, scalability, and responsiveness
in diverse environments. Through systematic integration testing, the sign language
detection system employing Random Forest algorithm can be thoroughly validated,
instilling confidence in its reliability and effectiveness for real-world applications.
Manual Testing is a sort of software testing in which test cases are manually conducted
by a tester without the use of automated tools like Selenium IDE, Junit,TestNG, and so
on. The goal of manual testing is to find faults and problems inthe software application.
Manual software testing is the most basic of all testingmethods, and it aids in the
detection of important flaws. Before automating testing, any new application should
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
43
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
be manually tested. Manual software testing takes more time and effort, but it is
required to determinewhether automation is possible. Manual testing concepts do not
necessitate familiarity with any testing tool. ”100% Automation is not achievable,”
says one of the Software Testing Fundamentals. This improves the efficiency of manual
testing.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
44
Chapter 8
Result and Analysis
8.1 Snapshots
45
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
46
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
47
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
9.1 Benefits
1. Improvement in communication: This software can be used by people of any
age group to communicate with each other in day to day lives .Also this system
will not create a problem to normal people to communicate withe these specially
abeled people.
2. Education:
Since the system has provided an ease in communication we can also provide a
betterment in the education of these people so that the can also have the education
that each normal individual has taken.
3. Independence:
4. Technological Integration:
Sign language detection system can be integrated into various devices and plat-
forms, such as smartphones, tablets, and smart glasses, making it convenient for
deaf individuals to communicate in different contexts.
49
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
5. Accessibility:
Sign language detection systems make information more accessible to people with
hearing impairments or communication disabilities. They can access various ser-
vices and participate in conversations, education, and employment opportunities
that might otherwise be challenging to engage with.
6. Employment Opportunities:
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
50
Sign Language Detection System Using Machine Learning
9.2 Conclusion
9.2.1 Conclusion
Sign languages use hand, body, and facial movements to communicate visually. They’re
crucial for people with disabilities as they provide a way to express themselves and con-
nect with others.To help overcome communication barriers, automated Sign Language
Recognition systems are invaluable. These systems can translate sign language gestures
into spoken language, making it easier for those who don’t understand sign language
to comprehend and interact with individuals who use it by using the Random Forest
Algorithm of Machine Learning .By bridging this communication gap, these systems
empower people with disabilities to communicate more effectively, enhancing their abil-
ity to express emotions, thoughts, and ideas. This advancement fosters inclusivity and
ensures that everyone has the opportunity to participate fully in society, regardless of
their communication abilities.
We can include letters from different languages such as Marathi and Hindi because
everyone’s mother tongue is different. By doing this, we can form words using these
letters, and then combine those words to create a meaningful conversation. This process
allows us to build a paragraph with words that make sense and convey ideas effectively.
It’s a way to ensure that people from various linguistic backgrounds can understand
and participate in the conversation.
Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers) Polytechnic College Chandwad Computer Technology:2023-24
51
Bibliography
3. Ashok K Sahoo, Gouri Sankar Mishra and Kiran Kumar Ravulakollu “Sign Lan-
guage Recognition: State Of The Art” Volume:09 (2014)
52