Measurement Systems Analysis: Total Quality Management
Measurement Systems Analysis: Total Quality Management
Measurement Systems Analysis: Total Quality Management
M.S.A.
Power Solutions ABSL STM Quality Limited 2007
variation present in the results of each type of measuring and test equipment system. This requirement shall apply to measurement systems referenced in the control plan. The analytical methods and acceptance criteria used shall conform to those in customer reference manuals on measurement systems analysis. Other analytical methods and acceptance criteria may be used if approved by the customer.
Process Control
A Typical Process
People Methods Material Equipment Environment
Input
PROCESS
Product
Process / System
Output
Variation
Variation
Actual Process
Variation
Location variation
Bias Stability
Width variation
the observed average of measurement and the reference value. Bias The reference value, also known as the accepted reference value or master value, is a value that serves as an agreed-upon reference for the Reference measured values. A reference Value value can be determined by averaging several measurements with a higher level of measuring equipment.
variation in the measurements obtained with a measurement system on the same master or part when measuring a single characteristic over an extended time period
Reference Value
STM Quality Limited
Reference Value
Reference Value
Smaller Bias
Larger Bias
50mm
200mm
STM Quality Limited
Determining Repeatability
Repeatability is the variation in
measurements obtained By one appraiser with one measurement instrument when used several times while measuring the identical characteristic on the same part
Repeatability
Determining Reproducibility
Reproducibility is the variation in
the average of the measurements made by different appraisers using the same measuring instrument when measuring the identical characteristic on the same part
Reproducibility
The average and range method of gauge study breaks the gauge error into repeatability and reproducibility. Optimum conditions: 3 operators; 3 trials; 10 parts. Study of the results can provide information concerning the causes of the measurement error.
If reproducibility is large compared to repeatability then; The operator is not properly trained in how to use and read the gauge; Graduations on the gauge are not clear.
decompose the variability into repeatability and reproducability. Conducted with 2 appraisers and 5 parts; Each appraiser measures each part once; Evaluate the range at each part; Estimate the variation between the measurement results over the average Range (R/d2); Gauge R&R = 99%-area under the normal distribution curve (2*2,576*variation). (not sufficient for PPAP and QS-9000 clause 4.11.4)
R&R (R&R) = EV + AV
Part Variation PV Total VariationTV = (R&R) + PV
(99%- norm. distr.) (99%- norm. distr.) (99%- norm. distr.) (99%- norm. distr.) (99%- norm. distr.)
AV (appraiser variation)
R&R (repeatability, reproducibility and interaction (I) R&R (R&R) = EV + AV+I Part Variation PV
(99%- norm. distr.) (99%- norm. distr.) (99%- norm. distr.) (99%- norm. distr.) (99%- norm. distr.)
STM Quality Limited
The clamping or location for gauging needs to be improved; There is excessive part variation. If reproducibility is large compared to repeatability, then possible causes
could be: The appraiser needs to be better trained in how to use and read the gauge instrument; Calibrations on the gauge dial are not clear; A fixture of some sort may be needed to help the appraiser use the gauge more consistently.