Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 60 views

    Universal Description Discovery and Integration (UDDI) : A Review

    Uploaded by

    nivi_09
    Semantic processing of web services involves annotating services with semantic descriptions to allow for automated discovery based on the meaning of services rather than just keywords. This is done by using ontologies and semantic web languages like OWL-S to describe the inputs, outputs, preconditions and effects of services, enabling semantic matchmaking and composition of services. While adding semantics facilitates more accurate discovery and automation, it also increases the complexity of the registration and discovery process.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Universal Description Discovery and Integration (UDDI) : A Review

    Uploaded by

    nivi_09
    60 views34 pages
    Semantic processing of web services involves annotating services with semantic descriptions to allow for automated discovery based on the meaning of services rather than just keywords. This is done by using ontologies and semantic web languages like OWL-S to describe the inputs, outputs, preconditions and effects of services, enabling semantic matchmaking and composition of services. While adding semantics facilitates more accurate discovery and automation, it also increases the complexity of the registration and discovery process.

    Original Description:

    presentation

    Original Title

    UDDI Thursday

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Semantic processing of web services involves annotating services with semantic descriptions to allow for automated discovery based on the meaning of services rather than just keywords. This is done by using ontologies and semantic web languages like OWL-S to describe the inputs, outputs, preconditions and effects of services, enabling semantic matchmaking and composition of services. While adding semantics facilitates more accurate discovery and automation, it also increases the complexity of the registration and discovery process.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    60 views34 pages

    Universal Description Discovery and Integration (UDDI) : A Review

    Uploaded by

    nivi_09
    Semantic processing of web services involves annotating services with semantic descriptions to allow for automated discovery based on the meaning of services rather than just keywords. This is done by using ontologies and semantic web languages like OWL-S to describe the inputs, outputs, preconditions and effects of services, enabling semantic matchmaking and composition of services. While adding semantics facilitates more accurate discovery and automation, it also increases the complexity of the registration and discovery process.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 34

    Universal Description Discovery

    and Integration (UDDI)

    A Review

    CONTENTS

    INTRODUCTION
    Whats UDDI?
    Its working principle
    How UDDI works
    A Demonstration with Apache jUDDI and SOAP
    RESEARCH DIRECTIONS FROM LITERATURE
    Framework
    Architecture
    Web Services
    Search Optimization
    Administration
    Semantic Processing
    Its Significance and Limitations

    OVERVIEW OF PRODUCT IMPLEMENTATION


    CONCLUSION
    2

    What is UDDI?

    Universal
    Description
    Integration

    Discovery

    and

    A platform-independent, XML-based registry for


    businesses world wide to list themselves on
    internet.

    UDDI registers and publishes Web service


    definitions
    UDDI is a directory of Web services
    UDDI uses SOAP for registering and
    discovering information
    3

    How it Works?
    A technical specification for publishing and finding
    businesses and Web services.
    4.
    1.

    2.

    Companies, standards bodies,


    and programmers populate
    the registry with
    descriptions of different
    types of services

    Marketplaces, search
    engines, and business
    apps query the registry to
    discover services at other
    companies

    5.
    Businesses
    populate
    the registry
    with
    descriptions of
    the services
    they support

    Business
    Registrations

    Service Type
    Registrations

    Business uses this


    data to facilitate
    3. UBR assigns a programmatically unique easier integration
    identifier to each service and business
    with each other over
    registration
    the Web
    4

    UDDI Data Structure

    UDDI describes four core types of information:

    businessEntity
    A business or organization providing services.
    White page.
    businessService
    Services provided by an organization.
    Support classification using various taxonomy systems.
    Yellow page.
    bindingTemplate
    Technical information necessary to access a service.
    Green page.
    tModel (Technical Model)
    Descriptions and pointers to a reusable concept, external
    technical specifications or taxonomies.
    E.g., Web service type, a protocol used by Web services, a
    category system.
    6

    Juddi Steps
    1. From thejUDDI releases page, download the latest
    jUDDI v3 tomcat-bundle, or if you want an additional
    browser then you can download the portal-bundle.
    2. Unzip the bundle and start the server by running
    thebin/start.sh (use the start.bat on windows).
    3. Since the UDDI v3 API is a WebServices API you can
    interact with it using tools like SoapUI.
    Visithttp://www.soapui.org/to download SoapUI. Unzip
    the SoapUI.zip and start it using/bin/soapui.sh.
    4. Open your browser tohttp://localhost:8080/juddiv3,
    and save the wsdls for thesecurity,
    publishandinquiryAPI.
    5. Import these WSDLs into a SoapUI project, and you are
    now ready to use the API. See also the demo to publish
    and delete a business.
    8

    Review on Literature

    1. FRAMEWORK
    A layered structure.
    - indicating what kind of programs can or should be built and
    how they would interrelate.
    - An implemented architecture.
    Specify programming interfaces.
    UDDI framework
    - defines a data model in XML and SOAP.

