Nb-Lifts Rfus en

NB-LIFTS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR USE SHEETS (RfUs) CONSIDERED AS APPROVED STATUS ON FEBRUARY 2010
Number NB-L/REC (1) 0
Version (V.)
Keywords
Decision Horizontal Committee of NB-L (2) 23/05/07 21/11/07
Approved StC Lifts by WP/OP (3) 10/10/07 28/04/08
Organizational Questions 0/004 05 CAP; NB; Final inspection, Format of report 0/005 03 European data base, withdrawn certificates, NB, Member states 1 Safety Components 1/001 03 Conformity Assessment Procedure (CAP), Safety device, Type examination, Test procedure 1/002 03 CAP, Safety component, Type examination, Certificate 1/003 03 CAP, Safety component, Type examination, manufacturing procedures 1/004 1/005 1/006 1/007 2 Lifts 2/001 2/002 2/003 2/004 2/005 2/006 2/007 2/008 2/010 2/011 2/012 2/013 2/014 2/017 2/018 2/019 2/020 05 05 03 03 Electric safety devices, Formulation, Language versions Electric safety devices, Type examination Safety components, Directive 84/529/EEC, Certificates CAP, safety component, rupture valve, Sealing of adjustment Machinery Directive, ESR Lifts, ESR, Stopping accuracy, CAP Lifts, EMC-Directive, CAP NB, Lift, CE-marking, identification number CAP, Brake, test CAP, Lifts, Safety components, Risk analysis CAP, Lift, Model lift, Certificate CAP, Certificate, Model lift, NB, type examination, two landings. NB; CAP; Certificate; remark on Annex I, 2.2 Rescue operation procedures and equipment for inspection, examination and testing Driving unit in the well Activities by one person only Leaving the pit CAP, Landing doors, fire resistance, Certificates Emergency operation; Manual / Electrical / 400N Impact risks
19/01/00
31/12/00
19/01/00 19/01/00
31/12/00 31/12/00
19/01/00 05/06/00 19/01/00 19/01/00
13/09/07 13/09/07 31/12/00 31/12/00
08 06 03 03 07 03 05 03 04 05 09 05 04 07 04 02 02
23/05/07 19/01/00 19/01/00 12/11/98 23/05/07 19/01/00 19/01/00 16/11/00 22/11/06 13/11/03
13/09/07 23/04/07 31/12/00 31/12/00 13/09/07 31/12/00 05/06/00 13/09/07 23/04/07 10/10/06 28/04/08 10/10/06 10/10/06 13/09/07 23/04/07 23/04/07 23/04/07
13/11/03 13/11/03 23/05/07 21/11/03 23/05/06 23/05/06
Alarm device - two way communication system 2/025 04 Electric appliance, machine-room, temperature limit-exceeding 3 Systems according to Annexes VIII, IX, XII, XIII and XIV 3/001 05 CAP, NB, Lift, Annex XIII, Assessment 3/002 05 CAP, NB, Safety component, Annex IX, Assessment 3/003 03 CAP, Annex XIII, Lift 3/004 04 CAP, NB, Systems 3/005 06 CAP, NB, Systems, Certificate, Content of certificate 3/006 07 CAP; NB; Systems; Design inspection 3/007 03 CAP, NB, Systems, Modification 3/008 08 CAP, NB, Systems 3/009 05 CAP, NB, Systems, Certificate, Design inspection, Content of certificate 3/010 03 Annex XI, random check, module c, safety components, verification, conformity to type 3/012 04 CAP, final inspection, subcontracting
2/021
02
21/11/06 03/11/09
23/04/07 10/02/10
09/05/00 09/05/00 19/01/00 19/01/00 04/07/01 05/07/01 19/01/00 04/07/01 09/05/00 21/11/07
31/12/00 31/12/00 31/12/00 31/12/00 23/04/07 23/04/07 31/12/00 23/04/07 23/04/07 28/04/08
03/11/09
10/02/10
(1) : NB-L/REC x/xxx/V.y = Notified Bodies-Lifts / R: Recommendation for Use E: English version C: Coordination of Notified Bodies x: Numbering of the RfUs / V.: Version y: index of the Version (2) : NB-L = Notified Bodies - Lifts Directive 95/16/EC (3) : StC = Standing Committee WP/OP = Written Procedure / Oral Procedure
page 1 of 1 of NB-L/REC 0/004
NB-LIFT
NB-L CO-ORDINATION OF NOTIFIED BODIES LIFTS DIRECTIVE 95/16/EC
NB-L/REC 0/004 version: 05 date: 15-04-2008
NB-L RECOMMENDATION FOR USE

Keywords: CAP; NB; Final inspection, Format of report Proposed by AH-FI on 01-03-15, Decided by NB-L/HC on 01-07-04, Modified by NB-L/HC on 23-05-2007 StC: to be approved done on by WP by OP X done on 10.10.2007 prEN/EN: Clause:
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: 8 (2) Question: Annex: Clause:
How can be shown that the range of examinations and tests to be carried out on an installed lift before placing it onto the market and putting it into service has completely been done?
Answer: A format of reports for examinations and tests to be carried out on an installed lift before placing it onto the market and putting it into service is given by the enclosed documents NB-L/013/2000 and NB-L/14/2000 rev. 07-2007.
History: decision of NB-L/HC in its 4th meeting, proposals from AH-FI, consideration by NB-L/HC in its 8th meeting, editorial amendments by AH-FI, decided by NB-L/HC in its 9th meeting, discussed and approved at the 18th meeting, discussed again on request of the StC by NB L/HC and approved by NB L/HC in its 19th meeting According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
NB-LIFT
REPORT
ABOUT
EXAMINATIONS AND TESTS

ON AN INSTALLED
ELECTRIC LIFT
CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH Lifts Directive, Annexes VI, X, XII, XIII and XIV to establish conformity with the provisions of the Lifts Directive
The installation is based on a lift with EC Type examination ( Art. 8 (2) i & ii) design of a type in accordance with Annex XIII ( Art. 8 (2) iii)
With or Without Design Examination
a lift with Unit Verification ( Art. 8 (2) iv) design in accordance with Annex XIII ( Art. 8 (2) v)
IDENTIFICATION OF THIS REPORT
DOC NB-L/013/2000, version 07.2007
Electric Lift
Identification of this Report:
This Test Report is composed by 31 pages and the following Annexes:

Annex A : Additional Requirements for Unit Verification Annex B1 : Machinery inside the well : working area in the car or car roof Annex B2 : Machinery inside the well : working area in the pit Annex B3 : Machinery inside the well : working area on a platform Annex B4 : Working area outside the well Annex B5 : Machinery outside the well Annex C : Additional requirements for lifts designed according to EN 81-70 Annex D : Additional requirements for lifts designed according to EN 81-72
Page 2 of 31
Electric Lift
INTRODUCTION
1. It is the purpose of this report to be used as a means to facilitate the proof of having carried out the necessary examinations and tests to show the compliance with the Lifts Directive before putting a new lift into service. 2. According to practice in Europe, details of the compliance with the Lifts Directive are related to fulfilling the requirements of the Harmonised Standard EN 811:1998 + A2/2004. Therefore this report is based on the requirements of this standard. The drafting committee for this report consider that the limited tests and examinations described in Annex D2 of EN81-1:1998 + A2/2004 and included in this report are not sufficient on their own to verify compliance with the harmonised standard. Furthermore the tests and examinations in this report are intended to ensure that the requirements of Annex D1 are also satisfied.This does not exclude other solutions, provided the same safety level has been reached. 3. The format of this report does not specify how the examinations or tests have to be carried out. It is assumed that the examinations and tests are carried out in accordance with approved engineering practice (state of the art) and, where necessary, with instruments being in line with the provisions in the relevant approved QM-system. 4. The sequence of examinations and tests stated within this report have been arranged for the safety of the person conducting the test. Each stage once completed successfully helps to increase the level of safety of the following tests. 5. This document has been compiled by a group of experts representing manufacturers and notified bodies (NB). This work was requested by the NB-L/HC in its meeting 99-05-11/12 and further amendments at the meeting dated 04-05-26/27. 6. Attention shall be paid to possible differences in the lift installation due to national regulations not touched by the LD. 7. This report should be retained by the Notified Body and/or the Installer carrying out these tests
Page 3 of 31
Electric Lift
Documents Required
The following documentation may be required in order for the person conducting the tests to be able to fully complete the rest of this report. :General description of the lift installation if not already included in this document Architectural plans with regard to the shaft, machinery or pulley room, landings and access to these areas (clearly dimensioned) User Handbook Mechanical general arrangement drawings Electrical circuit diagrams Instructions for use of the lift Maintenance instructions Requirements for periodic inspections Logbook for registration of all maintenance and alterations Emergency procedures EC declarations of conformity of relevant safety components as listed in Annex IV of the Lifts Directive (95/16/EC) or a list from which these may be identified.
Certification -
Quality Assurance Certification (If applicable) EC Type Examination of Model Lift / Lift Notified Body Design Examination for deviations from Harmonised Standards Fire Rating Certification for Landing Doors (National Requirement) Testing/Suitability of Glass Panels Rope and Chain Certificates Alarm device according to EN 81-28 (e.g. statement of compliance by manufacturer)
Information Type Tested Safety Components ~ range of use, correct installation procedures and special testing procedures. National Regulations which need to be respected. Contract specific negotiations, such as accessibility for certain groups of users (the handicapped / the elderly). Whilst conformity with these items is not the responsibility of the Notified Bodies they may effect the design of the lift and therefore its compliance with the Lifts Directive. Risk Analysis in the case of Unit Verification.
Note : The drawings and circuit diagrams used for the installation and testing process may be subject to minor alteration due to changes in site conditions. It should be noted that as built drawings are required as part of the handover documentation to be provided to the owner of the lift. The EMC conformity should be confirmed during the test.
In the following document shaded areas shown thus denote tests which must be carried out on site. Any box which is not shaded allows for the installer to provide the examiner with this information prior to the tests being carried out providing that they have the necessary Quality Assurance system. If the installer has no recognised Quality Assurance system then all tests must be conducted on site.
Page 4 of 31
Electric Lift
In the case of Final Inspection (annex vi) or similar the following information shall be provided : EC Type Examination Certificate Document providing equivalent information to the Type Examination Certificate in case of Article 8 (2) iii Design Examination Certificate
Lift Installer Details Responsible For Design Name: Address:
Lift Installer Details Name: Address:
Notified Body No. (where applicable)
Notified Body Carrying Out Inspection Name: Address:
Location of Installed Lift Name: Address:
* Lift Identification No. *Lift Type (Model) * Year of Manufacture * The above details to be taken from the installers plate inside the car.
Page 5 of 31
Electric Lift
1 Description of the Lift Installation

1.1 Length of travel 1.2 No of levels served 1.3 No of landing doors Total Front Rear Side 1.4 Rated load 1.5 Rated speed 1.6 Machine room location (at which level) Above well Below well Side of well Remote Other 1.7 Counterweight Position Side of Car Rear of Car 1.8 Mass of Counterweight 1.9 Mass of Empty Car 1.10 Plan(s) of the well and machine/pulley room : 1.11 Electric Circuit Diagram(s) Kg Kg Drawing No.(s) Drawing No.(s) Yes No kg m/s Persons m
1.12 Confirm that the plans or other documents contains information relating to :Loads and forces imposed on the building Indication of the well enclosure Dimensions of pit and headroom Location of the machinery and pulley spaces and access to them Accessible spaces underneath the well Fixation points of guide rails
Page 6 of 31
Electric Lift
1 Description of the Lift Installation (continued)

1.13 Power supply: Specified V Hz Actual at time of test Voltage Phase Hz Wire (3,4 or 5) Fuse Type Fuse Rating
A 1.14 Specifications relating to negotiations Duration of fire rating of landing doors Fire Fighting Lift Accessibility for Disabled Vandal Resistance Other (specify) :1.15 Verification of Conformity
min Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No
The following are items not fully conforming to the Harmonised Standard EN81-1:1999 Design Inspection Refuge Space approval by Member State (annex 2.2) 1.16 List Of Used Safety Components Device for Locking Landing Door Device to prevent the lift car from falling (safety gear) Overspeed Limitation Device (speed governor) Buffers - Energy Accumulation Non Linear (car) - Energy Accumulation Non Linear (cwt) - Energy Accumulation Buffered Return (car) - Energy Accumulation Buffered Return (cwt) - Energy Dissipation (car) - Energy Dissipation (cwt) Device to prevent uncontrolled upwards movement Electric Safety Switches containing electronic components N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Approval No. Approval No. EC Type Examination Certificate No. Notified Body No.
Page 7 of 31
Electric Lift
2.0 Machine and Pulley Spaces

2.1 Main Switch (a) Confirm that the main switch is in accordance with that specified (b) Confirm that the main switch control mechanism is easily identifiable and accessible from the machine room doorway (see 13.4.2 of EN 81-1) (c) Confirm that it is lockable in the OFF position (See 13.4.2 of EN 81-1) Specified Yes Yes No No A
Yes
No
2.2 Lighting & Socket Outlets Confirm that this conforms to 6 and 13.6 of EN. 81-1
Lux Rating Yes No
2.3 Dimensions Confirm these are in accordance with the minimum figures in 6.3.2 of EN.81-1 Yes No
2.4 Access Confirm there is safe access as defined in 6.2 of EN.81-1 Yes No
2.5 Safety Signs Confirm that notices and signs are in place according to 15.4 of EN.81-1 Yes No
2.6 Lift Machine Confirm that the correct lift machine is supplied
Manufacturer Type Specified Yes No
2.7 Controller Type Confirm that the correct controller is supplied
2.8 Emergency Release (a) Confirm that the emergency operation system(s) function(s) correctly in accordance with 12.5 of EN.81-1 (b) Confirm that the instructions called for in 15.4.3 of EN.81-1 are displayed Yes No
Yes
No
2.9 Machine Room Ventilation Confirm that the machine is room ventilated as called for in 6.3.5 of EN.81-1 Yes No
Page 8 of 31
Electric Lift
2.0 Machine and Pulley Room (continued)

2.10 Doors/Trap Doors Confirm that the machine room doors or trap doors are fitted with a suitable lock and of the correct size and construction (see 6.3.3 of EN.81-1) Yes No
2.11 Communication Confirm that there is a communication device in place and working as called for in 14.2.3.4.of EN.81-1(for lift travel > 30m) N/A Yes No
2.12 Openings into the well Confirm that protection against objects and/or persons falling into the well from the machine room has been provided (see 6.3.4of EN.81-1) N/A Yes No
2.13 Lifting Accessories Confirm that, where necessary, means for lifting heavy components are available and correctly marked (see 6.3.7 of EN.81-1) N/A Yes No
2.14 Multiple Lifts Confirm that where multiple lifts have been installed into a common machine room components have been marked identifying the lift to which the components belong (see 15.15 of EN.81-1) N/A Yes No
2.15 Confirm the safety chain has been tested to ensure that an earth fault will cause disconnection without delay (14.1.1.1.d of EN.81-1)
Yes
No
2.16 Confirm that the phase reversal protection functions correctly (14.1.1.1.j of EN.81-1)
Yes
No
2.17 Confirm that there is no equipment not related to the safe operation of the lift in these spaces (6.1.1 of EN.81-1)
Yes
No
Page 9 of 31
Electric Lift
3.0 The Well

3.1 Clearances and run-bys (a) Is the slowdown of the machine monitored ? (see 5.7.1.3 and 12.8 of EN.81-1) (b) Is there fitted an anti-rebound device? (see 5.7.1.4 of EN.81-1) NOTE : N/A Yes No
N/A
Yes
No
In (c) & (d) below h=0.035v2 which may be reduced in the circumstances given in 5.7.1.3 and 5.7.1.4 of EN 81-1
(c) With the counterweight resting on its fully compressed buffers confirm with reference to Fig. 1 that : Specified Measured Distance m
(i) The rail lengths will accommodate a further guided travel of at least (0.1+ h) m (see 5.7.1.1a of EN.81-1) (ii) The dimension from the standing area on the car roof to the lowest part of the ceiling of the well above this area is at least (1.0+ h) m. (see 5.7.1.1.b of EN.81-1) (iii) The free vertical distance between the lowest part of the ceiling of the well and the highest item of equipment on the car roof (excluding (iv) below) is at least (0.3+ h) m (see 5.7.1.1.c.1 of EN.81-1) (iv) The free vertical distance between the lowest part of the ceiling of the well and the highest part of the guide shoes/rollers, rope attachments/header or parts of vertically sliding doors should be at least (0.1+ h) m (see 5.7.1.1.c.2 of EN.81-1) Confirm that there is sufficient space above the car to accommodate a rectangular block 0.5m x 0.6m x 0.8m (see 5.7.1.1.d of EN 81-1)
Yes
No
Figure 1
Page 10 of 31
Electric Lift
3.0 The Well (continued)

Specified Measured Distance m
(d) With the car resting on its fully compressed buffers confirm that the further guided travel of the counterweight is at least (0.1+ h) m. (see 5.7.1.2 of EN.81-1) (e) When the car rests on its fully compressed buffers confirm (see Fig.2) there is: (i) Sufficient space below the car to accommodate a rectangular block 0.5m x 0.6m x 1.0m (see 5.7.3.3.a of EN.81-1), resting on one of its faces.
Yes
No
(ii) A free vertical distance between the bottom of the pit and the lowest part of the car (excluding the area in (iii) below) of at least 0.5m (see 5.7.3.3.b of EN.81-1) (iii) A free vertical distance of not less than 0.1m within a horizontal distance of 0.15m between (1) the apron or parts of the vertical sliding door and adjacent walls and (2) the lowest parts of the car and the guide rails. (see 5.7.3.3.b of EN 81-1). (iv) Except for items in (iii) above, a free vertical distance between highest parts in the pit and the lowest part of the car of at least 0.3m. (see 5.7.3.3.c of EN.81-1)
Figure 2
Page 11 of 31
Electric Lift

3.2 Reduced Stroke Buffering Confirm that the terminal speed reduction system ensures that buffer impact is appropriate to the stroke of the buffer (see 10.4.3.2.of EN.81-1) N/A Yes No
3.3 Buffers
3.3.a Car Buffers Specified Confirm that the car buffers are in accordance with what is specified Number Installed Yes No
3.3.1 Energy Accumulation Buffers When the car with its rated load is placed on the buffer(s), the ropes being made slack, confirm that the compression corresponds to that given by the characteristic curve of the buffer (as provided by the buffer supplier or lift supplier): (see Annex D.2.l of EN 81-1). N/A Yes No
3.3.2 Energy Accumulation Buffers (Non-Linear Type) Confirm that the buffer has been CE marked N/A Yes No
3.3.3 Energy Dissipation Buffers (Oil Type) When the car with its rated load is brought into contact with the buffer at the speed for which the buffer is designed (see 10.4.3 of EN 81-1) confirm that no deterioration occurs to the lift. Confirm that the buffer has been CE marked N/A Yes No
Yes
No
3.3.b Counterweight Buffers Specified Confirm that the counterweight buffers are in accordance with what is specified Number Installed Yes No
Page 12 of 31
Electric Lift

3.3.4 Energy Accumulation Buffers When the counterweight with empty car is placed on the buffer(s) the ropes being made slack, confirm that the compression corresponds to that given by the characteristic curve of the buffer (as provided by the buffer supplier or lift supplier) (see Annex D.2.l.1 of EN 81-1). N/A Yes No
3.3.6 Energy Dissipation Buffers (Oil Type) When the counterweight with its rated load is brought into contact with the buffer at the speed for which the buffer is designed (see 10.4.3 of EN 81-1) confirm that no deterioration occurs to the lift. Confirm that the buffer has been CE marked N/A Yes No
Yes
No
3.4 Protection in the well

(a) Confirm that in the case of a fully enclosed well there are no gaps in the enclosure other than those listed in 5.2.1.1 of EN.81-1 (b) Confirm that a rigid counterweight screen has been fitted and that the counterweight is a minimum of 50mm clear of the car (see 5.6.1 and 11.3 of EN.81-1) (c) Confirm that in the case of adjacent lifts there is a screen in the pit extending to a height of 2.5m above the lowest landing floor (see 5.6.2.1 of EN 81-1) (d) Confirm that when the horizontal distance between the edge of the car roof and any moving parts of adjacent lifts are less than 0.5m there is a full height screen (see 5.6.2.2 of EN.81-1) (e) Confirm that the inspection doors and inspection traps fulfil the requirements of 5.2.2 of EN 81-1 (f) Confirm that the access to the pit fulfils the requirements of 5.7.3.2 of EN 81-1 (g) Confirm In the case of partially enclosed wells imperforate screening in accordance with figure 1 of 5.2.1.2 of EN 81-1 has been provided (h) Confirm that all other requirements of 5.2.1.2 of EN 81-1 have been satisfied N/A N/A N/A Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No

Page 13 of 31
Electric Lift
(i) Confirm that any ventilation provided conforms to 5.2.3 of EN.81-1 (j) Confirm that the wall facing the car entrance conforms with the requirements of 5.4.3 of EN.81-1 (k) Confirm that there are no objects/services in the well except for those associated with the lift (see 5.8 of EN.81-1) (l) Confirm that if there are accessible areas under the pit suitable precautions have been taken. (see 5.5 of EN.81-1) (m) Confirm that rotating pulleys in the well have been guarded (see 9.6 of EN.81-1) (n) Confirm that the final limit switches are correctly positioned and operate satisfactorily (10.5 of EN.81-1) (o) Confirm that the stopping device in the pit has been positioned correctly and proved (5.7.3.4 and 14.2.2.1 of EN81-1) (p) Confirm that the well meets the requirements of 5.3 of EN81-1, particularly in the case of glass N/A
Yes Yes
No No
Yes
No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
3.5 Landing Door Assemblies

