Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

Quick Search 1

The project report for 'Quick Search' by Mr. Akash Anil Jadhav outlines the development of an Android application aimed at enhancing user search capabilities across various data types on mobile devices. The application addresses the limitations of existing systems by providing advanced search functionalities, improved bookmark management, and a user-friendly interface. Future enhancements are proposed, including voice search, AI integration, and cloud capabilities to further improve usability and accessibility.

Uploaded by

umeshsabale.2006
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

Quick Search 1

The project report for 'Quick Search' by Mr. Akash Anil Jadhav outlines the development of an Android application aimed at enhancing user search capabilities across various data types on mobile devices. The application addresses the limitations of existing systems by providing advanced search functionalities, improved bookmark management, and a user-friendly interface. Future enhancements are proposed, including voice search, AI integration, and cloud capabilities to further improve usability and accessibility.

Uploaded by

umeshsabale.2006
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 31

A

Project Report
on
“Quick Search”

Submitted to

Savitribai Phule Pune University,


Pune In Partial Fulfillment of
Master of Computer Application
(MCA - II, Sem-III)
Submitted by
Mr. Akash Anil Jadhav
Under the Guidance of
Prof. Samiksha Pawar

Through

Dr. D. Y. Patil Educational Federation’s


Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Management and
Entrepreneur Development.
2024-2025
Dr. D. Y. PATIL EDUCATIONAL FEDERATION
Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Management and Entrepreneur Development
Approved by AICTE, Affiliated to SPPU Pune
Address: - Sr. No. 27/A/1/2C, Near Talegaon Railway Station, Towards HP Service Station, Varale, Talegaon, Pune,
Maharashtra 410507. Website: dypatilef.com. dypatilimed.com E- mail- director.dypimed@dypatilef.com

Dr. D. Y. Patil Dr. Sushant Patil Dr. Priyanka A. Singh


Founder Dr. D Y Patil Group President Director

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that Project entitled Quick Search is submitted by


Mr. Akash Anil Jadhav has successfully Completed the Project under the guidance of
Prof. Samiksha Pawar This Project is submitted to the Savitribai Phule Pune University in
Partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the degree of Master of Computer
Application (MCA II Sem.III Batch 2024-2025).

Prof. Samiksha Pawar Dr.Ashwini Chavan Dr.Priyanka Singh


Project Guide HOD Director

Internal Examiner External Examiner


DECLARATION

I, the undersigned hereby declare that the project entitled “Quick Search”, being submitted for
the award of degree of Master of Computer Application (MCA – II, Sem–III) by me to Dr.
D. Y. Patil Institute of Management and Entrepreneur Development, Varale, Talegaon,
Pune affiliated to Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune is the result of an independent
work carried out under the guidance of
Prof. Samiksha pawar , is my original work. Further, I declare that this project has not been
submitted to this or any institution for the award of any degree.

PLACE: Talegoan Akash Anil Jadhav


DATE:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The project developed for the MCA was not possible without the persons and
organizations that helped me in completing this. I am deeply grateful to all whose enthusiasm
and energy transformed my vision of this study into reality.
I extend my sincere thanks to Prof. Samiksha pawar for making it easy to work in the
Institute and providing me needed guidance throughout the project keeping it focused and on
the track. I am thankful to him/her for the extended knowledge imparted to me during the
course of project development.

I take this opportunity to thank our HOD Dr. Ashwini Chavan and our Director Dr.
Priyanka Singh, for encouragement and guidance throughout the progress of this
report.

Akash Anil Jadhav


INDEX

Chapter Details Page


1 Introduction
1.1 Existing System and Need for System 1
1.2 Scope of System 2
1.3 Operating Environment - Hardware and Software 2

1.4 Brief Description of Technology Used


3
1.4.1 Operating System Used (Windows)
1.4.2 mysql used to built database.