    10

    AUTHOR
    & YEAR
    Dogac et.al,
    2002[2]

    RESEARCH ON UDDI FRAMEWORK


    & ITS SIGNIFICANCE
    Relating

    the services with electronic catalogs, describing the


    complementary services and finding services according to the properties of
    products or services.
    The ontology model developed is general enough to be used with any
    service registry.
    Integrate the described service semantics to UDDI registries.
    Brahim jahed et.al An ontology-based model provided for composition of web service.
    2003 [7]
    Sven

    Overhage WS-Specification - UDDI specification framework as a part of the emerging

    et.al 2003,[12]

    Web

    service

    architecture.

    White

    pages

    General

    and

    Technological

    information about Web Services; Yellow pages Classifying Web Services ;


    Simona

    UDDI - Framework

    Blue pages Conceptual information about Web services.


    Colucci Framework for discovery of services, stored in an UDDI registry, which

    et.al 2004[15]

    exposes a description whose semantic can be modeled using OWL-DL based

    formalism. Description logic for semantic discovery


    Brahim Medjahed A novel matching framework for Web service composition to support the
    et.al,2006[49]

    LIMITATION

    matching of contexts that have different types within the same category
    Interoperability of web service discovery.
    Quality of Web Service composition is under investigation.
    Ontology required to describe services.

    11

    12

    2. ARCHITECTURE

    15

    AUTHOR
    & YEAR

    RESEARCH ON UDDI ARCHITECTURE AND ITS


    SIGNIFICANCE

    Alistair
    Duke
    et.al, 2004[14]

    Service oriented Architecture - eTOM provides a helpful method framework


    for categorizing processes or service functions.
    Requires OWL-S description.
    PWSD, a scalable Web service discovery architecture based on peer-to-peer
    overlay network.
    PWSD support XML-based complicate query.
    Experimental results show that PWSD has good robustness and scalability.
    Architecture of Semantic matchmaker system and demonstrate the key
    process for service.
    OWL subsumption rule to measure the similarity of the involved service
    concepts,
    OWL rules to our semantic similarity measure and the matching algorithm
    semantic
    similarity of
    service
    properties
    A novel architecture
    for
    web service
    composition..

    Yin Li et.al 2004


    [25]
    Qiu Tian
    2007[66]

    et.al,

    Rajesh
    Karunamurthy
    et.al,2012[91]
    Milos Bogdanovic
    et.al, 2015[98]
    LIMITATION

    Structuring for web administration


    Geo portal A geo information combination architecture.
    An unambiguous information maintained for users.
    Structuring data is under process
    lack of semantic inference support, and the search mechanism based
    16 on
    keyword and categorization information leads to a limited performance.

    17

    3. WEB SERVICE

    18

    AUTHOR
    & YEAR

    RESEARCH ON UDDI WEB SERVICE & SIGNIFICANCE

    Rama
    Akkiraju
    et.al 2003[4]

    BPEL4WS 1.
    Using BPEL4WS execution engines such as BPWS4J one
    can automatically execute the services specified in a BPEL4WS flow. An
    extension to the UDDI inquiry API specification to enable requesters to
    specify the required capabilities of a service.
    2.
    Enhance the service discovery of UDDI by performing semantic
    matching and automatic service composition using planning algorithms.

    Liang-jie
    zhang
    et.al 2003,[13]

    An XML-based advanced UDDI exploring engine, Business Explorer for Web


    Services (BE4WS).
    Provides developers with standard interfaces for efficiently searching
    business and service information in single or multiple UDDI registries .
    A distributed XML repository, based on a Peer-to-Peer infrastructure called
    pXRepository for Web Service discovery.
    The service descriptions
    are managed in a completely decentralized way. Moreover, since the basic
    Peer-to-Peer routing algorithm cannot be applied directly in the service
    discovery process, we extend the basic Peer-to-Peer routing algorithm with
    XML support, which enables pXRepository to support XPath-based
    composite queries. Experimental results show that pXRepository has good
    Information
    model
    for web service
    Provides specifications by an
    robustness and
    scalability.
    ontology language, and hence they can be used further to discover
    19 Web
    Services semantically.