(a) Confirm that the running clearance between the door panels and between panels and uprights, lintels or sills is less than or equal to 6mm (7.1 of EN.81-1) N/A (b) Confirm that no recess or projection on the face of power operated automatic sliding door panels exceeds 3mm (7.5.1 of EN.81-1) (c) Is a fire test certificate required, if so is it available, complete and correct? (d) If the answer to (c) is Yes are the landing doors correctly fire rated for the installation? N/A Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Specified:
Makers Type Rating Yes No No min
(e) Confirm that where glass panels (excluding vision panel) are used they are correctly marked in accordance with clause 7.2.3.5 of EN.81-1 (f) Confirm that where glass panels (excluding vision panel) are used they conform in size and fixing to annex J of EN.81-1or have a pendulum test certificate available, complete and correct. (g) Confirm that one of the options for child protection in 7.2.3.6 of EN.81-1 has been adopted (h) Confirm that vertically sliding doors conform to the requirements of 7.4.3 and 7.5.2.2 of EN.81-1
NA
Yes
NA
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Page 14 of 31
Electric Lift

3.6 Landing Door Locks
(a) Confirm that the correct door locks are fitted (see 1.16) (b) Confirm that all the door locks are CE marked (c) Confirm that the contacts at each landing door have been proved so that when broken they stop and prevent movement of the car outside the unlocking zone (7.7.4 of EN.81-1) (d) Confirm that the mechanical locks at each landing door have been proved for positive locking (7.7.5 of EN.81-1) (e) Confirm that all electrical safety devices on the landing door panels, which are not directly mechanically linked, operate correctly (see 7.7.6.2 of EN.81-1). N/A Yes Yes Yes No No No
Yes
No
Yes
No
3.7 Lighting and Socket Outlet

(a) Confirm that the well lighting level is in accordance with 5.9 and 13.6 of EN.81-1 (b) Confirm Are the terminal light fittings less than 0.5m from the pit floor and ceiling (see 5.9 of EN.81-1) (c) Confirm that the lights can be switched from both the pit and machine room (see 13.6.3.2 of EN.81-1) (d) Confirm that an electrical outlet socket has been provided in the pit (see 5.7.3.4 of EN.81-1) lux Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
3.8 Car and Counterweight Guide Rails

Specified (a) Is the designation of the guide rails in accordance with that specified? Car Cwt (b) Confirm the pitch of the rail fixings is in accordance with the layout drawing Car Cwt (c) Confirm that where the guides are lubricated it is in accordance with the EC type test certification of the safety gear N/A Yes Yes Yes No No No Actual
Page 15 of 31
Electric Lift
4.0 The Car, Inspection Operation & Entrance Clearances

4.1 The Car
Specified (a) Confirm that the available floor area, related to rated load and maximum number of passengers, conforms to 8.2 of EN.81-1 (b) Confirm that the inside of the car is at least 2.0m in height (c) Confirm that where glass panels are used, each panel is correctly marked in accordance with 8.3.2.4 of EN.81-1 (1) Doors (2) Walls (d) Confirm that where glass panels are used a handrail conforming to 8.3.2.2 of EN81-1 has been fitted. (e) Confirm that one of the options for child protection in 8.6.7.5 of EN 81-1 has been adopted (f) Confirm that the maximum load and makers name is indicated in the car (i.e. Number of persons load in kg and identification no.) and it complies with 15.2.1 and 15.2.2 of EN.81-1 (g) Confirm that the emergency alarm device allows for two-way communication with a rescue service according to EN 81-28. (h) Confirm that the lighting in the car gives a minimum of 50 lux at floor level and on the controls (see 8.17.1 of EN.81-1) (i) Confirm that the emergency lighting in the car stays illuminated for at least 1h. (see 8.17.4 of EN.81-1) (j)Confirm that the car overload device operates in accordance with clause 14.2.5 of EN.81-1 (k) Confirm that the apron conforms to 8.4 of EN.81-1 (l) Confirm that any emergency doors or trap door comply with 8.12 of EN 81-1 (m) Confirm that ventilation has been provided in the car (see 8.16 of EN 81-1) (n) Confirm that the car walls are imperforate except for ventilation apertures (see 8.16 of EN 81-1) N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes No No No m2 Actual m2
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes Yes
No No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Page 16 of 31
Electric Lift
4.0 The Car, Inspection Operation & Entrance Clearances (continued)

4.2 Car Top
(a) Confirm that the car top has been fitted with controls, stopping devices and socket outlet in accordance with 8.15 of EN.81-1 (b) Confirm that the car top station is constructed and operates in accordance with 14.2.1.3 of EN 81-1 (c) Confirm that the alarm device in 5.10 of EN.81-2 operates correctly N/A Yes No
Yes
No
Yes Specified:
No
(d) Confirm that the balustrade on the car roof is in accordance with 8.13.3 of EN 81-1 (e) Confirm that the car roof has one clear area for standing (see 8.13.1 of EN.81-1) (f) Confirm that any pulleys have been guarded (see 9.7 of EN.81-1) (g) Confirm that the roof of the car has been designed to take the weight of two persons
Note :- Only where visual inspection suggests non-compliance should the car roof be subjected to further examination)
N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
(h) Confirm that the stopping devices on the car top have been positioned correctly and proved so that when operated they stop and prevent movement of the car (8.15.b and 14.2.2.1 of EN81-1)
Yes
No
Page 17 of 31
Electric Lift

4.3 Car Entrance Clearances
(a) Confirm that the running clearance between the door panels and between panels and uprights, lintels or sills is less than or equal to 6mm (8.6.3 of EN.81-1) (b) Confirm that no recess or projection on the face of power operated automatic sliding door panels exceeds 3mm (8.7.1 of EN.81-1) (c) Confirm that the horizontal distance between the sill of the car and the sill of the landing doors is 35mm or less (see 11.2.2 of EN.81-1) (d) Confirm that where there is a hinged landing door and a folding car door the clearances between them do not exceed 150mm (see 11.2.4 of EN.81-1) (e) Is the distance between the inner surface of the well and the sill or framework of the car entrance or door 0.15m or less, or 0.2m if over a height not exceeding 0.5m? (11.2.1 of EN.81-1) (f) If the answer to (e) is NO, is the car door mechanically locked when away from the unlocking zone in accordance with 11.2.1. c of EN.81-1)? N/A N/A N/A Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
4.4 Landing and Car Door Tests

Note: Where appropriate, the following tests should be carried out with the car and landing doors coupled. If the doors are manual answer f, h, i, j, k, l, m, n If the doors are power operated answer all except n, (a) Confirm the maximum force to prevent closing is 150N or less (7.5.2.1.1.1/8.7.2.1.1.1 of EN.81-1) (b) Confirm that with a mechanical force of 150N the clearances defined in 7.1 of EN.81-1 do not exceed 30mm for side opening doors or 45mm for centre opening doors (7.2.3.2 of EN.81-1) (c) Confirm that the kinetic energy is 10J or less (see 7.5.2.1.1.2/8.7.2.1.1.2 of EN.81-1) (d) Confirm that all the protective devices reverse the doors in accordance with 7.5.2.1.1.3/8.7.2.1.1.3 of EN.81-1) (e) Confirm that if the doors are able to close with the reversal device inoperative the kinetic energy is less than or equal to 4J (see 7.5.2.1.1.3/8.7.2.1.1.3 of EN 81-1) N/A Front Front Alternate Alternate Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Page 18 of 31
Electric Lift
(f) Confirm that the unlocking zone is 0.2m or less above and below landing levels (or 0.35 in the case of simultaneously operated car and landing doors (7.7.1 of EN.81-1) (g) Confirm that the automatic self closing mechanism functions correctly (7.7.3.2 of EN.81-1) (h) Confirm that each set of landing doors is capable of being unlocked from the outside with an emergency key (7.7.3.2 of EN.81-1) (i) Confirm that the car doors can be manually opened within the unlocking zone with a force of less than 300N with the power off (8.11.2 and Annex B of EN.81-1) (j) Confirm that in the case of folding doors the maximum force to prevent opening is 150N or less (8.7.2.1.1.4 of EN.81-1) (k) Confirm that for vertical sliding doors the requirements of 7.5.2.2.(a), (b) and (d)/8.7.2.2 (b), (c) and (d) of EN 81-1 have been met (l) Confirm that if fitted the car door lock functions correctly (8.9.3 of EN.81-1) (m) Confirm that the car door contacts have been proved so that when broken there is no car movement outside the unlocking zone (8.9 of EN.81-1) (n) Confirm that the car here indication conforms to 7.6.2 of EN.81-1 for manual doors N/A N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Page 19 of 31
Electric Lift
5.0 Suspension, Compensation, Braking & Traction

5.1 Suspension
(a) Suspension ropes (1) Number (2) Nominal diameter (3) Lay and construction (4) Confirm that the correct ropes are supplied and that the rope test certificate is available, complete and correct (A copy is sufficient as original will be held by the rope maker) N/A Specified Specified Specified Yes No mm
Rope Terminations (5) Type of termination Car Cwt (6) Confirm that the rope terminations are correctly made and secure as required in 9.2.3 of EN.81-1 (7) Confirm that the rope terminations conform to 9.5 of EN.81-1 ensuring distribution of load between the ropes Yes No Well
Yes
No
(b) Suspension chains (1) Number (2) Nominal Pitch (3) Type and construction (4) Confirm that the correct chains are supplied and that the chain test certificate is available, complete and correct. (A copy is sufficient as original will be held by the chain maker)
N/A Specified Specified Specified Yes No mm
(5) Confirm that the chain terminations conform to 9.2.5 of EN.81-1 ensuring distribution of load between the chains
Yes
No
(c) Confirm that in the case of two rope/chain suspension the slack rope/chain safety device operates correctly. (see 9.5.3 of EN 81-1)
N/A
Yes
No
5.0 Suspension, Compensation, Braking & Traction (continued)

Page 20 of 31
Electric Lift
5.2 Compensation
(a) Confirm that compensation is required (b) If the answer to (a) is Yes, confirm it is of the correct type (see 9.6 of EN81-1) Specified Yes Alternate No
(c) Confirm that the electrical safety device on the anti-rebound device operates correctly. (see 9.6.2 of EN81-1)
N/A
Yes
No
5.3 Traction/Braking Checks

(a) Confirm that the brake stops the lift car when the supply is interrupted with 125% load in the car and at rated speed (see Annex D.2.h.2 of EN 81-1) (b) Confirm that the car stops under emergency conditions: (1) With the car empty, when travelling upwards at rated speed in the upper part of the well (see Annex D.2.h.1.a of EN 81-1) (2) With 125% rated load, when travelling downwards at rated speed in the lower part of the well (see Annex D.2.h.1.b of EN 81-1) (c) Confirm that the car cannot be raised when the counterweight is brought into contact with the buffer (see Annex D.2.h.2 of EN 81-1) Yes No Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Note: This test may be performed with the car empty at any speed between zero and inspection speed. (d) Confirm that the overbalance is correct (see Annex D.2.h.3 of EN 81-1) Specified Yes No
Page 21 of 31
Electric Lift
6.0 Controls
(a) Confirm the levelling and relevelling circuits operate correctly (see 14.2.1.2 of EN 81-1) and Confirm that the stopping and levelling accuracy is according to EN 81-70. (b) Confirm that the docking operation functions in accordance with 14.2.1.5.b of EN 81-1 (c) Confirm the operation of the stopping device in the car (see 14.2.1.5.i of EN 81-1) (d) Confirm that the electrical slowdown system operates correctly including any non-electrical device. (see 12.8.4.c of EN 81-1) (e) Confirm that safety circuits containing electronic components are CE marked N/A Yes No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
7.0 Car & Counterweight Safety Gear & Overspeed Protection

7.1 Car Safety Gear
(a) Confirm that the correct safety gear is supplied (see 1.16) (b) Confirm that the safety gear has been CE marked Yes Yes No No
(c) Confirm that the safety gear stops the car in the downward direction when operated by the governor and engaging at the appropriate speed with the load uniformly distributed at: - rated load at rated speed in the case of instantaneous safety gear (see Annex D.2.j.1 of EN 81-1) - 125% of rated load at rated speed or lower in the case of progressive safety gear (see Annex D.2.j.2 of EN 81-1) (d) Confirm that the floor of the lift is horizontal or sloping less than 5% from the horizontal (9.8.7 of EN.81-1) (e) Following the test confirm that no deterioration which could adversely affect the normal use of the lift has occurred (see Annex D.2.j of EN 81-1) (f) Confirm that the electrical safety device operates correctly N/A Yes No
N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Page 22 of 31
Electric Lift
7.0 Car & Counterweight Safety Gear & Overspeed Protection (continued)
7.2 Car Governor
(a) Confirm that the correct overspeed governor is supplied (see 1.16) (b) Confirm that the overspeed governor tripping speed is correct (see 9.9.1 of EN.81-1) (c) Confirm the overspeed governor has been CE marked (d) Confirm that the overspeed governor is accessible or is able to be remotely tested and reset. (see 9.9.8 of EN.81-1) (e) Confirm that the electrical safety device on the overspeed governor operates correctly (f) Confirm that the electrical safety device on the overspeed governor prevents the lift from restarting if the governor is not self resetting (g) Confirm that the electrical safety device detecting breakage or slack in the overspeed governor safety rope operates correctly (h) Confirm that the governor, if adjustable, is sealed N/A Specified (i) Confirm that the correct rope type is supplied and the rope certificate is available, complete and correct Make /Type Yes No N/A Yes Yes No No
Yes Yes
No No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
7.3 Counterweight Safety Gear

(a) Confirm that the correct safety gear is supplied Progressive : Instantaneous : Specified Make /Type Make /Type
N/A
Yes Yes Yes
No No No
(b) Confirm that the safety gear has been CE marked
(c) Confirm that the safety gear stops the counterweight in the downward direction when operated and engaging at the appropriate speed and with the car empty of load: - at rated speed in the case of instantaneous safety gear (see Annex D.2.k.1 of EN 81-1) - at rated speed or lower in the case of progressive safety gear (see Annex D.2.k.2 of EN 81-1) (d) Following the test confirm that no deterioration which could adversely affect the normal use of the lift has occurred (see Annex D.2.k of EN 81-1) Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Page 23 of 31
Electric Lift
7.0 Car & Counterweight Safety Gear & Overspeed Protection (continued)
7.4 Counterweight Governor
Specified (a) Confirm that the correct overspeed governor is supplied Make /Type Yes No
N/A
(b) Confirm that the overspeed governor tripping speed is correct (see 9.9.3 of EN.81-1) (c) Confirm the overspeed governor has been CE marked (d) Confirm that the overspeed governor is accessible or is able to be remotely tested and reset. (see 9.9.8 of EN.81-1) (e) Confirm that the electrical safety device on the overspeed governor device operates correctly (f) Confirm that the electrical safety device on the overspeed governor prevents the lift from restarting if the governor is not self resetting (g) Confirm that the electrical safety device detecting breakage or slack in the overspeed governor safety rope operates correctly (h) Confirm that the governor, if adjustable, is sealed N/A Specified (i) Confirm that the correct rope type is and the rope certificate is available, complete and correct. Make /Type N/A
Yes
No
Yes Yes
No No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
7.5 Ascending Car Protection

(a) Confirm the correct ascending car overspeed protection has been provided (see 1.16 of this document and 9.10 of EN 81-1) (b) Confirm that the protective device has been CE marked (c) Confirm that the device functions correctly with the car ascending at not less than 115% of rated speed (9.10.1 of EN.81-1) (d) Confirm that the electrical safety device on the means of protection operates correctly (see 9.10.5 of EN.81-1) (e) Following the test confirm that no deterioration which could adversely affect the normal use of the lift has occurred (f) Confirm that where the speed monitoring device is not an overspeed governor it conforms to 9.10.10 of EN.81-1 Yes No
Yes Yes
No No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Page 24 of 31
Electric Lift
8.0 Measurement of the Electrical System

(a) Is the mains current within the limit specified ? (See Annex D.2.e of EN.81-1) Specified A Actual A
(b) Measure and record the following operational data when the car is at mid-point of travel. (See Annex D.2.e of EN.81-1)
Note : In addition to speed it may be necessary to measure current or voltage on some drive types * Car Loading Condition Rated Speed Levelling Speed Re-levelling Speed Inspection Speed Emergency Operation Speed N/A m/s m/s m/s Docking Operation Speed N/A m/s
N/A m/s m/s
N/A
EN.81-1 Clause No.
12.6
14.2.1.2
14.2.1.2
14.2.1.3
14.2.1.4
14.2.1.5
Up Empty Dn
Up Balanced ** Dn
Up Rated Dn
* with advance door opening ** the balanced load down speed shall be within +5% of the rated speed
(c) Confirm that the measured rated speed does not exceed the design rated speed by more than 5% (see 12.6 of EN 81-1) (d) Confirm that the maximum levelling deviation is within the manufacturers tolerances Specified
Yes
No
Actual
Page 25 of 31
Electric Lift
9.0 Protective Devices

9.1 Lift Motor Windings
Is motor protection provided (see 13.3 of EN 81-1) N/A Yes No
9.2 Door Motor Winding

Is motor protection provided (see 13.3 of EN 81-1) N/A Yes No
9.3 Main Power Converter

Is protection provided (see 13.3 of EN 81-1) N/A Yes No
9.4 Motor Run Time Limiter

Confirm that the correct motor run time limiter is supplied and operates correctly (12.10 of EN.81-1) Yes No
9.5 Lighting and Socket Outlet Protection

Confirm that the lighting and socket electrical supply is separate to that of the lift machine and that these circuits have there own independent short circuit protection (see 13.6.1 and 13.6.3.3 of EN.81-1 Yes No
Page 26 of 31
Electric Lift
10.0 Electrical Wiring Examination

10.1 Insulation Resistance to Earth
Confirm that the insulation resistance to earth for the electrical system is correct and in accordance 13.1.1.1.a and b and 13.1.3 of EN.81-1 (see also Annex D.2.f.1) Yes No
10.2 Earthing
Confirm that all metal work is properly earthed back to the lift main earthed isolator. (see Annex D.2.f.2 in EN 81-1) Yes No
10.3 Electrical Wiring

(a) Confirm that the electrical conductors, including travelling cables, conform to 13.5 of EN.81-1 (b) Confirm that the wiring installed (for EMC compliance) is in accordance with the manufacturers instructions (c) Confirm that the controller components are labelled in accordance with the wiring diagram (see 15.10 of EN.81-1) (d) Confirm that the controller and other electrical equipment are protected against direct contact with enclosures of at least IP2X Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
11.0 Documentation
(a) Confirm that there is a register as called for in 16.2 of EN.81-1 (b) Confirm that there is an instruction manual as called for in 16.3 of EN 81-1, EN 81-70, EN 81-72 giving also information about normal operation, rescue operation, periodical inspection procedures, etc. (c) Confirm that where the lift deviates from the Harmonised Standard a design examination certificate has been provided (d) Confirm that where the lift is a Model Lift an EC type examination certificate has been provided N/A Yes Yes No No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Page 27 of 31
Electric Lift
12.0 Confirmation of compliance with the Standard EN 81-1

(a) Are all the items associated with the lift installation, for which the lift manufacturer is not directly responsible, in a suitable state for the installation to be put into service? e.g. access to lift machine room, telephone line, access lighting etc. NOTE: Some of the items requiring attention may not be part part of the contract for the lift but part of the installation and the responsibility of others. Yes No
If No provide details :
(b) Confirm that all the tests and examinations have been carried out successfully to prove compliance with EN.81-1. Where the lift requires additional tests to prove compliance with Notified Body Design Examination Certificates confirm that these have also been completed, the results of which should be attached to these test results.
Yes
No
Where any previous question in this report has led to a answer of NO indicate the reasons and further actions necessary to achieve compliance
Note : Before signing this report ensure that every question has been answered
Signature Name Position
Company
Date
Name and address of the Branch Office making the examination
Note : Completion of this document does not, in itself, constitute authority to place the lift into service
Page 28 of 31
Electric Lift
Annex A Additional Requirements For Unit Verification

The following describes additional tests and verification necessary when validating lift installations in accordance with Annex X of the Lifts Directive 95/16/EC.
A.1 Documentation and Design

A.1.1 Confirm that calculations for the following are available, complete and correct :Loads imposed on the building by the lift components e.g. Guide Brackets, Buffers, Gear Supporting Steelwork, etc. (see EN81-1 Clause 5.3) Selection of car guide rail size and distance between supports. (see EN81-1 Clause 10.1 and Annex G) Proof of traction and need for compensation (see EN81-1 Clause 9.3, 9.6 and Annex M) Selection of Suspension Rope and Terminations (see EN81-1 Clause 9.2.2 , 9.2.3 and Annex N) Selection of Suspension Chain and Terminations (see EN81-1 Clause 9.2.4, 9.2.5 and Annex N) Selection of Overspeed Governor Rope / Safety Rope (see EN81-1 Clause 9.9.6) The design of the car sling The design of the compensation rope tensioning device A.1.2 Confirm that documentation and test results are available and in order for any glass used in the construction of the car or car and landing doors. (see EN81-1 Clause 7.2.3.3, 8.3.2.2, 8.6.7.2 and Annex J) A.1.3 Confirm that Certificates of Type Examinations according to annex v(a) or annex ix are available for the installed safety components listed in Annex iv of the Lifts Directive 95/16/EC. A.1.4 Confirm that where the lift is not in complete conformity with EN81-1 a Risk Assessment has been carried out to show that the equivalent level of safety has been achieved for the new/alternative lift equipment. A.1.5 Confirm that where installed the counterweight safety gear and its means of tripping are compatible and in accordance with EN.81-1 Clause 9.8.1.2 N/A N/A N/A Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Yes Yes Yes
No No No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Page 29 of 31
Electric Lift
A.2 Safety Components

