Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

FM14e PPT Ch06

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 77

Brigham & Ehrhardt

Financial
Management:
Theory and Practice
14e
1

CHAPTER 6
Risk and Return

Topics in Chapter

Basic return and risk concepts


Stand-alone risk
Portfolio (market) risk
Risk and return: CAPM/SML
Market equilibrium and market
efficiency

Determinants of Intrinsic Value:


The Cost of Equity
Net operating
profit after taxes

Required investments
in operating capital

Free cash flow


=
(FCF)

Value =

FCF1
FCF2
+
(1 + WACC)1 (1 + WACC)2

+
...

FCF
+
(1 +
WACC)

Weighted average
cost of capital
(WACC)
Market interest rates
Market risk aversion

Cost of debt

Firms debt/equity mix

Cost of equity

Firms business risk


4

What are investment


returns?

Investment returns measure the


financial results of an investment.
Returns may be historical or
prospective (anticipated).
Returns can be expressed in:

Dollar terms.
Percentage terms.
5

An investment costs $1,000 and


is sold after 1 year for $1,060.
Dollar return:
$ Received - $ Invested
$1,060
- $1,000

= $60.

Percentage return:
$ Return/$ Invested
$60/$1,000
= 0.06 = 6%.
6

What is investment risk?

Investment risk is exposure to the


chance of earning less than
expected.
The greater the chance of a return
far below the expected return, the
greater the risk.

Scenarios and Returns for the 10Year Zero Coupon T-bond Over the
Next Year
Scenari Probabilit
o
y
Return
Worst
0.10
Case
14%
Poor Case
0.20
4%
Most
0.40
6%
Likely
Good
0.20
16%
Case
Best Case
0.10
26%
8

Discrete Probability
Distribution for Scenarios
0.4
0.3
Probability

0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.14000000000000001

0.06

0.26

Returns
9

Example of a Continuous
Probability Distribution

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

Returns
10

40%

Calculate the expected rate of return


on the bond for the next year.

= 0.10(-14%) + 0.20(-4%) +
0.40(6%)
+ 0.20(16%) + 0.10(26%)
= 6%

11

Use Excel to Calculate the


Expected Value of a Discrete
Distribution

= SUMPRODUCT(Probabilities,Returns)

SUMPRODUCT:
Multiplies each value in the first array (the
range of cells with probabilities) by its
corresponding value in the second array
(the range of cells with returns).
Sums the products.
This is identical to the formula on the
previous slide.
See Ch06 Mini Case.xls
12

Consider these probability


distributions for two investments.
Which riskier? Why?

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

Return
13

40%

Stand-Alone Risk:
Standard Deviation

Stand-alone risk is the risk of each


asset held by itself.
Standard deviation measures the
dispersion of possible outcomes.
For a single asset:

Stand-alone risk = Standard deviation

14

Variance (2) and Standard Deviation


() for Discrete Probabilities

15

Standard Deviation of the Bonds


Return During the Next Year

2 = 0.10 (-0.14 0.06)2


+ 0.20 (-0.04 0.06)2
+ 0.40 ( 0.06 0.06)2
+ 0.20 ( 0.16 0.06)2
+ 0.10 ( 0.26 0.06)2
2 = 0.0120

=
= 0.1095 = 10.95%
16

Use Excel to Calculate the Variance and


Standard Deviation of a Discrete
Distribution
=

SUMPRODUCT(Probabilities,Returns ,Returns)

SUMPRODUCT:
Multiplies each value in the first array (the
range of cells with probabilities) by its
corresponding value in the second array (the
range of cells with returns less the expected
return) and by the third array (which is
identical to the second array).
Sums the products; the result is variance.
Take the square root of the variance to get the
standard deviation. See Ch06 Mini Case.xls
17

Understanding the
Standard Deviation

the returns are normally


If
distributed:

Outcome will be more than 1 away


from about 31.74% 32% of the
time:

16% of the time below


16% of the time above +.