    Yin
    L
    2004[16]

    Natenapa
    Sriharee
    2005[36]

    et.al

    et.al,

    20

    4. SEARCH OPTIMIZATION

    21

    AUTHOR
    & YEAR

    Marco
    et.al,

    Crasso
    2008[69]

    LIMITATION

    RESEARCH ON UDDI SEARCH OPTIMIZATION &


    SIGNIFICANCE

    A search method for Web services called WSQBE that aims at both easing
    query specification and assisting discoverers by returning a short and
    accurate list of candidate services.
    In contrast with previous approaches, WSQBE discovery process is based on
    an automatic search space reduction mechanism that makes this approach
    more efficient.
    Empirical evaluations of WSQBE search space reduction mechanism,
    retrieval performance, processing time and memory usage, using a registry
    with service descriptions
    WSQBE discovery process is based on an automatic search space reduction
    mechanism that makes this approach more efficient.
    Empirical evaluations of WSQBE search space reduction mechanism,
    Less
    accessible
    retrieval
    performance, processing time and memory usage, using a registry
    with service descriptions.

    22

    23

    5. ADMINISTRATION

    24

    AUTHOR
    & YEAR

    Chen Wu
    2007 [58]

    et.al,

    Eunjoo Lee 2007


    [59]
    Jorge
    Cardosoet.al
    2008[73]

    Khalid
    Elgazzar
    et.al, 2014[97]
    Jim

    Luo

    et.al

    RESEARCH ON UDDI ADMINISTRATION & SIGNIFICANCE

    A novel Web administration revelation structural engineeringAtomServ


    AtomServ, which is based upon broadly received Web2.0
    innovation (RSS/Atom) and the distribute/subscribe model.
    Backing web Administration A structure called bolsters a solitary
    administration choice taking into account Qos properties. In this paper, We
    propose a structure that backings a Web administration organization in
    light of Semantic data and Qos properties.
    SAWSDL In the first place, the closeness among Semantic Web
    administration properties, for example, inputs and yields, is assessed
    utilizing Tversky's model which is taking into account ideas (classes), their
    Semantic connections, and their regular and recognizing elements
    (properties). Second, the calculation, not just considers administrations
    inputs and yields, yet it likewise considers the usefulness of
    administrations. At last, the calculation has the capacity coordinate a
    Semantic Web administration demand against commercials that are
    explained with ideas that are with or without a typical ontological duty. As
    such, it ca assess the compare ability of ideas characterized in the setting
    Discovery as an administration (Daas) Establishes the framework of
    of distinctive ontologies.
    proficient versatile Web administration revelation that looks into client
    inclinations and setting
    25
    OWL-S administration over UDDI
    A methodology with backing

    26

    6. SEMANTIC PROCESSING
    Semantic services are a component of the
    semantic web because they use markup
    which makes data machine-readable in a
    detailed and sophisticated way (as compared
    with human-readable HTML which is usually
    not
    easily
    "understood"
    by
    computer
    programs).

    27

    AUTHOR
    & YEAR

    RESEARCH ON UDDI SEMANTIC PROCESSING &


    SIGNIFICANCE

    Massimo Paolucci
    et.al, 2002. [1]

    Extension of UDDI using DAML-S


    Translation of DAML-S service
    profiles into UDDI business service descriptions thereby expressing
    capabilities of services and matching functionalities in UDDI.
    DAML-S A solution based on DAML-S, a DAML-based language for service
    description, and we show how service capabilities are presented in the
    Profile section of a DAML-S description and how a semantic match between
    advertisements and requests is performed.
    Implementation of the DAML-S/UDDI
    DAML-S as a prototypical example of ontology for describing Semantic Web
    services.
    DAML-S Virtual Machine that uses the DAML-S Process Model to manage
    the interaction with Web service.
    UDDI and OWL-S semantic web
    Finds each other on the basis of the information that they provide, rather
    than incidental properties such as their name, port, or a free text
    description.
    Semantic Processing of service registry
    Highly assured system
    standards.

    Massimo
    Paolucci1
    2002 [3]

    et.al,

    Katia
    Sycara
    et.al, 2003 [6]

    Katia Sycara et.al


    2004 [19]

    Dieter
    Fensel
    et.al 2004 [29]

    LIMITATION

    Problem of Semantics of web service is not solved.


    Semantics of UDDI not yet solved. Less service registry processing
    Ontology layer construction for UDDI matching is required.
    DAML-S is not just an abstract description.

    28

    29

    REFERENCES

    Ref
    No
    [2]

    Author & Title

    A. Dogac, I. Cingil, G. Laleci, and Y. Kabak, Improving the Functionality


    of UDDI Registries through Web Service Semantics, pp. 2324, 2002.

