Lecture 10a - Notes - Single-Phase Distributed Parameter Line Modeling
Lecture 10a - Notes - Single-Phase Distributed Parameter Line Modeling
In order to come up with a model, we will assume that a line is composed of small differential
segments of the type shown below in Fig. 6, where ∆x is the length of the segment. We are
neglecting the resistance, which will give us a lossless line model. The inductance L and
capacitance C are given in terms of Henries/meter and Farads/meter. The voltage drop across this
element is given by
∂i
−∆v= L∆x (1)
∂t
In the limit as ∆x approaches zero, we can rewrite this equation as
∂v ∂i
= −L (2)
∂x ∂t
where we are using partial derivatives in this formulation since voltage and current are functions
of both position along the line segment and time.
I L∆x I+∆I
+ +
∆I
V C∆x V+∆V
- -
∆x
Fig. 6 Line Segment Model
∂ 2v ∂i 2
From (2) = − L (5)
∂x 2 ∂x∂t
∂ 2i ∂ 2v
From (4) = −C 2 (6)
∂x∂t ∂t
And finally
∂ 2v ∂ 2v
= LC (7)
∂x 2 ∂t 2
Equations (7) and (10) are the two relationships which define voltage and current on a lossless
transmission line as a function of distance and time. The solution for current will have the form
i ( x, t ) = f1 ( x − υ t ) + f 2 ( x + υ t ) (11)
where
1
υ= (12)
LC
We can verify this by substituting (11) into (10) and show that the equality holds. If the solution
for current has this particular form then if the voltage and current are related by (2) then
∂v ∂i ∂f ( x − υ t ) ∂f 2 ( x + υ t )
= −L = −L 1 +
∂x ∂t ∂t ∂t (13)
= Lυ f1' ( x − υ t ) − f 2 ' ( x + υ t )
and integrating both side with respect to x
= v Lυ f1 ( x − υ t ) − f 2 ( x + υ t )
(14)
= Z o f1 ( x − υ t ) − Z o f 2 ( x + υ t )
L L
Z=
o υ
L= = (15)
LC C
b g
direction of increasing x. Similarly it can be shown that f 2 x + υτ represents a traveling wave
b
moving to the left in the direction of decreasing x. We would say in this case that f1 x − υτ g
b g
represents a forward traveling wave and f 2 x + υτ represents a backward traveling wave. It is
also interesting to compare equation (11) to (14) which shows that the forward traveling wave
components of the voltage and current differ by a positive impedance while the backward traveling
wave components of the voltage and current differ by a negative impedance. The solution also
suggests that on a loss-free line, that the corresponding voltage and current have the same
waveshape.
t=0 t=τ
f
V1
I1 = (16)
ZA
At the discontinuity between the two cables we will get a reflected wave with magnitude V2 and a
refracted wave with magnitude V3, where
V V3
I2 =
− 2 ; I3 = (17)
ZA ZB
The subscript 1 will refer to the forward traveling incident waveform, while subscripts 2 and 3 will
refer to the reflected and refracted waveforms.
V1
ZA ZB
In order for voltage and current to be continuous at the intersections between the two cables
we have the following two boundary conditions
V1 + V2 =V3 (18)
I1 + I 2 =
I3 (19)
1 1 Z A − ZB 1 1 Z A + ZB
− V1 = V1 = + V2 = V2 (22)
Z A ZB Z AZB Z A ZB Z AZB
where the ratio between the reflected and incident voltage is called the reflection coefficient and
is defined by
V Z − ZA
Γa = 2 = B (23)
V1 Z B + Z A
For various values of cable impedances this reflection coefficient can vary between –1 and 1.
To obtain the relationship between the magnitude of the refracted and the incident wave we
again substitute (18) into (20), but this time looking at the relationship between V3 and V1.
V1 V3 − V1 V3
− = (24)
ZA ZA ZB
If we take the ratio of the refracted to the incident voltage we get a refraction coefficient defined
by
V 2Z B
Γb = 3 = (26)
V1 Z B + Z A
For various values of impedance this refraction coefficient can vary between 0 and 2.
Suppose that we have a step function voltage applied to a line. A voltage waveform will
propagate down the line as shown in Fig. 9. When this step function hits the discontinuity a
reflection will be generated with an amplitude of V2 = Γ aV1 . This reflection will be a backward
traveling wave which when superimposed with the forward traveling wave will give us the total
voltage as a function of time and position on the first transmission line. A refracted wave will be
injected into the second transmission line with an amplitude given by V3 = ΓbV1 . When this
refracted wave traveling in the forward direction hits a new discontinuity, then this will produce
another reflected waveform.
