May10 Beacon (Modified)
May10 Beacon (Modified)
May10 Beacon (Modified)
continued from page 1 mark the conclusion of the present dispensation of grace (also known as the church age or the dispensation of the Spirit). That believers will be spared from Gods wrath poured out during the Tribulation is made clear by the Apostle Paul when he commends the Thessalonian Christians at the beginning of his letter: For they themselves report about us what kind of a reception we had with you, and how you turned to God from idols to serve a living and true God, and to wait for His Son from heaven, whom He raised from the dead, that is Jesus, who rescues us from the wrath to come (1 Thess 1:9-10). Turning to Revelation, the message to the church in Philadelphia also promises the pretribulational coming of Christ to claim His church out of the world: Because you have kept the word of My perseverance, I also will keep you from the hour of testing, that hour which is about to come upon the whole world, to test those who dwell on the earth (Rev 3:10). Third, both passages affirm the promise of Jesus return, and that we can rest upon the authority of His Word. Jesus spoke, In my Fathers house are many dwelling places; if it were not so, I would have told you; for I go to prepare a place for you. If I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again (vv. 2-3). Paul reminds the Thessalonians that this we say to you by the word of the Lord (v. 15)this is not merely one mans fanciful speculation and then declares that the Lord Himself will descend from heaven (v. 16). Moreover, we discover that there will be an extraordinary removal of Christians from the earth. Paul writes, Then we who are alive and remain will be caught up together with [believers who died prior to Christs return] in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air (v. 17). Note the use of the first person plural pronoun we by the Apostle, reflecting his personal conviction of the imminency of the Lords return. According to Revelation 5:9, those who are raptured from the earth will include men from every tribe and tongue and people and nation who were purchased for God with the blood of the Lamb. We find in the Old Testament an illustration of this remarkable translation from the earth that is promised for believers. In Genesis 5, we find a man named Enoch; a man who walked with God for 365 years. To us that seems like a tremendous lifespan, but compared to the other men listed in Genesis 5 it is rather short. The first man, Adam, lived for 930 years; Adams son, Seth, lived for 912 years; and Jared, Enochs father, lived for 962 years. However, three words that appear eight times in that chapter are conspicuously absent from the description of Enoch. Those three missing words are and he died. In Genesis 5:24, we learn that something entirely different happened to Enoch: Enoch walked with God; and he was not, for God took him. The manner of Enochs departure is elaborated upon in Hebrews 11:5-6: By faith Enoch was taken up so that he would not see death; AND HE WAS NOT FOUND BECAUSE GOD TOOK HIM UP; for he obtained the witness that before his being taken up he was pleasing to God. And without faith it is impossible to please Him. Finally, both the Lord Jesus and the Apostle Paul make the exhilarating promise that all of the believers from this age who are ushered into the presence of Christ at the Rapture can look forward to spending an eternity with Him. Jesus promised, I will come again and receive you to Myself, that where I am, there you may be also (v. 3). After explaining to the Thessalonians the meeting with the Lord Jesus that will occur in the clouds, Paul writes: and so we shall always be with the Lord (v. 17). This will include reigning with Christ in His future Kingdom (2 Tim 2:12). How are we to live given the reality of our Lords imminent return? The Apostle Paul offered this prayer at the beginning of his letter to the Philippians: And this I pray, that your love may abound still more and more in real knowledge and all discernment, so that you may approve of the things that are excellent, in order to be sincere and blameless until the day of Christ (Phil 1:9-10). The Lords soon return should motivate our sanctification. Sanctification is the ongoing process in which those of us who have received Jesus as Savior and Lord and have been indwelt by the Holy Spirit become increasingly free from sin and increasingly more like Christ. In his first letter, the Apostle John states that unless we abide in Christ, we risk being ashamed at His appearing: Now, little children, abide in Him, so that when He appears, we may have confidence and not shrink away from Him in shame at His coming (1 Jn 2:28). Three verses later, he explains that all who truly hope in the Lords coming will seek to live purely in this world: Beloved, now we are children of God, and it has not appeared as yet what we will be. We know that when He appears, we will be like Him, because we will see Him just as He is. And everyone who has this hope fixed on Him purifies himself, just as He is pure (1 Jn 3:2-3). Although Scripture teaches that Jesus return is imminentwhich means He may come at any momentwe must recognize that it will not necessarily be immediate. The church, which was born on the Day of Pentecost in the year A. D. 30, is almost 2,000 years old. While we are to live each day as if it just may be the day of our Lords glorious appearing, we must at the same time cultivate an attitude of patience as we endure the trials of this life. The virtue of patience is emphasized in the exhortation of James 5:7-8: Therefore be patient, brethren, until the coming of the Lord. The farmer waits for the precious produce of the soil, being patient about it, until it gets the early and late rains. You too be patient; strengthen your hearts, for the coming of the Lord is near. Peter Albrecht