2 Proposed System
2.1 Feasibility Study 4
2.2 Objectives of Proposed System 5
2.3 Users of System 5
3 Analysis and Design
3.1 System Requirements (Functional and Non-Functional requirements) 6
3.4 Use Case Diagrams 10
3.5 Class Diagram 11
3.6 Activity Diagram 12
3.7 Sequence Diagram 13
3.8 Sample Input and Output Screens. 14
4 Coding
4.1 Code snippets 18
8 Conclusion 26
9 Bibliography 27
1. Introduction

1.1 Existing System and Need for System


The existing systems primarily consist of standard web browsers that offer basic
search functionalities, bookmarking, and tab management. However, they often lack
user-friendly features, personalized experience, and efficient organization of bookmarks
and tabs. Android devices come with basic search functionality that typically allows users
to find apps, contacts, or limited file types. However, these built-in search features
often lack depth, speed, and customization. In many cases, users must open individual
apps or navigate through multiple menus to locate the desired content, leading to a
fragmented and
time-consuming experience.
The increasing storage capacity of smartphones and the volume of apps and data stored
have created a need for a more robust, centralized search system. Users want a solution
that can retrieve information instantly, regardless of where it is stored on the device.
The Quick Search Android Application addresses this need by offering a single,
unified platform where users can perform keyword-based searches across multiple
data types, including contacts, files, and applications. This significantly enhances user
convenience, reduces effort, and improves the overall mobile experience.

Need for System:

The need for "Quick Search" arises from the demand for a more intuitive, efficient, and
user-centered web browsing experience. Users require better search functionalities,
advanced bookmarking options, and seamless tab management to enhance productivity
and navigation.

1.2Scope of System

"Quick Search" aims to provide users with a modern web browsing experience,
including features such as:

 Advanced search capabilities.


 Bookmarking and organizing bookmarks.
 Multiple tab management.
 User-friendly interface and experience.
 Integration with additional features like page saving and history navigation .

The Quick Search Android Application is designed to function as a smart search assistant within the
device. It allows users to quickly locate various types of data without the need to open separate apps
6
or navigate through the file manager.

The main scope includes:

 Searching for contacts, applications, and internal files using a single input field.
 Real-time search result display with minimal delay.
 Lightweight and responsive user interface compatible with a wide range of Android devices.
 Integration with the Android system to provide better accessibility and background performance.
 Low resource consumption, ensuring smooth operation even on devices with limited hardware
capabilities.

In the future, the system can be extended to support advanced features such as voice search, cloud file
integration, internet-based search results, and AI-driven personalized suggestions based on user
behavior.

1.3Operating Environment - Hardware and Software

Hardware Specifications:
 Processor – intel i5

 Ram – 8GB

 Hard disk – 512 GB

 Operating System - Windows 10/11

1.4 To develop and run the Quick Search Android Application effectively, the
following hardware and software environments are used:
1.5 Hardware Requirements (Target Device):
1.6 Android smartphone or tablet (Version 5.0 – Lollipop and above)
1.7 Minimum RAM: 1 GB (2 GB or higher recommended for better performance)
1.8 Internal Storage: At least 100 MB of free space
1.9 Processor: Dual-core or higher (Quad-core recommended)
1.10

7
Software Specifications:
 Operating System - Windows 10/11
 Language: Java
 Backend: SQLite
 Software: - Android Studio

8
1.11Brief Description of Technology Used

"Quick Search" utilizes modern web technologies and frameworks to create a

responsive and efficient browsing experience.

The application was developed on a Windows-based system. Windows OS


offers a stable, user-friendly environment for Android development, with full
support for Android Studio, Java Development Kit (JDK), and related tools. It
allows efficient code writing, testing, and debugging through Android Studio’s
built-in features.

4.1 Operating System Used

 Windows: The application is developed to run on the Windows operating system,


ensuring

 compatibility with the majority of users.

4.2 MySQL Used to Build Database

 MySQL: The application employs MySQL as the database management system


 to store user
 data, bookmarks, and search history securely.

5. Proposed System

"Quick Search" is designed to enhance user interaction with web browsing


by introducing

advanced functionalities tailored to user needs.

9
2. Proposed System
"Quick Search" is designed to enhance user interaction with web browsing by
introducing advanced functionalities tailored to user needs.

2.1 Feasibility Study

The feasibility study evaluates the technical, economic, and operational


the proposed system, concluding that "Quick Search" is viable and beneficial
for users.

2.1.1 Operational Feasibility


2.2
 Provide a streamlined search experience.
 Enhance bookmark management with categorization and tags.
 Allow multiple tab management for better organization.
 Offer user-friendly navigation features.

