HT 305 B1 (B)
HT 305 B1 (B)
HT 305 B1 (B)
Theory
The tubes are coiled into helices in which inlet and outlet are conveniently located side by side.
To calculate experimentally, we use the relationship between hi and v0.8. Substituting this and the Seider Tate equation in the Overall heat transfer equation, we get:
The plot of 1/U vs 1/ v0.8 gives 1/ ho (k2) as intercept. Then, we get hi by subtracting the intercept from 1/U and reciprocating. The correlation describing the Nusselt no. for heat transfer to fluids in vessel with mechanical agitation heated or cooled by submerged coils is as follows:
Where, Dj = inside diameter of the agitated vessel [m] hc = coil side heat transfer coefficient [kcal/hr-m2-0C] L = agitator diameter [m] N = agitator speed [rev/sec] or rev/hr K = thermal conductivity of fluid in the vessel [Kcal/hr-m-OC] = viscosity of fluid in the vessel [kg/m-hr] w = viscosity of fluid in the vessel at coil wall temp. [kg/m-hr]
Experimental Setup:
Experimental Procedure:
Fill the given agitated vessel with the given test liquid to about 8590 % of its capacity and start the agitator motor Start the heaters in the agitated vessel and set the desired temperature (about 600C) on the thermostat. Throughout the given set of readings keep this temperature at this level.
Start the water motor pump. Adjust the flow rate of the water at the desired level by its speed regulator
After steady state is attained note down inlet and outlet temperatures of the cooling water. Also measure the flow rate of the cooling water
Take three readings of temperatures for each flow rate and keep the agitation speed constant.
Perform the same experiment by keeping the flowrate of water constant (at about 400 lph) and varying the rpm of the agitator
Calculation Procedure
Calculate the amount of heat transferred to the cold fluid Q=m*C*T Calculate LMTD and area of heat transfer Calculate overall heat transfer coefficient U using U=Q/A*LMTD
Calculate theoretical heat transfer coefficient hth from Seider Tate Equation
Observation table
Sno Flow rate (cold) t1 t2 LMTD Q=mCpdT U v 1/v0.8 1/U
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Observation table
1/v0.8 0.96 0.80 0.69 0.61 0.55 0.50 0.46 1/U 0.0026 0.0026 0.0024 0.0026 0.0027 0.0030 0.0032 1/ho 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 hi exper 1418.83 1503.31 2027.87 1565.80 1285.35 1056.48 901.52 Re 11817 14772 17726 20681 23635 26589 29544 Pr 5.77 5.77 5.77 5.77 5.77 5.77 5.77 Nu 87.86 104.19 120.55 136.37 151.75 166.74 181.41 hi theor 5616.97 6714.76 7769.18 8788.86 9779.72 10747.04 11691.07
Graphs
Graphs
Graphs
Ln U and Ln ho vs. Ln N
6.4 6.3 y = 0.5562x + 2.6125
6.2
6.1 y = 0.5015x + 2.832 Ln U and Ln ho 6 5.9 5.8 5.7 5.6 lnU ln ho Linear (lnU) Linear (ln ho)
5.5
5.4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Ln N
Conclusion
With increase in flow rate, the velocity of each differential packet gets less time for heat exchange, thus less temperature gain by the cold fluid. With the increase in agitator speed, the turbulence increases and thus the heat exchange. The helical coil arrangements heat transfer coefficient is better than the corresponding straight coil, due to more turbulence generated inside the tube because of turns of helix geometry.