The function of organizational leadership is well defined but practiced with extreme
diversity. What is meant by this is that volumes of books have been written on the most
successful characteristics of effective leaders. Good leaders across public and private sectors
generally possess these characteristics, but they are applied in different manners depending on
the industry. Part the reason this is so is because different industries and organizations in
different sectors of employment require leaders that exemplify leadership characteristics in
different measures.
Take the following examples. General George S. Patton is regarded as one of the most
effective generals of World War II. Eccentric personality, but effective, Patton orchestrated a
strategic and logistical miracle at the Battle of the Bulge when he was able to dislodge his army
from fighting at the front to relieve surrounded infantry units near the city of Bastogne, France.
His style of discipline created order and motivation that led his troops to believe that they could
not be defeated while being led by Patton.
Steve Jobs, on the other hand, is considered a creative genius with a vision that can see
what his products should be able to deliver for future consumers. He has successfully led Apple
from mediocrity to a major competitor in the electronic device entertainment industry. During
his tenure as CEO of Pixar Animation, he was described as a mature and mellow individual who
was totally hands off of the creative process of Pixar’s creative process
([Link]
w).
Imagine first the leadership style of Steve Jobs commanding soldiers at war as a mellow
individual who was totally “hands off” the strategic planning and execution of battle plans. Or,
imagine General Patton tirading across the Apple campus, slapping employees across the face
who did not perform up to his heroic standards of performance.
The point is, of course, that both are effective leaders and possess characteristics of
successful leadership at an organizational level. The difference is what works for the industry of
warfare does not necessarily work for the industry of the creative envisioning of the making of
electronic entertainment devices that start with the letter “i” and vice versa.
This paper will explore those leadership characteristics that are necessary for public
sector law enforcement department heads. The specific characteristics to be discussed are vision,
adaptability, and organizational structure, and being a motivational role model.
My total career experience is in law enforcement at a variety of positions within the
organization. The structure of law enforcement agencies is para-military in nature. Successful
organizational leadership relies on emphasizing those characteristics that encourage and motivate
men and women to risk life, limb, and litigation in enforcing the law and providing safe
communities.
The success of a law enforcement organizational leader rests on achieving two goals
within each individual employee. The first is providing a sense of purpose. The second is the
belief that the employee is a part of something that is bigger than himself, and that his
participation as part of a team partially helps to fulfill the first goal. This is important because
officers need to know that the job he/she is performing is important and that by collaborating
together goals can be achieved that could not be individually.
One of the methods of achieving the above two goals are based in organizational
structure. This includes both the hierarchical rank structure and and the organization of
specialized sub-groups. By utilizing a tree style organizational structure, typically called an
Organizational Chart, where the leader is at the top of the tree and the branches show the
hierarchy and separation of a divisions, the chain of command is clearly depicted for all
employees to follow. A simplified organizational chart for the San Fernando Police Department
is shown below as an example.
The rank structure in most police departments resembles that of the military with the
entry level position of police officer. The first level of supervision is the rank of sergeant,
managers begin at lieutenant. Larger organizations may have captains, commanders, and deputy
chiefs as upper level managers. The organization is lead by a chief or an elected county sheriff.
An advantage that law enforcement agencies have in selecting leaders is that in nearly
every case a police chief or sheriff began his/her career as an officer working a beat. Law
enforcement leaders share similar field experiences with every other employee that serves under
them, from routine traffic stops to life and death situations. Even though it is a poor measure on
if a leader will be effective or not, this sort of shared experiences provide credibility with line
personnel knowing that their chief began his/her career just as they had.
As stated, the methods used by the chief to organize employees into groups to execute
specific job functions is critically important. Law enforcement agencies are typically organized
into divisions, with different functions performed by each one. The basic unit of performance is
performed in a patrol division. Depending on the size of the agency, there are typically other
ancillary divisions, such as traffic, special investigations, narcotics, and vice to name a few.
In order to have the most effective personnel assigned to each division, it is the
organizational leader’s responsibility to set the criteria that enables the most qualified to promote
or be reassigned to different divisions. The leader therefore provides the purpose to the
employee by making him/her a part of a team that can only accomplish its goals and objectives
by working together.
In 2009, The San Fernando Police Department set a goal to reduce the incidents of traffic
collisions caused by drunk drivers. The primary method to accomplish this was to reduce the
number of drunk drivers on the roadways by making arrests for driving under the influence of
alcohol and drugs. The department applied for and received a grant from the state to pay for
overtime for officers to work solely towards arresting drunk drivers. One of the problems, is that
studies have shown that financial gain is not itself sufficient motivation for employees to be
productive.
The chief of police capitalized an a tragedy that befell one of the officers. While working
on a grant funded drunk driving task force, an officer’s mother was killed by a drunk driver. For
this officer, the issue of drunk driving became emotional and deeply personal. The chief, with
the permission of the employee, publicized the ironic tragedy. The chief also made public that he
was transferring the officer to the traffic division where the officer himself became a leader and
inspiration for other officers to make drunk driving enforcement a priority. Because of the
chief’s action, the department made a record number of drunk driving arrests in 2009, and the
officer who’s mother was slain was the most productive police officer in the department, not just
in drunk driving enforcement, but in many other areas as well.
Literature Review
Sun Tzu is credited as one of the most brilliant military leaders of all time. The Art of
War defines strategies and concepts used by generals in the execution of war. Tzu’s philosophies
of military strategies have endured and been applied to industries other than warfare. Business
executives across Asia have studied leadership principles presented by Sun Tzu interpreted for
the success of business over the competition.
One of the main principles to Sun Tzu’s achieving success is organization of the groups
that collaborate to achieve common goals. Tzu statement sounds oversimplified, “The control of
a large force is the same principle as the control of a few men: it is merely a question of dividing
up their numbers.”
Chief Robert Ordelheide of the San Fernando Police Department proved during his five
years as police chief that he is a transformational leader. In 2008, crime in San Fernando was
flat, while in the surrounding areas is was in a downward trend. Chief Ordelheide did something
that transformed the way department viewed the services that the police provided the City. Two
interested officers were taken out of patrol and he created a traffic division. Traffic enforcement
divisions are common in police departments everywhere, but for reasons unknown, the traffic
division in San Fernando was disbanded in 1957.