2.2.1 Technical Feasibility


2.3
Technical feasibility centers on the existing computer system (hardware,
software, etc.) and to what extent it can support the proposed addition. For
example, if the current computer is operating at 80% capacity-an arbitrary
ceiling-then running another application could overload the system or require
additional hardware. This involves financial considerations to accommodate
technical enhancements. If the budget is a serious constraint, then the project is
judged but not feasible.

2.3.1 Economical Feasibility


The primary users of "Quick Search" include:

 General public looking for a better browsing experience.


 Students and professionals needing efficient research tools.
 Users seeking enhanced bookmark and tab management.

3. Analysis and Design


10
3.1 System Requirements (Functional and

Non-Functional requirements) Functional

3.2 Requirements:

 Ability to perform web searches.


 Features to add, delete, and organize bookmarks.
 Support for multiple tabs.
 Save pages for offline access.

3.2 Non-Functional Requirements:

 Usability: The system should be easy to use.


 Performance: Quick response times for searches and loading.
 Security: Secure user data and preferences.

3.3 Use Case Diagram

11
12
3.4 Class Diagram

13
3.5 Activity Diagram

14
3.6 Sequence Diagram

15
3.7 Sample Input and Output Screens:

1. Home Screen

16
2. Tabs Screen

17
3. Settings

18
4. Search Screen

19
Future Scope :
Future Scope of the Application
The Quick Search Android Application is designed with flexibility and
expandability in mind. As user demands and mobile technologies continue to
advance, the application can evolve to include several enhanced features. These
improvements aim to boost usability, accessibility, and overall performance.

1. Voice-Based Search
A voice input feature can be added to allow users to search by speaking, which
would be faster and more accessible, especially for people with disabilities or those
who prefer hands-free operation.

2. AI and Machine Learning Integration


In future versions, the app can utilize machine learning to learn from user behavior
and offer smart suggestions, auto-complete predictions, and personalized search
results based on usage patterns.

3. Cloud Search Capability


Adding support for cloud platforms like Google Drive or Dropbox will allow the
app to search not just local files but also documents and media stored online,
giving users unified access to all their data.

4. Multi-Format File Search


Currently limited to basic types, the app can expand to support searching through
images, PDFs, Word documents, and even audio or video files with previews and
filters for better navigation.

5. Cross-Device Sync
With the help of user authentication, future versions could enable cross-device data
syncing—allowing search preferences, history, or bookmarks to be shared across
multiple devices.

6. Home Screen Widgets


Quick access widgets can be introduced, letting users perform searches right from
the home screen. This would reduce the number of steps required and enhance
convenience.

7. Multilingual Interface
To serve a wider audience, the application can include multilingual support,
enabling users to interact with the app in their native language and perform
searches in multiple languages.

20
8. Enhanced Privacy Controls
User privacy will remain a key focus. Future updates can include private/incognito
search modes, encryption of search data, and user-controlled access permissions to
improve data safety.

Summary:
With these enhancements, the Quick Search app can grow into a comprehensive
smart search assistant that goes beyond local device search. The flexibility of
Android and the app’s lightweight design make it well-suited for continuous
improvement and adaptation to future trends.

21
Features of Application :

Features of the Application

The Quick Search Android Application is developed to enhance user


productivity by providing a centralized and fast way to search for
information stored on an Android device. The key features of the
application are outlined below:

1. Real-Time Search Functionality


 As the user types, the app instantly displays relevant results.
 No need to press a search button—results update dynamically with
each keystroke.

2. Unified Search Bar


 A single search bar is used to search across multiple categories such
as contacts, apps, and files.
 Simplifies the user interface and improves ease of use.

3. Lightweight and Fast


 Optimized for performance with minimal memory and CPU usage.
 Ideal for both high-end and low-end Android devices.

4. User-Friendly Interface
 Clean and intuitive design.
 Easy navigation and smooth transitions between search results.

5. Contact and App Search


 Instantly find saved contacts by name or number.
 Quickly locate and launch installed applications.

6. File Search
 Enables searching of files stored in internal memory.
 Supports filtering by file name or type (e.g., .pdf, .txt, .jpg).

7. Compatibility
 Works on Android version 5.0 (Lollipop) and above.
 Compatible with a wide range of smartphones and tablets.

22
8. Minimal Setup Required
 Simple installation with no complex configurations.
 No login or internet connection needed for basic search functions.

9. Search History (Optional)


 Optionally stores previous searches for quick re-access (can be
enabled or disabled by the user).