A.2.1 Confirm that the following have been selected, in accordance with the contract, so that they provide the level of safety required by the Harmonised Standard EN.81-1:1999, and that where appropriate they are compatible. Device for Locking Landing Door (see EN.81-1 Clause 7.7.3) Device to prevent the lift car from falling (safety gear) (see EN.81-1 Clause 9.8) Overspeed Limitation Device (speed governor) (see EN.81-1 Clause 9.10.2) Buffers - Energy Accumulation Non Linear (see EN.81-1 Clause 10.4.1.2) - Energy Accumulation Buffered Return (see EN.81-1 Clause 10.4.2) - Energy Dissipation (see EN.81-1 Clause 10.4.3) Ascending Car Overspeed Protection (see EN.81-1 Clause 9.10) Electric Safety Switches containing electronic components (see EN.81-1 Clause 14.1.2.3) A.2.2 Confirm that all of the relevant safety switches listed in EN.81-1 Clause 14.1.2 and Annex A have been provided and correctly used and identified in accordance with the wiring diagram for the lift N/A Yes No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
A.3 Control Systems

A.3.1 Confirm that the levelling and re-levelling operations have been designed and operate in accordance with EN.81-1 Clause 14.2.1.2 A.3.2 Confirm that the inspection operations have been designed and operate in accordance with EN.81-1 Clause 14.2.1.3 A.3.3 Confirm that the emergency electrical operation has been designed and operates in accordance with EN.81-1 Clause 14.2.1.4 A.3.4 Confirm that the docking operations have been designed and operate in accordance with EN.81-1 Clause 14.2.1.5 A.3.5 Confirm that where reduced stroke buffering is used the device used to monitor the normal slowing of the lift conforms to EN.81-1 Clause 12.8 A.3.6 Confirm that where vertical sliding doors have been used the control system complies with EN.81-1 Clause 7.5.2.2 N/A N/A Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Page 30 of 31
Electric Lift
A.4 Protective Devices

A.4.1 Confirm that the motor over current protection has been designed in accordance with EN.81-1 Clause 13.3 Yes No
A.5 Negotiations
A.5.1 Confirm that the supplied lift as described within this test report is in compliance with that described in the agreed technical specification, negotiated between the lift manufacturer and their client. Yes No
A.6 Details of Examiner

Company
Date
Page 31 of 31
NB-LIFT
REPORT
ABOUT
EXAMINATIONS AND TESTS

ON AN INSTALLED
HYDRAULIC LIFT
CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH Lifts Directive, Annexes VI, X, XII, XIII and XIV to establish conformity with the provisions of the Lifts Directive
The installation is based on a lift with EC Type examination ( Art. 8 (2) i & ii) design of a type in accordance with Annex XIII ( Art. 8 (2) iii)
a lift with Unit Verification ( Art. 8 (2) iv) design in accordance with Annex XIII ( Art. 8 (2) v)
IDENTIFICATION OF THIS REPORT
DOC NB-L/014/2000, version 07 2007
Hydraulic Lifts
This Test Report is composed by 34 pages and the following Annexes:

Annex A : Additional Requirements for Unit Verification Annex B1 : Machinery inside the well : working area in the car or car roof Annex B2 : Machinery inside the well : working area in the pit Annex B3 : Machinery inside the well : working area on a platform Annex B4 : Working area outside the well Annex B5 : Machinery outside the well Annex C : Additional requirements for lifts designed according to EN 81-70 Annex D : Additional requirements for lifts designed according to EN 81-72
Page 2 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
INTRODUCTION
1. It is the purpose of this report to be used as a means to facilitate the proof of having carried out the necessary examinations and tests to show the compliance with the Lifts Directive before putting a new lift into service. 2. According to practice in Europe, details of the compliance with the Lifts Directive are related to fulfilling the requirements of the Harmonised Standard EN 812:1998 + A2/2004. The drafting committee for this report consider that the limited tests and examinations described in Annex D2 of EN81-1:1998 + A2/2004 and included in this report are not sufficient on their own to verify compliance with the harmonised standard. Furthermore the tests and examinations in this report are intended to ensure that the requirements of Annex D1 are also satisfied. Therefore this report is based on the requirements of this standard. This does not exclude other solutions, provided the same safety level has been reached. 3. The format of this report does not specify how the examinations or tests have to be carried out. It is assumed that the examinations and tests are carried out in accordance with approved engineering practice (state of the art) and, where necessary, with instruments being in line with the provisions in the relevant approved QM-system. 4. The sequence of examinations and tests stated within this report have been arranged for the safety of the person conducting the test. Each stage once completed successfully helps to increase the level of safety of the following tests. 5. This document has been compiled by a group of experts representing manufacturers and notified bodies (NB). This work was requested by the NB-L/HC in its meeting 99-05-11/12. 6. Attention shall be paid to possible differences in the lift installation due to national regulations not touched by the LD. 7. This report should be retained by the Notified Body and/or the Installer carrying out these tests
Page 3 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
Documents Required
The following documentation may be required in order for the person conducting the tests to be able to fully complete the rest of this report. :General description of the lift installation if not already included in this document Architectural plans with regard to the shaft, machinery or pulley room, landings and access to these areas (clearly dimensioned) User Handbook Mechanical general arrangement drawings Electrical and Hydraulic circuit diagrams Instructions for use of the lift Maintenance instructions Requirements for periodic inspections Logbook for registration of all maintenance and alterations Emergency procedures EC declarations of conformity of relevant safety components as listed in Annex IV of the Lifts Directive (95/16/EC) or a list from which these may be identified.
Certification -
Quality Assurance Certification (if applicable) EC Type Examination of Model Lift Notified Body Design Examination for deviations from Harmonised Standards Fire Rating Certification for Landing Doors (National Requirement) Testing/Suitability of Glass Panels Rope and Chain Certificates Alarm device according to EN 81-28 (e.g. statement of compliance by manufacturer)
Information Type Tested Safety Components ~ range of use, correct installation procedures and special testing procedures. National Regulations which need to be respected. Contract specific negotiations, such as accessibility for certain groups of users (the handicapped / the elderly). Whilst conformity with these items is not the responsibility of the Notified Bodies they may effect the design of the lift and therefore its compliance with the Lifts Directive. Risk Analysis in the case of Unit Verification.
Note : The drawings used for the installation and testing process may be subject to minor alteration due to changes in site conditions. It should be noted that as built drawings are required as part of the handover documentation to be provided to the owner of the lift. The EMC conformity should be confirmed during the test. In the following document shaded areas shown thus denote tests which must be carried out on site. Any box which is not shaded allows for the installer to provide the examiner with this information prior to the tests being carried out providing that they have the necessary Quality Assurance system. If the installer has no recognised Quality Assurance system then all tests must be conducted on site.
Page 4 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
In the case of Final Inspection (annex vi) or similar the following information shall be provided : EC Type Examination Certificate Number Document providing equivalent information to the Type Examination Certificate in case of Article 8 (2) iii Number Design Examination Certificate Number
Lift Installer Details Responsible For Design Name: Address:
Lift Installer Details Name: Address:
Notified Body Carrying Out Inspection Name: Address:
Location of Installed Lift Name: Address:
* Lift Identification No. *Lift Type (Model) * Year of Manufacture * The above details to be taken from the installers plate inside the car.
Page 5 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
1 Description of the Lift Installation

1.1 Length of travel 1.2 No of levels served 1.3 No of landing doors Total Front Rear Side 1.4 Rated load 1.5 Rated speed 1.6 Machine room location (at which level) Above well Below well Side of well Remote Other 1.7 Type of Jack 1.8 Jack Location Side of car Under Car Other 1.9 No. of Jacks 1.10 Jack Arrangement 1.11 Suspension Type 1.12 Balancing Weight Position Direct Acting Ropes Side of Car Rear of Car 1.13 Mass of Balancing Weight 1.14 Mass of Empty Car 1.15 Type of Oil 1.16 Full Load Pressure
Note : 1 MPa = 106 N/m2 = 10 bar = 145,038 lbf/in2 (pushing, pulling, telescopic etc.)
kg m/s
Persons
Indirect Acting Chains
Kg
Kg
(ISO 46, ISO 68 etc.)
MPa
**
Page 6 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts

1.17 Plan(s) of the well and machine/pulley room : 1.18 Electric Circuit Diagram(s) 1.19 Hydraulic Circuit Diagrams(s) Drawing No.(s) Drawing No.(s) Drawing No.(s) Yes No
1.20 Confirm that the plans or other documents contains information relating to :Loads and forces imposed on the building Indication of the well enclosure Dimensions of pit and headroom Location of the machine room and its access door Accessible spaces under the well Fixation points of guide rails 1.21 Precautions against creeping Mechanical Electrical
1.22 Power supply: Specified V Hz Actual at time of test V
Voltage Phase Hz Wire (3,4 or 5) Fuse Type Fuse Rating
1.23 Specifications relating to negotiations Duration of fire rating of landing doors Fire Fighting Lift Accessibility for Disabled Vandal Resistance Other Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No min
1.24 Verification of Conformity The following are items not fully conforming to the Harmonised Standard EN81-2:1999 Design Inspection Refuge Space approval by Member State (annex 2.2) N/A N/A Approval No. Approval No.
Page 7 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts

1.25 List Of Used Safety Components EC Type Examination Certificate No. Notified Body No.
Device for Locking Landing Door Device to prevent the lift car from falling (safety gear) Overspeed Limitation Device (speed governor) Buffers - Energy Accumulation Non Linear - Energy Accumulation Buffered Return - Energy Dissipation Hydraulic Rupture Valve Electric Safety Switches containing electronic components N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 8 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
2.0 Machine and Pulley Room

2.1 Main Switch (a) Confirm that the main switch is in accordance with that specified (b) Confirm that the main switch control mechanism is easily identifiable and accessible from the machine room doorway (see 13.4.2 of EN.81-2) (c) Confirm that it is lockable in the OFF position (See 13.4.2 of EN.81-2) Specified Yes Yes No No A
Yes
No
2.2 Lighting & Socket Outlets Confirm that these conform to 6 and 13.6 of EN.81-2
Lux Rating Yes No
2.3 Dimensions Confirm these are in accordance with the minimum figures in 6.3.2 of EN.81-2 Yes No
2.4 Access Confirm there is safe access as defined in 6.2 of EN.81-2 Yes No
2.5 Safety Signs Confirm that notices and signs are in place according to 15.4 of EN.81-2 Yes No
2.6 Lift Machine Confirm that the correct lift machine is supplied
2.7 Controller Type Confirm that the correct controller is supplied
2.8 Emergency Release (a) Confirm that the emergency operation system(s) function(s) correctly in accordance with 12.9 of EN.81-2 (b) Confirm that the instructions called for in 15.4.3 of EN.81-2 are displayed Yes No
Yes
No
2.9 Machine Room Ventilation Confirm that the machine is room ventilated as called for in 6.3.5 of EN.81-2 Yes No
Page 9 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
2.0 Machine and Pulley Room (continued)

2.10 Doors/Trap Doors Confirm that the machine room doors or trap doors are fitted with a suitable lock conforming to 6.3.3.3 of EN.81-2 Yes No
2.11 Communication Confirm that there is a communication device in place and working as called for in 14.2.3.4.of EN.81.2 N/A Yes No
2.12 Openings into the well Confirm that protection against objects and/or persons falling into the well from the machine room has been provided (see 6.3.4 of EN.81-2) N/A Yes No
2.13 Lifting Accessories Confirm that, where necessary, means for lifting heavy components are available and correctly marked (see 6.3.7 of EN.81.2) N/A Yes No
2.14 Multiple Lifts Confirm that where multiple lifts have been installed into a common machine room components have been marked identifying the lift to which the components belong (see 15.17 of EN.81-2) N/A Yes No
2.15 Confirm the safety chain has been tested to ensure that an earth fault will cause disconnection without delay (14.1.1.1.d of EN.81-2)
Yes
No
2.16 Confirm that the phase reversal protection functions correctly (14.1.1.1.j of EN.81-2)
Yes
No
2.17 Confirm that there is no equipment not related to the safe operation of the lift in these spaces (6.1.1 of EN.81-1)
Yes
No
Page 10 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
3.0 The Well

3.1 Clearances and run-bys NOTE : In (a), (b) & (f) below h = 0.035v2 for indirect acting lifts. In the case of direct acting lifts the value h = 0 (see 5.7.1.1 f. EN.81-2)
(a) With the ram in its ultimate position confirm with reference to Fig. 1 that : Specified Measured Distance m
(i) The rail lengths will accommodate a further guided travel of at least (0.1+ h) m (see 5.7.1.1a of EN.81-2) (ii) The dimension from the standing area on the car roof to the lowest part of the ceiling of the well above this area is at least (1.0+ h) m. (see 5.7.1.1.b of EN.81-2) (iii) The free vertical distance between the lowest part of the ceiling of the well and the highest item of equipment on the car roof (excluding (iv) below) is at least (0.3+ h) m (see 5.7.1.1.c.1 of EN.81-2) (iv) The free vertical distance between the lowest part of the ceiling of the well and the highest part of the guide shoes/rollers, rope attachments/header or parts of vertically sliding doors should be at least (0.1+ h) m (see 5.7.1.1.c.2 of EN.81-2) Confirm that there is sufficient space above the car to accommodate a rectangular block 0.5m x 0.6m x 0.8m (see 5.7.1.1.d of EN.81-2) Confirm that in the case of indirect acting lifts there is at least 0.1m Above the ram to the first striking point. (see 5.7.1.1.e of EN.81-2)
Yes
No
Yes
No
Figure 1
Page 11 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts

Specified Measured Distance m
(b) With the car resting on its fully compressed buffers confirm that the further guided travel of the balancing weight is at least (0.1+ h) m. (see 5.7.1.2 of EN.81-2) (c) When the car rests on its fully compressed buffers confirm (see Fig.2) there is: (i) Sufficient space below the car to accommodate a rectangular block 0.5m x 0.6m x 1.0m (see 5.7.2.3.a of EN.81-2), resting on one of its faces. (ii) A free vertical distance between the bottom of the pit and the lowest part of the car (excluding the area in (iii) below) of at least 0.5m (see 5.7.2.3.b of EN.81-2) (iii) A free vertical distance of not less than 0.1m within a horizontal distance of 0.15m between (1) the apron or parts of the vertical sliding door and adjacent walls and (2) the lowest parts of the car and the guide rails. (see 5.7.2.3.b of EN.81-2). (iv) Except for items in (iii) above, a free vertical distance between highest parts in the pit and the lowest part of the car of at least 0.3m. (see 5.7.2.3.c of EN.81-2)
Yes
No
Figure 2
Page 12 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts

(d) Confirm that in the case of an inverted jack the distance between the ram head and the first striking point in the pit is at least 0.5m (0.1m with a screen) (see 5.7.2.3.d of EN.81-2 (e) Confirm that In the case of a telescopic jack with a guided yoke confirm there is 0.5m between the lowest yoke and the pit floor with the jack fully collapsed (see 5.7.2.3.e of EN 81-2) (f) Confirm that with the jack fully extended there is further guided travel for the balancing weight of at least (0.1 + h)m. (see 5.7.2.4 of EN.81-2) N/A Yes Actual m
N/A
Yes
Actual
N/A
Yes
Actual
3.2 Buffers
Specified Confirm that the car buffers are in accordance with what is specified Number Installed Yes No
3.2.1 Energy Accumulation Buffers When the car with its rated load is placed on the buffer(s), the ropes being made slack, confirm that the compression corresponds to that given by the characteristic curve of the buffer (as provided by the buffer supplier or lift supplier): (see Annex D.2.n of EN.81-2). N/A Yes No
3.2.3 Energy Dissipation Buffers (Oil Type) When the car with its rated load is brought into contact with the buffer at the speed for which the buffer is designed (see 10.4.3.2.c of EN.81-2) confirm that no deterioration occurs to the lift. Confirm that the buffer has been CE marked N/A Yes No
Yes
No
Page 13 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts

3.3 Protection in the well
(a) Confirm that in the case of a fully enclosed well there are no gaps in the enclosure other than those listed in 5.2.1.1 of EN.81-2 (b) Confirm that a rigid balancing weight screen has been fitted and that the balance weight is a minimum of 50mm clear of the car (see 5.6.1 and 11.3 of EN.81-2) (c) Confirm that in the case of adjacent lifts there is a screen in the pit extending to a height of 2.5m above the lowest landing floor (see 5.6.2.1 of EN 81-2) (d) Confirm that when the horizontal distance between the edge of the car roof and any moving parts of adjacent lifts is less than 0.5m there is a full height screen (see 5.6.2.2 of EN.81-2) (e) Confirm that the ram head of an inverted jack is screened in accordance with 5.7.2.3.d of EN.81-2 (f) Confirm that the inspection doors and inspection traps fulfil the requirements of 5.2.2 of EN.81-2 N/A Yes No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
(g) Confirm that the access to the pit fulfils the requirements of 5.7.2.2 of EN.81-2 (h) Confirm In the case of partially enclosed wells imperforate screening in accordance with figure 1 of 5.2.1.2 of EN.81-2 has been provided (i) Confirm that all other requirements of 5.2.1.2 of EN.81-2 have been satisfied (j) Confirm that any ventilation provided conforms to 5.2.3 of EN.81-2 (k) Confirm that the wall facing the car entrance conforms with the requirements of 5.4.3 of EN.81-2 (l) Confirm that there are no objects/services well except for those associated with the lift (see 5.8 of EN.81-2) (m) Confirm that if there are accessible areas under the pit suitable precautions have been taken. (see 5.5 of EN.81-2) (n) Confirm that rotating pulleys in the well have been guarded (see 9.6 of EN.81.2) (o) Confirm that the final limit switches are correctly positioned and operate satisfactorily (10.5 of EN.81-2) (p) Confirm that the stopping device in the pit has been positioned correctly and proved (5.7.2.5 and 14.2.2.1 of EN81-1) (q) Confirm that the well meets the requirements of 5.3 of EN81-1, particularly in the case of glass N/A N/A
Yes Yes
No No
N/A
Yes
No
Yes Yes
No No
Yes
No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Page 14 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts

3.4 Landing Door Assemblies
(a) Confirm that the running clearance between the door panels and between panels and uprights, lintels or sills is less than or equal to 6mm (7.1 of EN.81-2) (b) Confirm that no recess or projection on the face of power operated automatic sliding door panels exceeds 3mm (7.5.1 of EN.81-2) (c) Is a fire test certificate required, if so is it available, complete and correct? (d) If the answer to (c) is Yes are the landing doors correctly fire rated for the installation? N/A Yes No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Specified:
Makers Type Rating Yes No No min
(e) Confirm that where glass panels (excluding vision panels) are used they are correctly marked in accordance with clause 7.2.3.5 of EN.81-2 (f) Confirm that where glass panels (excluding vision panels) are used they conform in size and fixing to annex J of EN.81-2 or have a pendulum test certificate available, complete and correct. (g) Confirm that one of the options for child protection in 7.2.3.6 of EN.81-2 has been adopted (h) Confirm that vertically sliding doors conform to the requirements of 7.4.3 and 7.5.2.2 of EN.81-2
NA
Yes
NA
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
3.5 Landing Door Locks and Contacts

(a) Confirm that the correct door locks are fitted (see 1.25) (b) Confirm that all the door locks are CE marked (c) Confirm that the contacts at each landing door have been proved so that when broken they stop and prevent movement of the car outside the unlocking zone (7.7.4 of EN.81-2) (d) Confirm that the mechanical locks at each landing door have been proved for positive locking (7.7.5 of EN.81-2) (e) Confirm that all electrical safety devices on the landing door panels, which are not directly mechanically linked, operate correctly (see 7.7.6.2 of EN.81-2). N/A Yes Yes Yes No No No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Page 15 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts

3.6 Lighting and Socket Outlet
(a) Confirm that the well lighting level is in accordance with 5.9 and 13.6 of EN.81-2 (b) Confirm Are the terminal light fittings less than 0.5m from the pit floor and ceiling (see 5.9 of EN.81-2) (c) Confirm that the lights can be switched from both the pit and machine room (see 13.6.3.2 of EN.81-2) (d) Confirm that a socket outlet has been provided in the pit (see 5.7.2.5 of EN.81-2) lux Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
3.7 Car and Balancing weight / Ram Guide Rails

Specified (a) Is the size of the guide rails in accordance with that specified? Car Bwt / Ram (b) Confirm the distance between the rail fixings is in accordance with the layout drawing Bwt / Ram (c) Confirm that where the guides are lubricated it is in accordance with the EC type test certification of the safety gear Car N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes No No No Actual
Page 16 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
4.0 The Car, Inspection Operation & Entrance Clearances

4.1 The Car
Specified (a) Confirm that the available floor area, related to rated load and maximum number of passengers, conforms to 8.2 of EN.81-2 (b) Confirm that the inside of the car is greater than 2.0m in height (c) Confirm that where glass panels are used, each panel is correctly marked in accordance with 8.3.2.4 of EN.81-2 (1) Doors (2) Walls (d) Confirm that where glass panels are used a handrail conforming to 8.3.2.2 of EN81-1 has been fitted. (e) Confirm that one of the options for child protection in 8.6.7.5 of EN.81-2 has been adopted (f) Confirm that the maximum load and makers name is indicated In the car (i.e. Number of persons load in kg and identification no.) and it complies with 15.2.1 and 15.2.2 of EN.81-2 (g) Confirm that the emergency alarm device allows for two-way verbal communication with a rescue service according to EN 81-28. (h) Confirm that the lighting in the car gives a minimum of 50 lux At floor level and on the controls (see 8.17.1 of EN.81-2) (i) Confirm that the emergency lighting in the car stays illuminated for at least 1h. (see 8.17.4 of EN.81-2) (j)Confirm that the car overload device operates in accordance with clause 14.2.5 of EN.81-2 (k) Confirm that the apron conforms to 8.4 of EN.81-2 (l) Confirm that any emergency doors or trap door comply with 8.12 of EN.81-2 (m) Confirm that ventilation has been provided in the car (see 8.16 of EN.81-2) (n) Confirm that the car walls are imperforate except for ventilation apertures (see 8.16 of EN.81-2) N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes No No No m2 Actual m2
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes Yes
No No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Page 17 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts

