2 Straumann Implants TL
2 Straumann Implants TL
2 Straumann Implants TL
Straumann 2
Straumann Implants at Tissue Level
Features and Benefits Features Benefits
Optimal load distribution and minimal
45
1 microgap between implant and
shoulder
prosthesis
Smooth
Enables flexible tissue management
2 neck
taking the biologic width into account
section
Straumann 3
Restorative Dimensions Built into the Tissue Level
Implant Design
Straumann 4
Clinical Situations
* It is the clinicians decision to determine which implant deign is most appropriate for treatment. As a general rule, always use the widest endosseous implant
diameter possible. Due to their reduced mechanical stability, small diameter implants are not recommended for a molar region
Straumann 5
Predictable and Efficient - Straumann Tissue Level
Design Fundamental
Product Portfolio
Scientific Overview
Straumann 6
Bone Control Design
Straumann developed Bone Control Design based on five fundamental biological
principles, thereby designed to assure crestal bone preservation and soft
tissue stability.
Implant surface
Bone Control Design
1 osseoconductivity
5
2 Microgap control
Biomechanical
3 implant design
Respecting the
4 biological distance
crestal bone preservation
Position of smooth soft tissue stability
5 and rough surface
Straumann 7
Bone Control Design
Implant surface
1 osseoconductivity
SLActive
4 Respecting the
biological distance
Vertical offset: microgap above bone
Optimal position of
Interface located in relation to the biologic
5 smooth and rough
distance.
surface
Straumann 8
Predictable and Efficient - Straumann Tissue Level
Design Fundamental
Product Portfolio
Scientific Overview
Straumann 9
Straumann Tissue Level Portfolio - Implant Lines
Straumann 10
Standard Implant Features and Benefits
Features Benefits
First microgap clearly above bone level
2.8 mm
to take the biologic width into account.
1 smooth neck
Optimized tulip shape for transgingival
section one-stage surgical protocol.
Optimized
Engineered for primary and secondary
2 thread
stability
design
Straumann 11
Standard Implant Options
Neck
diameter
Endosteal
diameter
Available
lengths 8/10/12/14/16 mm 6/8/10/12/14/16 mm 6/8/10/12/14 mm 6/8/10/12 mm
Straumann 12
Straumann Tissue Level Portfolio - Implant Lines
Straumann 13
Standard Plus Features and Benefits
Features Benefits
Straumann 14
Standard Plus Implant - Options
Neck
diameter
Endosteal
diameter
Straumann 15
Standard vs. Standard Plus
1.8 mm
2.8 mm
Straumann 16
Straumann Tissue Level Portfolio - Implant Lines
Straumann 17
Tapered Effect Implant Features and Benefits
Features Benefits
Straumann 18
Tapered Effect Implant
Secondary stability:
Bone-to-implant
contact
Primary stability:
Immediate bone-to-
implant contact
Straumann 19
Tapered Effect Implant - Options
Neck
diameter
Endosteal
diameter
Straumann 20
Tapered Effect vs. Standard and Standard Plus
0.8 mm
Straumann 21
Prosthetic Options
Treatments:
- Crowns
- Bridges
- Overdentures
- Cement-retained restorations
- Screw-retained restorations
- Fixed prostheses
Straumann 22
Reliable and Secure Implant-to-Abutment Connection
Straumann 23
Healing Caps and Closure Screws
For submucosal healing closure screw or shorter healing cap
For transmucosal healing, taller healing cap
For esthetic region, the labial bevel facilitates exact approximation of
the soft tissue over the healing cap.
Straumann 24
Predictable and Efficient - Straumann Tissue Level
Design Fundamental
Product Portfolio
Scientific Overview
Straumann 25
Scientific Confidence at Tissue Level
20 years of clinical documentation
More than 9 million implants sold
Limited Lifetime guarantee
Straumann 26
Straumann SLActive - Study Overview
Topic Nr Content Author
1 Evaluation of surface free energy (SFE) and hydrophilicity of different titanium surfaces F. Rupp et al.
Surface
properties
In-vitro
2 Effects of molecular and cellular interactions on various treated titanium surfaces L. Scheideler et al.
&
early cell 3 Comparison of early cellular activity at hydrophilic and hydrophobic surface G. Zhao et al.
response
4 Proliferation of MG63 and primary cells on various treated titanium surfaces X. Raush-Fan et al.
5 Comparison of bone opposition of the surface of SLA and SLActive implants D.Buser et al.
6 Comparison of biomechanical properties of SLA and SLActive implants SJ. Ferguson et al.
7 Effects of surface hydrophilicity and microtopography on early stages of soft and hard tissue integration Schwarz F. et al.
8 Evaluation of initial and early subepithelial connective tissue attachment to SLA and SLActive implants Schwarz F. et al.
Early bone 9 Assessment of initial and early osseous integration at SLA and SLActive implants F. Schwarz et al.
Animal
healing
10 Influences of implant design and surface properties on osteointegration and implant stability J. Gottlow et al.
11 Comparison of bone apposition around SLA and SLActive implants M. Bornstein et al.
13 Comparison of bone apposition around SLA and SLActive implants at sites with coronal circumferential defects Lai H-Cet al.
