Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Vesicoureteral Reflux: Done By: Khalid Al-Qudsi Faisal Burghal Supervised By: Dr. Osama Bani Hani

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 27

Vesicoureteral reflux

Done By : Khalid Al-Qudsi


Faisal Burghal
Supervised by : Dr. Osama Bani Hani

Difinition
Vesicoureteral

reflux(VUR) is an
abnormal backward movement
ofurinefrom
thebladderintouretersorkidneys
( Upper urinary tract).

Why Vesicoureteral reflux Is a


problem ?
Acute

Pyeloneohritis

Multiple
Renal

UTIs

Scarring

Subsequent
Decreased
End-stage

hypertension

renal function
renal disease (ESRD)

Epidemiology

It is the most common urologic finding in


children

Occurring in approximately 1 percent of


newborns

In 30 to 45 percent of young children with


a urinary tract infection (UTI)

In neonates with prenatal hydronephrosis,


the prevalence of VUR is about 15 percent

Etiology: Primary VUR:

The most common form of reflux, Often


Unilateral
It is due to incompetent or inadequate
closure of the ureterovesical junction (UVJ),
which contains a segment of the ureter within the
bladder wall (intravesical ureter).
The failure of this anti-reflux mechanism is due to
the shortening of the intravesical ureter.The
intravesical ureter length may be genetically
dictated, which may explain the increased
incidence in family members of patients with
VUR.
Other Causes : Absence of adequate detrusor backing,
Lateral displacement of the ureteral orifice, Paraureteral

Secondary VUR:

Result of abnormally high pressure in the


bladder that results in failure of the closure of the
UVJ during bladder contraction.
Often associated with anatomic (e.g., posterior
urethral valves) or functional bladder
obstruction (e.g., dysfunctional voiding and
neurogenic bladder)
Often Bilateral
The degree and chronicity of obstruction can
influence the severity of VUR.
The management of secondary VUR is focused on
treating the primary abnormality with the rare
need for direct surgical correction of the VUR

Grading
The

International Reflux Study Group (IRSG) developed a


classification system that grades the severity of VUR
based upon the degree of retrograde filling and dilation of
the renal collecting system demonstrated by VCUG

Grade

I Reflux only fills the ureter without dilation.


Grade II Reflux fills the ureter and the collecting system
without dilation
Grade III Reflux fills and mildly dilates the ureter and the
collecting system with mild blunting of the calyces.
Grade IV Reflux fills and grossly dilates the ureter and the
collecting system with blunting of the calyces. Some tortuosity of
the ureter is also present.
Grade V Massive reflux grossly dilates the collecting system.
All the calyces are blunted with a loss of papillary impression and
intrarenal reflux may be present. There is significant ureteral
dilation and tortuosity.

Clinical Features
The

clinical course and outcome vary


depending upon whether VUR presents
prenatally or postnatally.

Prenatal

presentationThe presence of VUR is


suggested by the finding of hydronephrosis
on prenatal ultrasonography

Postnatal

presentationPostnatal diagnosis of
VUR usually is made after a UTI, and less
commonly, it is detected after screening of
family members

Signs and symptoms


Vesicoureteral

reflux in itself does not produce any


symptoms. These occur when infection of the urinary tract
(UTI) is present.

Older

children
Infection causes symptoms such as fever, pain,
unpleasant smelling urine and a burning sensation when
urinating.
Other

symptoms commonly experienced include:


Bedwetting (nocturnal enuresis).
Lower abdominal pain.
Blood in the urine (haematuria) and/or pus in the urine
(pyuria).

In neonate
irritability,

persistent high fever, and


listlessness. In cases of VUR and
febrile UTI associated with a serious
underlying urinary tract abnormality,
the neonate could present with
respiratory distress, failure to thrive,
renal failure, flank masses, and
urinary ascites.