V1
V3
V1
V2
Discontinuity Discontinuity
As a quick example of how these coefficients can be applied to a power system, consider the
case of an overhead line connected to an underground cable. The overhead cable has an impedance
of ZA= 400 Ohms and the underground cable has an impedance of ZB= 50 Ohms. Suppose that a
surge with an amplitude of 300 kV is traveling down the overhead line, then how much of this
voltage will get into the underground cable? This can be determined by looking at the refraction
coefficent:
2Z B 2 × 50
= Γb = = 0.22 (27)
Z B + Z A 50 + 400
Multiplying the magnitude of the incident waveform times this refraction coefficient gives us
0.22x300kV=66kV. An overvoltage on an overhead circuit might result in a flashover, which
would not necessarily result in permanent damage. However, an overvoltage on an underground
cable would likely damage the insulation and possibly destroy the cable.
It is also possible that instead of having a second transmission line, we have an open circuit
instead. In this case the impedance Z B = ∞ which will give us a reflection coefficient of Γ A = 1
and a refraction coefficient of Γ B = 2 . This means that an incident wave traveling down the line
will have a reflected wave of the same magnitude, which basically gives us a voltage doubling
effect. This is the reason why underground cables normally need surge arrestors at the ends of the
circuit.
Lattice Diagrams
A methodology referred to as lattice (or pulse-bounce) diagrams has been developed to track
the forward and backward traveling waveforms on a transmission system. A lattice diagram,
shown in Fig. 10, has a vertical time scale which is usually set up in units corresponding to the
time it takes a waveform to travel from one end of the line to the next. This time factor is defined
by
line length l
= τ = = l LC (28)
velocity 1/ LC
The horizontal axis of the lattice diagram corresponds to position. Using this tool, one can
determine the voltage (or current) as a function of time and position. At a given time and position
the voltage (current) is found by summing up all the waves that have passed in both directions up
to that particular time. If this line had losses, then the waveshapes would be both attenuated and
distorted. However for this lossless case the waveshapes maintain their integrity.
0
V1 Reflection
Time
τ Coefficient
Γa1V1 Γa1
Reflection
Coefficient 2τ Γa2Γa1V1
Γa2
3τ Γa2(Γa1)2V1
4τ
5τ
6τ
Sources that inject a waveform into a cable typically have an output impedance. If the voltage
is represented by Vs and the source impedance is given by Rs, then for a cable of surge impedance
Zo, the incident waveform magnitude is
Zo
V1 = Vs (29)
Rs + Z o
The source impedance also factors into the computation of the reflection coefficient at the source
end of the circuit, where
R − Zo
Γ a = s (30)
Z o + Rs
Sometime resistance is purposefully inserted at the source end of the circuit. This is done to reduce
the initial amount of voltage which is injected into the transmission line when it is energized. This
element inserted to accomplish this is called a closing resistor and it would have the effect of
minimizing transient overvoltages.
EMTP Models
From the solution to the partial differential equations that describe how voltage and current
vary on a lossless transmission line, we saw that:
i ( x, t ) = f1 ( x − υ t ) + f 2 ( x + υ t ) (31)
v ( x,=
t ) Z o f1 ( x − υ t ) − Z o f 2 ( x + υ t ) (32)
where
1
υ= (33)
LC
L
Zo = (34)
C
v( x, t ) + Z oi ( x, t ) = 2 Z o f1 ( x − υ t ) (35)
This equation tells us that the sum of the voltage plus impedance times the current is constant with
respect to an observer traveling down the transmission line in the direction of increasing x at a
velocity υ . Suppose that we are now trying to model the transmission line shown in Fig. 11. The
time it takes for a waveform to propagate down the line is given by τ . The term v + Zoi as seen
by an observer at node k at t=0 must be the same as seen by the observer at node m at t= τ .
ik,m(t) im,k(t)
k m
+ +
vk(t) vm(t)
- -
We can take this relationship and use it to build an ATP line model, where
) vk ( t ) + Z o ( −ik ,m ( t ) )
vm ( t − τ ) + Z oim ,k ( t − τ = (36)
1 1 1
m (t )
ik ,= vk ( t ) − vm ( t − τ ) − im,k ( t=
−τ ) vk ( t ) + I k ( t − τ ) (37)
Zo Zo Zo
1
Ik (t −τ ) = − vm ( t − τ ) − im,k ( t − τ ) (38)
Zo
) vm ( t ) + Z o ( −im,k ( t ) )
vk ( t − τ ) + Z oik ,m ( t − τ= (39)
1 1 1
,k ( t )
im= vm ( t ) − vk ( t − τ ) − ik ,m ( t=
−τ ) vm ( t ) + I m ( t − τ ) (40)
Zo Zo Zo
1
Im (t −τ ) = − vk ( t − τ ) − ik ,m ( t − τ ) (41)
Zo
Equations (37), (38), (40) and (41) are formulated in the same format we used for the network
modeling described earlier in the semester. The relationship between voltage and current is given
in terms of an impedance and a parallel current source. These equations can also be illustrated in
the equivalent model shown in Fig. 12.
ik,m(t) im,k(t)
+ +
Ik(t-τ)
vk(t) Zo Zo vm(t)
Im(t-τ)
- -