4.2 Car Top
(a) Confirm that the car top has been fitted with controls, stopping devices and socket outlet in accordance with 8.15 of EN.81-2 (b) Confirm that the car top station is constructed and operates in accordance with 14.2.1.3 of EN.81-2 (c) Confirm that the alarm device in 5.10 of EN.81-2 operates correctly N/A Yes No
Yes
No
Yes Specified:
No
(d) Confirm that the balustrade on the car roof is in accordance with 8.13.3 of EN.81-2 (e) Confirm that the car roof has one clear area for standing (see 8.13.1 of EN.81-2) (f) Confirm that any pulleys have been guarded (see 9.4 of EN.81-2) (g) Confirm that the roof of the car has been designed to take the weight of two persons
Note :- Only where visual inspection suggests non-compliance should the car roof be subjected to further examination)
N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
(h) Confirm that the stopping devices on the car top have been positioned correctly and proved so that when operated they stop and prevent movement of the car (8.15.b and 14.2.2.1 of EN81-2)
Yes
No
Page 18 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts

4.3 Car Entrance Clearances
(a) Confirm that the running clearance between the door panels and between panels and uprights, lintels or sills is less than or equal to 6mm (8.6.3 of EN.81-2) (b) Confirm that no recess or projection on the face of power operated automatic sliding door panels exceeds 3mm (8.7.1 of EN.81-2) (c) Confirm that the horizontal distance between the sill of the car and the sill of the landing doors 35mm or less (see 11.2.2 of EN.81-2) (d) Confirm that where there is a hinged landing door and a folding car door the clearances between them do not exceed 150mm (see 11.2.4 of EN.81.2) (e) Is the distance between the inner surface of the well and the sill or framework of the car entrance or door 0.15m or less, or 0.2m if over a height not exceeding 0.5m? (11.2.1 of EN.81-2) (f) If the answer to (e) is NO, is the car door mechanically locked when away from the unlocking zone in accordance with 11.2.1. c of EN.81-2)? N/A N/A N/A Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
4.4 Landing and Car Door Tests

Note: Where appropriate, the following tests should be carried out with the car and landing doors coupled. If the doors are manual answer f, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, If the doors are power operated answer all except n, Front Front Alternate Alternate Yes No
(a) Confirm the maximum force to prevent closing is 150N or less (7.5.2.1.1.1/8.7.2.1.1.1 of EN.81-2) (b) Confirm that with a mechanical force of 150N the clearances defined in 7.1 of EN.81-2 do not exceed 30mm for side opening doors or 45mm for centre opening doors (7.2.3.2 of EN.81-2) (c) Confirm that the kinetic energy is 10J or less (see 7.5.2.1.1.2/8.7.2.1.1.2 of EN.81-2) (d) Confirm that all the protective devices reverse the doors in accordance with 7.5.2.1.1.3/8.7.2.1.1.3 of EN.81-2) (e) Confirm that if the doors are able to close with the reversal device inoperative the kinetic energy is less than or equal to 4J (see 7.5.2.1.1.3/8.7.2.1.1.3 of EN.81-2) N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Page 19 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
(f) Confirm that the unlocking zone is 0.2m or less above and below landing levels (or 0.35 in the case of simultaneously operated car and landing doors (7.7.1 of EN.81-2) (g) Confirm that the automatic self closing mechanism functions correctly (7.7.3.2 of EN.81-2) (h) Confirm that each set of landing doors is capable of being unlocked from the outside with an emergency key (7.7.3.2 of EN.81-2) (i) Confirm that the car doors can be manually opened within the unlocking zone with a force of less than 300N with the power off (8.11.2 and Annex B of EN.81-2) (j) Confirm that in the case of folding doors the maximum force to prevent opening is 150N or less (8.7.2.1.1.4 of EN.81-2) (k) Confirm that for vertical sliding doors the requirements of 7.5.2.2.(a), (b) and (d)/8.7.2.2 (b), (c) and (d) of EN.81-2 have been met (l) Confirm that if fitted the car door lock functions correctly (8.9.3 of EN.81-2) (m) Confirm that the car door contacts have been proved so that when broken there is no car movement outside the unlocking zone (8.9 of EN.81-2) (n) Confirm that the car here indication conforms to 7.6.2 of EN.81-2 for manual doors N/A N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Page 20 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
5.0 Suspension
5.1 Suspension
(a) Suspension ropes (1) Number (2) Nominal diameter (3) Lay and construction (4) Confirm that the correct ropes are supplied and that the rope test certificate is available, complete and correct (A copy is sufficient as original will be held by the rope maker) Direct N/A Specified Specified Specified Yes No mm Indirect
Rope Terminations (5) Type of terminations Car Balance Weight : N/A Well
(6) Confirm that the rope terminations are correctly made and secure as required in 9.2.3 and 9.2.4 of EN.81-2 (7) Confirm that the rope terminations conform to 9.3 of EN.81-2 ensuring distribution of load between the ropes
Yes
No
Yes
No
(b) Suspension chains (1) Number (2) Nominal Pitch (3) Type and construction (4) Confirm that the correct chains are supplied and that the chain test certificate is available, complete and correct (A copy is sufficient as original will be held by the chain maker)
N/A Specified Specified Specified Yes No mm
(5) Confirm that the chain terminations conform to 9.3 of EN.81-2 ensuring distribution of load between the chains (c) Confirm that where the ram is directly connected to the car the joint is flexible and secure. (d) Suspension Pulleys (1) Pulley Material (2) Pulley Diameter N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Specified
Actual
mm
mm
Page 21 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
5.0 Suspension (continued)

5.2 Slack Suspension Device
(a) Confirm that in the case of two rope or chain suspension of the car the electrical safety device detecting the extension of one rope/chain operates correctly (see 9.3.3 of EN.81-2) (b) Confirm that the slack safety rope detector device operates correctly (see 12.13 of EN.81-2) N/A Yes No
N/A
Yes
No
6.0 Controls
(a) Confirm the levelling and relevelling circuits operate correctly (see 14.2.1.2 of EN.81-2) and Confirm that the stopping and levelling accuracy is according to EN 81-70. (b) Confirm that the docking operation functions in accordance with 14.2.1.4.b of EN.81-2 (c) Confirm the operation of the stopping device in the car (see 14.2.1.5.i of EN.81-2) (d) Confirm that safety circuits containing electronic components are CE marked (e) Confirm that the electrical anti-creep system operates correctly with rated load in the car (see 14.2.1.5 and Annex D.2.y of EN 81-2) N/A Yes No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Page 22 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
7.0 Car & Balancing Weight Safety Gear & Overspeed Protection
7.1 Car Safety Gear
(a) Confirm that the correct safety gear is supplied (see 1.25) (b) Confirm that the safety gear has been CE marked N/A Yes Yes No No
(c) Confirm that the safety gear stops the car in the downward direction when operated by the governor and engaging at the appropriate speed with the load uniformly distributed at: - rated load at rated speed for instantaneous safety gear where Table 1.1 applies (Annex D.2.h.1.a of EN.81-2) - 125% of rated load at rated speed for instantaneous safety gear where Table 1.1 may not apply (Annex D.2.h.1.b of EN.81-2) - 125% of rated load at rated speed or lower in the case of progressive safety gear (see Annex D.2.h.2 of EN.81-2) (d) Confirm that the floor of the lift is horizontal or sloping less than 5% from the horizontal (9.8.7 of EN.81-2) (e) Following the test confirm that no deterioration which could adversely affect the normal use of the lift has occurred (see Annex D.2.h of EN.81-2) (f) Confirm that the electrical safety device on the safety gear operates correctly N/A Yes No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
7.2 Actuation of Safety Gear

7.2.1 Car Overspeed Governor N/A Yes Yes No No
(a) Confirm that the correct overspeed governor is supplied (see 1.25) (b) Confirm that the overspeed governor tripping speed is correct (see 9.10.2.1 of EN.81-2) (c) Confirm the overspeed governor has been CE marked (d) Confirm that the overspeed governor is accessible or is able to be remotely tested and reset. (see 9.10.2.7.2 & 9.10.2.7.3 of EN.81.2) (e) Confirm that the electrical safety device on the overspeed governor operates correctly
Yes Yes
No No
Yes
No
Page 23 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
7.0 Car & Balancing Weight Safety Gear & Overspeed Protection (continued)
(f) Confirm that the electrical safety device on the overspeed governor prevents the lift from restarting if the governor is not self resetting (g) Confirm that the electrical safety device detecting breakage or slack in the overspeed governor safety rope stops the lift (h) Confirm that the governor, if adjustable, is sealed N/A Specified (i) Confirm that the correct rope type is supplied and the rope certificate is available, complete and correct Make /Type Yes No N/A Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
7.2.2 Tripping by Safety Rope
N/A Specified
(a) Confirm that the correct rope type is supplied and the rope certificate is available, complete and correct
Make /Type
Yes
No
(b) Confirm that the electrical safety device detecting breakage or slack in the safety rope stops the lift
Yes
No
7.3 Balancing Weight Safety Gear

(a) Confirm that the correct safety gear is supplied Progressive : Instantaneous : Specified Make /Type Make /Type
N/A
Yes Yes Yes
No No No
(b) Confirm that the safety gear has been CE marked
(c) Confirm that the safety gear stops the balancing weight in the downward direction when operated and engaging at the appropriate speed and with the car empty of load: - at rated speed in the case of instantaneous safety gear (see Annex D.2.i.1 of EN.81-2) - at rated speed or lower in the case of progressive safety gear (see Annex D.2.i.2 of EN.81-2) Yes No
Yes
No
(d) Following the test confirm that no deterioration which could adversely affect the normal use of the lift has occurred and that the safety gear resets upon release (see Annex D.2.i of EN.81-2)
Yes
No
Page 24 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
7.4 Balancing Weight Overspeed Governor
Specified (a) Confirm that the correct overspeed governor is supplied Make /Type Yes No N/A
(b) Confirm the overspeed governor has been CE marked (c) Confirm that the overspeed governor is accessible or is able to be remotely tested and reset. (see 9.10.2.7.2 & 9.10.2.7.3 of EN.81.2) (d) Confirm that the electrical safety device stops the lift at a speed up to 10% greater than the speed of the car (e) Confirm that the overspeed governor, if adjustable, is sealed N/A Specified (f) Confirm that the correct rope type is and the rope certificate is available, complete and correct. Make /Type
Yes Yes
No No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
7.5 Pipe Rupture Valve or Restrictor

(a) Confirm that the correct rupture valve has been fitted (see 1.25) (b) Confirm that the device has been CE marked (c) Confirm that the tripping speed is correct according to Annex D.2.r and s of EN.81-2 (d) Confirm that the device has been positioned and fitted correctly (e) Confirm that if adjustable the rupture valve/restrictor has been sealed
N/A Yes Yes Yes No No No
Yes Yes
No No
Page 25 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
7.6 Mechanical Anti-creep Device
(a) Clamping Device/Safety Gear (see 9.10.5.2 of EN 81-2) Confirm that the clamping device stops the car whilst travelling down at rated speed and 125% load uniformly distributed (see Annex D.2.j.1 and 2 of EN 81-2) Following the test confirm that no deterioration which could adversely affect the normal use of the lift has occurred. (see Annex D.2.j of EN 81-2) Confirm that the lever actuates the device at each floor level and it engages on its stops properly (see 9.10.5.2.a of EN 81-2) Confirm that the rope actuates the device (see 9.10.5.1 of EN 81-2) Confirm that when the car is running the device is fully retracted and it is clear of its stops (see 9.10.5.2.b of EN 81-2) N/A N/A N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Yes
No
(b)
Pawl Device (see 9.11 of EN.81-2) Confirm that the pawl device stops the car whilst travelling down at rated speed with 125% load uniformly distributed (see Annex D.2.m.1 of EN 81-2) Following the test confirm that no deterioration which could adversely affect the normal use of the lift has occurred. (see Annex D.2.m.1 of EN 81-2) Confirm that the pawl device engages on its stops at each landing to support the car (see Annex D.2.m.1 of EN 81-2) Confirm that the pawl device is properly clear of its supports when the car travels through the lift shaft (see Annex D.2.m.2 of EN 81-2) Confirm that the buffer stroke is correct for the pawl device (see Annex D.2.m.3 of EN 81-2)
N/A Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Page 26 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
8.0 Hydraulic Equipment

8.1 Jack
Make/Type Specified Actual Yes Yes N/A N/A Yes Yes No No No No
(a) Confirm that the jack has been provided with method of guidance (b) Confirm that the jack has been correctly supported as near to the top of the cylinder as specified (c) Confirm that jacks installed in the ground have been provided with protection (d) Confirm that pulleys fitted to jacks are fitted with guards (see 9.4 of EN.81-2)
8.2 Machine
(a) Confirm that if safety gear or clamping device is used a handpump has been provided with a correctly set pressure relief valve. (see 12.9.2 of EN.81.2) (b) Confirm that a device to show the position of the lift in the well is fitted in the machine room (c) Confirm that a pressure gauge has been provided, is easily read and operates correctly (d) Confirm that the oil reservoir can be easily filled, drained and its level checked N/A Yes No
Yes Yes
No No
Yes
No
8.3 Pipework
Specified (a) Solid Pipework diameter (b) Flexible Pipework diameter (c) Minimum bend radius (d) Confirm that the Flexible pipework has been marked with the test pressure N/A Yes No N/A N/A Actual
Page 27 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
9.0 Measurement of the System Parameters

(a) Is the mains current within the limit specified? (See Annex D.2.d of EN.81-2) Specified A Actual A
(b) Measure and record the following operational data when the car is at mid-point of travel. (See Annex D.2.d of EN.81-2)
* Car Loading Condition Rated Speed Levelling Speed Re-levelling Speed Inspection Speed Emergency Operation Speed N/A m/s m/s m/s Docking Operation Speed N/A m/s
N/A m/s m/s
N/A
EN.81-2 Clause No.
12.8
14.2.1.2
14.2.1.2
14.2.1.3
12.9.1.2
14.2.1.4
Up Empty Dn w Up Balanced Dn
Up Rated Dn
* with advance door opening (c) Confirm that the measured rated speed does not exceed the design rated speed by more than 8% (see 12.8.2 of EN 81-2) (d) Confirm that the maximum levelling deviation is within the manufacturers tolerances Specified Yes No
Actual
Page 28 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
9.0 Measurement System Parameters (continued)

(e) Pressure Test
(1) (2) State the full load static pressure (see Annex D.2.p of EN 81-2) With 200% full load static pressure applied to the system for 5 minutes confirm there is no evidence of pressure drop due to leakage. (see Annex D.2.t of EN 81-2) Confirm the pressure relief valve operates at 140% of full load static pressure (see Annex D.2.q of EN 81-2) and that the integrity of the hydraulic system is maintained after the test Where the pressure relief valve has to be set at a value greater than 140% the designer is to confirm this setting Specified % Yes No MPa
(3)
Yes
No
(4)
Actual
(5)
Confirm that the car does not creep down from the top floor more than 10mm in 10 minutes. (see Annex D.2.u of EN 81-2) Confirm the manual lowering automatically stops before the ropes/chains become slack (see Annex D.2.v of EN 81-2) Confirm that the oil temperature overheating protection device functions correctly. (see Annex D.2.x of EN 81-2) N/A
Yes
No
(6)
Yes
No
(7)
Yes
No
10.0 Protective Devices

10.1 Pump Motor Windings
Is motor protection provided (see 13.3 of EN.81-2) Yes No
10.2 Door Motor Winding

Is motor protection provided (see 13.3 of EN.81-2) N/A Yes No
10.3 Motor Run Time Limiter

Confirm that the correct motor run time limiter is installed and operates correctly (see 12.12 of EN.81-2) Yes No
10.4 Lighting and Socket Outlet Protection

Confirm that the lighting and socket electrical supply is separate to that of the lift machine and that these circuits have there own independent short circuit protection (see 13.6.1 and 13.6.3.3 of EN.81-2 Yes No
Page 29 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
11.0 Electrical Wiring Examination

11.1 Insulation Resistance to Earth
Confirm that the insulation resistance to earth for the electrical system is correct and in accordance 13.1.3 of EN.81-2 (see also Annex D.2.e.1) Yes No
11.2 Earthing
Confirm that all metal work is properly earthed back to the lift main earthed isolator. (see Annex D.2.e.2 in EN.81-2) Yes No
11.3 Electrical Wiring

(a) Confirm that the electrical wiring, including travelling cables, conform to 13.5 of EN.81-2 (b) Confirm that the wiring installed is in accordance with the manufacturers instructions (see EMC compliance) (c) Confirm that the controller components are labelled in accordance with the wiring diagram (see 15.10 of EN.81-2) (d) Confirm that the controller and other electrical equipment are protected against direct contact with enclosures of at least IP2X Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
12.0 Documentation
(a) Confirm that there is a register as called for in 16.2 of EN.81-2 (b) Confirm that there is an instruction manual as called for in 16.3 of EN.81-2. EN 81-70, EN 81-72 giving also information about normal operation, rescue operation, periodical inspection procedures, etc. (c) Confirm that where the lift deviates from the Harmonised Standard a design examination certificate has been provided (d) Confirm that where the lift is a Model Lift an EC type examination certificate has been provided N/A Yes Yes No No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Page 30 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
13.0 Confirmation of compliance with the Standard EN.81-2

(a) Are all the items associated with the lift installation, for which the lift manufacturer is not directly responsible, in a suitable state for the installation to be put into service? e.g. access to lift machine room, telephone line, access lighting etc. NOTE: Some of the items requiring attention may not be part part of the contract for the lift but part of the installation and the responsibility of others. Yes No
If No provide details :
(b) Confirm that all the tests and examinations have been carried out successfully to prove compliance with EN.81-2. Where the lift requires additional tests to prove compliance with Notified Body Design Examination Certificates confirm that these have also been completed, the results of which should be attached to these test results.
Yes
No
Where any previous question in this report has led to a answer of NO indicate the reasons and further actions necessary to achieve compliance
Company
Date
Page 31 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
Annex A Additional Requirements For Unit Verification

The following describes additional tests and verification necessary when validating lift installations in accordance with Annex X of the Lifts Directive 95/16/EC.
A.1 Documentation and Design

A.1.1 Confirm that calculations for the following are available, complete and correct :Loads imposed on the building by the lift components e.g. Guide Brackets, Buffers, Ram, Pawl Device, etc. (see EN81-2 Clause 5.3) Selection of car guide rail size and distance between supports. (see EN81-2 Clause 10.1 and Annex G) Jack selection using Pressure, Buckling and Tensile Stress (see EN81-2 Clause 12.2.1 and Annex K) Sizing of Rigid Pipes (see EN81-2 Clause 12.3.2) Selection of Suspension Rope and Terminations (see EN81-2 Clause 9.2.2 & 9.2.3) Selection of Suspension Chain and Terminations (see EN81-2 Clause 9.2.5 & 9.2.6) Selection of Overspeed Governor Rope / Safety Rope (see EN81-2 Clause 9.10.6) The design of the car sling A.1.2 Confirm that documentation and test results are available and in order for any glass used in the construction of the car or car and landing doors. (see EN81-2 Clause 7.2.3.3, 8.3.2.2, 8.6.7.2 and Annex J) A.1.3 Confirm that Certificates of Type Examinations according to annex v(a) or annex ix are available for the installed safety components listed in Annex iv of the Lifts Directive 95/16/EC A.1.4 Confirm that where the lift is not in complete conformity with EN81-1 a Risk Assessment has been carried out to show that the equivalent level of safety has been achieved for the new/alternative lift equipment. A.1.5 Confirm that the pawl device has been designed in accordance with EN.81-2 Clause 9.11 N/A N/A Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Yes Yes
No No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
Page 32 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
A.1 Documentation and Design (continued)

A.1.7 Confirm that where the safety gear is tripped by suspension failure its design conforms to EN.81-2 Clause 9.10.3) A.1.8 Confirm that where the safety gear is tripped by a lever its design conforms to EN.81-2 Clause 9.10.5.2) A.1.9 Confirm that where installed the balance weight safety gear and its means of tripping are compatible and in accordance with EN.81-2 Clause 9.6 A.1.10 Confirm that where telescopic jacks are used they are designed in accordance with EN.81-2 Clause 12.2.5 A.11 Confirm that the means of limiting the stroke of the ram has been designed in accordance with EN.81-2 Clause 12.2.3 A.1.12 Confirm that the connection between the ram and the car has been designed in accordance with EN.81-2 Clause 12.2.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes No No No
N/A
Yes Yes Yes
No No No
A.2 Safety Components

