Fiber Optic Network Design From Madang To Lae - Second Part
Fiber Optic Network Design From Madang To Lae - Second Part
Fiber Optic Network Design From Madang To Lae - Second Part
Optic Cables using WDM network system to connect Lae and Madang-Papua New Guinea
A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted by
A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted by
Preface
This report results from work supported by the PNG Power company communications Systems, Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby, National Capital District, under the rollout of PNG LNG fiber communication link from Madang to Lae and assessed as a project by the Papua New Guinea University of Technology under the Applied Physics Department which is supervised by Mr. Manu Rawali for AP422, Modern Optics and Lasers in communications project. This is a second part report which presents and extends information from the first part of the project design on FIBER OPTIC LINK BUDGET DESIGN Optic Cables using WDM network system to connect Lae and Madang-Papua New Guinea by Mr. Jeremiah J. A. Napi, Bachelor of Science in Applied Physics with Electronics and Instrumentations final year student
ii
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my gratitude towards my research supervisor Mr. Manu Rawali. Without his support, guidance and constant encouragement, this project would not have been possible. I am also grateful to Doctor S. Dey for his understanding in postponing the due dates of our project presentation and the time given for the completion of the project. I would like to thank the lab assistants for the internet use which was very helpful in me finding more information on my project. I would also like to thank the members of the AP Lab for all their helpful feedback as well as for their contributions on various fiber optic research laboratory experiments. The work in this project report has been supported in part by PNG Powers project outline for 2011 which is in partnership with Telikom PNG.
Prerequisites
Before working through the second part of this project report, there should be considerations of the reviewing of the first part project report, Basic Principles of Fiber Optics, the components used, the PNG Power Specifications and a strong understanding of how information is generated using optic cables, its effects and also benefits socially, economically and how it may also have an impact to the environment in which it is routed. In addition, one should understand and be able to manipulate and use algebraic formulas, deal with units, and use basic trigonometric functions such as sine, cosine, and tangent. A basic understanding of wavelength, frequency, and the velocity of light is also assumed.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page Preface Acknowledgements Prerequisites Table of Contents List of Tables List of Figures CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction and Background 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Scope CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Report Summary and General Improvement Requirements from first part 2.2 System Design 2.3 Optical Fiber Communications 2.4 Telecom Windows 2.5 Transmission Capacity CHAPTER THREE MAJOR PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS TO THE SYSTEM DESIGN 3.1 Problems 3.2 Solutions 3.2.1 Key Components in increasing the link design performance CHAPTER FOUR METHOD AND DESIGN APPROACH 4.1 System Design Approach 4.2 Cabling Design 4.3 Transmission Equipment 4.4 Planning the Route 8 9-10 10-11 11-12 5-6 7 7-8 1 1 2 Page i ii iii iii iv-v vi vi
iv
CHAPTER FIVE ANALYSATION AND CALCULATIONS 5.1 Analysing Operation and Principle to the LINK LOSS BUDGET 5.1.1 Cable Route Link Loss Budget Analysis 5.2 Calculations 5.3 Equipment Link Loss Budget Calculation CHAPTER SIX EFFECTS OF THE SYSTEM DESIGN 6.1 Economics 6.2 Advantages 6.3 Disadvantages CHAPTER SEVEN CONCLUSIONS AND REFERENCES 7.1 Conclusion 7.2 Bibliography 20 20 18 18-19 19 13 13 13-17 17
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Telecom windows with brief descriptions and wavelength range Table 2: Singlemode optical fibers according to ITU-T G52 Table 3: Calculations of connector and splice loss Table 4: Splice Loss Calculations Table 5: The Total Cable Route Loss Table 6: Data from manufacturers Specification for active components Table 7: Loss Margin Calculation
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: A simple representation of a Fiber Optic Network Design Figure 2: Map of Madang to Lae Route Design Figure 3: Transmission Equipments Figure 4: Network Route from Madang to Lae on satellite map Figure 5: Diagram of Cable Route Passive Component Loss
vi
FIBER OPTIC LINK BUDGET DESIGN-Optic Cables using WDM network system to connect Lae and Madang-Papua New Guinea Jeremiah J. A. Napi An engineering approach to the design of optical fiber communication link from Madang to Lae to meet mandated specifications for performance and interoperability is described. The report follows and expands upon technical guidance based on the first part, Subsystem and Design Specifications from PNG Power for common Long Haul and Tactical Fiber Optics Communications. This engineering approach can be useful in the implementation of other links throughout Papua New Guinea and for other Government and voluntary standards under development.