Investigation
Urine

R/E
Urine C/S
B. urea S. creatinine
X-ray KUB
USG-KUB
IVU Simple cystography
MCUG Voiding cinefluoroscopy
Radionuclide scan

Diagnosis
The

diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux


(VUR) is based upon the
demonstration of reflux of urine from
the bladder to the upper urinary
tract by either contrast voiding
cystourethrogram (VCUG) or
radionuclide cystogram (RNC). The
VCUG provides greater anatomic
detail but there is increased
radiation exposure with VCUG

In

the larger of the


systematic reviews
conducted by the
American Urological
Association (AUA),
prenatal hydronephrosis
was defined as a renal
pelvic diameter (RPD)
4 mm during the
second trimester and
7 mm during the third
trimester

Ultrasound Scanning:
The

bladder and kidneys are scanned


to survey the anatomy and assess for
any irregularities.

DSMA Renal Scan:

Pictures of the kidneys are taken with a


specialised scanner following the injection of a
weak radioactive solution (radioisotope) into the
bloodstream via a drip in the hand or arm. The
pictures taken by the scanner can assess kidney
size, position and function and check for scarring
of the kidneys as the result of repeated UTIs.

Management
THERAPEUTIC

INTERVENTIONS is principally
based upon the following :
Identification of children with VUR
Prevention of pyelonephritis
Prevention of further renal damage resulting from

infection and inflammation


Minimization of morbidity of treatment and follow-up
Identifying and managing children with bladder and
bowel dysfunction
Therapeutic interventions include medical therapy
(ie, antibiotic prophylaxis), and surgical correction

We

suggest all children with grades III through V


reflux be treated because they are at greatest
risk for recurrent UTI, renal scarring, and
hypertension.

Children

with grade I to II reflux are at the lowest


risk for renal scarring. In our practice, the
different treatment options of observation or
medical therapy (ie, antibiotic prophylaxis) are
presented to the family, which plays a major role
in the final therapeutic decision. We do not
suggest surgical correction in these patients

MEDICAL TRETMENT
(Indications)
Unilateral

reflux
Lower grades of reflux
Earlier age at presentation
Male gender

MEDICAL TRETMENT
Consists of daily prophylactic
administration of antibiotics. It is based
upon the observation that reflux will
spontaneously resolve in most cases,
and the assumptions that use of
continuous antibiotics results in sterile
urine and the continued reflux of
sterile urine does not cause renal
infection

Antimicrobial

agents most commonly used for


prophylaxis include trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole ,
trimethoprim alone, or nitrofurantoin . One daily
dose is administered at bedtime. The dose is onehalf to one-quarter the usual therapeutic dose for
treating an acute infection. Amoxicillin and
cephalosporins are not recommended because of
the increased likelihood of resistant organisms ,
except in infants below two months of age. Adverse
effects of sulfonamides, trimethoprim, or
nitrofurantoin preclude their use in infants less than
two months of age

Surgical treatment
Surgical

treatment corrects the


anatomy at the refluxing
ureterovesical junction.
The two surgical approaches used
are open surgical reimplantation and
endoscopic correction

Open surgical
reimplantation
Highly

successful procedure, with reported


correction rates of 95 to 99 percent
regardless of the severity of VUR
In open reimplantation, the bladder is opened
(intravesical approach) and the ureters are
reimplanted by tunneling a ureteral segment
through the detrusor (bladder wall muscle),
thereby creating a submucosal tunnel .
Alternatively, reimplantation can be done
without opening the bladder (extravesical
approach).

Endoscopic correction
Subureteric

transurethral injection (STING


procedure), he procedure involves injecting a
copolymer substance, such as
dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA or DEFLUX),
beneath the mucosa of the ureterovesical
junction through a cystoscope. This injection
changes the angle and perhaps fixation of the
intravesical ureter, thereby correcting reflux
The success rate for correcting VUR by STING in
one or more procedures ranges from 75 to
almost 100 percen

Thank You

You might also like