A.2.1 Confirm that the following have been selected, in accordance with the contract, so that they provide the level of safety required by the EN.81-2 Harmonised Standard, and that where appropriate they are compatible. Device for Locking Landing Door (see EN.81-2 Clause 7.7.3) Device to prevent the lift car from falling (safety gear) (see EN.81-2 Clause 9.8) Overspeed Limitation Device (speed governor) (see EN.81-2 Clause 9.10.2) Buffers - Energy Accumulation Non Linear (see EN.81-2 Clause 10.4.1.2) - Energy Accumulation Buffered Return (see EN.81-2 Clause 10.4.2) - Energy Dissipation (see EN.81-2 Clause 10.4.3) Hydraulic Rupture Valve / Restrictor (see EN.81-2 Clause 12.5.5 and 12.5.6) Electric Safety Switches containing electronic components (see EN.81-2 Clause 14.1.2.3) A.2.2 Confirm that all of the relevant safety switches listed in EN.81-2 Clause 14.1.2 and Annex A have been provided and correctly used and identified in accordance with the wiring diagram for the lift N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No
Page 33 of 34
Hydraulic Lifts
A.3 Machine
A.3.1 Confirm that in relation to the up valve, down valve, shut off valve, pressure relief valve, pressure gauge, filters and non return valve the hydraulic control valve is suitable for its intended use. (see EN.81-2 Clause 12.5) A.3.2 Confirm that the machine is fitted with a means of hand lowering the lift car for emergency rescue of trapped passengers and that it is suitable for its intended use. (see EN.81-2 Clause 12.9) Yes No
Yes
No
A.4 Control Systems

A.4.1 Confirm that the levelling, re-levelling and anti-creeping Operations have been designed and operate in accordance with EN.81-2 Clause 14.2.1.2 and 14.2.1.5 A.4.2 Confirm that the inspection operations have been designed and operate in accordance with EN.81-2 Clause 14.2.1.3 A.4.3 Confirm that the docking operations have been designed and operate in accordance with EN.81-2 Clause 14.2.1.4 A.4.4 Confirm that where vertical sliding doors have been used the control system complies with EN.81-2 Clause 7.5.2.2) N/A N/A Yes No
Yes
No
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
A.5 Protective Devices

Yes A.5.1 Confirm that the means of protecting the hydraulic fluid from overheating is suitable for the fluid used and designed in accordance with EN.81-2 Clause 12.14 A.5.2 Confirm that the motor over current protection has been designed in accordance with EN.81-2 Clause 13.3 Yes No
No
A.6 Negotiations
A.6.1 Confirm that the supplied lift as described within this test report is in compliance with that described in the agreed technical specification, negotiated between the lift manufacturer and their client. Yes No
A.7 Details of Examiner

Company
Date
Page 34 of 34
page 1 of 2 of NB L/REC 0/005
NB-LIFT

Keywords: Proposed by NB-L on 21.11.2007 Decided by NB L/HC on 21.11.2007 European data base, withdrawn certificates, Notified Bodies, Member Modified by NB-L/HC on states StC: to be approved by WP done on by OP done on Related to Directive: 95/16/EC prEN/EN: Article: Question: Annex: Clause: Clause:
Which procedure do the Notified Bodies use to satisfy the obligation of communication to the other Notified Bodies and the Member States related to the withdrawn certificates? Answer: The Notified Bodies shall send the communications on the withdrawn certificates in the form of lists to the Technical Secretariat including a copy of the withdrawn certificate. Both the list and the copy of the certificate shall be sent by e-mail. The communication and the documents mentioned above shall be sent within a short time after the withdrawal of the certificate. The content and the form of the lists shall be drawn up following the minimum details mentioned in the following table in order to have a common style.
Number of certificate Released by Notified Body N Country Release date Released for Limit of validity Number of the certificate as it appears on the document delivered by the notified body. Name and legal structure of the notified body which has released the certificate Identification number of the notified body Residential country of the notified body Date in which the certificate was released Name and legal structure of the lift-installer to whom the certificate is entitled For all certificates having a limited validity, indication of the final validity date of the certificate. For all certificates which do not have a limited validity, the indication "unlimited" shall appear. The procedure with which the certificate is released (for example, final inspection, lift quality assurance, etc.) Annex which has been used as reference for the certification Identification code of the technical file used by the notified body for releasing the certificate.
Type of procedure Annex Identification code of the technical dossier of reference Date of certificate withdrawal Justification of withdrawal Identification code of the technical dossier justifying the withdrawal of the certificate Safeguard procedure Safeguard procedure initiated by
Identification code of the technical file used by the notified body containing the documents which justify the withdrawal of the certificate. Identify whether a safeguard procedure concerning products covered by the certificate exists. Identify the country(ies) having started a safeguard procedure concerning the products covered by the certificate
The Technical Secretariat will update the European database related to the withdrawn certificates with the details sent by the Notified Bodies. After that, the database will be uploaded with a copy of the withdrawn certificates, placed in dedicated folder, in the section NBG:Lifts Notified Bodies Group of Circa Notified Bodies Network. The details of the withdrawn certificates and the copy of the relevant certificates will be sent to the Commission so that the Member States receive a communication on them.
History: presented and approved at the 20th NB-L/HC meeting held on 20-21 November 2007.
According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, the Notified Bodies are expected to take the recommendations into consideration
NB-LIFT

Keywords: Conformity Assessment Procedure (CAP), Safety de- Proposed by TS on 97-06-11, vice, Type examination, Test procedure, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-01-19, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 00-12-31 done on by OP related to Directive: 95/16/EC prEN/EN: EN 81-1/2:1998 Article: 8 (1) Question: Annex: IV, V (A) Clause: Clause: Annex F
Which test procedures shall be used for EC-type examination of safety components?
Answer: The European standards EN 81-1 and 2:1998 describe in their Annexes F procedures for the type examination of safety components mentioned in Annex IV of the Lifts Directive, which are partially in use since many years and have been proven good.
History: Decision of NB-L/HC, 1st meeting 1997-06-11, adopted in 6th NB-L/HC meeting, adopted by StC, editorially amended to new format of REC 01-07.04. According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-1-001-V03-EN-TEST PROCEDURES SAFETY COMPONENTS.DOC
NB-LIFT

Keywords: CAP, Safety component, Type examination, Certificate, Proposed by TS on 97-06-11, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-01-19, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 00-12-31 done on by OP prEN/EN: EN 81-1/2:1998 Clause: F.0.2
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: 8 (1) Question: Annex: IV, V (A) Clause:
What shall be the content of an EC-type examination certificate for safety components ?
Answer: The former EC Lifts Directive (84/529/EEC) specified the content of the EC-type examination certificate for safety components, which has been taken over into EN 81-1/2. To assure compatibility with former EC-type examination certificates especially when they are updated according to the new Lifts Directive (95/16/EC) and new certificates it is urgently requested to use this format also for new certificates.
History: Decision of NB-L/HC, 1st meeting 1997-06-11, adopted in 6th NB-L/HC meeting, adopted by StC, editorially amended to the new format of REC 01-07-04, According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-1-002-V03-EN-CONTENT OF CERTIFICATE SAFETY COMPONENTS.DOC
NB-LIFT

Keywords: CAP, Safety component, Type examination, manufac- Proposed by NB on 97-10-07, turing procedures Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-01-19, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 00-12-31 done on by OP related to Directive: 95/16/EC prEN/EN: Article: 8 (1) Question: Annex: IV; V (A) Clause: 3, last ident Clause:
Does the requirement of Lifts Directive Annex V (A) clause 3 last ident (steps taken at the manufacturing stage to ensure that series-produced safety components conform to the safety component examined) mean that the manufacturer has to make a choice between the possibilities of Annex VIII (approval of a system) and Annex XI (random checking by NB) ?
Answer: No. The requirement is related to internal procedures of production control the manufacturer intends to follow in order to be sure that the produced safety components are in compliance with the type examined model.
History: Decision of NB-L/HC, 2nd meeting, 1997-10-08, adopted in 6th NB-L/HC meeting, adopted by StC, editorially amended to new format of REC 01-07-04 According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-1-003-v03-EN-internal procedures of production control.doc
NB-LIFT

Keywords: Electric safety devices, Formulation, Language versions Proposed by NB-L on 98-06-15, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-01-19, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07-09-13 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause: -
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: Question: Annex: IV Clause: -
Which safety devices are meant by Annex IV, 6 ?
Answer: The wording in Annex IV, 6 differs in the D-, E- and F-version. According to an information from the Commission the German version is the correct one, reading "Electric safety devices in the form of safety circuits containing electronic components." EN 81-1/2:1998 takes this into consideration. See also REC 1/005
History: Question from the 3rd meeting of NB-L/HC to CEN/TC 10/WG 1, answer from CEN/TC 10/WG 1, adopted in 6th NB-L/HC meeting, editorially amended to the new format of REC According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-1-004V05 CORRECT WORDING OF ANNEX IV, 6.rtf
NB-LIFT

Keywords: Electric safety devices, Type examination Proposed by NB-L on 98-06-15, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-06-05, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07.09.13 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause: Clause: -
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: Question: Annex: IV, 6; V (A)
What has to be respected at the EC-Type examination of electric safety devices? Answer: In addition to REC 1/004, the following has to be taken into consideration with electric safety devices:
1. As shown in figure 1, electric safety devices can be designed differently. Only a design in accordance with d) is
a safety device in the sense of Lifts Directive, Annex IV, 6.
Item a): is a safety contact as mentioned in Annex A and clause 14.1.2.2. of the EN81-1 and 2. Item b): is a safety circuit which could be in wiring and relays or all relays mounted on a print board with print paths making the circuit wiring. The safety circuit should be made up according to clause 14.1.2.3 and makes a reference to Annex H of EN81-1 and 2 if it is circuitry mounted on PCB that means the design rules of Annex H shall be followed. Item c): is a PCB without electronic components and contains only terminals and circuitry to connect the different terminal points. This type of equipment shall fulfil clause 13.2.2.3. with a reference to clause 14.1.2.2.3 with a reference to the design rules of Annex H ( creepage distances etc. ) Item d): Is a PCB with electronic components which influence a part of the safety chain. This type of equipment shall fulfill clause 14.1.2.2.3 with a reference to Annex F6 which means subject to type testing and a CE-marking of the PCB. Item e): is a PCB which contains electronic circuitry using taps from the different points of the safety chain to make logic decisions in the control. This type shall fulfil clause 14.1.2.1.3 with a reference to clause 14.1.2.3. with a reference to design rules of Annex H of the EN81-1 and 2 ( creepage distances etc. ).
continued History: Question from the 3rd meeting of NB-L/HC to CEN/TC 10/WG 1, answer from CEN/TC 10/WG 1, 4th and 5th meeting of NB-L/HC, proposal of an ad hoc group, modified in 6th NB-L/HC meeting, amended in accordance with the wish of CEC. According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
2.
Item e) may be a type tested ( with CE-marking ) which results in an easy acceptance during testing by Notified Bodies before putting the lift into service. Not following the type testing ( no CE marking ) means that all the questions, raised during the check on site by the Notified Body, shall be answered by the manufacturer. Specially if multi-layer boards are used the need for drawings of the lay-out to inform the inspection bodies shall be available. Only the safety circuits and not the whole safety chain have to be type examined. The whole safety chain cannot be type tested due to the fact that the field is wiring the terminals and cannot be wired in a single way of design. In case of current paths of electric safety circuits run on PCBs which have no other function in this circuitry just follow the design rules of Annex H of EN81-1 and 2 in regard to clearance and creepage distances. Air gaps and creepage distances between paths of the electric safety chain on PCB without any further elements of electric safety devices and adjacent parts of the control have to fulfil the requirements of electric safety devices. Relevant proofs are not part of the type examination, but have to be carried out during the other conformity assessment procedures in accordance with Art. 8 (2) of LD. Annex H of EN 81-1/2:1998 is not a description of electronic elements and also not a list of electronic elements allowed to be used in electric safety circuits. It only states the conditions under which at the specified elements failures according to EN 81-1/2, 14.1.1.1 can be excluded. It is recognized that the devices connected to the safety chain for gathering information are not electric safety components in the sense of the Lift Directive 95/16/EC Annex IV but it is the duty of the manufacturer to design the devices according to the design rules of Annex H of EN81-1 and 2 and for the circuits which can influence the safety chain, especially 14.1.2.1.3 to assure that bridging of electric safety device(s) is not possible. The proof that this requirement is fulfilled can be made by the way of a certified examination of a competent body (recommendation to the manufacturers to call in a NB for annex IV,6 components on that case or implementing a system according to Annex IX or XIII). In any case the test procedures shall be that of EN 81-1/2:1998, Annex F.6; the manufacturer has to make a written declaration about these laboratory tests (Annex F.6 of EN 81-1/2:1998) Where changes in a safety circuit with electronic components are necessary in the course of a type examination of a lift/model lift the notified body having certified this electric safety device shall be contacted if the modification of the electric safety component used in the model lift is influencing the defined limits ( range of application and interfacing parameters ) or the test certificate number itself of the safety device. A recertification shall be limited to the impact of the changes of the component to the model lift by the original Notified Body and not a complete type test procedure for the whole model lift.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Note: The certificate of a model lift shall at least describe the certified components used in the model lift. If one of these components has to be changed, due to non-availability on the market or price considerations, to an other component having the same characteristic but other certificate, it does not make sense to do a complete new type testing of the whole lift, if the limits of application fit the use of the model lift. The type examination shall be limited to the component only and verify the use within the range of application.
8. During the type examination of a lift/lift model according to Annex V (B) or the unit verification following Annex X an examination of the wiring diagram and the electric installation is necessary. Regarding PCB the check of sufficient air gaps/creepage distances is possible by using the layout drawings. Since the transposition of the layout drawings to the PCB is done photographically, it can be assumed that the PCB corresponds to the layout drawing. Part of the examination is also the proof, whether the elements indicated by the manufacturer are mounted on the PCB. Since the breaking off of the failure analysis allowed according to figure 6 of EN 81-1/2:1998 is based on the assumption, that examinations and tests are carried out on a new installed lift before putting it into service, functional tests of the electric safety devices installed in a given lift and, if need be, of their bridging circuits (e. g. door bridging) have to be carried out during examinations according to Annex VI or X. continued
9. Where electronic elements in an electric safety circuit influence during the failure analysis in accordance
with EN 81-1/2, figure 6 the decision "acceptable" or "not acceptable", the electric safety device has to be regarded as safety component in the sense of LD; Annex IV, 6. This also applies where electronic elements are used in the sense of power transmission to operate the main contactors.
10. The marking of an electric safety device being type examined can be realised by using the 11. 12. 13. identification of the PCB on which it is placed and a printed on borderline surrounding the type examined part
PCB with symbols of id ifi i part of the PCB being type examined
printed-on borderline of
12. The certificate of the type examined electric safety component shall, if need be, indicate specifications about the usability of the safety device, e.g. replacement of a door locking contact, range of temperature to be observed, protection degree of boxes in which the safety component shall be installed. 13. The failure analysis of safety circuits is based on the assumption that at the latest where the car is changing its travelling direction there will occur in the safety circuit a change of a signal allowing to detect failure in function. Some of the electric safety devices in a lift are not actuated during normal operation, e. g. limit switches, switches at the overspeed governor or at the safety gear. Replacement of these contacts by a safety circuit would only be acceptable if the circuit contains a routine giving at certain intervals changes in signal and by that allowing to detect failure in function.
continued
NB-LIFT

Keywords: Safety components, Dirctive 84/529/EEC, Certificates Proposed by NB-L on 98-06-15, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-01-19, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 00-12-31 done on by OP related to Directive: 95/16/EC prEN/EN: Article: 8(1) Question: Annex: Clause: Clause:
What has to be done with safety components being certified according to the old Lifts Directive 84/529/EEC?
Answer: From 1999-07-01 on only the new Lifts Directive 95/16/EC is valid. That means that only safety components and Lifts complying with this directive can be placed on the market and put into service. Therefore certificates according to the Directive 84/529/EEC have to be updated to comply with the new Directive; if a corresponding application is made to a NB notified for this activity in accordance with 95/16/EC, the formal requirements of the new Directive have to be observed; it is not necessary to repeat the tests performed for the previous certificate if the safety component has not been modified. If it has been modified the NB shall decide on the nature and extent of tests to be carried out; in contrast to the provisions of the old Lifts Directive 84/529EEC the new certificate is issued without any restrictions as to its period of validity since additional measures are taken (Annex VIII, Production control or Annex XI approval of a system).
History: 3rd meeting of NB-L/HC, modified and adopted in 6th NB-L/HC meeting, adopted by StC, editorially amended to the new format of REC, According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-1-006-v03-EN-safety components certified according to 84-529-EEC.doc
NB-LIFT

Keywords: CAP, safety component, rupture valve, Sealing of ad- Proposed by NB-L on 98-11-12, justment Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-01-19, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 00-12-31 done on by OP related to Directive: 95/16/EC prEN/EN: Article: 8 (1) Question: Annex: IV, 5 Clause: Clause:
Is it necessary that an adjustable rupture valve is provided with means allowing to safeguard the adjustment against unauthorised modification ?
Answer: Yes. Rupture valves having a bigger range of use and needing an adjustment according to the special conditions of the lift in which they are installed, shall be provided with means to safeguard the adjustment against unauthorised modification. This can be done for instance by sealing. At the EC-type examination it has to be considered that such safeguarding means are provided and can be used. The intended safeguarding means has to be mentioned in the certificate. The correct adjustment and safeguarding is the responsibility of the manufacturer or the installer the latter following the adjustment instructions of the manufacturer.
History: 4th meeting of NB-L/HC, discussed and adopted in 6th NB-L/HC meeting, adopted by StC, editorially amended to new format of REC, According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-1-007-V03-EN-NEED OF SAFEGUARDING MEANS FOR ADJUSTMENTS OF RUPTURE VALVES.DOC
NB-LIFT
NB-L/REC 2/001 version 08 date 17-09-2007

Keywords Machinery Directive, ESR Proposed by NB-L on 23.05.2007 Decided by NB-L/HC on 23.05.2007 Modified by NB-L/HC on XX-XX-XX StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07.09.13 done on by OP
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Question Which ESRs of the Machinery Directives 98/37/EC and 2006/42/EC must be considered in addition to those detailed within Annex I of Lift Directive?
Answer The ESRs of the Machinery Directive, which have to be taken into consideration, are detailed in the attached table. (Note: The attached table does not change previous decisions of approved Rec for Use NB-L/REC 2/001 version 03 on applicability of Annex I in directive 98/37/EC)
History: proposed by Technical Secretariat 1998-11-12, modified by NB-L/AH-MD 2007-02-01, discussed and accepted by NB L/HC in its 19th meeting
According to the "Rules of Procedure" clause 2.7 it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: R2_001_3.rtf
NB-LIFT
European Co-ordination of Notified Bodies for Lifts and their Safety Components NB-L
Machinery Directives Essential Safety Requirements (ESR) The ESRs of the Machinery Directives (98/37/EC & 2006/42/EC) which have to be taken into consideration in addition to those listed within Annex I of the Lifts Directive are detailed in the table below. The table lists the clauses from both Machinery Directives and whether they are considered applicable or not. It is recognised that the requirements of 2006/42/EC will not become mandatory until 29 December 2009, however, considering development and installation lead times, compliance with the new requirements will need to be taken into account in advance of this date. It must be remembered that application of the Machinery Directive ESRs in addition to those from the Lifts Directive is required where the specific hazard is considered to exist and is not covered by Annex I of the Lift Directive.
MD 98/37/EC, Annex I, clause Prel. Observ. 1.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3 1.1.4 1.1.5 1.1.2 d
MD 2006/42/EC Annex I, clause