INTRODUCTION
1.2 Purpose
The purpose of this report is to present an engineering approach to the design of a link budget using fiber optic cables to connect Madang and Lae with basic point to point topology system using Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) and also to boost the signal performance in a long haul scenario. This approach is not limited to the implementation of just this standard, however,
APPLIED PHYSICS WITH ELECTRONICS AND INSTRUMENTATIONS
1.3 Scope
The design approach used in this report is based largely upon an Applications Appendix from PNG Power Specifications contained in the first part of the project report, but which was modified with the adapted changes that will be proposed in this report. A tutorial on major system components has also been included in the first part to amplify the brief descriptions given in sections of this report devoted to the design approach and example calculations. References and websites of the report used by the author in preparation of this report are included to assist those users who would like further background information.
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Report Summary and General Improvement Requirements from first part
A fiber optic link includes, as a minimum, a fiber optic transmitter, a fiber optic receiver, and a fiber optic cable. In this report, link means fiber optic link, transmitter means fiber optic transmitter, receiver means fiber optic receiver, and cable means fiber optic cable. The link may also include fiber optic repeaters, connectors, and splices. Normally, the transmitter accepts an electrical input signal and delivers an optical output signal, and the receiver accepts an optical input signal and delivers an electrical output signal. The cable serves as the medium for propagating optical signals between transmitter and receiver.
The first window at 800900 nm was originally used. GaAs/AlGaAs-based laser diodes and light-emitting diodes (LEDs) served as transmitters, and silicon photodiodes were suitable for the receivers. However, the fiber losses are relatively high in this region, and
fiber amplifiers are not well developed for this spectral region. Therefore, the first telecom window is suitable only for short-distance transmission. The second telecom window utilizes wavelengths around 1.3 m, where the loss of silica fibers is much lower and the fibers' chromatic dispersion is very weak, so that dispersive broadening is minimized. This window was originally used for long-haul transmission. However, fiber amplifiers for 1.3 m (based on, e.g. on praseodymium-doped glass) are not as good as their 1.5-m counterparts based on erbium. Also, low dispersion is not necessarily ideal for long-haul transmission, as it can increase the effect of optical nonlinearities. The third telecom window, which is now very widely used, utilizes wavelengths around 1.5 m. The losses of silica fibers are lowest in this region, and erbium-doped fiber amplifiers are available which offer very high performance. Fiber dispersion is usually anomalous but can be tailored with great flexibility ( dispersion-shifted fibers).
The second and third telecom windows are further subdivided into the following wavelength bands: Band O band E band S band C band L band U band Wavelength range Original 12601360 nm Extended 13601460 nm Short wavelengths 14601530 nm Conventional (erbium window) 15301565 nm Long wavelengths 15651625 nm Ultralong wavelengths 16251675 nm Description
Table 1: Telecom windows with brief descriptions and wavelength range. The second and third telecom windows were originally separated by a pronounced loss peak around 1.4 m, but they can effectively be joined with advanced fibers with low OH content which do not exhibit this peak.
