Thailand Competition Act Report
Thailand Competition Act Report
Thailand Competition Act Report
Prohibited Acts
Anticompetitive Mergers
Section 26. A business operator shall not merge businesses, which may result in
monopoly or unfair competition as prescribed and published in the Government
Gazette by the Commission unless the Commission's permission is obtained.
The publication by the Commission under paragraph one shall specify the minimum
amount or number of market share, sale volume, capital, shares or assets in respect
of which the merger of businesses is governed thereby.
Anticompetitive Mergers
The merger of businesses under paragraph one shall include:
(1) a merger made by a manufacturer with another manufacturer, by a distributor
with another distributor, by a manufacturer with a distributor, or by a service
provider with another service provider, which has the effect of maintaining the
status of one business and terminating the status of the other business or creating a
new business;
(2) a purpose of the whole or part of assets of another business with a view to
controlling business administration policies, administration and management;
Anticompetitive Mergers
(3) a purpose of the whole or part of shares of another business with a view to controlling
business administration policies, administration and management;
The application by a business operator for the permission under paragraph one shall be
submitted to the Commission under section 35.
Note: Under Sec. 37(1) of the Act, a merger can be authorized, provided that it is
reasonably necessary in the business, beneficial to business promotion, has no serious
harm to the economy and has no effect on due interests of general consumers. Also,
under Sec. 37(2), mergers may be approved under conditions.
Threshold Requirements
Prohibited Mergers and Acquisitions
Prior to or after the merger, the businesses have market shares equivalent to or
exceeding 30% and total revenues in the previous year equal to or exceeding 2
Billion Baht in any product or service; or
With respect to an acquisition of voting shares, the above thresholds are met
and:
With respect to a public limited company, the acquisition reaches or
exceeds 25% of all voting rights;
With respect to a private limited company, the acquisition reaches or
exceeds 50% of all voting rights.
Threshold Requirements
Monopolies and Abuse of Dominant Market Position
Business operators have a dominant position when the following thresholds are met:
Market share exceeding 50% and a turnover of at least 1,000 million THB in the
previous year;
Top 3 BOs with combined market shares exceeding 75% and a turnover of at
least 1,000 million THB in the previous year, except business operators whose
market share is less than 10% or whose turnover is less than 1,000 million THB
(Sec. 3 of the Act in relation to the Notice on Dominant Business Operators
with Market Domination).
Note: The act includes both single and collective dominance.
Threshold Requirements
Monopolies and Abuse of Dominant Market Position
Section 30. The Commission shall have the power to issue a written order requiring a
business operator who has market domination, with the market share of more than 75% to
suspend, cease, or vary the market share. For this purpose, the Commission may prescribe
rules, procedure, conditions and time limit for compliance therewith.
Enforcement Body
The Competition Commission (hereinafter called the Commission) is
responsible for the enforcement of the Act.
It consists of
the Minister of Commerce as Chairman,
the Permanent-Secretary of the Ministry of Commerce as Vice-Chairman,
the Director-General of the Department of Internal Trade as Member and
Secretary, and
the Permanent-Secretary of the Ministry of Finance, and no more than twelve
other qualified persons as members,
Enforcement Body
These qualified persons appointed as members must not be
political members,
holders of political positions,
executive members or holders of positions with the responsibilities in the
administration of political parties.
They shall hold office for a term of two years and not more than two
consecutive terms in case they are re-appointed.
Enforcement Body
The Commission shall have the powers and duties
to consider complaints,
to prescribe rules for dominant position,
to consider an application for permission to merge business,
to initiate the joint reduction or restriction of competition, or
to give orders for suspension, cessation, correction, or variation of activities by
business operations.
Penalties
Failure to abide by the provisions of the Competition Act could result in
jail terms of between one to three years and/or
fines ranging from two to six million baht.
Under the Act, such penalties may be applied
not only to the enterprises
but also to their managing partner or person in charge of operations, unless
the offence at stake was committed without his/her knowledge or consent
and/or
reasonable measures were taken to prevent such offence.
Commission's Rulings
During the first seven years of the TCA, only three cases have been ruled upon by
the Commission
UBC Case
Beer-Whiskey Tying Case (Chang Beer Case)
Honda Case
Proposed Amendments
The amended Act introduces more stringent and extensive provisions:
The definition of "business operator" is broader.
Violations committed outside Thailand are punishable. Any violations that have an
anticompetitive effect on Thailand would be punishable in Thailand.
The OTCC must be notified of certain merger activities.
Criminal penalties will be adjusted.
The OTCC, at its discretion, may decrease the fines imposed on business operators.
State enterprises will be subject to the Act.
State enterprises that are subject to the Act and engage in anticompetitive practices may
incur both criminal and civil penalties.
Proposed Amendments
The definition of "market dominant operator" (MDO) will be reviewed and revised at
least once every five years. The OTCC is empowered to determine the criteria to be
classified as an MDO.
If a business operator is classified as market dominant, its obligations and scrutiny
under the Act would be higher.
Companies face much heftier fines for violations of the new Act.
THE END