Stiebing, Ancient Astronauts 1992

Ancient Astronauts, Cosmic Collisions and Other Popular Theories About Man's Past
by William H. Stiebing, Jr.
(Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books 1984) 217 pp $18.95 hardback, $9.95 paperback
This book critically reviews several popular theories and ideas that have gained wide currency among the general public. It is written by W.H. Stiebing, Jr. an associate professor of history at the University of New Orleans. The popular concepts dealt with by Stiebing are the universality of the Deluge, Atlantis, Cosmic Catastrophism, Ancient Astronauts, the mysteries of the pyramids and early voyages to the Americas. A concluding chapter summarizes some elements common to all of the above theories. In this chapter he cites the poor nature of the evidence: simple answers to complex problems and a pervasive anti-establishment rhetoric as being examples of these common elements. Stiebing goes on to conclude this same chapter with some reflections on why these views have gained such popularity; he believes the growing popularity is due primarily to the communications gap between the scholarly and general community. Stiebing's handling of the idea of a universal flood is essentially even-handed. He brings to bear deficiencies in the interpretations of myths concerning the flood: overstatement of the evidence and difficulties in locating the alleged landing place of the Ark. Stiebing makes an acceptable case for most flood stories being regionally and temporarily disparate. He also notes that many flood stories cited in favor of universality can be understood as local in character or as having been brought by early Christian proselyzers and then re-grafted into the tribal tradition. Stiebing also finds that some evidence is overstated, as in the case of the mass and instant destruction of the mammals in Siberia; which is believed to be proof of a universal flood. Stiebing brings expert testimony to bear on this issue. That testimony asserts that such deaths were far less instantaneous than some believe, as decay was present in these corpses before they froze. Also at least five locations for the Ark are noted, of which the one on the mountains of Ararat on the Turkish-Russian border, according to a number of lines of inquiry by Stiebing, is not very compelling. These as well as the absence of flood layers or flood layers from different time periods in Mesopotamia make the idea of a universal flood difficult to maintain uncritically. The question of Atlantis is handled with equal reserve. Stiebing discusses various concepts for Atlantis' location and floruit. His basic conclusion is that in the absence of direct and substantial physical evidence for Atlantis we must remain circumspect with regards to our zeal concerning the existence of such an ancient and fabulous place. He also warns that we must be careful not to draw overmuch on Plato, our principle remaining ancient source on Atlantis.
In dealing with cosmic catastrophism in historical times Stiebing is once again relatively even-handed. He observes that many of these concepts are based on a single-minded interpretation of myths from different periods. Often such overriding interpretations cannot be justified. Instead many people seem to believe that their overall assessment will somehow justify itself i.e. "the end will justify the means". However, this approach almost invariably ends without means of any sort. Furthermore it would seem prudent if you have spent so much time looking up these stories, to know a little about how and when they were written. One might even expect that the suggested astral interpretation of these myths be clear and correct with respect to specific identifications. Neither of the above is assured with respect to such catastrophic models of the past. Building such catastrophic theories on the basis of a single reductionist interpretation of all myths is surely precarious. However, it must be stressed that while many of these myths are not "Recollections of a Fallen Sky" some of them may be. In dealing with the remaining parts of Stiebing's book I have only a few minor criticisms. First, in referring to the function of the pyramids of Egypt Stiebing uncritically accepts them as tombs. However, to date, no completely unambiguous in situ burials of a Pharaoh have yet been found in a Pyramid from the earliest periods. This, to be sure, we are told is due to grave robbers. However, the fact that some Pharaohs had two tombs and some two Pyramids does not commend this view without qualification. Certainly some other factors can have motivated these massive project (see for example Kurt Mendelsohn Riddle of the Pyramids for another tentative possibility). Stiebing's questioning of the relationship of Old World and a New Pyramids by citing differences in construction and building materials is not immediately decisive. One would expect that availability of materials would have some bearing on construction material and methods. However, Stiebing's arguments concerning the chronological disparity between these Old and New World Pyramids must be considered decisive until explicitly challenged with respect to the dating techniques themselves. Stiebing concludes his book with the hope that a concerted effort with respect to narrowing the communication gap between scholars and the public may "make people less intellectually unwary than they have been heretofore." He wishes to believe, thereby, that popular theories will "become much less popular in the future." While agreeing with the overall thrust of this, most timely tome, I would rather suggest that our desiratta be that these popular ideas improve with respect to their deficiencies in method and attitude, through meaningful interaction between scholars and the general public. This will give people a better idea of the problems associated with their favourite concept. Whereupon, interested individuals will either re-evaluate their ideas in the light of such criticisms or take those criticisms to task. Best of all some might do both. Ideally this could develop into a situation of reciprocal enrichment. However, as Stiebing notes, the failure to communicate can have unpleasant consequences, as in the Evolution vs. Creation controversy. In this situation the general public by means of lobbying its governing bodies, is having its say in what will be taught in their schools. This has the potential of getting out of hand. Academic issues should not be determined by plebiscite. However neither should the general
public be treated as some cult group members i.e. as there only to pay and pray without questioning. Certainly better communication is a commendable alternative to either of these options. It is in this regard that Stiebing's clearly written book is to be recommended to people of all backgrounds. Hopefully, it will be an inspiration to other scholars to produce marketable material for general consumption as well as their usual scholarly articles. Stiebing is to be commended for his efforts to close this "communication gap" between scholars and the general public.

Stiebing, Ancient Astronauts 1992

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Stiebing, Ancient Astronauts 1992

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Stiebing, Ancient Astronauts 1992

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ancient Astronauts, Cosmic Collisions and Other Popular Theories About Man's Past

by William H. Stiebing, Jr.

You might also like