For short distances of a few hundred meters or less (e.g. within storage area networks), it is often more convenient to utilize multimode fibers, as these are cheaper to install (for example, due to their large core areas, they are easier to splice). Depending on the transmitter technology and fiber length, they achieve data rates between a few hundred Mbit/s and 10 Gbit/s. Single-mode fibers are typically used for longer distances of a few kilometers or more. Current commercial telecom systems typically transmit 2.5 or 10 Gbit/s per data channel over distances of ten kilometers or more. Future systems may use higher data rates per channel of 40 or even 160 Gbit/s, but currently the required total capacity is usually obtained by transmitting many channels with slightly different wavelengths through fibers; this is called wavelength division multiplexing (WDM). Total data rates can be several terabits per second, sufficient for transmitting many millions of telephone channels simultaneously. Even this capacity does not reach by far the physical limit of an optical fiber. In addition, note that a fiber-optic cable can contain multiple fibers.
installed and is being upgraded, this information is probably readily available. If the installation is new, knowing the transmission distance (i.e. the distance between the transmitter and the receiver) can help an applications engineer calculate the fiber loss. The fiber loss will determine transmitter optical output requirements and/or the inclusion of regenerators in the fiber path. 2. What type of signals do you wish to transmit? This includes video signals, audio signals, data signals, and also indicates whether or not the signal will be digital or analog. 3. What type of fiber will be used? The choices are multimode or single-mode. Transmission distance, signal type and application will predetermine the best fiber type. Typically long distance, high speed, or multichannel transmission require single-mode fiber, while short distance, low speed, and single channel transmission will allow the use of less expensive multimode fiber. 4. What optical connectors will be used? As with fiber type, different systems will have different requirements. Connectors may be specified to reduce backreflection, increase ease of installation, meet dense packaging requirements, or interface with connectors in an existing system. 5. What quality is expected at the receive end? This usually refers to video quality, and while it may seem obvious to answer, "the best quality," the helpful answers include: surveillance quality, high quality, broadcast quality, studio quality, etc. The required video quality can impact fiber type and required electronics. 6. What configuration will the system require? This generally refers to the topology of the system, which may be point-to-point, ring, or star. In broadcast networks, configurations also include add/drop/repeat topologies. Other problems of the following designs may include but are not limited to Attenuation Splices Patch Panels/Connectors Optical Components (filters, amplifiers, etc) Dispersion (Chromatic and Polarization) Bends in Fiber (Topography) Optical fiber signal distortion from contamination (dirt/oil on connectors)
3.2 Solutions 3.2.1 Key Components in increasing the link design performance
Optical fiber communication systems rely on a number of key components:
optical transmitters, based mostly on semiconductor lasers (often VCSELs), fiber lasers, and optical modulators optical receivers, mostly based on photodiodes (often avalanche photodiodes) optical fibers with optimized properties concerning losses, guiding properties, dispersion, and nonlinearities dispersion-compensating modules semiconductor and fiber amplifiers (mostly erbium-doped fiber amplifiers, sometimes Raman amplifiers) for maintaining sufficient signal powers over long lengths of fibers, or as preamplifiers before signal detection optical filters (e.g. based on fiber Bragg gratings) and couplers optical switches and multiplexers (e.g. based on arrayed waveguide gratings); for example, optical add/drop multiplexers (OADMs) allow wavelength channels to be added or dropped in a WDM system electrically controlled optical switches devices for signal regeneration (electronic or optical regenerators), clock recovery and the like various kinds of electronics e.g. for signal processing and monitoring computers and software to control the system operation
In many cases, optical and electronic components for fiber communications are combined on photonic integrated circuits. Further progress in this technological area will help optical fiber communications to be extended to private households ( fiber to the home) and small offices. A typical channel capacity for long-haul transmission is nowadays 2.5 or 10 Gbit/s; 40, 100 or even 160 Gbit/s may be used in the future. This report suggests more advanced systems which may be used to increase the transmission capacity by simultaneously using several or even many different wavelength channels (coarse or dense wavelength division multiplexing). The main challenges are to suppress channel cross-talk via nonlinearities, to balance the channel powers (e.g. with gain-flattened fiber amplifiers), and to simplify the systems. Another approach is time division multiplexing, where several input channels are combined by nesting in the time domain, and solitons are often used to ensure that the sent ultrashort pulses stay cleanly separated even at small pulse-to-pulse spacings. Another important development is that of systems which link many different stations with a sophisticated fiber-optic network. This approach can be very flexible and powerful, but also raises a number of non-trivial technical issues, such as the need for adding or dropping
APPLIED PHYSICS WITH ELECTRONICS AND INSTRUMENTATIONS
wavelength channels, ideally in a fully reconfigurable manner, or to constantly readjust the connection topology so as to obtain optimum performance, or to properly handle faults so as to minimize their impact on the overall system performance. As many different concepts (e.g. concerning topologies, modulation formats, dispersion management, nonlinear management, and software) and new types of devices (senders, receivers, fibers, fiber components, electronic circuits) are constantly being developed, it is not clear so far which kind of system will dominate the future of optical fiber communications.