If = 6% and =10.95% 11%:

16% of the time return <5% = 6%


11%
18

Useful in Comparing
Investments

Investments with bigger standard


deviations have more risk.
High risk doesnt mean you should
reject the investment, but:

You should know the risk before


investing
You should expect a higher return as
compensation for bearing the risk.
19

Using Historical Data to


Estimate Risk

Analysts often use discrete outcomes to analyze


risk for projects; see Chapter 11.
But for investments, most analysts normally use
historical data rather than discrete forecasts to
estimate an investments risk unless it is a very
special situation.
Most analysts use:

48 to 60 months of monthly data, or


52 weeks of weekly data, or
Shorter period using daily data.

Use annual returns here for sake of simplicity.


20

Formulas for a Sample of T


Historical Returns

Tedious to calculate by hand, easy


in Excel. See next slide.

21

Formulas for a Sample of T


Historical Returns

Tedious to calculate by hand, easy


in Excel. See next slide.

22

Excel Functions a Sample


of T Historical Returns
Suppose

SampleData is the cell


range with the T historical returns.

=AVERAGE(SampleData)
=STDEV(SampleData)

23

Historical Data for Stock Returns


Year

Market

Blandy

Gourmange

30%

26%

47%

15

54

18

14

15

22

15

14

28

10

18

40

26

42

17

10

30

23

32

10

38

28

75
24

Average and Standard Deviations


for Stand-Alone Investments

Use formulas shown previously (tedious)


or use Excel (easy)
What is Blandys stand-alone risk?
Note: analysts often use past risk as a
predictor of future risk, but past
returns are not a good prediction of
future returns.

Average return
Standard
deviation

Market
8.0%

Blandy
6.4%

20.1%

25.2%

Gourmange
9.2%
38.6%
25

How risky is Blandy stock?

Assumptions:

Returns are normally distributed, so about 16% of


the time, return will be less than the average minus
; about 16% of the time the return will be greater
than the average plus .
is 25.2%
Expected return is about 6.4%.

About 16% of the time, return will be:

< 18.8%
(6.4%25.2% = 18.8%)
> 31.6%
(6.4%+25.2% = 31.6%)
Stocks are very risky!
26

Portfolio Returns

The
percentage of a portfolios
value that is invested in Stock i is
denoted by the weight wi. Notice
that the sum of all the weights
must equal 1.
With n stocks in the portfolio, its
return each year will be:
27

Example: 2-Stock Portfolio

Form
a portfolio by selling 25% of
the Blandy stock and investing it in
the higher-risk Gourmange stock.
The portfolio return each year will
be:

28

Historical Data for Stocks and


Portfolio Returns
Year

Blandy

Gourmange

Portfolio of Blandy
and Gourmange

26%

47%

31.3%

15

54

2.3

14

15

6.8

15

9.5

28

5.5

18

40

3.5

42

17

35.8

30

23

16.8

32

25.0

10

28

75

39.8
29

Portfolio Historical Average


and Standard Deviation

The portfolios average return is


the weighted average of the
stocks average returns.
The portfolios standard deviation
is less than either stocks !
What explains this?
Gourmang
Blandy

Portfolio
e

Average return
Standard

6.4%

9.2%
38.6%

7.1%
30

22.2%

How closely do the returns


follow one another?
Return
75%
50%
25%
0%

-25%
-50%
-75%

Year

9 10

Notice that the


returns dont
move in perfect
lock-step:
Sometimes one is
up and the other
is down.
31

Correlation Coefficient (i,j)

Loosely
speaking, the correlation ()

coefficient measures the tendency of


two variables to move together.
Estimating i,j with historical data is
tedious:

32

Excel Functions to Estimate


the Correlation Coefficient
(i,j)
Stocki and Stockj are the cell
ranges with historical returns for
Stocks i and j.
Est. i,j = Rij =Correl(Stocki,Stockj)
Correlation between Blandy (B) and
Gourmange (G):
Est. B,G = 0.11
33

2-Stock Portfolios

= 1

= +1

2 stocks can be combined to form a


riskless portfolio: p = 0.
Risk is not reduced
p is just the weighted average of the
2 stocks standard deviations.