GENERAL PRINCIPLES
applicable Reason Yes/No
no yes yes yes yes yes yes no no yes yes
identical with the Preliminary Remarks of annex I of the LD the defined terms are not used in the LD, but are necessary for the understanding of the ESR of the MD see LD, Annex I, 1.1 not mentioned in LD Annex I only lighting of the car mentioned in LD Annex I. Machine room, well and other spaces particular to the lift need also illumination not mentioned in LD Annex I
1.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3 1.1.4 1.1.5 1.1.6 1.1.7 1.1.8 1.2.1 1.2.2
1.2.1 1.2.2
1.2.3 1.2.4 1.2.5
1.2.3 1.2.4 1.2.5
no no no
see LD, Annex I, 1.6.4, LD Annex I, 1.6.1, 1.6.2 and 1.6.3 deals only with the controls for the user. Controls for maintenance/rescue personnel located in the well or machine room have to comply with the relevant requirements see LD, Annex I, 1.6.4 Note: see LD, Annex I, 1.6.4 1.6.4 incorporates the ESR of 1.2.3, 1.2.4, see LD, Annex I, 1.6.4 1.2.5 and 1.2.6 if it is understood as in the
MD 98/37/EC, Annex I, clause 1.2.6 1.2.7 1.2.8 1.2.8 1.3.1 1.3.2
MD 2006/42/EC Annex I, clause 1.2.6 1.2.1 1.1.6 1.7.1.1 1.3.1 1.3.2
no yes yes yes yes yes
see LD, Annex I, 1.6.4 present state of the art see LD, Annex I, 1.6.4 relevant for maintenance and adjustment work for complete lifts part of the exchange of information according to LD, art. 2 (2) LD Annex I, 1.2 and 1.3 deals only with the car and suspension elements. Other parts of the lift need also to be designed to withstand the loads and forces imposed on them. relevant in case of installation, maintenance, repair and dismantling LD Annex I, 4.1 deals only with the hazards related to the movements of landing doors. Car doors or parts in need of maintenance, adjustment or inspection are not mentioned. not relevant not relevant in addition to LD, Annex I, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 4.1 and 4.3 in addition to LD, Annex I, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 4.1 and 4.3 in addition to LD, Annex I, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 4.1 and 4.3 Concept not relevant to lifts in addition to LD, Annex I, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 4.1 and 4.3 covered by LD, Annex I, 1.6.4, see note above Relevant in conjunction with use of new materials, sometimes combustion engines are used e. g. plug in connections of electric wiring LD, Annex I, 4.6 is not covering hot components e. g. overloading electrical equipment e. g. lifts in explosive atmosphere normally lifts do not create dangerous noise normally lifts do not create dangerous vibrations not relevant Precautions according EMC Directive are not covering all kind of radiation which can influence electric safety circuits with electronic components probably during installation or as protecting device e. g. batteries for emergency supply in addition to LD, Annex I, 4.4 and 4.5 not only inside the car, but also in the machine room, on car roof, in the pit; relevant also for landing inaccuracy not mentioned in LD Annex I not mentioned in LD Annex I see LD, Annex I, 1.6.4 LD, Annex I, 4.4 deals only with rescue operations. Maintenance etc. is not addressed especially for lifts with glass as well enclosure and/or car walls see LD, Annex I, 1.6.2, 5.1 and 5.2 e. g. on car roof, on machine, etc. e. g. on electrical equipment see LD, Annex I, 5.1 see LD, Annex I, 6.1 and 6.2 not relevant not relevant the defined terms are not used in the LD, but are necessary for the understanding of the ESR of the MD
1.3.3 1.3.4
1.3.3 1.3.4
yes yes
1.3.5 1.3.6 1.3.7 1.3.8 A 1.3.8 B 1.4. 1.5.1 1.5.2 1.5.3 1.5.4 1.5.5 1.5.6 1.5.7 1.5.8 1.5.9 1.5.10 1.5.11
1.3.5 1.3.6 1.3.7 1.3.8.1 1.3.8.2 1.3.9 1.4 1.5.1 1.5.2 1.5.3 1.5.4 1.5.5 1.5.6 1.5.7 1.5.8 1.5.9 1.5.10 1.5.11
no no yes yes yes no yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes no no no yes
1.5.12 1.5.13 1.5.14 1.5.15 4.1.2.8 1.6.1 1.6.2 1.6.3 1.6.4 1.6.5 1.7.0 1.7.1 1.7.2 1.7.3 1.7.4 2 3 4.1.1
1.5.12 1.5.13 1.5.14 1.5.15 1.5.16 1.6.1 1.6.2 1.6.3 1.6.4 1.6.5 1.7.1.1 1.7.1.2 1.7.2 1.7.3 1.7.4 2 3 4.1.1
yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes no yes yes yes no no no yes
MD 98/37/EC, Annex I, clause 4.1.2.1 4.1.2.2 4.1.2.3 4.1.2.4 4.1.2.5 4.1.2.6 4.1.2.7 4.1.2.8
MD 2006/42/EC Annex I, clause 4.1.2.1 4.1.2.2 4.1.2.3 4.1.2.4 4.1.2.5 4.1.2.6 4.1.2.7 1.5.16 4.1.2.8 4.1.3 1.1.7 1.1.8 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.1.2.7 4.1.2.8.2 4.1.3 4.3.1 4.3.2 4.3.3 4.4.1 4.4.2 5 4.1.1 (g) 6.1.1 6.1.2 6.2
yes yes yes yes no yes no yes yes no no no yes no no no yes no yes no no no no no yes no no no yes no no yes yes yes no no no no no no no
part of the exchange of information according to LD, art. 2 (2), see also 1.3.1 not mentioned in LD Annex I in combination with clause 1.1.3 and 1.3.2 regarding the relation between the diameter of ropes and pulleys/sheaves or drums not relevant, see 1.3.7 buffers on counterweights not mentioned in the LD not relevant relevant according to building regulations or for lifts outside of buildings only 4.1.2.8.2 is relevant covered by the Conformity Assessment Procedures not relevant except for second sentence: hold-to-run-controls are relevant for rescue and maintenance see LD Annex I, 1.4.1 not relevant see LD Annex I, 2.1, 2.2, 3.1 and 4.1 covered by the Conformity Assessment Procedures relevant information is part of the documentation, see LD Annex I, 6.2 see LD Annex I, 5.1 see LD Annex I, 5.1 not relevant see LD Annex I, 6.2 not relevant the defined terms are not used in the LD, but are necessary for the understanding of the ESR of the MD see LD Annex I, 1.3 see LD Annex I, 1.4.1 not relevant e. g. inspection control on the car roof not relevant see LD Annex I, 1.4.2, 1.4.3, 1.4.4, 3.2 and 3.3 only when 1.5.15 precautions are not sufficient for persons during maintenance relevant for trap doors for maintenance, inspection and/or emergency relevant e. g. for inclined lifts with variable inclination see LD Annex I, 1.4.3 and 3.2 see LD Annex I, 3 see LD Annex I, 3.2
4.2.1.1 4.2.1.2 4.2.1.3 4.2.1.4 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.3 4.2.4 4.3.1 4.3.2 4.3.3 4.4.1 4.4.2 5 6.1.1 6.1.2 6.1.3 6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3 6.3.1 6.3.2 6.3.3 6.4.1 6.4.2
6.3.1 6.3.2; 3rd 6.3.2; 4th 6.3.2; 1st 6.3.3 6.4.1 6.3.1 6.4.2 6.4.3 6.5
6.5
see LD Annex I, 5.1

NB-LIFT

Keywords: Lifts, ESR, Stopping accuracy, CAP, Proposed by NB-L on 97-10-07, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-01-19, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07-04-23 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause: Clause:
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: 3 Question: Annex: I, 1.1
Does stopping accuracy of lifts belong to the Essential Safety Requirements (ESR) of the Lifts Directive? Answer: Yes. According to Annex I, 1.1 of the Lifts Directive the ESR of the Machinery Directive also apply where the relevant hazard exists and is not dealt with in Annex I of the Lifts Directive. The necessity of a certain stopping accuracy is related to clause 1.5.15 of Annex I of the Machinery Directive (avoidance of risks of tripping). The following shall be taken into consideration: Stopping accuracy is a structural condition and has to be observed during CAP; Manufacturers should aim for the highest level of stopping accuracy possible; Stopping accuracy has to take 2 different items into consideration accuracy of stopping at a landing (stopping) variations of the car position in a landing when stopped due to loading and unloading (relevelling) (It is considered acceptable that during loading and unloading of a heavy load in the case of lifts with high capacity the reaction of the levelling-means allows the step between car-floor and landing-to exceed the normal value as it is not expected that any disabled person transits through the car-entrance during these loading and unloading operations) Defined values are published in EN 81-70:2003, clause 5.3.3, 'Stopping and Levelling accuracy'; In assessing stopping and levelling accuracy both, the layout of the specific installation and operational factors (hospital, residential building, factory, etc.) shall be taken into account; The stopping accuracy is part of the exchange of information between the installer of the lift and the persons responsible for the building according to Art. 2 (2); The technical means of the installation shall be such as to meet the degree of stopping accuracy agreed by the installer and the persons responsible for the building. The value of stopping accuracy agreed by the installer and the persons responsible for the building shall be referenced in the instruction manual according to Annex I, 6.2. In the meantime a CEN/TC10-interpretation 578 has been developed to clarify the missing subject on stopping/levelling accuracy in EN 81-1/2:1998, Electric- and Hydraulic Lifts. History: Discussion in NB-L/HC, 2nd meeting, adopted in 6th NB-L/HC meeting, adopted by StC, editorially amended to new format of REC According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-2-002-V05-EN-stopping accuracy.DOC
NB-LIFT

Keywords: Lifts, EMC-Directive, CAP, Proposed by NB-L on 97-10-07, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-01-19, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 00-12-31 done on by OP prEN/EN: Clause: Clause:
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: 8 (4) Question: Annex:
Do lifts have to comply with the EMC-Directive?
Answer: Yes. The safe use of lifts depends to quite an extent from unobjectionable functioning of electrical equipment. These equipment can be disturbed by electromagnetic influences. In that respect not only perturbing radiation but also effective radiation e. g. from mobile phones have to be taken into consideration. Not all of the possible perturbing radiation are covered by the EMC-Directive. During CAP NB have to prove that electromagnetic radiation does not affect the safe operation of the lift. The fact that the Lifts and EMC Directives have equal legal force does not allow any restrictions to the installers choice regarding the order in which he carries out the CAPs of the individual directives. Given the close links between protection from interference and the safe operation of the lift in case of lift controls which are sensitive to interference, the installer is nonetheless well-advised to carry out the necessary checks as close together as possible or to ensure close co-operation between the different NB.
History: Discussion in NB-L/HC, 2nd meeting, adopted in NB-L/HC, 6th meeting, adopted by StC, editorially amended to new format of REC, According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-2-003-V03-EN-lifts and EMC directive.DOC
NB-LIFT

Keywords: NB, Lift, CE-marking, identification number Proposed by NB-L on 98-11-12, Decided by NB-L/HC on 98-11-12, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 00-12-31 done on by OP prEN/EN: Clause: Clause:
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: 10 Question: Annex: III
Which identification number of a NB shall follow the CE-marking of a lift ?
Answer: The identification number of the NB to be added to the CE-marking of a lift can be taken from the following table
Conformity assessment procedure according to Article 8 (2), item i, ii,iii
CE-marking followed by the identification number of the NB having made the final inspection (Annex VI) or NB having approved a system (Annex XII, XIII or XIV) NB having made the unit verification (Annex X) NB having approved a system (Annex XIII)
iv
History: Discussion and adoption in NB-L/HC, 4th meeting, adoption by StC, editorially amended to new format of REC, According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-2-004-V03-EN-identification number of NB at CE marking.doc
NB-LIFT

Keywords: CAP, Brake, test Proposed by NB-L/HC on 1998, Decided by NB-L/HC on 2000-01-19 Modified by NB-L/HC on 23-05-2007 StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07.09.13 done on by OP prEN/EN: 12.4.2.1, Annex D Clause: Clause: -
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: 8 (2) Question: Annex: VI, X
What shall be demonstrated with the test of the brake of an electric lift ?
Answer:
The answer is considered to be fully described in CEN interpretation n. 560 (L-REC-2-005 ANNEX).
Comments The main purpose of the overload test is to ensure the hoist brake is effective. The manufacturer shall make available information how the brake fulfils the requirements of clause 12.4 of EN81.1 and shall provide instructions showing how the tests may be performed in a proper way, this must also include instructions for testing with one brake-half, to avoid different interpretations on the result. If the deceleration is considered excessive, by observation, then this should be measured utilising an accelerometer or similar device.
History: discussed in the 5th NB-L/HC meeting, adopted in the 6th NB-L/HC meeting, approved by the StC, discussed again and modified in the 9th NB-L/HC meeting, editorially amended to new format of REC. Discussed and approved at the 19th NB-L/HC meeting. According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-2-005V06 BRAKE TESTING CONDITIONS
NB-LIFT

Keywords: CAP, Lifts, Safety components, Risk analysis Proposed by NB on 98-11-12, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-01-19, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 00-12-31 done on by OP prEN/EN: Clause:
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: Question: Annex: I Clause:
What are the aspects and procedures which have to be observed at the risk analysis ?
Answer: Besides the clauses of the Annexes I of the Lifts and Machinery Directive relevant for the safety device or lift concerned the following documents give guidance for carrying out the risk analysis: EN 292-1/2 EN 1050 ISO/PDTR 14 798-1:09.1998
History: discussion in NB-L/HC, 4th meeting, adopted in NB-L/HC, 6th meeting, adopted by StC, editorially amended to new format of REC According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-2-006-V03-EN-risk analysis.doc
NB-LIFT
DRAFT NB-L RECOMMENDATION FOR USE

Keywords: CAP, Lift, Model lift, Certificate Proposed by NB-L on 97-10-07, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-01-19, Modified by NB-L/HC on 00-05-23 StC: to be approved done on by WP by OP X done on 00-06-05 prEN/EN: Clause: Clause:
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: 1 (4) Question: Annex: V (B)
Which elements have to be mentioned in the certificate of a lift/model lift in order to give a clear information about the range of the EC-type examinations and the possible modifications.
Answer: The necessary details are given in the enclosed document NB-L/029/98
History: discussed in 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th NB-L/HC meeting, adopted in 6th NB-L/HC meeting; editorial modification on 00-05-23, adopted by StC, editorially amended to new format of REC, According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-2-007-V05-EN-content of type examination certificate for model lift.DOC
DOC
NB-L
029
98
A MODEL LIFT WITHIN THE TERMS OF THE LIFTS DIRECTIVE 95/16/EC
DN:GAREIS/EA_AUFZ/NB_L/CAPMODL1.DOC
MODEL LIFT CRITERIA
Article 1.4 of Directive 95/16/EC states:A model lift shall mean a representative lift whose technical dossier shows the way in which the essential safety requirements will be met for lifts which conform to the model lift as defined by objective parameters and which uses identical safety components. All permitted variations between the model lift and the lifts forming part of the lifts derived from the model lift must be clearly specified (with maximum and minimum values) in the technical dossier. By calculation and/or on the basis of design plans it is permitted to demonstrate the similarity of a range of equipment to satisfy the essential requirements. The objective of these proposals is, through type-examination and the setting down of predetermined criteria, to demonstrate the similarity of a range of equipment and thereby reduce the extent of testing necessary to satisfy the essential health and safety requirements within the Directive. The model lift concept recognises that individual components and assemblies may cover a range of applications. The objective is therefore to avoid the need for every combination within any one series of lifts having to be subjected to separate test and examination where, within a set of prescribed parameters, one test is sufficient. In these circumstances it should not be necessary to submit every variant for type-examination. By submitting what might be the worst case this should provide adequately for a range of equipment. Type-examination involves the testing of a lift in-situ by a notified body where the safety components will have undergone separate type-testing in accordance with the appropriate harmonised standard. In addition, the lift manufacturer will have provided detailed design criteria and relevant information as contained within the technical dossier to enable the notified body to judge compliance for a range of equipment within agreed performance criteria. The proposed criteria for the model lift has been structured to allow, within a range, the setting of specified limits, at the same time recognising that within such a range the components need not be obtained from a single source in order to satisfy the prescribed criteria. Accompanying the tables are notes to illustrate the general objectives.
1.0
Technical Data - General
Range Minimum Maximum X X X X X
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8
Range of Rated Load Range of Suspended Load Range of Rated Speed Range of Travel Mass of Car Type of Drive System Location of Drive System Entrance Configuration
X X X X X
2.0 2.1
Technical Data - Safety Components (Showing Dual Sourcing Alternatives A/B) Locking Devices (According to Entrance Configuration - See 1.8 above) Certificate Source A Type 1 Type 2 X X Certificate Source B X X
2.2
Safety Gear Type 1 Type 2 X X X X
2.3
Ascending Car Overspeed Protection Type 1 Type 2 X X X X
2.4
Overspeed Governor Type 1 Type 2 X X X X
Certificate Source A 2.5 Buffers Type 1 Type 2 2.6 Hydraulic Valves Type 1 Type 2 2.7 Electronic Safety Devices Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 X X X X X X X X
Certificate Source B
X X
X X
X X X X
3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8
Technical Data - Other Components Suspension Ropes (Construction/Certification) Guiderails (Type/Max Span) Compensation (Type) Doors (Manual/Power Operated) Door Drive System Suspension Configuration (Means of Suspension/Support) Car (Type of Construction/Dimensions) Machine
4.0
Drawings To include headroom, pit depth, machine room loading, pit loading, well loading/stress and all information to enable the lift to be incorporated in the building. Safety circuit schematic diagram.
5.0 5.1
Documentation Type-examination Certificates Specific Exclusions Traction Calculations Guide Rail Calculations Instruction Manual Compliance with E.S.R.s
Appendix 1 NOTES
1.0 TECHNICAL DATA - GENERAL 1.1 Rated Load
The range of rated loads must be related to the available car areas and to EN 81-1 Tables 1.1, 1.2 and EN 81-2 Tables 1.1, 1.1A and 1.2. Thus it is not anticipated that a model range be unrelated to the number of persons to be transported. 1.2 Suspended Load
This gives the information necessary for the interaction with the building requirements. 1.3 Rated Speed
To some extent this will be related to 1.6, it is not envisaged that there should be almost unlimited min/max figures. There are natural break limits imposed by EN 81. It is anticipated these will be reflected in this item. 1.4 Range of Travel
This is an important consideration for traction calculations in the case of EN 81-1 lifts and technical limitation of the ram for EN 81-2 lifts. The minimum figures may not be significant. 1.5 Mass of Car
The figures quoted in the table should reflect the absolute minimum and maximum values for the overall range. Within any particular rated load it could be that differing technical requirements will influence the overall mass of the car but without necessarily changing the range of the model. A different model would emerge should the range of mass for a particular rated load fall outside a reasonable tolerance. From a practical viewpoint reasonable needs to reflect the fact that the mass is normally a calculation and not usually subject to weighing. 1.6 Drive System
This item should recognise the primary Drive System Type eg:Traction (all types) Hydraulic (direct/indirect) including all types of pump Rack and Pinion Scissor Guided Chain Nevertheless within the category traction since fundamental safety components and other equipment changes occur by virtue of the EN 81 standards it is not envisaged that one model range covering all systems will be submitted for type-examination. Again the number of combinations for
one range should be such that no confusion can arise between the manufacturer and the notified body. 1.7 Location of Drive
This may be self evident, but it is anticipated that if the location of the drive brings about significant changes to the model different ranges are envisaged. By way of example is the case of a traction lift, a machine room above is considered to be a different range to the machine room below. In the case of a hydraulic lift this may not be significant unless the machine room is so remote that technical considerations are not compatible. 1.8 Entrance
It may be perfectly feasible to accommodate differing types of entrance in one model range ie single sliding doors and centre opening doors since the resultant masses may be within reasonable range. Likewise 800mm and 900mm entrances may also be acceptable. However, one entrance configuration with an alternative two entrance style may vary the overall mass in the calculations such that it is not sensible for one model range to be produced, even ignoring layout details. Differing types of motor control are seen to be allowable in any model range.
2.0 TECHNICAL DATA - SAFETY COMPONENTS The fundamental consideration is that alternative sources for components including Safety Components must be allowable for any model. Nevertheless at the time of submission the alternatives must be provided so that the model can be truly assessed against the alternative sources. In the case of safety components each will have been type-examined and therefore carry a CE mark. As a consequence direct comparisons of application can be made and satisfied. By way of example lift companies do not manufacture polyurethane buffers ie energy accumulation types with non-linear characteristics, but obtain these from other sources. All of these will have been type-examined and CE marked yet will inevitably carry the original equipment manufacturers identification number. Each must be considered as equivalent and interchangeable within the concept of the model. 2.1 Locking Devices
Type 1 and 2 could equate to the variations demanded by the entrance configuration eg side opening/centre opening. Each type would be submitted (with alternative supply sources) so that the notified body can decide what to examine.
2.2
Safety Gears
In this case it could be that in order to cover the whole rated load range two assemblies of safety gear are required. By way of example in order to cover total range of suspended loads from say minimum 1,500 kg to 3,000 kg maximum, safety gear type 1 whose range when type-examined is 1,000 - 2,200 kg and safety gear type 2 whose range when type-examined is 2,200 - 3,500 kg would be needed. The safety gears of course would be of identical type eg both progressive. When submitted for type-examination the application for approval would still be limited for the model to 1,500 - 3,000 kg. (Obviously these could still be applied over this total range in the nonmodel or alternative model concept). It is not considered that instantaneous/progressive alternatives would be one model range unless it can be demonstrated that all other criteria are not affected. 2.3 Ascending Car Overspeed Protection
The application of such devices is not dissimilar in concept from a safety gear and therefore the same principles will apply. 2.4 Governor
It is felt that it may be necessary to have two types of governor for one model range. So again whilst the two types of governor will each have been type-examined for their application, and be CE marked, both types may be considered as part of one model lift range. Whilst the safety gear which the governors operate may not change on account of speed where a model has a wide range of speeds a governor may not cover all applications. 2.5 Buffers
Not all types of buffer are safety components as defined in the Directive, energy accumulation types of simple design with a linear characteristic are excluded from type-examination. Energy accumulation types with non-linear characteristics are comparable with those that have linear characteristics and either may fall within a model and the categories 1 and 2 in the table. Where energy dissipation types are to be used these may cover a range of speeds and may also be types 1 and 2. 2.6 Hydraulic Valves
Differing types of rupture/one-way restrictor valves are used in hydraulic lifts, each will have been type-examined. They may be considered equivalent to each other in terms of overall model application. 2.7 Electronic Safety Devices
Since EN 81 allows these as an alternative to a Safety Contact it is seen that differing types may be applied within any one lift concept, type 1, 2, 3 and 4 is to recognise this fact. Each type will have been type-examined and therefore fit for its purpose.
3.0 TECHNICAL DATA - OTHER COMPONENTS When submitting details for such components generally these will need to satisfy minimum requirements covering their performance. Thus the model will not be nullified should higher performance criteria be applied. By way of example, if under 3.2 Guiderails the maximum span quoted is 2.2m then fixings at 1.8m are acceptable. Likewise if the guiderail type is T....., then it is acceptable to use type T...... where the profile is identical. 3.1 Suspension Ropes
Details to be given:(a) (b) (c) (d) Number of ropes Breaking load Construction Certification
Appropriate calculations will be provided to ensure the selection gives satisfactory Safety Factors etc for the application. This information should not preclude a manufacturer from fitting extra ropes, or those with a higher breaking load, if it so chooses to do so. A manufacturer must have the freedom of choice of rope supplier. 3.2 Guiderails
Information to be provided will be:(a) (b) Type (including surface finish) Maximum Span
This information will be supported by appropriate calculations so as to satisfy maximum deflection limits. As indicated by the example in 3.0 a model should not be nullified if any quoted criteria is improved when using alternatives. 3.3 Compensation
Compensation is a means of providing adequate traction by the fitting of ropes, chains or other methods. Therefore, provided proper materials are used to achieve identical results a manufacturer should be allowed the choice of whichever method it considers best for a particular application. By way of example a chain could be substituted by a weighted belt to give comparable results. 3.4 Doors
Generally sliding doors, manual doors and power operated types would result in separate models. However, sliding shutter doors could be either manual or power operated and be taken as alternatives within the scope of a single model provided the intention is clear at the time of application. The same might apply to hinged landing doors.
3.5
Door Drive System
This has been mentioned under 1.8 where it is seen that door motor control using different techniques should not result in a separate model assessment which should be allowed as interchangeable equipment. Obviously any type must satisfy the overall safety requirements required by the Directive. 3.6 Suspension Configuration
Provided safety components are not affected then there should be no restriction on types of suspension. Whether a model uses 1:1 or 2:1 roping should not materially affect safety issues. Whereas in the case of a hydraulic lift direct/indirect types need differing safety components and as a consequence would result in separate models. However, central/eccentric (cantilevered) suspension may be allowable if it does not impact on other components. 3.7 Car
Details should be provided to give an adequate description of the construction and dimensions of the car. The car construction could be such that it is designed to incorporate add-on decor panels etc. Provided information is given within the limits of the mass under 1.5 glass panels might be offered as an alternative (although generally the overall method of construction would be so different that two models would naturally result). Some cars might be designed with an integral sling whilst others could have a separate sling. This does not impinge on safety and therefore is not a significant issue for defining the model. 3.8 Machine
Criteria for the machine need involve no more than that necessary to provide safe performance and should not preclude a manufacturer from applying a higher specification should he choose to do so.
NB-LIFT