Fiber optic network design refers to the specialized processes leading to a successful installation and operation of a fiber optic network. It includes determining the type of communication system(s) which will be carried over the network, the geographic layout (premises, campus, outside plant etc), the transmission equipment required and the fiber network over which it will operate. Designing a fiber optic network usually also requires interfacing to other networks which may be connected over copper cabling and wireless. Next to consider are requirements for permits, easements, permissions and inspections. Once we get to that stage, we can consider actual component selection, placement, installation practices, testing, troubleshooting and network equipment installation and startup. Finally, we have to consider documentation, maintenance and planning for restoration in event of a future outage. However, the design of the network in this report will be concentrated only on determining the type of communication system(s) which will be carried over the network, the geographical layout (Madang to Lae), the transmission equipment required and the fiber network over which it will operate.
Long Distance and Outside Route Cabling Other than telecom systems that still use copper for the final connection to the home, practically every cable in the telephone system is fiber optic. The design as proposed, should use a high performance coax into the home, but connects to a fiber optic backbone. The Internet backbone will be all fiber. Not all commercial buildings in Madang and Lae have direct fiber connections from communications suppliers. This design has the potential to expand into communications in and around remote areas. Designing long distance or outside plant applications generally means choosing cabling containing singlemode (SM) fiber over all other media. Most of these systems are designed to be used over distances and speeds that preclude anything but SM fiber. Occasionally other options may be more cost effective, for example if a company has two buildings on opposite sides of a highway, a line-of-sight or radio optical wireless network may be easier to use since
APPLIED PHYSICS WITH ELECTRONICS AND INSTRUMENTATIONS
they have lower cost of installation and are easier to obtain relevant permits. The choice of the actual singlemode fiber, however, can depend on the application. Depending on the length of the link, the wavelength of the transmitters, data rate of the transmission and if Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) is planned, different types of fiber may be optimal.
Figure 3: Transmission Equipments. Choosing transmission equipment is the next step in designing a fiber optic network. This step will usually be a cooperative venture involving the customer, who knows what kinds of data they need to communicate, the designer and installer, and the manufacturers of transmission equipment. Transmission equipment and the cable plant are tightly interrelated. The distance and bandwidth will help determine the fiber type necessary and that will dictate the optical interfaces on the cable plant. The ease of choosing equipment may depend on the type of communications equipment needed. Telecom has been standardized on fiber optics for 30 years now, so they have plenty of experience building and installing equipment. Since most telecom equipment uses industry
10
conventions, equipment for telecom transmission that will be available for short links (usually metropolitan networks, maybe up to 20-30 km), long distance and then really long distance like undersea runs. All run on singlemode fiber, but may specify different types of singlemode. The link will will use 1310 nm lasers on regular singlemode fiber, often referred to as SINGLEMODE OPTICAL FIBERS ACCORDING TO ITU-T G652 as specified by the PNG Power in the first part of the report with its international standard. Longer links will use a dispersion-shifted fiber optimized for operation with 1550 nm lasers (G.652 fiber). For thsese applications, one of these will be used. In this design, it is strongly required that the links are AM (analog) systems based on special linear lasers called distributed feedback (DFB) lasers using either 1310 nm or 1550 nm operating on regular singlemode fibers.