1 < < 1

Risk is reduced but not eliminated.


34

Adding Stocks to a
Portfolio

What would happen to the risk of


an average 1-stock portfolio as
more randomly selected stocks
were added?
p would decrease because the
added stocks would not be
perfectly correlated.
35

Risk vs. Number of Stocks


in Portfolio
p
35%

Company Specific
(Diversifiable) Risk
Total Portfolio Risk, p

20%

Market Risk
0

10 20 30 40

2,000 stocks
36

Stand-alone risk = Market


risk + Diversifiable risk

Market risk is that part of a


securitys stand-alone risk that
cannot be eliminated by
diversification.
Firm-specific, or diversifiable, risk
is that part of a securitys standalone risk that can be eliminated
by diversification.
37

Conclusions

As more stocks are added, each new


stock has a smaller risk-reducing impact
on the portfolio.
p falls very slowly after about 40 stocks
are included. The lower limit for p is
about 20% = M .
By forming well-diversified portfolios,
investors can eliminate about half the
risk of owning a single stock.
38

Can an investor holding one stock


earn a return commensurate with its
risk?

No. Rational investors will


minimize risk by holding portfolios.
Investors bear only market risk, so
prices and returns reflect the
amount of market risk an
individual stock brings to a
portfolio, not the stand-alone risk
of individual stock.
39

Market Risk Due to an


Individual Stock

How do you measure the amount


of market risk that an individual
stock brings to a well-diversified
portfolio?
William Sharpe developed the
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
to answer this question.
And the answer is.. See next
slide.
40

Market Risk as Defined by


the CAPM

Define:

wi is the percent of the portfolio invested in


Stock i.
M is the standard deviation of the market
index.
i,M is the correlation between Stock i and the
market.

The contribution of Stock i to the


standard deviation of a well-diversified
portfolio (p) is:
w

41

Market Risk and Beta

The
beta of Stock i (bi) is defined:
bi =
The contribution of Stock i to the standard
deviation of a well-diversified portfolio ( p) is:
wi M bi
Given the standard deviation of the market
and the percent of the portfolio invested in
Stock i, beta measures the impact of
Stock i on p.
42

Required Return and Risk:


General Concept

Investors require a return for time (for


tying their funds up in the investment).

rRF, the risk-free rate

Investors require a return for risk,


which is the extra return above the riskfree rate that investors require to
induce them to invest in Stock i.

RPi, the risk premium of Stock i.


43

Required Return and Risk: The


CAPM

RPM is the market risk premium. It


is the extra return above the riskfree rate that that investors require
to invest in the stock market:

RPM = rM rRF.

The CAPM defines the risk premium


for Stock i as:

RPi = bi (RPM)
44

The Security Market Line: Relating


Risk and Required Return

The Security Market Line (SML)


puts the pieces together, showing
how to determine the return
required for bearing a stocks risk:
SML: ri = rRF + (RPM)bi

45

The Security Market Line: Relating


Risk and Required Return
Risk depends on beta:
The part of p due to Stock i = wi M
bi

Required return depends on beta:


ri = rRF + (RPM) bi
46

Correlation Between
Blandy and the Market

Using the formula for correlation or


the Excel function =CORREL,
Blandys correlation with the
market (B,M) is:

B,M = 0.481

47

Beta for Blandy

Use the previously calculated standard


deviations for Blandy and the market to
estimate Blandys beta:

b = B,M (B/M)
b = 0.481(.252/.201) = 0.60

The average beta is equal to 1.0, so


Blandys stock contributes less risk to a
well-diversified portfolio than does the
average stock.
48

Required Return for Blandy

Inputs:

rRF = 4% (given)