Keywords:
CAP, (Conformity assessment procedure), Certificate, Model lift, NB (notified body), Type examination, two landings
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: 8 (2) i, ii Question: Annex: V, B Clause: 2
Proposed by NB-L on 00-05-09, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-11-16, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07.09.13 done on by OP prEN/EN: Clause: -
Can an EC-type examination be carried out on a 2-level lift?
Answer: Yes. Despite of Annex V, B clause 2, last ident it is possible to carry out an EC-type examination on a 2-level lift. In the type examination certificate this limitation has to be clearly indicated.
History: based on COFNA interpretation sheet 0.001, discussed in 7th NB-L/HC meeting, decided in 8th meeting, editorially amended to new format of REC According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-2-008V03 TYPE EXAMINATION ON TWO LEVEL LIFT

NB-LIFT
DRAFT NB-L RECOMMENDATION FOR USE

Keywords: NB; CAP; Certificate; remark on Annex I, 2.2; Proposed by TS on 01-11-15, Decided by NB-L/HC on 06-11-22, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07-04-23 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause:
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: 8 (2) Question: Annex: I, 2.2 Clause:
There is no common practice in the Member States regarding the application of Annex I, 2.2 prior approval. How can the interested parties be made aware about the needs in the specific case of installation of a lift?
Answer: NB certifying solutions of measures alternative to EN 81-1/2 to assure the refuge spaces above and underneath the car by the way of type examination or design examination shall add a notice to the relevant certificate using the wording:
"According to section 2.2 of Annex I to the Lifts Directive, the application of alternative measures to prevent the risk of crushing above and underneath the car is restricted to installations where the requirement for free space or refuges is impossible to fulfil and may be subject to prior approval by national authorities."
History: Conclusion in the 10th meeting of NB-L/HC; discussed at the NBL-17; modified according to decision made at the NBL-17 meeting; approved at NBL-18 According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
NB-LIFT
NB-L/REC 2/011 version: 05 date: 24 May 2006

Keywords: Rescue operation Proposed by NB-L on 02-11-20, Decided by NB-L/HC on 03-11-13, Modified by NB-L/HC on XX-XX-XX StC: to be approved by WP X done on 06.10.10 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause:
Related to Directive: 95/16/EC Annex: I, Clause: 4.4; 6.2 Annex: V; VI; X; XIII Question:
Related to Directive 98/37/EC Annex I, Clause:
How can passengers be rescued after a blockage of a lift with the car in a position where the passengers cannot be rescued safely? E.g. due to lack of machine-power or traction, after an electrical and/or a mechanical breakdown including a tripped safety gear.
Answer: For lifts which remain blocked, means must be provided to bring the car safely to a landing to allow the opening of the car- and landing doors and release of the trapped passengers. The instruction manual shall describe those means and specify any special tools and equipment to be used for such operations. Ideally these special tools and equipment shall be always part of the lift and available for each lift type one set only on site throughout its life-cycle. It should be possible for rescue operations to be carried out by one person, except in exceptional circumstances. When carrying out final inspection, unit verification or EC Type examination Notified Bodies must check if those emergency release measures have been designed and written in the owners instruction manual correctly. Notified Bodies must also carry out a functional check that the measures can be applied safely as written. Exceptional circumstances are e.g. when the counterweight strikes the buffer, the car jumps and the safety-gear blocks the car at the very top of the well; in this rare case special equipment and more persons may be needed.
History: Prepared by NB-L/AH -WG WC on base of an order of NB-L/HC; consideration in 12th NB-L/HC meeting; decided on 03-11-13 by 13th NB-L/HC According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-X-XXX-XXXX.DOC
NB-LIFT

Keywords:
procedures and equipment for inspection, examination and testing
Related to Directive: 95/16/EC Annex: I, Clause: 1.1; 6.2 Annex: VI; X; XII, XIII, XIV Question:
Related to Directive 98/37/EC Annex I, Clause: 1.1.2; 1.6.1; 1.6.2; 1.6.4
Proposed by NB-L on 2002-11-20, Decided by NB-L/HC on 2003-11-13, Modified by NB-L/HC on 2008-05-21 StC: to be approved done on by WP done on 28.04.2008 by OP prEN/EN: Clause:
How can routine inspection, examination, testing and rescue operations be safely executed at lifts where particular procedures, activities and/or special equipment are required? This question does not expect the answer to consider requirements for major repairs, refurbishment or abnormal parameter changes.
Answer:
For lifts where inspection, examinations, testing and rescue operations require particular procedures, activities and/or special tools and equipment

means must be provided for safe access to all inspection, testing, examination and rescue points, tools and equipment shall be always part of the lift, available for each lift type, one set only on site throughout its life-cycle1).
The necessary tools and equipment must be provided for safe and easy performance of inspection, examination, tests and rescue operations. The instruction manual must describe those means and how they are to be used safely. A functional check that the measures can be applied as safely as written shall be carried out during conformity assessment procedures. Competent parties shall, by following the instructions provided by the OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer), be able to use these instruments or equipment as part of safe maintenance, inspections and rescue operations. Instructions shall describe the use of such equipment.
1) Special equipment such as specific tools (not hoists or test weights) shall be available. (For example, tools for allowing movement of the lift car other than at normal duty.)
th th decided on 03-11-13 by 13 NB-L/HC, discussed again, modified and approved at the 20 NB-L/HC meeting; endorsed with reservation of deleting the following sentence Inspection, examination, testing and rescue operations should, normally, need to be carried out by one person only from the Answer on 28.04.2008. The deletion was approved at the st 21 NB-L/HC meeting held on 20-21 May 2008.
History: prepared by NB-L/AH -WG WC on base of an order of NB-L/HC; consideration in 12th NB-L/HC meeting;
According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-2-012
NB-LIFT

Keywords: Driving unit in the well Proposed by NB-L on 02-11-20, Decided by NB-L/HC on 03-11-13, Modified by NB-L/HC on XX-XX-XX StC: to be approved by WP X done on 06.10.10 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause:
Related to Directive 98/37/EC Annex I, Clause: 1.1.2; 1.6.1; 1.6.2; 1.6.4
How can equipment in the well be reached for routine maintenance, adjustment and inspection in all circumstances?
Answer: Lifts must be provided with means of safe access to all equipment in the well that may require intervention in all circumstances. All solutions must follow the ranking given in Directive 98/37/EC, Annex I, 1.1.2, part b. The instruction manual must describe those practical means and how they are to be used safely. The means shall be part of the lift and always be available for each lift type one set only on site of the lift through out its lifecycle. When carrying out final inspection, unit verification or EC Type examination Notified Bodies must check if those measures have been designed and written in the owners instruction manual correctly. Notified Bodies must also carry out a functional check that the measures and equipment can be applied as safely as written. This answer does not address particular requirements necessary for replacements or repair of components, which may require additional items to be brought to site.
NB-LIFT

Keywords:? Activities by one person only Proposed by NB-L on 02-11-20, Decided by NB-L/HC on 03-11-13, Modified by NB-L/HC on XX-XX-XX StC: to be approved by WP X done on 06.10.10 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause:
Related to Directive 98/37/EC Annex I, Clause: 1.1.2; 1.1.5; 1.5.14; 1.6.1; 1.6.2; 1.6.4
How can maintenance, adjustment, inspection, and repair on a lift safely be carried out by one person?
Answer: Lifts must be designed on the assumption that normal maintenance, adjustment, inspection and repair will be done by one person under safe access and working conditions. These conditions have to be described in the instruction manual. When situations require more than one person, the instruction manual has also to indicate this and has to describe the additional measures and procedures. When carrying out final inspection, unit verification or EC Type examination Notified Bodies must check if those measures have been designed and written in the owners instruction manual correctly. Notified Bodies must also carry out a functional check to ensure that the measures can be applied safely as written.
NB-LIFT

Keywords: Leaving the pit Proposed by NB-L on 02-11-20, Decided by NB-L/HC on 03-11-13, Modified by NB-L/HC on 23-05-2007 StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07.09.13 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause: -
Related to Directive: 95/16/EC Annex: I, Clause: 1.1 Annex: V; VI; X; XIII
Related to Directive 98/37/EC Annex I, Clause: 1.1.2; 1.5.14; 1.6.2
Question: How can the working area in the pit be left safely (EN 81-1/2:1998/A2:2004, clause 6.4.4.2) under the condition that the car is blocked by the devices required in EN 81-1/2:1998/A2:2004, clause 6.4.4.1 b.
Answer:
When the car is blocked as stated in the question there is an emergency situation. In order to make it possible for the maintenance engineer to leave the pit safely the minimum distance between the sill of the landing door and the bottom line of the apron to allow the working area in the pit to be left safely (EN 81-1/2:1998/A2:2004, clause 6.4.4.2) has to be at least 0.50 m (a value taken from EN 81-1/2:1998, clause 8.12.2, car trap-doors, the large side of the car trap-door) when the car is blocked by the devices required in EN 81-1/2:1998/A2:2004, clause 6.4.4.1 b.
History: Prepared by NB-L/AH -WG WC on base of an order of NB-L/HC; consideration in 12th NB-L/HC meeting; decided on 03-11-13 by 13th NB-L/HC, discussed and approved at the 19th NB-L/HC meeting According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-2-017V07 LEAVING THE PIT
NB-LIFT

Keywords: CAP, Landing doors, fire resistance, Certificates Proposed by NB-L on, 03-11-13 Decided by NB-L/HC on, 03-11-13 Modified by NB-L/HC on 06-11-21 StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07-04-23 by OP done on EN: 81-58 Clause:
Related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: Question: Annex: I Clause: 4.2
What shall be considered in the conformity assessment procedures concerning Annex I, clause 4.2 on the fire resistance of lift landing doors? Answer: EHSR 4.2. of Annex I of Directive 95/16/EC expresses the requirement that lift landing doors that have to contribute to the protection of the building against fire must be suitably resistant to fire. The fire resistance of lift landing doors is thus a requirement of the Lifts Directive 95/16/EC which covers the corresponding requirement of the Construction Products Directive 89/106/EEC (see 95/16/EC Committee Working Group on Lifts - Doc. 2002.06 and Doc. 2006.01). The conformity assessment procedures to be applied to this aspect of lift safety are determined by the Lifts Directive 95/16/EC. Lifts certified as in conformity to EHSR 4.2. of the Directive 95/16/EC according to one of the conformity assessment procedures laid down in this Directive can be placed on the market and put in service freely in the EEA without the need for further national testing or approval procedures. The harmonized standard EN 81-58: 2003 in support of the Lifts Directive, specifies a test method for determining the fire resistance of lift landing doors. It follows the general principles described in standards developed by CEN/TC 127. Additionally, it specifies a method for testing the integrity of lift landing doors intended to provide a fire barrier to the spread of a fire from the landing to the floors above through the lift shaft and includes a classification for lift landing doors that is identical to the classification specified in standard EN 13501-2. For the conformity assessment procedures the following shall be considered: General Application of standards, including the EN 81-58, is voluntary. However, since the reference of EN 81-58 has been published in the OJEU (OJ C 36, 10.2.2004) as harmonized standard in relation with the lift Directive 95/16/EC, application of that standard confers a presumption of conformity with the essential requirement 4.2 of the Lifts Directive. Organisation to carry out the fire resistance test The test method described in EN 81-58 requires sophisticated test equipment and expertise, which, today, is only available in very few test laboratories. All of these test laboratories are approved bodies under the Construction Products Directive 89/106/EEC. A manufacturer which is certified under annex IX or XIII of the Lifts Directive and which is providing the same equipment and expertise can also carry out these tests. In this case the notified body auditing the annex IX or XIII system has to check the testing equipment and the capability of the manufacturer.
NB-LIFT
Certification According to EN 81-58 the specification of the door, the evaluation and the results of the test, etc. are described in details in a test report. As a summary a type examination certificate similar to that in EN 81-1/2 annex F.0.2 can be issued by the test laboratory or manufacturer which includes the name of the test laboratory, the type(s) of door(s), the certification number, the name and address of the manufacturer, the references of the test method standard, the class of the door, the field of application, etc. This certificate is clearly not an EC type examination certificate. It is of normal practice, to avoid endless series of tests, that not every variation within a door family is submitted to a specific test, where experience can confirm that no significant negative influence for the fire resistance has to be expected. In this case, the certificate will be an overall certificate for a door family including all above mentioned information. Marking of the door The door shall be fitted with a data plate with information about the manufacturer, the type of door, the certification number, the references of the test method standard, the class of the door and other relevant information. Since lift landing doors including their fire resistance are not mentioned in the list of safety components in Annex IV of the Lifts Directive they cannot be CE marked under the Lifts Directive. Production control A production control for fire-rated lift landing doors is not required under the Lifts Directive. Due to the fact that it is quite impossible to check the compliance of an installed door with the type approved sample during a final inspection of a lift a production control should be established similar to the procedures given in Annex VIII, IX or XI. . Classification EN 81-58 contains a classification system identical to the classification system for other construction products (according to EN 13501-2). The classification system covers the test criteria (integrity E, insulation I, radiation W) and the duration of the test. Each member state has to select and determine a class of door, which suits to their national fire protection concepts in buildings. During the conformity assessment procedures it has to be checked that the lift landing doors comply with the required door class of the member state and for the building in which they are installed. Use of existing certificates according to national regulations Up to now lift landing doors have been tested and certified according to existing national regulations. Most member states will select a door class according to EN 81-58 which ensures a comparable safety level as their existing national regulations. In these cases the Member State considers that lift landing doors are certified according to the former national regulations satisfy EHSR 4.2 of the Lifts Directive and therefore do not necessarily need retesting to EN 81-58 for the time being. In these cases the National Standard shall not be used as a substitute to EN 81-58 when exporting doors to other Member States. History: Prepared by NB-L/AH -WG CW on base of an order of NB-L/HC; consideration in 12th NB-L/HC th meeting; decided on 03-11-13 by 13 NB-L/HC; adopted by Stg LC on 04-09-08, modified on 04-11-17 by th th th 15 NB-L/HC; proposed amendment 2 at the 18 NB-L/HC and accepted after some amendments at the 18 NB-L/HC According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
NB-LIFT

Keywords:? Emergency operation; Manual / Electrical / 400N Proposed by NB-L on 22-11-2005, Decided by NB-L/HC on 23-05-2006, Modified by NB-L/HC on XX-XX-XX StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07-04-23 by OP done on prEN/EN: 81-1 :1998/A2 :2004 Clause: 12.5.1
Related to Directive: 95/16/EC Annex: I, Clause: 1.1; 4.4; 6.2 Annex: V; X; XIII Question:
Related to Directive 98/37/EC Annex I, Clause: 1.1.2; 1.5.4; 1.7.4
Is it correct that, although the effort required to move the car in the upward direction with its rated load does not exceed 400N, the machine is NOT provided with a manual means of emergency operation. To be able to perform emergency operation an electrical means is fitted allowing the car to be moved to a landing.
Answer: No, if the effort to move the car does not exceed 400N a manual means of emergency operation shall be provided. If manual means arent applied it is regarded as deviation to harmonized standard and shall be subject of design approval according the relevant Annex (V, X or XIII). If the machine is not accessible the emergency rescue operation described in clause 14.2.1.4 of EN 81-1 may not be sufficient to guarantee a safe rescue operation in all circumstances: in those cases additional means shall be used and evaluated by a proper risk assessment.
History: th th Prepared by NB-L/AH -FI; consideration in 16 NB-L/HC meeting; decided on 23-05-2006 by 17 NB-L/HC According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-2-019-EN
NB-LIFT

Keywords: Impact risks Proposed by NB-L on 23-05-2006, Decided by NB-L/HC on 23-05-2006 Modified by NB-L/HC on XX-XX-XX StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07-04-23 by OP done on EN: 81 : Part 1
Related to Directive: 95/16/EC No reference
Related to Directive 98/37/EC
Annex I, Clause: 1.1.2; 1.6.2; Clause: 5.7.1.1 1.6.4 Pre-amble: Some designs of electric traction machine roomless lifts place the winding unit and/or its supporting cradle above the travelling area of the lift car or its sling assembly. When the lift car is at its extreme of travel as described within clause 5.7.1.1 of EN81: Part 1 there may be a risk of the car or sling striking the winding unit or its support. EN81:Part 1 does not specifically address the risk of impact between the lift car and a fixed object in the lift well. However clause 0.1.2.1 (d) recognises risks due to impact and 0.1.2.3 (d) requires components of the lift to be safeguarded. Also impact may create a risk to users of the lift. Question: In the absence of any other guidance shall we assume that the requirements of clause 5.7.1.1 (c) (2) apply as a minimum requirement? This measurement to remain even if the crushing and shearing risk to persons on car roof is prevented by guarding fitted to the lift car top?
Answer: Yes, the minimum distance of 0.1 + 0.035v2 shall apply between the lift car and/or sling and any fixed object in the lift well when the lift is at the extreme of its travel. All other areas on the lift car roof where an engineer may stand shall remain subject to the requirements of EN81: Part 1: Clause 5.7.1.1
History: Prepared by NB-L/AH -WG WC on base of an order of NB-L/HC; consideration in 17th NB-L/HC meeting; decided on 23/05/2006 by 17th NB-L/HC According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-2-020V01-EN-FREE SPACES.DOC
NB-LIFT

Keywords: Alarm device two way communication system Proposed by NB-L on 06,11,21, Decided by NB-L/HC on 06,11,21 Modified by NB-L/HC on XX-XX-XX StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07-04-23 by OP done on EN: 81-28 Clause 4.5 Clause: ====
Related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: Question: Annex I
According to the Essential Requirements of the Lift Directive, lifts shall be connected to a rescue service by a two way communication system. In some cases several lifts are installed inside the same building. Is it possible to connect several lifts to a rescue service by only one telephone line ?
Answer: The connection between the lift and the rescue service is covered by requirements listed in the Lift Directive and in the Standard EN81-28 as follows: Lift Directive 95/16/CE E.S.R. 4.5: Cars must be fitted with two-way means of communication allowing permanent contact with a rescue service. Standard EN 81-28: many clauses refer to this aspect (e.g. 4.1.6; B2; necessity for the rescue service to understand the number of the lift from which the alarm is coming). In conclusion, where multiple lifts are connected to one transmitter, the alarm shall be able to operate from each lift, the communication between the rescue service and the car shall be able to operate on each lift and the alarm system from one lift shall not prevent the alarm system from the other lifts to operate at the same time. Vocal communication between the rescue service and the lift might not take place simultaneously. Where several lifts are connected to a single telephone line a risk assessment may be necessary to verify the effectiveness of the measures adopted.
History: Prepared by NB-L/AH WG CW on base of an order of NB-L/HC; modified and adopted in 18th NB L/HC meeting According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-2-021V01-EN-ALARM DEVICE - TWO WAY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM.doc
NB-LIFT
NB-L/REC 02/025 version: 04 date: 15.02.2010