11
Figure 4: Network Route from Madang to Lae on satellite map. With all those options to the design approach, start with a good map. Not just a road map or a topographical map, but satellite images overlaid on roads are much better, (provided by Google Maps). First, create a route map; note other utilities along the route on that map, and check with groups that document the current utilities to prevent contractors from damaging currently installed pipes and cables. After marking up the maps, find out whose permission you need to run the cabling. The route installs are subject to approval by local, state and federal authorities who will influence heavily how your project is designed and other documentation for that purpose.
12
ANALYSATION AND
CALCULATIONS 5.1 Analysing Operation and Principle to the LINK LOSS BUDGET 5.1.1 Cable Route Link Loss Budget Analysis
Loss budget analysis is the calculation and verification of a fiber optic system's operating characteristics as discussed in the first part of the report. This encompasses items such as routing, electronics, wavelengths, fiber type, and circuit length. Attenuation and bandwidth are the key parameters for budget loss analysis. The designer should analyse link loss early in the design stage prior to installing a fiber optic system to make certain the system will work over the proposed cable plant which was carried out in the first part of this project report. Both the passive and active components of the circuit can be included in the budget loss calculation. Passive loss is made up of fiber loss, connector loss, and splice loss. Not forgetting any couplers or splitters in the link. If the system electronics are already chosen, active components such as wavelength, transmitter power, receiver sensitivity, and dynamic range can be considered. If the electronics are not known, industry generic or standard loss values can be used for the loss budget. Prior to system turn up, the insertion loss of the cable plant must be tested with a source and power meter to ensure that it is within the loss budget. The idea of a loss budget is to insure the network equipment will work over the installed fiber optic link. It is normal to be conservative over the specifications. However, we will use the best possible specs for fiber attenuation or connector loss to allow some margin for installation and component degradation over time.
5.2 Calculations
Network Design Route for Papua New Guinea linking Madang and Lae To calculate total link loss in the given transmission line from Yonki to Lae (145km) and Yonki to Madang (170km), we add the total cable loss (distance x loss amount from table above) to connector loss (at 0.75dB per connector), splice loss (at 0.1dB per splice) and a margin of error of 3dB which is demonstrated below. We therefore calculate the total link loss when cable distance and the number of connections and splices are known.
13
In the project, we have a cable distance of 145km from Yonki to Lae and 170km from Yonki to Madang over a single mode 1310nm/1550nm transmission line which has 64 connectors and 63 splices, due to the splicing point at every 5km, our calculations will be: Hub centre: Yonki Using a single mode of 1310nm transmission line: From Yonki to Lae Total loss = (145km x 0.38dB/km) + (64conn x 0.75dB/conn) + ( 63splice x 0.1dB/splice) + 3dB = 55.1dB + 48dB + 6.3dB + 3dB = 112.4dB From Yonki to Madang Total loss = (170km x 0.38dB/km) + (64conn x 0.75dB/conn) + ( 63splice x 0.1dB/splice) + 3dB = 64.6dB + 48dB + 6.3dB + 3dB = 121.9dB Therefore the total of 234.3dB (112.4dB + 121.9dB) represents the amount of power required to transmit across this transmission line. Using single mode 0f 1550nm transmission line: From Yonki to Lae Total loss = (145km x 0.25dB/km) + (64conn x 0.75dB/conn) + ( 63splice x 0.1dB/splice) + 3dB = 36.25dB + 48dB + 6.3dB + 3dB = 93.55dB From Yonki to Madang Total loss = (170km x 0.25dB/km) + (64conn x 0.75dB/conn) + ( 63splice x 0.1dB/splice) + 3dB = 42.5dB + 48dB + 6.3dB + 3dB = 99.8dB Therefore the total of 193.35dB (93.55dB + 99.8dB) represents the amount of power required to transmit across this transmission line.