RPM = 5% (given)

b = 0.60 (estimated)

ri = rRF + bi (RPM)
ri = 4% + 0.60(5%) = 7%
49

Comparing Risk and


Return for Different Stocks

The beta of an average stock is 1.0; Gourmanges beta


is 1.3. How do their required returns compare with
Blandys?

rAvg_company = 4%+ 1.0 (5%) = 9%


rG = 4%+ 1.3 (5%) = 10.5%
rB = 4%+ 0.6 (5%) = 7%

Blandys stock contributes less risk to a well-diversified


portfolio than do Gourmange or the average stock, so
Blandys investors require a lower rate of return.
50

Using a Regression to
Estimate Beta

Run a regression with returns on


the stock plotted on the Y-axis and
returns on the market portfolio
plotted on the X-axis.
The slope of the regression line is
equal to the stocks beta
coefficient.
51

Excel: Plot Trendline Right


on Chart
Blandy Returns

0.45

f(x) = 0.6x + 0.02


R = 0.23
0
-0.45

0.45
Market
Returns

-0.45

52

Estimated Beta from


Regression

The trendline is plotted on the


previous slide, including the
regression equation.

y = 0.6027x + 0.0158
b = Slope = 0.6027 (same as before)

Easier wayuse the Excel SLOPE


function.

b =SLOPE(y_values,x_values)
53

Web Sites for Beta

http://finance.yahoo.com

www.valueline.com

Enter the ticker symbol for a Stock Quote,


such as IBM or Dell, then click GO.
When the quote comes up, select Key
Statistics from panel on left.
Enter a ticker symbol at the top of the page.

Most stocks have betas in the range of


0.5 to 1.5.
54

Impact on SML of Increase


in Risk-Free Rate
18%
16%
14%
12%
10%
8% Return
Required
6%
4%
2%
0%

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Beta
55

Impact on SML of Increase


in Risk Aversion
25%
20%
15%

Required
Return
10%
5%
0%

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Beta
56

Calculate the weights for a portfolio


with $1.4 million in Blandy and $0.6
million in Gourmange.

Find the weights:

wB = $1.4/($1.4+$0.6) = 70%

wG = $0.6/($1.4+$0.6) = 30%

The portfolio beta is the weighted


average of the stocks betas:

57

Calculate the portfolio beta.


bp = 0.7(bBlandy) + 0.3(bGour.)
= 0.7(0.60) + 0.3(1.30)
= 0.81.

58

What is the Required


Return on the Portfolio?

(1) Use SML:


rp
= rRF + bp (RPM)
= 4.0% + 0.81%(5%) =
8.05%.
(2)Use fact that rp=
rp= 0.7(7.0%) + 0.3(10.5%)
= 8.05%.
59

Portfolio Performance
Evaluation Relative to SML
Portfolio Manager
JJ
CC
Portfolio beta
0.7
1.4
Risk-free rate
4%
4%
Market risk premium
5%
5%
Portfolio required return
7.5%
11.0%
Portfolio actual return
8.5%
9.5%
Over/under
+1.0%
1.5%
performance

60

Performance Relative to
the SML
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%

Required Return
6%
4%
2%
0%

0.5

1.5

2.5

Beta
61

Intrinsic Values and Market Prices


The Company, the Economic
Environment, and the Political Climate

All Relevant
Available
Information
Unbiased
Expected Future
Cash Flows

Unbiase
d Risk

Intrinsic Value

Selected Information
and Its
Interpretation
Perceived Future
Cash Flows

Equal
?

Perceived
Risk

Market Price

What is required for the


market to be in
equilibrium?

The
market price of a security must equal

the securitys intrinsic value (intrinsic


value reflects the size, timing, and risk of
the future cash flows).
Market price = Intrinsic value
The expected return a security must
equal its required return (which reflects
the securitys risk).
=r
63

How is equilibrium
established?