10. Error Handling and Feedback


 Displays proper messages when no results are found.
 Handles invalid or empty input gracefully.

23
Limitations of the Application

Although the Quick Search Android Application serves as a useful tool for fast and
efficient local device search, it is important to acknowledge the limitations present in
its current version. These limitations define the boundaries of the system’s capabilities
and provide direction for future upgrades. The key limitations are described below:

1. Limited to Local Search Only


The current version of the application is capable of searching only the content stored
locally on the Android device, such as contacts, files in internal storage, and installed
apps. It does not support searching on external storage (SD cards), nor does it provide
integration with cloud services such as Google Drive, Dropbox, or OneDrive. As a
result, users cannot access or search cloud-based content through the app.

2. No Voice or Visual Input Support


The application lacks voice search functionality, which could improve accessibility for
users who prefer hands-free operation or have difficulty typing. Similarly, the app does
not support image-based search or Optical Character Recognition (OCR), which limits
its utility in scanning documents or identifying content from photos.

3. Language Limitations
At present, the application only supports search operations in English. It lacks
multilingual support, which may hinder usability for non-English-speaking users or
users who prefer to interact with their devices in regional languages. This reduces the
application’s reach and limits its adoption in non-English-speaking regions.

4. Basic User Interface Design


While the UI is clean and simple, it lacks advanced customization options. There is no
support for dark mode, theme switching, font resizing, or layout adjustments. Users
with specific visual preferences or accessibility needs may find the current interface
less comfortable for long-term use.

5. No Advanced Search Filters


The app does not offer filters or advanced sorting options. Users cannot narrow down
their searches by file type (e.g., documents, images, videos), file size, creation date, or
folder location. This can make it harder to find specific files among many similar
items.

6. No Support for App Lock or Privacy Settings


The application does not include any built-in security or privacy features such as
password/PIN protection, fingerprint lock, or private mode. Users cannot hide certain
search results or restrict access to specific types of content. This limits the app’s use in
scenarios where data privacy is a concern.
24
7. Absence of Search History Management
Although the app may optionally show recent searches, it lacks full search history
management features. Users cannot view, export, delete, or pin past search queries for
frequent use. This limits personalization and convenience for power users.

8. Lack of Cross-Device Syncing


The app does not currently support user accounts or cloud-based syncing. This means
search history, app settings, or preferences cannot be shared across multiple Android
devices. Each installation works independently, with no continuity of user data
between devices.

9. No Background Indexing
The app does not continuously index new files or apps in the background. Therefore,
search results might miss newly added data until the app is restarted or a manual
refresh is triggered. This can slightly impact real-time usability.

10. No Analytics or Battery Optimization Settings


There is no in-app feature to monitor usage statistics or optimize battery consumption
during long search sessions. Although the app is lightweight, power users may benefit
from settings that allow manual control over performance and background activity.

Conclusion
While the application effectively serves its primary purpose of quick and unified
search, addressing these limitations in future versions will significantly improve
functionality, usability, and appeal to a broader range of users. These areas also
provide a strong foundation for further development and innovation.

Methodology Used

25
To ensure the successful development of the Quick Search Android Application, a
structured and phased methodology was followed. This methodology focuses on a
clear understanding of user requirements, systematic design and development, rigorous
testing, and continuous improvement. Each phase was carefully executed to meet the
objectives of functionality, speed, and user-friendliness.
The methodology adopted can be broadly classified into the following stages:

1. Requirement Gathering and Analysis


This is the foundation stage of the project where efforts were made to understand what
the user truly needs in a mobile search application.

 User Research: Analysis of existing search tools on Android platforms was


conducted to identify limitations and gaps.

 Problem Identification: Common problems such as slow searches, cluttered


interfaces, and limited file support were documented.

 Requirement Specification: Functional requirements (e.g., search contacts,


files, apps) and non-functional requirements (e.g., performance, responsiveness)
were finalized and documented in the Software Requirement Specification
(SRS) document.

 Feasibility Study: A feasibility analysis was carried out to evaluate the


technical and economic viability of implementing the required features within
the available time and resources.

2. System Design
After understanding the user’s needs, a detailed system design was created to guide the
implementation process.

 Architecture Design: The architecture was designed to separate logic into


modules such as Input Handler, Search Engine, Results Renderer, and File
Access Module.

