Public Health Model: DR Soumya Swaroop Sahoo
Public Health Model: DR Soumya Swaroop Sahoo
Public Health Model: DR Soumya Swaroop Sahoo
Types of PHM
PHM examples
PHM in India
References
What is public health
Public health refers to all organized
measures to prevent disease, promote
health, and prolong life among the
population as a whole
-WHO
Its activities aim to provide conditions in
which people can be healthy and focus on
entire populations, not on individual
patients or diseases.
Socio-ecological model
PATCH model
PERI model
PRECEDE-PROCEED model
Health belief model
Health Belief Model (HBM) is a psychological
model that attempts to explain and predict
health behaviors.
This is done by focusing on the attitudes and
beliefs of individuals.
It was developed in response to the failure of a
free tuberculosis (TB) health screening program.
Since then, the HBM has been adapted to
explore a variety of long- and short-term health
behaviors, including sexual risk behaviors and
the transmission of HIV/AIDS.
Health belief model
The HBM is based on the understanding that
a person will take a health-related action (i.e.,
use condoms) if that person:
feels that a negative health condition (i.e.,
HIV) can be avoided,
has a positive expectation that by taking a
recommended action, he/she will avoid a
negative health condition (i.e., using
condoms will be effective at preventing
HIV), and
believes that he/she can successfully take
a recommended health action (i.e., he/she
CONCE
DEFINITION APPLICATION
PT
Define population at risk,
Perceived Ones opinion of risk levels; personalize risk
chances of getting a
susceptibility based on a persons
condition
behaviour
Ones opinion of how
Perceived serious a condition Specify consequences of
and its consequences the risk and the condition
severity are
Ones belief in the Define action to take; how,
efficacy of the where, when; clarify the
Perceived positive effects to be
benefits advised action to
reduce the risk expected.
Ones opinion of Identify and reduce
Perceived the tangible and barriers through
barriers psychological costs reassurance, incentives,
of the advised assistance.
action Provide how-to do
Cues to Strategies to information,
action activate readiness promote awareness
Confidence in ones Provide training, guidance
Self efficacy ability to take in performing action.
action
Condom
STI
use
screening
concept educatio
or HIV
n
testing
example
Youth believe they can
Perceived get STIs or Youth believe they may
have been exposed to
Susceptibility HIV or create a STIs or HIV.
unwanted pregnancy.
believe the
believe that the consequences of
consequences of getting
Perceived STIs or HIV or creating a having STIs or HIV
pregnancy are without knowledge or
Severity treatment are
significant enough to
try to avoid significant enough to
try to avoid.
believe that the
recommended action of
recommended action of getting tested for STIs
using condoms would and HIV would benefit
Perceived protect them from them by allowing
Benefits getting STIs or HIV or them to get early
creating a pregnancy. treatment or preventing
them from infecting
others
Condom
STI
use
screening
concept educatio
or HIV
n
Youth identify their testing
example
personal barriers to
using condoms (i.e.,
Youth identify their
personal barriers to
getting tested (i.e.,
condoms limit the
getting to the clinic or
feeling or they are too
Perceived embarrassed to talk to
being seen at the clinic
barriers by someone they know)
their partner about it)
and explore ways to
and explore ways to
eliminate or reduce
eliminate or reduce receive reminder
these barrierscues
Youththese barriers
receive reminder for action in the form of
cues for action in the incentives (such as
form of incentives (such pencils that says, "Got
Cues to action as with the printed sex? Get tested!") or
message "no glove, no reminder messages
love") or reminder (that say, "25% of
messages sexually active teens
contract an STI)
interperson
al
organizatio
nal
community
Public
policy
PATCH Model
P lanned
A pproach
To
C ommunity
H ealth
PATCH Model
The Planned Approach to Community
Health (PATCH) was developed in
1983 by theUnited States Centers
for Disease Control(CDC) in
partnership withstate and local
health departmentsand community
groups.