Keywords: Electric appliance, machine-room, temperature limit-exceeding Proposed by NB-L on 08-05-20, Decided by NB-L/HC on 09-05-20, Modified by NB-L/HC on 09-11-03 StC: to be approved done on 2010-02-10 by WP done on by OP prEN/EN: EN 81-1/2:1998 Clause: 13.3.6 of EN 81-1, 13.3.5 of EN 81-2
Related to Directive: 95/16/EC Annex: Question: , Clause:
Related to Directive 98/37/EC Annex , Clause:
EN 81-1:1998, clause 13.3.6 and EN 81-2:1998, clause 13.3.5 states that, when the temperature of an electric appliance with temperature monitoring exceeds the set limit, the car shall stop at a floor and shall not execute any new car command or outside call. What conditions shall be fulfilled in order to prevent the users from being trapped if a sprinkler has been fit in the machine-room Answer: If a sprinkler has been fit in the machine-room, the following considerations shall be made in order to fulfil EN 81-1:1998, clause 13.3.6 and EN 81-2:1998, clause 13.3.5, EN 81-1:1998, clause 13.3.6 and EN 81-2:1998, clause 13.3.5 states that, when the temperature of an electric appliance with temperature monitoring exceeds the set limit, the car shall stop at a floor and shall not execute any new car command or outside call. This clause does not state at which floor the car should stop. In practice it will be the nearest floor. When the sprinkler is activated the installation shall automatically be cut off from the electric power by the main switch after the car has stopped at a floor with open doors.(Lift shall be cut from electric power before sprinkle is activated) As the fire department and insurance company may request a sprinkler in the machine room, damage caused by water is considered to be an insurance liability. The existence of a sprinkler installation causes an increased possibility of a car stopping with open doors and being shut off. This causes an increased possibility of fire transfer. This situation is unacceptable when the shaft doors are supposed to contribute to the fire-resistance of the building. EN81-73:2004, clause 5.3 states that the car after receiving an alarm signal should be sent to a preordained floor or to one of the preordained floors. EN81-73:2004, clause 5.4.2 provides for the possibility of more than one preordained floor in specific complicated situations. If a lift installation meets the requirements of EN81-73 it may be assumed that passengers will not be sent to a floor on fire and that there will be no fire transfer caused by open car doors. (some countries have requirements in national building regulations providing for closing the lift landing door (before the lift is switched off)
Finding: The lift installation is to be designed and built as follows: 1. The sprinkler head a. is to be fitted to an end piece of the water pipe, while the water pipe in the machine room shall not have any taps to any other room. b. will not be fitted above any electrical device. 2. The sprinkler head shall be properly protected against any accidental bumping by means of a protective mesh.
The sprinkler shall operate at a high operating temperature (minimal 93OC) and be operationally reliable for a long time. 4. A temperature switch shall be placed immediately next to the sprinkler contact, disconnecting the lift installation in a way as described in EN81-73, clauses 5.3.1 through 5.3.5 and 5.4, with the car being sent to a preordained floor or one of the preordained floors. This shall be done at a temperature which is at least 20 degrees below the operating temperature of the sprinkler. 5. The temperature switch mentioned above shall be sealed to prevent any changes to its tuning. 6. The main switch of the lift installation shall be executed as an automatic switch as pursuant to EN 81-1/2:1998 clause 13.4.2. 7. The main switch shall be disconnected automatically by a sprinkler contact (or any other signal from the sprinkler installation) after the car has stopped at a floor with open doors. To guarantee this a door-open-contact shall be integrated in the electrical circuit. 8. In accordance with EN81-72 (fire lifts) clause 5.3.1 and 5.11.2 all components of the electrical installation shall be protected against dripping and splashing water or be provided with a casing classified as IPX3 in accordance with EN60529:1991. 9. The user manual shall stipulate that inspection activities of the sprinkler installation shall only be executed in the presence of a lift expert, e.g. a maintenance engineer employed by the organisation which is contracted to maintain the lift installation. The user manual shall indicate the following risks: a. trapping b. creeping of the lift car c. moving components d. electrocution e. slipping f. overflowing of the oil reservoir 10. A warning shall be affixed to the door of the machine room, indicating that inspection activities of the sprinkler installation shall only be executed in the presence of a lift expert, e.g. a maintenance engineer employed by the organisation which is contracted to maintain the lift installation. This warning shall also mention that maintenance activities can be hazardous to both maintenance personnel and lift passengers. 11. To prevent the danger of electrocution a warning shall be affixed to the control cabinet indicating that the main switch shall be first disconnected if there is a possible presence of any moisture. 3. History: Prepared by Mr. Tegel (NB 0400) on base of an order of NB-L/HC received at the 20th NB-L/HC meeting held on 20-21 November 2007, discussed and approved at the 23rd NB-L/HC meeting; discussed again and approved at the 24th NB-L/HC meeting According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-2-025V04 SPRINKLER IN MACHINE ROOM
NB-LIFT

Keywords: CAP, NB, Lift, Annex XIII, Assessment Proposed by NB-L on 98-11-12, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-05-09, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 00.-12-31 done on by OP prEN/EN: Clause: Clause:
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: Question: Annex: XIII
What are the basic considerations a NB has to observe, when assessing an Annex XIII system for lifts?
Answer: Annex XIII, 2 states that the system shall contain the following activities: Design, manufacture, assembly, installation and final inspection of a lift. The applicant has to demonstrate that he has the competence to fulfil these activities. Competence means the capability of specifying and verifying the activities in detail, but not necessarily actually performing them always. In any case he remains fully responsible. In detail that is: Design means, that the applicant is able to perform a risk analysis define at least the configuration of (a) lift(s) to be installed, check whether these specifications are met or not and detect deviations from requirements of harmonised standards. Note: ability of risk analysis is essential (see LD, Annex I 3rd preliminary note). An applicant not having this ability is regarded as not being capable to design a lift in conformity with the LD. the ability to specify the lift design does not exclude the possibility to purchase components. A machine can be bought. One must be able to select the right type, fit for the purpose. This means for instance that knowledge about the applicability must as well be present, as knowledge about traction, possible combinations of ropes and sheaves, wrap angle, undercut, etc. design is defined as a) set of instructions (specifications, drawings, schedules, etc.) necessary to construct an artefact or service b) artefact or service itself. continued on page 2
History: prepared by NB-L/AH-QM on base of an order of NB-L/HC; approved by NB-L/HC on 00-05-09, adopted by StC, editorially amended to new format of REC According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-3-001-V04-EN-basic considerations on Annex XIII.DOC
Production includes manufacture and assembly. In case of internal production clear specifications are needed on production procedures inclusive the controls during and after the production. In case of external production clear specifications are needed about the subcontractors control. Installation requires, that the applicant is able to specify the installation activities, install and check, whether the installation activities are performed correctly. In case of outsourced installation clear specifications are needed about the subcontractors control. The necessary means to carry out installation safely as well as working conditions during installation activities have to be taken into consideration. Final Inspection means, that the applicant has the ability to specify the inspection activities, perform the inspection with competent persons document the final inspection and assess the results of the final inspection. The final inspection shall be carried out by (a) person(s), where the conflict of interests between design, manufacturing, assembling, installation and final inspection cannot occur. Design inspection needs to be addressed regarding the handling in case of deviation(s) from harmonised standard(s) taking into account the two possibilities general deviation (intended to be realised on more than one installation) and specific deviation (necessary on a single lift due to situation on site) The application has to be made to the NB having approved the Annex XIII system. The system requires procedures allowing the supervision of the system from design to final inspection.
NB-LIFT

Keywords: CAP, NB, Safety component, Annex IX, Assessment Proposed by NB-L on 98-11-12, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-05-09, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 00-12-31 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause:
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: Question: Annex: IX Clause:
What are the basic considerations a NB has to observe, when assessing an Annex IX system for safety components?
Answer: Annex IX, 2 states that the system shall contain the following activities: Design, manufacture, and final inspection of a safety component. The applicant has to demonstrate that he has the competence to fulfil these activities. Competence means the capability of specifying and verifying the activities in detail, but not necessarily actually performing them always. In any case he remains fully responsible. In detail that is: Design means, that the applicant is able to perform a risk analysis specify the design of a safety component, test whether these specifications are met or not Note: ability of risk analysis is essential (see LD, Annex I 3rd preliminary note). An applicant not having this ability is regarded as not being capable to design a safety component in conformity with the LD. the ability to specify the design of a safety component does not exclude the design is defined as a) Set of instructions (specifications, drawings, schedules, etc.) necessary to construct an artefact or service. b) Artefact or service itself. test includes to a) define the test methods b) define the necessary test equipment c) assess the results of the tests. continued on page 2 History: prepared by NB-L/AH-QM on base of an order of NB-L/HC; approved by NB-L/HC on 00-05-09, adopted by StC, editorially amended to new format of REC According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-3-002-V05-EN-BASIC CONSIDERATIONS ON ANNEX IX.DOC
possibility to purchase parts of the component.
Manufacture incorporates the specification of

-
production procedures, including subcontractors control, production control, including the frequency of checks, assessment of the results of production control,
Final inspection of safety component is regarded as part of the manufacturing process and is normally carried out at the end of the process. The following is necessary: - a clear specification of the contents of the inspection, including frequency. - a clear description on the assessment of the inspections.
Random testing of produced components is a method of back up checking of measures taken during manufacturing and final inspections. The following is necessary: - Specification of procedures, periodicity, responsibilities, etc. - Description of assessment of results Depending on the range and intensity of the final inspections, the random testing can be regarded as part of the final inspection.
Instructions to be submitted to the installer of a lift shall at least include a) documents in equivalence with EC-type examination certificate b) instructions for installation, adjustment, maintenance, storage, etc. as appropriate c) declaration of conformity The system requires procedures allowing the supervision of the system from design to final inspection.
NB-LIFT

Keywords: CAP, Annex XIII, Lift Proposed by NB-L on 98-11-12, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-01-19, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 00-12-31 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause: Clause:
An installer operating an approved Annex XIII system, is he allowed to use CAP according to art. 8 (2) i, ii or iii?
Answer: Yes, because an Annex XIII system incorporates all activities mentioned in Annex XII or XIV. The equivalent to Annexes XII or XIV is possible if a type certified lift/model lift or a lift designed in accordance with a lift for which a system pursuant Annex XIII was implemented, has been installed without design modification.
History: Prepared by NB-L/AH-QM on base of an order of NB-L/HC, decided in 6th NB-L/HC meeting, adopted by StC, editorially amended to new format of REC According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-3-003-V03-EN-Annex XIII within Article 8 (2) i, ii and iii.DOC
NB-LIFT

Keywords: CAP, NB, Systems, Proposed by NB-L on 98-11-12, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-01-19, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 00-12-31 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause: Clause:
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: Question: Annex: IX, XIII and others
Which limitations of the approval of systems according to Annexes VIII, IX, XII, XIII and XIV are possible?
Answer: Only product related limitations are possible. The limitation can be based on the application or on findings of the notified body. "Product related" means limitation to a certain technology a) in case of safety components e. g. door locking devices, energy dissipation type buffers, etc. b) in case of lifts e. g. traction drive lifts, hydraulic lifts, etc. or in case of Annex XIII systems limitations related to the competence of design, e. g.
-
planning of lift installations in a building plus design of parts and components of lifts plus selection of parts and/or components from catalogs, design of parts and components of lifts plus selection of parts and/or components from catalogs selection of parts and/or components from catalogs.
See also REC 0/003 and 3/005 History: Prepared by NB-L/HC-QM on base of an order of NB-L/HC; considerations in 5th meeting of NB-L/HC; modification by NB-L/AH-QM; approved by NB-L/HC on 00-05-09,adopted by StC, editorially amended to new format of REC, According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-3-004-V04-EN-limitations of approval of systems.DOC

NB-LIFT

Keywords: CAP, NB, Systems, Certificate, Content of certificate Proposed by NB-L on 98-12-11, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-05-09, Modified by NB-L/HC on 01-07-04 StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07-04-23 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause:
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: Question: Annex: IX, XIII and others Clause:
What shall be the content of a certificate showing the approval of a system according to Annexes VIII, IX, XII, XIII and XIV by a Notified Body?
Answer: The following minimum information shall be given in the certificate of approval preferably in the given order: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Name and EC-identification number of the NB Name and address of the holder of the certificate Certificate issued on the basis of Directive 95/16/EC (lifts) Annex ............ Certification Number Scope of approval Relation to assessment report Any additional information Place, date, signature and name printed
In case of an Annex XIII certificate it shall be stated under "any additional information" that this system in its range of validity can also be used in the conformity assessment procedures according to Art. 8 (2) i, ii and iii.
History: Prepared by NB-L/HC-QM on base of an order of NB-L/HC; ; consideration in 6th NB-L/HC meeting; modified by NB-L/AH-QM; decided on 00-05-09 by NB-L/HC, modified according to comments of StC, editorially amended to new format of REC, According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-3-005-V05-EN-content of certificate of approval of systems.DOC

NB-LIFT

Keywords: Proposed by NB-L on 98-12-11, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-05-09, Modified by NB-L/HC on 01-07-05 StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07-04-23 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause: 3.3 Clause:
CAP; NB; Systems ; Design inspection
When design inspections are necessary?
Answer: A design inspection is necessary - for deviations from aspects dealt with in harmonised standards, e. g. driving system, free spaces beyond the extreme positions of the car, etc. Those deviations may be needed for further installations due to technical progress or innovation or may be necessary in a specific case. - if the design is based on additional aspects for a lift affecting the safe use of the installation, but not yet dealt with in an harmonised standard, e. g. accessibility for handicapped persons, explosive atmosphere, fire, vandal resistance, etc The disign inspection is not only necessary for the parts/components deveating from the provisions of harmonised standards but also for parts being able to be influenced in their safety function by the deviations. The design inspection may be not only a check of documentation but can also include examinations and/<or tests on site. This REC will be altered with the progress of publication of harmonised standards in the filed of LD.
History: Prepared by NB-L/AH-QM on base of an order of NB-L/HC; consideration in the 6 NB-L/HC meeting; modified by NB-L/AH-QM; approved by NB-L/HC in its 7th meeting; refused by StC on 00-11-20; modified by NB-L/AH-QM; decided by NB-L/HC in its 9th meeting According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-3-006-V06-EN-necessity of design inspection.DOC
th
NB-LIFT

Keywords: CAP, NB, Systems, Modification Proposed by NB-L on 98-11-12, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-01-19, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 00-12-31 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause: Clause:
How to handle modifications of an Annex XIII system?
Answer: Within the handbook of an Annex XIII system there has to be a part describing the handling of modifications of the approved system. This description is containing the conclusion between the applicant and the approving NB about those modifications of which the NB needs to be informed and which of them need to be approved by the NB. By the way of the audits according to clause 4.3 or the unexpected visits laid down in clause 4.4 the NB is able to assure, that such a conclusion is not leading to misuse.
History: Prepared by NB-L/HC-QM on base of an order of NB-L/HC, decided in 6th NB-L/HC meeting, adopted by StC, editorially amended to new format of REC, According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-3-007-V03-EN-handling of modifications of Annex XIII.DOC

NB-LIFT

Keywords: CAP, NB, Systems Proposed by NB-L on 01-01-17, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-05-09, Modified by NB-L/HC on 01-07-04 StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07-04-23 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause: Clause:
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: 8 (2) Question: Annex: XII, XIII,XIV
The wording of Art. 8 (2) in combination with Annexes XII and XIV leads to the following questions: a) b) What is the difference between Art. 8 (2) iii and v? Which modifications are possible in the design of a lift within Art. 8 (2) iii-procedure?
Answer: To a)
The conformity assessment procedures (CAP) for lifts are described in Article 8 (2). The annexes referred to in this article are giving additional provisions. In case of different wording between Art. 8 (2) and the annexes, Article 8 contains the leading wording. Together with i and ii in Art. 8 (2), iii describes the possibility to carry out the CAP in two steps, where in the first step the compliance with a reference lift is proved, and in the second one the compliance of an installed lift with the reference lift is validated. In this CAP different organisations can be involved. Together with iv in Art. 8 (2), v describes the CAP as a single step procedure, where only one organisation is involved.
To b)
Within Art. 8 (2) iii procedure, modifications not being in compliance with the reference lift are not allowed. For carrying out the final inspection in this case the following is needed: technical documentation in accordance with Annex VI and in addition in case of Art. 8 (2) iii, a copy of the certificate of approval for the Annex XIII system and a description of the design, comparable with that of Art. 8 (2) i, or in case of Art. 8 (2) i and ii, a copy of the type examination of a lift/ model lift
History: Prepared by NB-L/AH-QM on base of an order of NB-L/HC; consideration in the 6th NB-L/HC meeting; modified by NB-L/AH-QM; decided by NB-L/HC on 00-05-09; not approved by StC; reconsidered by NB-L/AH-QM; decided by NB-L/HC in its 9th meeting, editorially amended to new format of REC According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-3-008-V07-EN-differences between Article 8 (2) iii and v,etc.DOC

NB-LIFT

Keywords: CAP, NB, Systems, Certificate, Design inspection, Content of certificate Proposed by NB-L on 98-11-12, Decided by NB-L/HC on 00-05-09, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved by WP X done on 07-04-23 by OP done on prEN/EN: Clause:
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: 8 (2) Question: Annex: XIII Clause:
What shall be the content of the EC-Design Inspection Certificate?
Answer: The following minimum information shall be given in the EC-Design Inspection Certificate preferably in the given order: 1. 2. 3. 4. Name and EC-identification number of the NB Name and address of the holder of the certificate Certification Number Scope of approval 4.1 Description of the deviation from harmonised standard 4.2 Description of the alternative solution 5. Conditions of approval 6. Environmental conditions 7. Relation to assessment report 8. Tests and examinations to be carried out on site 9. Any additional information 10. Place, date, signature and name printed. Notes: 1) The description of the deviation from harmonised standard may consist of the relevant clause(s) of the standard(s) concerned. 2) The description of the alternative solution shall consist at least of an detailed explanation of the function, drawings showing the essential details of the solution and the connection(s) to the other part(s) of the lift, electric/hydraulic schemes showing the connections to the electric/hydraulic diagram(s). 3) The description of the test(s) and examination to be carried out on site may be part of the instruction manual. History: Proposal of NB-L/AH-FI; decided in 7th meeting of NB-L/HC, commented by StC, modified by NB-L, th editorially amended to new format of REC, amended in the 11 meeting of NB-L (11.02) According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration
DN: L-REC-3-009-V04-EN-CONTENT OF DESIGN INSPECTION CERTIFICATE.rtf
NB-LIFT
NB-L/REC 3/010 version 02 date 30-01-2008

Keywords: Annex XI, random check, module c, safety components, verification, conformity to type Proposed by NB-L on 2007-11-21, Decided by NB-L/HC on 2007-11-21, Modified by NB-L/HC on StC: to be approved done on by WP done on by OP prEN/EN: Clause:
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: -, Question: Annex: XI, Clause: -
What has to be verified during a random check according to Annex XI?
Answer
The procedures and the tasks are described in the amended document: Guideline for checking the conformity of a safety component with the safety component described in the EC type certificate by random checking according to Annex XI (module C) of Directive 95/16/EC dated 29 June 1995, Revision October 2007 (Doc. No. NB-L/2007-26(2))
History: presented and approved at the 20th NB-L/HC meeting.

NB-LIFT

Keywords: CAP, final inspection, subcontracting Proposed by AH-QM on 2009-05-12, Decided by NB-L/HC on 20-05-2009 Modified by NB-L/HC on 2009-11-03 StC: to be approved done on 2010-02-10 by WP done on by OP prEN/EN: Clause:
related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: 8 (2) Question: Annex: XII, XIII, XIV Clause:
Is it allowed for an installer to subcontract the whole or part of the final inspection of an installed lift?
Answer:
Subcontracting the whole or a part of the final inspection of an installed lift under Annex XII, XIII and XIV is possible, but the installer is responsible for the total process of final inspection. Installer shall have proper procedure regarding requirements including reliability, competence and independence of subcontractor. Installer shall provide proper instructions and clearly define the work to be carried out. Installer shall assess the work carried out by the subcontractor. The notified body assessing the quality system shall check that this procedure has been implemented and followed.
History: matter discussed and approved in the 23rd meeting of NB-L/HC, discussed again and approved at the 24th NBL/HC meeting
According to the "Rules of Procedure", clause 2.7, it is expected that Notified Bodies take recommendations into consideration

Nb-Lifts Rfus en

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nb-Lifts Rfus en

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nb-Lifts Rfus en

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are the main topics covered in the document?

What are the main topics covered in the document?

What is the purpose of the NB-L/REC recommendations?

What is the purpose of the NB-L/REC recommendations?

NB-LIFTS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR USE SHEETS (RfUs) CONSIDERED AS APPROVED STATUS ON FEBRUARY 2010

Number NB-L/REC (1) 0

Decision Horizontal Committee of NB-L (2) 23/05/07 21/11/07

Approved StC Lifts by WP/OP (3) 10/10/07 28/04/08

19/01/00 05/06/00 19/01/00 19/01/00

13/09/07 13/09/07 31/12/00 31/12/00

13/11/03 13/11/03 23/05/07 21/11/03 23/05/06 23/05/06

page 1 of 1 of NB-L/REC 0/004

NB-L CO-ORDINATION OF NOTIFIED BODIES LIFTS DIRECTIVE 95/16/EC

NB-L/REC 0/004 version: 05 date: 15-04-2008

NB-L RECOMMENDATION FOR USE

related to Directive: 95/16/EC Article: 8 (2) Question: Annex: Clause:

EXAMINATIONS AND TESTS

IDENTIFICATION OF THIS REPORT

DOC NB-L/013/2000, version 07.2007

Identification of this Report:

This Test Report is composed by 31 pages and the following Annexes:

Identification of this Report:

Identification of this Report:

Identification of this Report:

Lift Installer Details Responsible For Design Name: Address:

Lift Installer Details Name: Address:

Notified Body No. (where applicable)

Notified Body No. (where applicable)

Notified Body Carrying Out Inspection Name: Address:

Location of Installed Lift Name: Address:

Notified Body No. (where applicable)

Identification of this Report:

1 Description of the Lift Installation

Identification of this Report:

1 Description of the Lift Installation (continued)

min Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No

Identification of this Report:

2.0 Machine and Pulley Spaces

Lux Rating Yes No

Manufacturer Type Specified Yes No

2.7 Controller Type Confirm that the correct controller is supplied

Manufacturer Type Specified Yes No

Identification of this Report:

2.0 Machine and Pulley Room (continued)

Identification of this Report:

3.0 The Well

Identification of this Report:

3.0 The Well (continued)

Identification of this Report:

3.0 The Well (continued)

Identification of this Report:

3.0 The Well (continued)

3.4 Protection in the well

3.0 The Well (continued)

Identification of this Report:

3.5 Landing Door Assemblies

Makers Type Rating Yes No No min

Identification of this Report:

3.0 The Well (continued)