14 Influence of titanium implant surface characteristics on bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects F. Schwarz et al.
16 Immediate and early loading of SLActive implants in the posterior mandible and maxil J. Ganeles et al.
17 3 weeks loading of SLActive implants in the maxillary molar region M. Roccuzzo/ T.G. Wilson
Human
Clinical
studies 18 Early loading of non-submerged SLActive implants Bornstein M.M. et al.
20 Early loading after 21 days of healing of non-submerged SLActive implants D. Morton et al.
21 A multicenter prospective non-interventional study about Straumann SLActive implants G. Luongo et al.
More details
Straumann 27
Straumann Tapered Effect Implant Selected Studies
TE implants have greater initial intraosseous stability (ISQ) Human cadaver study, Akkocaoglu
Initial stability 1
compared to SP 4.1 mm implants et al., 2005
Ridge 100% overall clinical success rate with TE implants placed 42 TE implants, 18 months follow
5
augmentation in combination with a ridge augmentation procedure up, Ferrigno et al., 2005
Tapered Effect implants provide excellent primary stability as well as high success and survival
rates.
Straumann 28
Why Straumann Tissue Level Portfolio?
Predictable
Efficient
Straumann 29
Have Science on Your Side
Data on file
Straumann 30
Save Time and Increase Efficiency in Your Practice
Straumann 31
Straumann Soft Tissue Level Implants
Predictable
Efficient
Straumann 32
Thank you!
Straumann 33
Tapered Effect
Scientific Overview
Straumann Tapered Effect Implant Selected Studies
Study Setup, Author /
Topic Nr Content
Principal Investigator
cadaver
TE implants have greater initial intraosseous stability (ISQ) Human cadaver study, Akkocaoglu
Initial stability 1
compared to SP 4.1 mm implants et al., 2005
Ridge 100% overall clinical success rate with TE implants placed 42 TE implants, 18 months follow
5
augmentation in combination with a ridge augmentation procedure up, Ferrigno et al., 2005
Tapered Effect implants provide excellent primary stability as well as high success and survival
rates.
Straumann 35
Implant design and intraosseous stability of immediately
placed Implants: a human cadaver study
Method:
- 4 cadavers were implanted with Straumann TE ( 4.1/4.8mm) and standard plus ( 4.1 and 4.8
mm) implants in freshly prepared mandibles premolar extraction sites
- Implants were placed in fresh extraction sites in the mandibular premolar region
- Parameters:
- Implant stability quotient (ISQ), installation torque value (ITV) and removal torque value (RTV)
- Vertical defect depth around the collar
- Bone-implant contact (BIC)
Results:
- ISQ of TE implant was higher than 4.1 mm implant, and comparable with the 4.8 mm implants.
- ITVs and RTVs of TE and 4.8 mm implants were higher than 4.1 mm implants, though not
significantly different p>0.05
- Vertical defect depths around all types of implants were similar
- %BIC of TE and 4.8 mm implants were comparable and higher than 4.1 mm implants.
Conclusions: Immediately placed TE implants leads to initial intraosseous stability and interface
mechanical properties comparable with a wide diameter implant
Straumann 36
Implant Placement at the Time of Maxillary Molar Extraction:
Technique and Report of Preliminary Results of 83 Sites
Methods:
- 83 TE implants ( = 4.1/6.5mm) placed in 1st or 2nd
maxillary molar site
- Manipulation of remaining interradicular bone with
osteotomes
- Regenerative materials (grafts and membranes) were placed
A radiograph of the restored implant in function
- Passive soft-tissue primary closure was attained in all cases for 16 months
Results
- Soft-tissue closure maintained until clinical reentry 6 months after insertion in 81 of 83 sites
- All implants were clinically immobile and were restored with single crowns 6 months after
insertion
- All implants were functioning successfully 12 to 18 months (mean: 12.4 months)
Conclusion: Through the use of these methods, all therapeutic compromises may, at worst, be
significantly minimized and, at best, be predictably avoided
Straumann 37
Dental implants placed in expanded narrow edentulous ridges with
Extension Crest device : A 1-3 year multicenter follow-up study
Methods:
- 45 patients treated by means of a sagittal osteotomy and expansion of the ridge with a new
surgical device (Extension Crest)
- 110 Straumann TE implants placed
- 3-4 months later, patients were rehabilitated with implant-supported prostheses
Results
- Implant survival rate of 97.3% (mean follow up of 20.4 months) using the specified surgical
procedure
Straumann 38
Surgical advantages with TE implants placement in conjunction with split
crest technique: 18-month results of an ongoing prospective study
Criteria for success
Method:
- 40 Standard solid screw implants placed in 20 patients and 42 TE
( =3.3/4.8mm) in another 20 patients
- Evaluation: 3 to 21 months from loading, with a mean observation
at 12 months.
Results:
- In surgical and implant insertion phases, fracture of labial or
palatal cortical plates was avoided in patients treated with TE.
- Success rate: 100% for TE implants and 95% for S implants
Straumann 39
Thank You!
Presentation links Video links
Straumann 41