still working at the age of 80 with his heavy equipment business. Reeva was the oldest of five children: Glenn Curley (1948), Jane Curley Eustis (1950), David Curley (1954), and Lynne Curley Borow (1955). Both of her parents were Christians but because of her fathers demanding work schedule with the NYPD, the family did not attend church until they moved to Delhi. Instead, her mother listened to several fundamentally sound preachers on the radio every Sunday morning. Her mother liked to play hymns on the piano, and as a result she taught Reeva to play hymns of faith. Reeva took piano lessons for 3 years. Reeva attended a Child Evangelism Fellowship summer program while in Richmond Hill, NY. It was at this time she came to know the Lord and was saved. When they moved to Delhi and began dairy farming they began attending a nondenominational church where her mother became the pianist. The death of her father at such a young age devastated Reeva, only 13 at the time, and it caused her to fall out of fellowship. She became painfully mad at God and held on to some of her dearest memories of her father; her favorite when he was finally able to spend Christmas with the family beginning in 1953 just a few years before his passing. Shortly afterward, a classmate invited Reeva back to church and within two years, Reeva rededicated her life to the Lord and was baptized by a pastor who would later perform her marriage ceremony. At the age of 14, Reeva began to recognize her ability to sing and joined the mixed chorus as a tenor as well as the girls chorus at the Delaware Academy and Cen-
continued from page 3 Pastor Milas, Pastor Hoover, Pastor Fritjofson, Pastor Moran, and now Pastor Glasshave made the Scriptures so very real to Reeva and left her most grateful for the continuity of her spiritual growth. Throughout Reevas life, music has played a prominent role. She has always sang in the choirs of the churches that she has attended. In 1994, when the music director retired from the church she was attending, she could not imagine a Christmas season without a choir. So Reeva volunteeredwithout any trainingand began leading the choir, playing the piano for the services and eventually she began playing the organ after the previous organist moved away. Reeva and her family began attending the WRBC in late spring of 2008. They have always known about the WRBC from its inception since many from the church they previously attended, including their son-in-law, became a part of the core membership of the WRBC. They were familiar with Pastor Glasss expository preaching style and found it quite natural to become a part of the WRBCs fellowship. Reeva is quite diversified and family oriented. Beyond her musical talents, we see her for her skills domestically such as knitting, crocheting, sewing, counted crossstitch embroidery and what she calls being an indifferent cook. She likes to garden and on occasion entertain friends in her home. She thoroughly enjoys the fellowship. To relax, she likes to take her basset hound, Gibbs, for a walkespecially in the warm weather. She has a bit of an addiction to jigsaw puzzles but they must be at least 1000 piecesyou know, the ones that are a little more difficult! She readily admits she likes to keep up with her email correspondence with friends that have moved away and on occasion indulges in a few computer games. Referring back to last months article in The Beacon on Vic Bellardthere is a connection between Vic and Reeva in the strong commitment they have jointly in providing for their families. The willingness on Reevas part to open their home to Vics mother between 1993 and 1997, and now as they share their home with their daughter and family, gives you an idea of her generous heart in making family members comfortable. To sum it all up, Reeva is a most caring, down-to-earth gal with a great sense of humor. She is strong to adversity and willingly will share yours as she carries another of her favorite Scriptures within her heart: There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it. (1 Cor 10:13, KJV). Joan Tyska
