Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd
Upload
1K views1 page

TOK Essay Grading Rubric 2025

The document outlines a grading rubric for evaluating student essays based on their exploration of the title. It categorizes performance into five levels, from 'Excellent' to 'Rudimentary', assessing clarity, coherence, argument support, and awareness of different viewpoints. Each level provides specific criteria to guide the evaluation process.

Uploaded by

26spark
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views1 page

TOK Essay Grading Rubric 2025

The document outlines a grading rubric for evaluating student essays based on their exploration of the title. It categorizes performance into five levels, from 'Excellent' to 'Rudimentary', assessing clarity, coherence, argument support, and awareness of different viewpoints. Each level provides specific criteria to guide the evaluation process.

Uploaded by

26spark
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Does the student provide a clear, coherent and critical exploration of the essay title?

Excellent Good Satisfactory Basic Rudimentary 0


9-10 7-8 5-6 3-4 1-2
The discussion The discussion The discussion The discussion is The discussion The discussion
has a sustained is focused on is focused on connected to the is weakly does not reach
focus on the the title and is the title and is title and makes connected to the standard
title and is linked developed with superficial or the title. described by
linked effectively to some links to limited links to While there may the other levels
effectively to areas of areas of areas of be links to the or is not a
areas of knowledge. knowledge. knowledge. areas of response to one
knowledge. Arguments are Arguments are The discussion is knowledge, any of the
Arguments are clear, coherent offered and are largely relevant points prescribed titles
clear, coherent and supported supported by descriptive. are descriptive for the correct
and effectively by examples. examples. Limited or consist only examination
supported by There is There is some arguments are of unsupported session.
specific awareness and awareness of offered but they assertions.
examples. The some different points are unclear and
implications of evaluation of of view. are not
arguments are different points supported by
considered. of view. effective
There is clear examples.
awareness and
evaluation of
different points
of view.
Possible characteristics
Insightful Pertinent Acceptable Underdeveloped Ineffective
Convincing Relevant Mainstream Basic Descriptive
Accomplished Analytical Adequate Superficial Incoherent
Lucid Organized Competent Limited Formless

You might also like