Port State Control Conference 2005, London Increased Information Sharing The Issue of Transparency
Port State Control Conference 2005, London Increased Information Sharing The Issue of Transparency
Port State Control Conference 2005, London Increased Information Sharing The Issue of Transparency
CLASS
SOCIETIES
CHARTERER
CARGO OWNER
PORTS &
TERMINALS
PARTNERSHIP:
Working closely
with regulators
and legislators to
ensure EFFECTIVE
REGULATIONS
FLAG STATES
BANKS &
INVESTORS
SHIPYARDS
INSURERS
CLASS
SOCIETIES
CHARTERER
CARGO OWNER
Industry
participation in
EQUASIS and
with MoUs
PORTS &
TERMINALS
SHIPYARDS
INSURERS
FLAG STATES
BANKS &
INVESTORS
CLASS
SOCIETIES
CHARTERER
CARGO OWNER
PORTS &
TERMINALS
Feedback Mechanisms
and Information
Sharing often weak
Openness and
transparency
questioned
FLAG STATES
BANKS &
INVESTORS
SHIPYARDS
INSURERS
The vision..
Information Sharing
Many examples of good practice:
Information Sharing
Examples of where we could do better:
OCIMF-SIRE Data
Tanker Structure Cooperative Forum
Industry guidelines and standards
IACS development of Requirements and Procedures
Incident statistics
Information Sharing
Examples of where we are failing:
Accident investigations
Design and in-service fault reporting and early warning systems
Waterways information exchange
Proliferation of ship inspections
Marine Safety Data Sheets
Abuse of information in internal audits and quality control systems
Information Sharing
Impediments to information sharing:
commercial competitiveness
legal liability
professional jealousy
lack of incentives
Shipowners
and Port State Control
Flag state
Classification society
P&I insurance
Charterer (through vetting)
Coastal state (through PSC)
Thank you
www.intertanko.com
www.shippingfacts.com