continued from page 4 tribulationism saturated the fundamental Baptist and many Pentecostal churches, Ernest Reisinger spread the teaching of Calvinism in the Southern Baptist Convention and its seminaries. By the 1990s, Reformed theology was thriving among younger evangelical pastors and the emerging generation of young evangelical scholars occupying faculty positions in Bible colleges, evangelical universities, and seminaries. Reformed theology was not monolithic. There were several threads of belief with regard to eschatology (the theology of last things). Those who held the Reformed position did agree on one thing, however: premillennial dispensationalism, with its teaching regarding a secret pretribulational rapture, was a heresy emerging out of nineteenth-century Darbyism and the slightly insane ministry of Edward Irving in England. But lets not forget, when John Calvin came to lecture and write on the Book of Revelation, he threw up his hands, admitting he didnt know what it meant! At least he was honest. So what were some of the other splinters? Second, there was Replacement Theology. This splinter was a new term for an old theology, what had heretofore been called amillennialism, which characterized the broader Reformed position known as Covenant Theology. This was the majority opinion among the Puritans and a form of it was also the historic position of the Roman Catholic Church. Amillennialism is the theology of the Lutherans, the Presbyterians, the Reformed Church, the Congregationalists, the Methodists, and some Pentecostals (and maybe a few Ive forgotten to mention). There will be no millennium, they say, because the Kingdom of God (if it exists at all) is now. Christ rules in the hearts of His people here on earth or He rules His saints in heaven. But forget any imminent rapture. Its not going to happen that way! Were looking for the end of the world, the second coming of Christ, and heaven. Period. Simple. End of story. Some evangelicals within the last decade cooked up this new name, Replacement Theology, meaning that Israels distinct biblical position as Gods covenant nation has been replaced by the Christian church. Third, there was a revived Postmillennialism. In fact, some of the Puritans were postmillennialists, believing that the churchs responsibility was to bring about the Kingdom of God through the conversion of the world and the social amelioration of society. In other words, world conditions would gradually improve (this was
actually theological Darwinism). Bring back the King, was their motto, and it became the watchword of the liberal Social Gospel. Although two world wars and the Great Depression almost finished this theology off, it experienced a revival among some late twentieth-century thinkers, blossoming in the movement known as Christian Reconstructionism (also called Theonomy). However, this movement, largely the brainchild of Rousas Rushdoony and his son-in-law, Gary North, isnt quite dead and buried yet. Theonomy said that the key to building this kingdom of righteousness is the imposition of biblical law as the civil law of the nations. It postulated that the coming of Christ could be literally millions of years in the future! As the twenty-first century dawned, this movement was dying right along with some of its primary apologists (who ironically passed away as young men). Fourth, there was Preterism. This position, which also is not new but which was held by very few evangelicals, has begun to grow in popularity. Probably most conspicuous among its advocates is Reformed apologist R. C. Sproul. Preterists believe prophecy is all past (what?), that the apocalyptic prophecies of Scripture (especially the Book of Revelation) were all fulfilled in the Roman invasion of Israel and destruction of Jerusalem in A. D. 70. The Tribulation is over and all were looking for is one last appearing of Christ, a final judgment, and eternal heaven. Finally, there is what we might call a new kind of eschatology. From lack of any other name, I appropriate this phrase from emerging church guru Brian McLarens most recent book, A New Kind of Christianity (2010). This is a largely amorphous, optimistic, and universalistic scheme that doesnt take the biblical text seriously at all. McLaren says that this new eschatology has no fixed end point, but a widening space opening into an infinitely expanding goodness. Thus, this is a hopeful alternative to the notion that in the end, everyone will be sorted into either the destruction/damnation or the redemption/salvation bin. Theres no burning destruction or eternal conscious torment, but healing, joy, resurrection, liberation, reconciliation, and salvation for everything and everybody. Were not looking for the end of the world, but only the end of the world as we know it. So the coming of Christ signals the appearance of a new generation of humanityGods presence being formed in all cultures. The last days were over in 70 CE, and at that point, the
new age came. Therefore, Christ has already come. You would think that this position would be ignored as one mans misguided, neo-liberal speculation, but because of McLarens influence among a huge number of young people via their emerging church leaders, he and the others who hold to this are making an impact. Diverse as they are, these views on biblical prophecy do have two things in common: (1) they refuse to interpret the prophetic texts of Scripture literally. Now thats bad, but even worse, (2) they hate the traditional, premillennial, dispensational, pretribulational understanding of the prophetic Scriptures. And hate is not too strong a word! They despise pretribulationism; they openly scorn dispensationalism (many dont hesitate to call it a heresy). They are most uncharitable and unchristian, and like the proponents of Darwinian evolution, global warming, and progressive socialism, they really do not like to discuss or debate the embarrassing specifics. But this is exactly what the Bible said would happen! Look