Guiness - Good Things
Guiness - Good Things
Guiness - Good Things
Account Planning Group, 16 Creighton Avenue, London N10 1NU, UK Tel: +44 (0)181 444 3692 Fax: +44 (0)181 883 9953
1999
Agency:
Whenever you analyse a brand like Guinness inevitably you start with the advertising. Guinness has a history of brilliant campaigns and Guinness ads are anticipated, consumed, and talked about like no other. It's been this way right from the start. Colin Storm continued his introduction to pay tribute to how advertising had helped to build this extraordinary brand. '...this is due in no small part to the advertising which, arguably without equals has maintained a quality and character so high that it has attracted its own brand loyalty.' Colin Storm, Managing Director Guinness GB, The book of Guinness advertising, 1998 The notion, in the last line, that Guinness advertising 'has attracted its own brand loyalty' opens the door to a problem. While it is not unusual for beer advertising to part company with the product, (much lager advertising for example works this way) it was creating problems for Guinness. We found through our initial qualitative research that Guinness advertising was being consumed separately to the brand. It was almost as if there were two brands, the advertising loved by all, and the beer we're not so sure about. It seems that while we happily consume one we can remain ambivalent about the other. The problem was that in these circumstances the values generated by the advertising were not transferring to the product. We concluded that we had to do more than build the right set of associations for Guinness and allow the consumer to catch on. It was essential that advertising was linked into the core of the brand if we wanted to change it . We needed a brand truth. Earlier advertising had used a brand truth but the problem was that it was too challenging. Both 'The Man with a Guinness' campaign (Rutger Hauer) and 'Not everything in Black and White' focused on Guinness' enigmatic brand personality. While these campaigns were highly creative, discriminating and loved by loyalists, it made the brand appear too challenging for trialists, as if the brand was asking 'are you smart enough to drink me?' Many for whom the brand was already challenging enough, decided they weren't, and drank elsewhere. Clearly the enigmatic nature of the brand was one 'truth' we should avoid because, if overplayed, it limits recruitment by making the brand appear too arrogant (it is a facet of the brand personality not its reason dtre).
http://www.warc.com