14
Figure 5: Diagram of Cable Route Passive Component Loss. Step 1. Calculate fiber loss at the operating wavelengths (length times standard estimates of loss at each wavelength) Single mode optical fibers according to ITU-T G652 Fiber Type Single mode 9.30.5m fiber @ 1310nm Loss Amount per 1km Average = 0.36 dB/km Maximum = 0.38 dB/km Single mode 9.30.5m fiber @ 1550nm Average = 0.22 dB/km Maximum = 0.25 dB/km Table 2: Singlemode optical fibers according to ITU-T G652. (All specifications in brackets are maximum values per ITU-T G652 standard. For singlemode fiber, a higher loss is allowed for premises applications, 1 dB/km for premises, 0.5 dB/km for outside plant. ) Step 2. Connector Loss
15
Singlemode connectors, which are factory made and fusion spliced on will have losses of 0.1-0.2 dB. Field terminated singlemode connectors may have losses as high as 0.5-1.0 dB. Let's calculate it at both typical and worst case values. Connector Loss 0.3 dB (typical adhesive/polish connector) 0.75 dB (prepolished/splice connector and TIA-568 max acceptable) 63
Total # of Connectors 64
Total Connector Loss 19.2 dB 47.25 dB Table 3: Calculations of connector and splice loss. Many designers and technicians forget when doing a loss budget that the connectors on the end of the cable plant must be included in the loss budget. When the cable plant is tested, the reference cables will mate with those connectors and their loss will be included in the measurements. Step 3. Splice Loss Fusion splicing of singlemode fiber will typically have less than 0.05 dB. Splice Loss Total # splices 0.3 dB 63
Total Splice Loss 18.9 dB Table 4: Splice Loss Calculations. (For this loss budget calculation, all splices are allowed 0.3 max per ITU-T G652 as given in the PNG Power Specifications) Step 4. Total Cable Route Loss Add together the fiber, connector and splice losses to get the total link loss of the cable plant. Best Case [ITU G652 Max] Wavelength (nm) Total Fiber Loss (dB) Total Connector Loss (dB) Total Splice Loss (dB) Other (dB) Total Link Loss (dB) 850 6.0 [7.0] 0.3 [0.3] 0 7.8 [11.05] 1300 2.0 [3.0] 0.3 [0.3] 0 3.8 [7.05] Best Case [ITU G652 Max] 1310 0.8 [2/1] 0.3 [0.3] 0 1550 0.6 [2/1] 1.5 [3.75] 0.3 [0.3] 0
16
Table 5: The Total Cable Route Loss. These values of cable route loss should be the criteria for testing. Allow +/- 0.2 -0.5 dB for measurement uncertainty and that becomes your pass/fail criterion.
Recommended Excess Margin 3 (dB) Table 6: Data from manufacturers Specification for active components. Step 6. Loss Margin Calculation Dynamic Range (dB) (above) 15 15 7.05 (ITU) 7.95
Cable Plant Link Loss (dB @ 1300 3.8 (Typical) nm) Link Loss Margin (dB) 11.2 Table 7: Loss Margin Calculation.
As a general rule, the Link Loss Margin should be greater than approximately 3 dB to allow for link degradation over time. Lasers in the transmitter may age and lose power, connectors or splices may degrade or connectors may get dirty if opened for rerouting or testing. If cables are accidentally cut, excess margin will be needed to accommodate splices for restoration.
17
Distance Limitations and Controlling Cost through Concatenation Very high data rates cannot travel far without regeneration. For example, the new 10 Gigabit Ethernet (10 Gbps is approx OC-192, and 1 Gbps is approx OC-24) can only travel a few hundred meters max. The newest fiber is called "laser-optimized fiber", and it can support 550 meters for 10Gbps, or 1100 meters for 1Gbps. Of course, it requires excellent transmitter/receiver equipment as well to achieve those distances. Which is only 550 meters and and that means if a provider wants to build a nationwide, 10 Gbps backbone, they need to install thousands of expensive repeaters and regens. This gives you an idea, why fiber networks are so expensive. Well, actually there is a way to reduce the cost dramatically. Instead of installing pure OC-48 (2.5 Gbps) or OC-192 (10 Gbps) systems, the provider can install OC-48c or OC-192c systems. The "c" stands for "concatenation", and this means that several fibers or several wavelengths on one fiber are used at lower speeds, and then concatenated at the endpoints. For example, Metro fiber systems (within a city) typically use CWDM (Course Wave-Division Multiplexing), and can only travel 5 km or so before requiring amplification and/or regeneration of the signal. Long-haul, intercity fiber uses WDM (Wave Division Multiplexing) as used in the this project report, which is much more expensive because it is tightly controlled and high-quality and carries more channels (more colors of light) - and it can carry a signal quite a distance -- perhaps 42 to 60 miles (70 to 100 km). Undersea fiber systems use very expensive transmitters and cabling, and can travel up to 400 miles before requiring amplification/regeneration. On a long distance line, there is an equipment hut every 40 to 60 miles. The hut contains equipment that picks up and retransmits the signal down the next segment at full strength.
