This document discusses advanced nuclear fuel cycles and synergistic relationships between different fuel cycle options. It presents arguments for and against nuclear power that are tied to the fuel cycle. One approach discussed is using new reactor designs like fast breeder reactors to minimize waste and produce more energy from uranium by breeding plutonium. Modeling shows that a phase-in of a combined light water and fast breeder reactor system could reduce plutonium stockpiles and spent fuel over time.
This document discusses advanced nuclear fuel cycles and synergistic relationships between different fuel cycle options. It presents arguments for and against nuclear power that are tied to the fuel cycle. One approach discussed is using new reactor designs like fast breeder reactors to minimize waste and produce more energy from uranium by breeding plutonium. Modeling shows that a phase-in of a combined light water and fast breeder reactor system could reduce plutonium stockpiles and spent fuel over time.
This document discusses advanced nuclear fuel cycles and synergistic relationships between different fuel cycle options. It presents arguments for and against nuclear power that are tied to the fuel cycle. One approach discussed is using new reactor designs like fast breeder reactors to minimize waste and produce more energy from uranium by breeding plutonium. Modeling shows that a phase-in of a combined light water and fast breeder reactor system could reduce plutonium stockpiles and spent fuel over time.
This document discusses advanced nuclear fuel cycles and synergistic relationships between different fuel cycle options. It presents arguments for and against nuclear power that are tied to the fuel cycle. One approach discussed is using new reactor designs like fast breeder reactors to minimize waste and produce more energy from uranium by breeding plutonium. Modeling shows that a phase-in of a combined light water and fast breeder reactor system could reduce plutonium stockpiles and spent fuel over time.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15
At a glance
Powered by AI
The presentation discusses advanced nuclear fuel cycles and synergistic relationships between different types of reactors and fuel cycles. It also covers topics like breeder reactors and modeling a phase-in of fast breeder reactors.
Arguments for nuclear power include reducing carbon emissions and producing more energy from the fuel. Arguments against include the lack of a long-term waste storage solution and safety/proliferation concerns.
A breeder reactor produces more fuel than it consumes by using uranium-238 in a breeding blanket to produce plutonium that can be used as fuel. It requires a fast neutron spectrum to achieve this breeding process.
Synergistic Relationships of
Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles
Jordan Weaver Technology Report Presentation Obligatory Graphic of Fuel Cycle Uranium Mining, Milling, Refining Ore Tailings Yellowcake (U 3 O 8 ) Conversion UF 6 (gas) Enrichment Depleted Uranium Enriched UO 2 Fuel Fabrication Fuel Assemblies Reactor e - Irradiated Fuel Onsite Cooling Storage Transportation Reprocessing Disposal Pu and (maybe) other actinides High Level Waste
(HLW) Vitrification Vitrified HLW Fuel Cycles are a Hot Topic Right Now. Why? If new reactor designs prove as safe as hoped and if progress is made on waste disposal, proliferation prevention, and protection against terrorism, nuclear power will deserve a chance to compete in the market against other sources of power that do not emit CO 2 . - Boston Globe, June 16, 2005
Now that the United States has removed the ban on recycling used fuel, it will be possible to use that energy and to greatly reduce the amount of waste that needs treatment and disposal. Last month, Japan joined France, Britain and Russia in the nuclear-fuel-recycling business. The United States will not be far behind - Patrick Moore, Greenpeace Founder, in the Washington Post, April 16, 2006
But there are arguments [against nuclear power] that do stand up. The most fundamental environmental principle is that you don't make a new mess until you have cleared up the old one. To start building a new generation of nuclear power stations before we know what to do with the waste produced by existing plants is grotesquely irresponsible. The government's advisers have determined only that it should be buried. No one yet knows where, how or at what cost. - The Manchester Guardian [UK], July 11, 2006 Consider these arguments for and against nuclear power -- --- The concerns raised are inevitably tied up with the fuel cycle. Motivation One possible aspect of an advanced fuel cycle lies in the use of new reactor designs that will help to minimize the amount of waste that will be disposed of as well as produce more energy (and more fuel). Generic Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor Fast Reactor Physics Typical PWR Neutron Flux Fast Na-Cooled Reactor Flux Fast Reactor Technology Breeder Reactors During operation, produces more fuel than it consumes. Uses U-238 in a breeding blanket to produce plutonium that can eventually be used as fuel. To achieve this, fast neutron spectrum is needed. Breeder Reactor Diagram Modeling FBR Phase-In Setup a network of Light-Water Reactors as well as Fast Breeder Reactors. Recycle spent fuel from LWR fleet to obtain plutonium. Use Pu as fuel in FBR to breed more fuel. One cycle is 10 years and fuel bred in FBR cannot be used until following cycle. Normalize overall capacity to 100 GWt to phase-out LWR fleet. First Decade Flow Chart Next Decade Concentration of Spent Fuel Fuel discharge coefficients obtained from ORIGEN-ARP Depletion Code. Driver Fuel 76.44% U 23.56% Pu 0.0% MA Na Cooled FR BU = 140 MWd/kg Driver Fuel 68.41% U 18.41% Pu 0.27% MA 12.91% FP Blanket Fuel 100.0% U 0.0% Pu 0.0% MA Blanket Fuel 97.50% U 1.70% Pu 0.00% MA 0.80% FP Breeding Blanket 4.55 kg Blanket per kg Driver Results 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 P o w e r
( G W t )
Years Power Split FBR Startup Power LWR Power FBR Reload Power 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 P u
m a s s
( k g )
Years Pu Inventory LWR + FBR Conclusions By having reprocessing infrastructures in place, fuel cycles can be designed to minimize waste as well as conserve fuel resources while inherently being proliferation-conscious. Multi-national approaches can benefit by utilizing regional resources and sharing the burden of nuclear waste. References 109th U.S.C. "Energy Policy Act." August 2005. Department of Energy. Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative. 2005. Nov 2008 <http://www.ne.doe.gov/AFCI/neAFCI.html>. Knief, Ronald Allen. Nuclear Engineering: Theory and Technology of Commercial Nuclear Power. 2nd. Washington: Taylor & Francis, 1992. "ORIGEN-ARP 5.1." Isotopic Depletion and Decay Analysis System. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2007. Salvatores, M. "Improved Resources Utilisation, Waste Minimisation and Proliferation Resistance in a Regional Context." 9th NEA Information Exchange on Actinide and Fission Product P&T. 2006. Wikipedia. Fast breeder reactor. November 2008. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_breeder>. . Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository. 16 November 2008. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yucca_Mountain>. World Nuclear Association. Nuclear Power in the USA. October 2008. 21 November 2008 <http://www.world-nuclear.org>.