 UI/UX Design: Wireframes and layout blueprints were designed to visualize the
user interface. XML was used to build layouts following Material Design
principles for consistency.

 Data Flow Diagrams (DFD) and Entity-Relationship Diagrams (ERD) were

26
used to visualize system operations and the interaction between different
components.

 Component Design: Classes and interfaces were planned using UML diagrams
for maintainable and reusable code structure.

3. Development Phase
This stage involved coding the application based on the approved design.

 Platform and Tools: The application was developed using Android Studio,
utilizing Java (or Kotlin), XML, and the Android SDK.

 Modular Coding: Each module was developed separately and integrated later.
This included modules for:
o File management
o Contact retrieval
o App detection
o Real-time search matching

 Version Control: Git was used to manage code versions and collaborative
development.

 Use of APIs: Android’s built-in APIs such as ContentResolver,


PackageManager, and File classes were used for efficient data access.

4. Testing and Debugging


Thorough testing was done to ensure that the app performs accurately and efficiently
across different conditions.

 Unit Testing: Individual modules were tested independently for correctness.

 Integration Testing: Interactions between modules were tested to ensure


smooth data flow and correct functionality.

 UI Testing: The interface was tested across multiple screen sizes and
resolutions for responsiveness.

 Performance Testing: The speed of the search operation was monitored under
different loads.
 Bug Tracking: Android Logcat and debugging tools were used to identify

27
runtime exceptions and logical errors.

 Compatibility Testing: The app was tested on various Android versions (from
Android 5.0 and above) and devices with different screen sizes and hardware
configurations.

5. Deployment and Evaluation


Once the testing phase was completed, the app was deployed for real-world usage.

 APK Build and Installation: The final APK was generated and installed on
various Android devices for beta testing.

 User Feedback: Feedback was collected from early users regarding speed, UI
experience, and ease of use.

 Performance Metrics: Metrics such as app load time, search result time, and
memory usage were evaluated.

 Bug Fixes and Optimization: Based on feedback, minor bugs were fixed, and
performance optimizations were made before final release.

6. Documentation
Comprehensive documentation was maintained throughout the project lifecycle.
 Technical Documentation: Included code structure, system architecture, and
API usage.

 User Documentation: A basic user guide was created for installation and usage
instructions.

 Maintenance Plan: Documented guidelines for future developers or


contributors to continue development or add new features.

7. Future Planning and Enhancement Scope


Based on the evaluation and limitations observed during testing and deployment, a
future development plan was established.
 Planned Features: Voice search, cloud integration, multilingual support, and
UI enhancements.

 Scalability Considerations: Architectural flexibility was maintained to easily


incorporate upcoming modules without requiring major rewrites.

 Feedback Loop: A system was set in place to collect continuous feedback for
iterative improvements.

28
Conclusion
The methodology followed ensured a logical flow of development, with each phase
supporting the next. By dividing the process into well-defined stages and focusing on
quality at each step, the final product was not only functional and reliable but also
scalable for future improvements. This structured approach contributed significantly to
the success of the Quick Search Android application.

29
6. Conclusion

"Quick Search" aims to transform the web browsing experience by addressing the
limitations of traditional browsers. With features like advanced search capabilities,
efficient bookmark management, and seamless tab navigation, the application provides
a user-friendly interface tailored to meet the diverse needs of modern users. This focus
on usability ensures that users can navigate the web more effectively, enhancing
productivity and overall satisfaction.

The development of "Quick Search" involved careful analysis of user requirements


and preferences, leading to a robust and reliable application. Through rigorous testing
and user feedback, we have validated the performance and functionality of the system,
ensuring it operates smoothly and meets user expectations. By employing technologies
such as MySQL for secure data management, the application guarantees a reliable
browsing environment.

Looking ahead, "Quick Search" is poised for continuous enhancement and evolution.
Future updates will focus on integrating advanced features like voice search and
personalized recommendations, allowing the application to adapt to changing user
behaviors and technological advancements. By prioritizing user experience and
maintaining an agile development approach, "Quick Search" is set to establish itself as
a leading choice for users seeking a more intuitive and efficient web browsing
solution.

30
7. Bibliography

 https://developer.android.com/reference/android/webkit/WebView
 https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/views/layout/webapps
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JhyblEx9Fo
 https://www.scribd.com/document/722961814/410799775-web_source

31

You might also like