    [7]

    B. Medjahed, A. Bouguettaya, and A. Elmagarmid, Composing Web


    Services on the Semantic Web, VLDB J., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 333351,
    2003.

    [12]

    S. Overhage and P. Thomas, WS-Specification: Specifying Web Services


    Using UDDI Improvements, Web, Web-Services, Database Syst., vol.
    2593, pp. 100119, 2003.

    [15]

    S. Colucci, T. Di Noia, and E. Di Sciascio, An agency for semantic-based


    automatic discovery of web-services, Artif. Intell. , 2004.

    [49]

    B. Medjahed and Y. Atif, Context-based matching for Web service


    composition, vol. 21, no. 1. 2007.

    30

    REFERENCES

    Ref
    No
    [2]

    Author & Title

    A. Dogac, I. Cingil, G. Laleci, and Y. Kabak, Improving the Functionality


    of UDDI Registries through Web Service Semantics, pp. 2324, 2002.

    [7]

    B. Medjahed, A. Bouguettaya, and A. Elmagarmid, Composing Web


    Services on the Semantic Web, VLDB J., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 333351,
    2003.

    [12]

    S. Overhage and P. Thomas, WS-Specification: Specifying Web Services


    Using UDDI Improvements, Web, Web-Services, Database Syst., vol.
    2593, pp. 100119, 2003.

    [15]

    S. Colucci, T. Di Noia, and E. Di Sciascio, An agency for semantic-based


    automatic discovery of web-services, Artif. Intell. , 2004.

    [49]

    B. Medjahed and Y. Atif, Context-based matching for Web service


    composition, vol. 21, no. 1. 2007.

    REFERENCES

    Ref
    No
    [2]

    Author & Title

    A. Dogac, I. Cingil, G. Laleci, and Y. Kabak, Improving the Functionality


    of UDDI Registries through Web Service Semantics, pp. 2324, 2002.

    [7]

    B. Medjahed, A. Bouguettaya, and A. Elmagarmid, Composing Web


    Services on the Semantic Web, VLDB J., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 333351,
    2003.

    [12]

    S. Overhage and P. Thomas, WS-Specification: Specifying Web Services


    Using UDDI Improvements, Web, Web-Services, Database Syst., vol.
    2593, pp. 100119, 2003.

    [15]

    S. Colucci, T. Di Noia, and E. Di Sciascio, An agency for semantic-based


    automatic discovery of web-services, Artif. Intell. , 2004.

    [49]

    B. Medjahed and Y. Atif, Context-based matching for Web service


    composition, vol. 21, no. 1. 2007.

    REFERENCES

    Ref
    No
    [2]

    Author & Title

    A. Dogac, I. Cingil, G. Laleci, and Y. Kabak, Improving the Functionality


    of UDDI Registries through Web Service Semantics, pp. 2324, 2002.

    [7]

    B. Medjahed, A. Bouguettaya, and A. Elmagarmid, Composing Web


    Services on the Semantic Web, VLDB J., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 333351,
    2003.

    [12]

    S. Overhage and P. Thomas, WS-Specification: Specifying Web Services


    Using UDDI Improvements, Web, Web-Services, Database Syst., vol.
    2593, pp. 100119, 2003.

    [15]

    S. Colucci, T. Di Noia, and E. Di Sciascio, An agency for semantic-based


    automatic discovery of web-services, Artif. Intell. , 2004.

    [49]

    B. Medjahed and Y. Atif, Context-based matching for Web service


    composition, vol. 21, no. 1. 2007.

    REFERENCES

    Ref
    No
    [2]

    Author & Title

    A. Dogac, I. Cingil, G. Laleci, and Y. Kabak, Improving the Functionality


    of UDDI Registries through Web Service Semantics, pp. 2324, 2002.

    [7]

    B. Medjahed, A. Bouguettaya, and A. Elmagarmid, Composing Web


    Services on the Semantic Web, VLDB J., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 333351,
    2003.

    [12]

    S. Overhage and P. Thomas, WS-Specification: Specifying Web Services


    Using UDDI Improvements, Web, Web-Services, Database Syst., vol.
    2593, pp. 100119, 2003.

    [15]

    S. Colucci, T. Di Noia, and E. Di Sciascio, An agency for semantic-based


    automatic discovery of web-services, Artif. Intell. , 2004.

    [49]

    B. Medjahed and Y. Atif, Context-based matching for Web service


    composition, vol. 21, no. 1. 2007.

    You might also like