Phillips Curve
Phillips Curve
1958 Professor A.W. Phillips expressed a statistical relationship between the rate of growth of money wages and unemployment from 1861 1957. A curve that shows the relationship between the inflation rate and the unemployment rate when the natural unemployment rate and the expected inflation rate remain constant. Rate of growth of money wages linked to inflationary pressure. Led to a theory expressing a trade-off between inflation and unemployment. A fall in unemployment may lead to an acceleration in wage inflation as the labour market tightens. Falling unemployment implies that: -- labour demand is rising --the pool of surplus labour available to employers is diminishing. -- a rising number of unfilled job vacancies emergence of labour shortages in some industries(particularly skilled labours). --increase in bargaining power of workers --a risk that strength of labour demand will lead to rise in wage claims and basic pay settlements.
AW Phillips (1958) looked at the unemployment rate and wage inflation rate for the UK over a 96 year period and noticed that there was a stable , inverse and non-linear relationship between the two. This implied that an economy trade off a lower level of unemployment, say , for a higher level of inflation.
Rationale for the relationship: In short run, there was an aggregate supply constraint which meant that an increase in AD might lead to inflation.
Reason for non-linearity: As unemployment falls, the threat of becoming unemployed falls so workers seek greater wage increase.
3.0%
1.5%
4%
6% PC2
PC1
Unemployment (%)
FREIDMANS CRITICISMS OF THE PHILLIPS CURVE Friedman in an address to the US economics association (1968) criticised the Phillips curve. Original Phillips relationship only held in short run In the long run there was no trade off between inflation and unemployment Position of the Phillips curve in the inflation , unemployment space was determined by peoples expectations of inflation. If the inflation rate was higher than the expected rate then the Phillips curve would shit upwards and vice versa. Thus the expectations augmented Phillips was born.
LONG-RUN ...
The long-run Phillips curve is a vertical line at the natural unemployment rate.
The AS-AD model provides an analogy to the negative relationship between unemployment and inflation along the short-run Phillips curve. The short-run Phillips curve is another way of looking at what lies behind the upwardsloping aggregate supply curve, but switching from price-level to rate of inflation. Both curves arise because the money wage rate is sticky in the short run.
4.0% 3.75% 2%
AD2
AD1
U = 4% U = 3%
Unemployment and Real GDP At full employment, the quantity of real GDP is potential GDP and the unemployment rate is the natural unemployment rate also known as NAIRU, which stands for Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment. If real GDP exceeds potential GDP, employment exceeds its full-employment level and the unemployment rate falls below the natural unemployment rate. With unemployment below NAIRU, inflation speeds up accelerates -- because the labor market is tight. If unemployment is above NAIRU, inflation tends to slow down decelerate because of slackness in the labor market.
Why Bother with the Phillips Curve? First, it focuses directly on two key real-world policy targets: the inflation rate and the unemployment rate. Second, the aggregate supply curve shifts whenever the money wage rate or potential GDP changes, and this suggests not-very-realistic changes in output and price level. More realistically, we argue that the short-run Phillips curve does not shift unless either the natural unemployment rate [NAIRU] or the expected inflation rate changes.
An increase in the natural unemployment rate shifts the two Phillips curves rightward to LRPC1 and SRPC1.