If the market price is below the intrinsic value (or if


the expected return is above the required return),
then the security is a bargain.
Buy orders will exceed sell orders, bidding up the
market price (which also drives down the expected
return, given no change in the assets cash flows).
Profitable trading (i.e., earning a return greater
than justified by risk) will continue until the market
price is equal to the intrinsic value.
The opposite occurs if the market price is above the
intrinsic value.
64

Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH):


Its all about the info.

The EMH asserts that when new information


arrives, prices move to the new equilibrium
price very, very quickly because:

There are many really smart analysts looking for


mispriced securities.
New information is available to most professional
traders almost instantly.
When mispricing occurs (due to new info or
inefficient markets), analysts have billions of dollars
to use in taking advantage of the mispricing which
then quickly eliminates the mispricing.
65

Implications of Efficient Market


Hypothesis (EMH)

Stocks are normally in equilibrium.


One cannot beat the market by
consistently earning a return
higher than is justified by a stocks
risk.

66

Testing the EMH

Choose a trading strategy and implement it over


a large sample.
Pick an asset pricing model, like the CAPM, and
measure the required return of the strategys
investments.
Measure the actual return.

Actual > required? Reject EMH.

Notice that this is a joint test of the EMH and


the particular asset model if the test rejects the
EMH, it could be that the asset pricing model is
wrong.
67

Weak-form EMH

Current prices already reflect all


the information contained in
past prices, so you cannot earn
excess returns with strategies
based on past prices.
Example strategy: Invest in stocks
that have declined below their
previous 52-week low.
This is a type of technical68

Weak-form EMH: Empirical


Evidence

Most empirical evidence supports


weak-form EMH because very few
trading strategies consistently
earn in excess of the CAPM
prediction.
Two exceptions with small excess
returns:

Short-term momentum
Long-term reversals

69

Semistrong-form EMH

Current prices already reflect all


publicly available information, so
analyzing a company is fruitless.
Example strategy: Invest in stocks
with past 5-year annual earnings
growth greater than 10%.
This is a type of fundamental
analysis.
70

Semistrong-form EMH:
Empirical Evidence

Most empirical evidence supports the


semistrong-form EMH.

In fact, the vast majority of portfolio


managers do not consistently have returns
in excess of CAPM predictions.

Two exceptions that earn excess


returns:

Small companies
Companies with high book-to-market ratios
71

Strong-form EMH

All information, even inside


information, is embedded in
stock prices.
Not trueexcess returns can be
gained by trading on the basis
of insider information.

Illegal! Go to jail now!


72

Market Bubbles and


Market Efficiency

Market bubbles:

Prices climb rapidly to heights that would


have been considered extremely unlikely
before the run-up.
Trading volume is unusually high.
Many new investors (or speculators?)
eagerly enter the market.
Prices suddenly fall precipitously.

What does this imply about the EMH?


73

Bubbles are hard to


puncture.

If there is a bubble, why dont


traders take positions that make
big profits when the bubble bursts?

It is hard to recognize a bubble until


after it burststhen it seems obvious!
Trading strategies expose traders to
possible big negative cash flows if the
bubble is slow to burst.
74

Market Efficiency:
The Bottom Line

For most stocks, for most of the


time, it is generally safe to assume
that the market is reasonably
efficient.
Many investors have given up
trying to beat the market, which
helps explain the popularity of
index funds.
However, bubbles do occur75

The CAPM:
The Bottom Line

Empirical tests of CAPM have statistical


problems that make empirical verification
or rejection virtually impossible.
Most corporations use the CAPM to
determine their stocks required return.
Most researchers use multi-factor models
to identify the portion of a stocks return
that remains unexplained after
accounting for the models factors.
76

Has the CAPM been


completely confirmed or
refuted?

No. The statistical tests have


problems that make empirical
verification or rejection virtually
impossible.

Investors required returns are based


on future risk, but betas are
calculated with historical data.
Investors may be concerned about
both stand-alone and market risk.
77

You might also like