again at this text from 2 Peter. Peter is urging his readers to remember what the prophets had written concerning the last days (3:1-2), and then says, Know this first of all. This is important, so pay attention. In the last days there will indeed be mockers who ridicule the notion of Christs second coming, claiming that since the days of the patriarchs, things havent really changed. But, says Peter, those who say this forget one very important event: the flood in the days of Noah (vv. 5-6). The Lord destroyed the earth then, but prior to that, there were apparently also mockers who ridiculed Noah during the 120 years he was building the ark. What the mockers dont realize is that the Lord is demonstrating His patience, not wishing for any [i. e., of you believers] to perish but for all to come to repentance (v. 9). Once the body of Christthe full number of His electhas been completed, then the Lord Jesus will return. Hence, in the words of the prophet Hosea (literally), His coming is as sure as the dawn (Hos 6:3). continued from page 5 In these days of increasing skepticism about the second coming of Christ, what should our attitude be? First, choose to believe the clear teaching of the Bible in the face of everyone who denies it or seeks to obscure or distort it. Second, in light of our Lords coming, keep the Apostle Peters question before you: what sort of people ought you to be in holy conduct and godlicontinued on page 6
continued from page 5 ness? (v. 11). Strive for consistent holiness in your life. And finally, like Noah, seek to warn your generation of the impending events of tribulation and judgment that will be set in motion by the rapture of the church, and urge them to flee from the wrath to come. So where is the promise of His coming? Right where its always been . . . in the Word of God, and that prophetic word is as certain as tomorrows sunrise! Maranatha! Pastor Ron Glass
Dariuss Dilemma
Among those who know the story of Daniel in the Lions Den, found in Daniel 6, very few would argue that Daniel was wrong in ignoring the statute that required him to pray to no one else except Darius. How often though is the question considered whether or not Darius was right to follow through with the order? I had posed this question previously in my article entitled, Against the Will of the People, which was published in the March 2010 issue of The Beacon. My guess is that some would think the question to be ridiculous and that Darius should have told the conspirators that if they didnt approve of him sparing Daniel, to go pound sand. At this point, Daniel proved to be extremely honorable to all he served and to have a clear understanding of law. Had Darius consulted Daniel on this dilemma, I speculate that Daniel would have told Darius to follow through and cast him into the lions den. Those of us who denounce the ends justify the means concept of law that seems to pervade societies today understand that victories attained through lawless means often make matters worse in the long run. The likely result had Darius spared Daniel of the consequences of his very public law would have been chaos in his kingdom. The 119 of his leaders being the schemers that they were would have undermined Darius in everything that he did because they could have told the people that their king could not be trusted. If Darius instead had done away with his scheming satraps, how could he be thought of as anything less than a tyrant and succeed in establishing trust with his new leadership? The only other way I see that the law could have been fulfilled would have been for Darius to declare that he was wrong in signing the law and to order Daniel to pray for him as he (Darius) let himself into the lions den. This would have been a huge step of faith. As it was, God honored Himself by delivering Daniel. God saw Dariuss remorse and blessed the kings reign. Carl Chapman
Then on Sunday, April 25, 2010, Liz Hyland led a group of young people in a craft project. Not much was revealed about the project as it was kept under a blanket of secrecy. But this is what we do know Mothers Day is just around the corner and judging by the materials at hand at that time, the assumption is that the young people were making special and unique Mothers Day gifts for their Moms. Joan Tyska
May 2010
Sunday
Monday Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
10
14
15
16 9:45 AM
Sunday School 11:00 AM Morning Worship Service
17
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 8:00 AM
Ladies Prayer 6:30 PM AWANA 7:00 PM Prayer Meeting and Exposition of Psalms
27
28
29
31
Our Purpose
1. To glorify God through sharing the good news of salvation by Gods sovereign grace through faith in His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ. 2. To nurture believers through a strong program of Christian education, youth ministries, and expository Biblical preaching. 3. To provide an opportunity for Biblical worship, service, and fellowship. 4. To extend our ministry throughout America and around the world through participation in home and foreign missions. WRBC is affiliated with the Conservative Baptist Association of America and the Conservative Baptist Mission to the Northeast.
For the Exaltation of God in All Things For the Proclamation of Faith in Christ For the Transformation of Gods People