PATCH: phases
Phase I: Mobilizing the community
Phase II: Collecting and organizing
data
Phase III: Choosing priorities
Phase IV: Developing a
comprehensive intervention plan
Phase V: Evaluating PATCH
PATCH Model: example
In Baltimore, PATCH was implemented to improve the
mental health among elderly people living in urban public
housing developments.
Health workers were trained to identify and refer residents
who may need mental health care to a PATCH nurse.
Psychiatric nurses, with consultation and supervision from
psychiatrists, provided psychiatric evaluation and treatment
in the residents homes.
Investigators evaluated the PATCH program to determine
whether it is more effective than usual care in decreasing
levels of depression and other psychiatric symptoms.
PATCH Model: example
A total of 945 (83%) of 1,195 residents in six
public housing sites were screened for psychiatric
illness
342 screened positive.
Residents in 3 building sites received the PATCH
model intervention; residents in the other 3
building sites received usual care (comparison
group).
Results:
Residents with mental disorders who lived in
housing sites where the PATCH program was
available had significantly fewer symptoms of
depression and other psychiatric symptoms at the
PERI Model
Problem- What is the health
problem?
Etiology- What is/are the contributory
cause(s)?
Recommendations- What works to
reduce the health impacts?
Implementation- How we get the job
done?
PERI Model
Proble
m
Etiolog
Implementation
y
Recommendatio
n
PRECEDE PROCEED Model
PRECEDE/PROCEED is a community-oriented,
participatory model for creating successful
community health promotion interventions
By Green and Kuerter(2005)
PRECEDE: Predisposing, Reinforcing &
Enabling Constructs in Educational/Ecological
Diagnosis & Evaluation
PROCEED: Policy, Regulatory & Organizational
Constructs in Educational and Environmental
Development
PRECEDE PROCEED Model
PRECEDE: :4 Phases PROCEED : 4 Phases
Phase 1: Social
diagnosis Phase 5:
Phase 2: Implementation
Epidemiological Phase 7: Process
diagnosis evaluation
Phase 3: Educational Phase 8: Impact
and ecological evaluation
diagnosis
Phase 9: Outcome
Phase 4: Administrative
evaluation
and policy diagnosis
PHM:INDIAs SUCCESS STORY
Society for Education,
Action and Research in
Community Health
(SEARCH), Gadchiroli,
Maharashtra
SEARCH was founded in
Gadchiroli district in 1986.
Its founders, Dr Abhay
Bang and Dr Rani Bang,
received their medical
training in India and their
training in public health at
Johns Hopkins University.
PHM:INDIAs SUCCESS STORY
3 Missions
i) providing health care to local populations,
ii) training and education in health
iii) research to help shape health policies.
SEARCH conducted a field trial in Gadchiroli on
home-based neonatal care from 1993 to 1998.
They trained village health workers (aarogyadoot)
to make home visits and manage birth asphyxia,
premature birth or low birth weight, hypothermia,
breast-feeding problems, in addition to diagnosing
and treating neonatal sepsis.
PHM:INDIAs SUCCESS STORY
39 Intervention and 47 control villages were selected in
Gadchiroli district
SEARCH's strategy to curb infant deaths relies on training
community health workers to diagnose and treat newborn
diseases and has been dramatically successful in reducing
IMR.
Over a span of 15 years, SEARCH has been able to reduce
IMR in its intervention area by 75% to 30, by providing
home-based newborn care (HBNC)
A 1999 Lancet research paper by Abhay Bang and his
colleagues at SEARCH, based on their interventions in
Gadchiroli, showed for the first time how very sick newborn
babies could be saved even in poor nations with a novel
cost-effective strategy. Bang's paper found a place in a
2005 compilation of "vintage papers" in the 180-year-old
history of Lancet.
Gadhchiroli: Turning the tide
Selecting a Specific Model to apply will
be based on:
The preferences of stakeholders (e.g., decision
makers, program partners, consumers);
Non-biased approach