The document discusses several portfolio planning tools used to evaluate a company's business units, including:
1. Hofer's Life-Cycle Market Evolution Matrix which plots products on a grid based on industry stage and competitive position to determine investment strategies.
2. Shell's Directional Policy Matrix which evaluates business units based on sector prospects and competitive position to determine whether to invest, maintain, or divest resources.
3. The matrices are used to identify developing "winners" for investment and "dogs" for divestment or liquidation based on their industry life cycle stage and competitive strength.
The document discusses several portfolio planning tools used to evaluate a company's business units, including:
1. Hofer's Life-Cycle Market Evolution Matrix which plots products on a grid based on industry stage and competitive position to determine investment strategies.
2. Shell's Directional Policy Matrix which evaluates business units based on sector prospects and competitive position to determine whether to invest, maintain, or divest resources.
3. The matrices are used to identify developing "winners" for investment and "dogs" for divestment or liquidation based on their industry life cycle stage and competitive strength.
The document discusses several portfolio planning tools used to evaluate a company's business units, including:
1. Hofer's Life-Cycle Market Evolution Matrix which plots products on a grid based on industry stage and competitive position to determine investment strategies.
2. Shell's Directional Policy Matrix which evaluates business units based on sector prospects and competitive position to determine whether to invest, maintain, or divest resources.
3. The matrices are used to identify developing "winners" for investment and "dogs" for divestment or liquidation based on their industry life cycle stage and competitive strength.
The document discusses several portfolio planning tools used to evaluate a company's business units, including:
1. Hofer's Life-Cycle Market Evolution Matrix which plots products on a grid based on industry stage and competitive position to determine investment strategies.
2. Shell's Directional Policy Matrix which evaluates business units based on sector prospects and competitive position to determine whether to invest, maintain, or divest resources.
3. The matrices are used to identify developing "winners" for investment and "dogs" for divestment or liquidation based on their industry life cycle stage and competitive strength.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 17
HOFERs LIFE-CYCLE MARKET EVOLUTION MATRIX
STAGE OF INDUSTRY EVOLUTION
Early Development Rapid Growth/Takeoff Shake-Out Maturity/Saturation Decline COMPETITIVE POSITION
The product/market evolution matrix was formulated to allow the analyst to focus corporate- and business-level strategy decisions on the stage of product/market evolution and its relationship with market position Products are plotted in terms of their product/market evolution and the competitive position Circles vary in size according to their respective industry size that represent business units Each circle contains a pie wedge that corresponds in size to its Market Share
A product in the Development or Growth stage has a potential to be a Star. If the market share is: large in these growth-oriented stages, more resources must be invested to develop competitive position. If market share is low, a strategy to improve the same must be developed. If the industry is relatively small and market share is low despite high growth stage, Management must consider divesting and redeploying resources in other more competitive business. A business in the Shakeout or Maturity stage has a potential to be Cash Cow. Investments could be made to maintain high market share A business in Decline stage with a low market share would be a Dog business. Though in the short run it may generate cash, in the long run, however, it should be considered for divestment or liquidation
STRATEGIES FOR DIFFERENT PRODUCTS
A product in the Development or Growth stage has a potential to be a Star. If the market share is:
large in these growth-oriented stages, more resources must be invested to develop competitive position.
If market share is low, a strategy to improve the same must be developed.
If the industry is relatively small and market share is low despite high growth stage, Management must consider divesting and redeploying resources in other more competitive business . A business in the Shakeout or Maturity stage has a potential to be Cash Cow. Investments could be made to maintain high market share A business in Decline stage with a low market share would be a Dog business. Though in the short run it may generate cash, in the long run, however, it should be considered for divestment or liquidation
6 Hofer-Schendel Portfolio Matrix Business unit A Developing winner. Its relatively large share of the market combined with its being at the development stage of product- market evolution and its potential for being in a strong competitive position make it a good candidate for receiving more corporate resources.
Business unit B It has a relatively small share of the market given its strong competitive position. A strategy would have to be developed to overcome this low market share in order to justify more investments.
Business unit C Potential loser. A strategy must be developed to overcome the low market share and weak competitive position in order to justify future investments.
Business unit D Shakeout period, has a relatively large share of the market, and is in a relatively strong position. Investment should be made to maintain current market position. On the long run, it will become a Cash Cow
Business units E and F are cash cows and should be used for cash generation. Business unit G appears to be a dog. It should be managed to generate cash in the short run, The long-run strategy will more the likely be divestment or liquidation
Advantages Used to identify developing winners Illustrates how businesses are distributed across the stages of industry evolution
The Royal Dutch Shell Group developed the directional policy matrix as a portfolio planning tool. Health of the market (business sector prospects) & the organization strength (companys competitive capabilities) . Business sector profitability- a) Market growth rate b) Environmental considerations c) Industry situation Companys competitive capability a) Market position b) Product research and development c) Production capability d) Porter Model Shell Directional Policy Matrix SHELLS DIRECTIONAL POLICY MATRIX S E C T O R A L
P R O S P E C T S
U n - A t t r a c t i v e
A v e r a g e
A t t r a c t i v e
COMPANYS COMPETITIVE POSITION Weak Average Strong Divest Phased withdrawal*2 Double or quit Custodial Try harder Cash Generator Growth Leader SHELLS DIRECTIONAL POLICY MATRIX Leader Try Harder Double or quit Growth custodial Phased Withdrawal Cash Generation Phased Withdrawal Disinvest S E C T O R A L
P R O S P E C T S
U n - A t t r a c t i v e
A v e r a g e
A t t r a c t i v e
COMPANYS COMPETITIVE POSITION Weak Average Strong
Divest: SBUs running in losses with uncertain cash flows. They should be divested as the situation is not likely to improve in the near future. These liquidate or move the assets. Phased withdrawal: SBUs with weak competitive position in a low growth market with very little chance of generating cash flows. They should be phased out gradually. The cash realized should be invested in more profitable ventures. Double or quit: Gamble on potential major SBUs for the future. Either invests more to use the prospects presented by the market or else better to quit the business. Custodial: SBUs are just like a cash cow, milk it and do not commit any more resources. The corporate has to bear with the situation by getting help from other SBUs or get out of the scene so as to focus more on other attractive business. Try harder: SBUs could be vulnerable over a longer period of time, but fine for now. They need additional resources to strength their capabilities. The corporate try harder to exploit the business prospects thoroughly. Cash Generator: Even more like a cash cow, milk here for expansion elsewhere. SBUs May continue their operations, at least for generating strong cash flows and satisfactory profits. No further investments are made. Growth: Grow the market by focusing just enough resources here. These SBUs need funds to support product innovations, R&D activities etc.