6.1 Economics
6.2 Advantages
Compared with systems based on electrical cables, the approach of optical fiber communications (lightwave communications) has advantages, the most important of which are:
The capacity of fibers for data transmission is huge: a single silica fiber can carry hundreds of thousands of telephone channels, utilizing only a small part of the theoretical capacity. In the last 30 years, the progress concerning transmission
18
capacities of fiber links has been significantly faster than e.g. the progress in the speed or storage capacity of computers. The losses for light propagating in fibers are amazingly small: 0.2 dB/km for modern single-mode silica fibers, so that many tens of kilometers can be bridged without amplifying the signals. A large number of channels can be reamplified in a single fiber amplifier, if required for very large transmission distances. Due to the huge transmission rate achievable, the cost per transported bit can be extremely low. Compared with electrical cables, fiber-optic cables are very lightweight, so that the cost of laying a fiber-optic cable can be lower. Fiber-optic cables are immune to problems that arise with electrical cables, such as ground loops or electromagnetic interference (EMI).
However, fiber systems are more sophisticated to install and operate, so that they tend to be less economical if their full transmission capacity is not required. Therefore, the last mile (the connection to the homes and offices) and is usually still bridged with electrical cables, whereas fiber-based communications do the bulk of the long-haul transmission.
6.3 Disadvantages
These are three main disadvantages for the use of Fiber Optic cabling. 1. Cost per user: optical networks are the rule for carriers backbone because the huge amount of traffic justifies the economic investments. Deploying fiber to the home, however, is a different story. Telecom operators spend around $ 1000 per fiber subscriber. 2. Physical Constraints: optical fibers cannot be bended too much or they lose some light reflecting properties. Additionally optical fibers can be damaged much more easily than copper cables and the cost and complexity of the repair is significantly higher. 3. Switching: current optical technology is very efficient for point-to-point data transmission. Unfortunately the same cannot be said for traffic switching. Optical switching technology is advancing fast but it still cannot match the flexibility and costefficiency of electrical switching solutions. Summing up you can see that optical systems offer many advantages over traditional electrical networks and there is no doubt they represent the future technology for telecommunications. On the short term, however, optical networks will expand mostly into backbones and wide area networks.
19
7.1 Conclusion
In conclusion, there should be no concern that technical limitations to fiber-optic data transmission could become severe in the foreseeable future. On the contrary, the fact that data transmission capacities can evolve faster than e.g. data storage and computational power, has inspired some people to predict that any transmission limitations will soon become obsolete, and large computation and storage facilities within high-capacity data networks will be extensively used, in a similar way as it has become common to use electrical power from many power stations within a large power grid. Such developments may be more severely limited by software and security issues than by the limitations of data transmission.
7.2 Bibliography
N. A. Olsson, Lightwave systems with optical amplifiers, J. Lightwave Technol. LT-7, 1071 (1989) D. O. Caplan, Laser communication transmitter and receiver design, J. Opt. Fiber Commun. Rep. 4, 225 (2007) International Telecommunication Union (ITU), http://www.itu.int/home/index.html G. P. Agrawal, Fiber-Optic Communication Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York (2002) H. J. R. Dutton, Understanding Optical Communications, http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/pubs/pdfs/redbooks/sg245230.pdf, IBM Redbooks Illustrated fiber optic glossary, http://www.fiber-optics.info/glossary-a.htm
20